← Back to CIFR filing summaryThis is the extracted source text from the SEC filing. Formatting may differ from the original document.
Our business, financial condition and operating results can be affected by a number of factors, whether currently known or unknown, including but not limited to the risk factors as previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of our 2025 Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference. Other than the additional and updated risk factors set forth below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our 2025 Form 10-K.
Our ability to successfully develop and operate projects is impacted by the availability of, and access to, interconnection facilities and transmission and generation systems, and is subject to third-party risks.
In recent years, the time and costs required to secure and expand interconnection facilities and transmission systems have increased, complicating project planning and creating additional contractual and financial risk for projects under construction. We may face difficulties in securing access to interconnection facilities and transmission systems for our data centers in a timely manner and at a reasonable cost as well as may face curtailment resulting from transmission or generation facility downtime, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow.
We are dependent on third parties for the construction of substations at our data centers and the delivery systems facilities, and timely performance by such third parties is critical to achieving target milestone dates and commencement of rent payments under our leases.
Any failure by our contractors (or replacement contractors) to complete the necessary interconnection facilities and transmission and generation systems to operate our data centers may result in increased construction costs, delays in construction timeline, delay of rent commencement and potential breach and termination of our leases, any of which could materially and adversely affect our operations.
We depend on third parties for our engineering, procurement and construction (“EPC”) work, including transmission and distribution utilities, grid operators, electric utility providers and manufacturers of certain critical and specialized equipment for the construction and operation of our data centers, and rely on components and raw materials that may be subject to price fluctuations or shortages.
Although we have established an in-house team of dedicated EPC professionals, we have and will continue to engage third-party providers to carry out various services and to obtain necessary infrastructure equipment that are critical to the successful operation of our data centers.
The availability of third parties and the successful and satisfactory completion of the relevant services and delivery of equipment are critical to our successful construction of our data centers and ultimately our ability to retain our tenants. There is no assurance that the third parties that we contract with will deliver equipment and/or services on a timely basis, within cost estimates, or at all, and we may incur significant additional costs to find alternative sources for the required EPC work in the case that the existing or planned contracted parties are unable to fulfill their obligations.
We also depend on third parties, including transmission and distribution utilities like Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC (“Oncor”) and American Electric Power (“AEP”), the Texas grid operator, ERCOT, and manufacturers of critical components for our mining equipment and our data centers, which may be subject to price fluctuations or shortages. For example, our operations require approval to operate from Oncor, AEP and/or ERCOT, which can be onerous to obtain. If Oncor, AEP and/or ERCOT delay in providing such approval, or change the requirements to operate HPC facilities, our business plans may be disrupted and our results of operations may be negatively affected.
We are also reliant on critical equipment to supply power to our data center facilities and we are exposed to the risk of disruptions or other failures in the overall global supply chain for related data center hardware. See also “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Any unfavorable global economic, business or political conditions, such as geopolitical tensions, military conflicts, acts of terrorism, natural disasters, pandemics, trade restrictions, tariffs, or similar events could have material
56
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.” included in our 2025 Form 10-K. If this critical equipment malfunctions or we have delays in the ability to fix such equipment, it could adversely affect our operations and financial results.
We face significant risks related to the cost and availability of labor.
Our success is heavily dependent on our ability to secure labor for the construction of our data centers within our timeline and budgeted costs. Construction, operation and maintenance of our data centers requires highly skilled personnel. There may be a limited supply of such personnel as a result of many factors, including intense competition to attract and retain the services of such persons. As a result, we and our contractors, including EPC contractors, may face shortages of qualified labor to construct, manage and operate our data centers, higher than anticipated labor costs or an inability to monitor, motivate and retain qualified personnel. An inability to recruit and retain such individuals could decrease productivity in the construction and operations of our data centers. Competition for skilled personnel could also require us and our contractors, including EPC contractors, to pay higher wages, which could also result in higher labor costs and result in our actual costs exceeding our budget estimate.
This competition may increase as additional data center and other large-scale infrastructure projects are developed and constructed in the United States, including in West Texas where our data centers are located, and any labor shortages affecting the region may materially and adversely affect our ability to successfully construct our data centers within our current estimated timeline and budget. Labor is subject to external factors that are beyond our control, including our industry’s highly competitive market for skilled workers and leaders, cost inflation, overall macroeconomics, workforce participation rates, pandemics, epidemics, and other health risks and/or labor disputes or work stoppages. If we are not able to attract and retain qualified personnel for the construction of our data centers, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and cash flow.
The value of our data centers may be adversely affected by changes in government regulation possibly motivated by community opposition.
We are focused on whether and how existing and changing federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances may affect our business. There can be no assurance that changing government policy and/or growing community opposition to data center development in the markets in which our data centers are located will not materially and adversely impact the development and/or operations of them. Any potential new community plan and any resulting zoning restrictions could impose stricter requirements on our data centers. Any such new ordinances and/or changes in government policy that prevent our data centers from operating or from continuing to develop as planned may reduce revenue.
Concerns about the power and resources consumed by data centers have garnered organized opposition from environmental, agricultural preservation and anti-growth groups, and any such opposition that may impact data center development in the states in which our data centers will be operated may have an adverse effect on our data center operations. In addition, growing public skepticism and resistance to AI, including concerns about AI’s impact on employment, privacy, safety and broader societal implications, may intensify opposition to infrastructure projects that are perceived as enabling or accelerating AI development. Construction of our data centers may face heightened scrutiny and opposition from groups that are critical of the AI industry, even if otherwise receptive to data center development. Disapproval from local communities or other interested parties may lead to direct action that could impede our tenants’ ability to commence or carry out operations at our data centers, resulting in reputational damage and difficulty in developing and constructing our data centers or renewing or re-leasing our data centers in the event that our tenants decide not to extend their lease. There may be community opposition regarding concerns about power facilities, including the conversion of agricultural or open land to solar installations, the visual impact of large-scale solar arrays, potential impacts on local property values, perceived fire or safety risks associated with battery energy storage systems, and the routing of new transmission lines through residential or agricultural areas. Any resulting disruption in our power supply to our data centers as a result may result in our inability to meet our obligations under our leases.
Any such community opposition may include undertaking legal proceedings (including challenges to required governmental approvals), seeking orders to prevent part or all of our operations, media campaigns and protests. If such community members are successful in any such campaigns, the construction and operation of our data centers may be delayed, suspended or abandoned, or we may not be able to obtain the permits and approvals needed to carry out commercial operations. These outcomes could adversely affect our ability to realize revenue from our data centers, including our tenants’ ability to satisfy their rent payment obligations, and therefore could impact our financial performance.
57
In response to such concerns and political opposition, a growing number of other state legislatures, county boards, city councils and other local governing bodies have enacted, or are considering enacting, temporary or permanent moratoria, restrictive zoning amendments, heightened permitting requirements and other land use limitations that prohibit or significantly constrain the development of new data centers, solar energy facilities, battery energy storage systems, gas-fired generation facilities or related infrastructure. These actions are often driven by concerns regarding potential for strain on local electrical grids and water supplies, visual and noise impacts, potential property devaluation, loss of agricultural land, fire risks and the perceived limited local economic benefit of such facilities after construction is completed. We cannot predict whether similar moratoria or restrictive land use regulations will be adopted in the states where our data centers will be operated. If any moratoria or restrictive regulations are adopted, we may be forced to abandon the project, relocate to alternative sites that may be less desirable or more costly to develop, or incur significant unrecoverable costs for land acquisition, permitting, engineering and equipment procurement. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.
Construction of our data centers includes significant safety risks.
Construction of our data centers may involve personal safety hazards for construction workers and other personnel on site, which could include electrocution, fire, mechanical failures, weather-related incidents, transportation accidents and damage to equipment. Any such incidents could result in personal injury and loss of life, severe damage to or destruction of our data centers or equipment and other consequential damages and could lead to delays in construction, large damage claims and, in extreme cases, criminal liability. Serious accidents may subject us to penalties, civil litigation or criminal prosecution. Claims for damages to property or persons, including claims for bodily injury or loss of life, could result in significant costs and liabilities, which could adversely affect our ability to complete construction of our data centers. Poor safety performance could also jeopardize our relationships with our tenants, negatively impact employee morale and harm our reputation.
Our indebtedness and liabilities could limit the cash flow available for our operations, expose us to risks that could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and impair our ability to satisfy our debt obligations.
As of June 30, 2026, our total consolidated indebtedness amounted to $6,016 million. In May 2025 and September 2025, we completed offerings of our 2030 Convertible Notes and 2031 Convertible Notes, from which we incurred $172.5 million and $1,300.0 million of additional indebtedness, respectively. Additionally, in November 2025, Cipher Compute LLC, our wholly owned indirect subsidiary, incurred $1,733.0 million of indebtedness from offerings of $1,400.0 million and $333.0 million of our senior secured notes due 2030. In February 2026, Black Pearl Compute LLC, our wholly owned indirect subsidiary, incurred $2.0 billion of 6.125% senior secured notes due 2031. In June 2026, Stingray Compute LLC, our wholly owned indirect subsidiary, incurred $810.0 million of 6.000% senior secured notes due 2031. We may also incur additional indebtedness to meet future financing needs. Our indebtedness could have significant negative consequences for our security holders and our business, results of operations and financial condition by, among other things:
•increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions;
•limiting our ability to obtain additional financing, such as in the event of adverse changes to our credit ratings;
•requiring the dedication of a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to service our indebtedness, which will reduce the amount of cash available for other purposes;
•limiting our flexibility to plan for, or react to, changes in our business;
•diluting the interests of our existing stockholders as a result of issuing shares of our common stock upon conversion of the Convertible Notes; and
•placing us at a possible competitive disadvantage with competitors that are less leveraged than us or have better access to capital.
Our ability to make scheduled payments of the principal of, to pay interest on or to refinance our indebtedness depends on our future performance, which is subject to economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our control. Our business may not generate sufficient funds, and we may otherwise be unable to maintain sufficient cash reserves, to pay amounts due under our indebtedness, including the Convertible Notes, and our cash needs may increase in the future. In addition, future indebtedness that we may incur may contain financial and other restrictive covenants that
58
limit our ability to operate our business, raise capital or make payments under our other indebtedness. If we fail to comply with these covenants or to make payments under our indebtedness when due, then we would be in default under that indebtedness, which could, in turn, result in that and our other indebtedness becoming immediately payable in full.