← Back to EH filing summaryThis is the extracted source text from the SEC filing. Formatting may differ from the original document.
Our Corporate Structure and Contractual Arrangements with the VIE and its Shareholders
EHang Holdings is not a PRC operating company but a Cayman Islands holding company conducting operations in China primarily through its subsidiaries incorporated in the PRC, including EHang Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd., or the WFOE. PRC laws and regulations impose certain restrictions or prohibitions on foreign ownership of companies in the aviation industry. Pursuant to the latest version of the “negative list,” namely, the Special Management Measures (Negative List) for the Access of Foreign Investment (2024), which became effective on November 1, 2024, our principal business does not fall into the “negative list” in respect of “restricted” or “prohibited” categories for foreign investment. However, foreign investment in commercial and general aviation is restricted under PRC laws and regulations. Accordingly, Guangzhou EHang Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., or the VIE, and its subsidiaries conduct business operations in the PRC, which may not be conducted by EHang Holdings and/or its subsidiaries under PRC laws and regulations, and the WFOE, the VIE and the VIE’s shareholders have entered into a series of contractual arrangements. These agreements enable us to:
• have the power to direct significant activities of the VIE;
• receive economic benefits from the VIE that potentially could be significant to the VIE; and
• have an exclusive option to purchase all or part of the equity interests and assets in the VIE, when and to the extent permitted by PRC laws.
These contractual arrangements among the WFOE, the VIE and the VIE’s shareholders include shareholders voting proxy agreements, exclusive technical consulting and services agreements, exclusive option agreements, special agreement on the capital increase arrangement of the VIE, and share pledge agreements. Under the contractual arrangements, EHang Holdings has a “controlling financing interest” as defined in FASB ASC 810 such that EHang Holdings is considered the primary beneficiary of the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries for accounting purposes only and thus consolidates each of these entities under U.S. GAAP. For more details of these contractual arrangements, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—C. Organizational Structure—Contractual Arrangements with the VIE and its Shareholders.” Investors in the ADSs are not purchasing equity interest in the VIE or the VIE’s subsidiaries but instead are purchasing equity interest in EHang Holdings, a Cayman Islands holding company. Revenues contributed by the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries accounted for 7.9%, 1.2% and 1.6% of our consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2024 and 2025, respectively, after elimination of inter-company transactions.
However, the contractual arrangements may not be as effective as direct ownership in providing us with power to direct the activities of the VIE and we may incur substantial costs to enforce the terms of the agreements. If the VIE or the VIE’s shareholders fail to perform their respective obligations under the contractual arrangements, we could be limited in our ability to enforce the contractual arrangements that give us power to direct the activities of the VIE. Furthermore, if we are unable to direct the activities of the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries, we would not be able to continue to consolidate the financial results of these entities in our financial statements. Please see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Corporate Structure—We rely on contractual arrangements with the VIE and the VIE’s shareholders for certain business operations in the PRC, which may not be as effective as direct ownership in providing operational control” and “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Corporate Structure—The shareholders of the VIE may have potential conflicts of interest with us, which may materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.”
5
Table of Contents
There are also uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current and future PRC laws, regulations and rules regarding the status of the rights of our Cayman Islands holding company with respect to the contractual arrangements with the VIE and the VIE’s shareholders. It is uncertain whether any new PRC laws or regulations relating to variable interest entity structures will be adopted or if adopted, what they would provide. If we or the VIE is found to be in violation of any existing or future PRC laws or regulations, or fail to obtain or maintain any of the required permits or approvals, the relevant PRC regulatory authorities would have discretion in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations to take action in dealing with such violations or failures. Please see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Corporate Structure—If the PRC government finds that the contractual arrangements between the WFOE, the VIE and the VIE’s shareholders do not comply with PRC regulations relating to the relevant industries, or if these regulations or the interpretation of existing regulations change in the future, we could be subject to penalties or be forced to relinquish our interests in those operations” and “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Corporate Structure—Our business may be significantly affected by the Foreign Investment Law.”
Our corporate structure is subject to risks associated with our contractual arrangements with the VIE. Investors may never have a direct ownership interest in the businesses that are conducted by the VIE. Uncertainties in the PRC legal system could limit our ability to enforce these contractual arrangements. If the PRC government finds that the agreements that establish the structure for operating our business in China do not comply with PRC laws and regulations, or if these regulations or the interpretation of existing regulations change or are interpreted differently in the future, we and the VIE could be subject to penalties or be forced to relinquish our interests in those operations. Our holding company, the WFOE, the VIE, and investors of our company face uncertainty about potential future actions by the PRC government that could affect the enforceability of the contractual arrangements with the VIE and, consequently, significantly affect the financial performance of the VIE and our company as a whole.
We and the VIE face various legal and operational risks and uncertainties related to doing business in China. Some of our business operations are conducted in China through the VIE, and we and the VIE are subject to PRC laws and regulations that continue to evolve. For example, we and the VIE face risks associated with regulatory approvals on offshore offerings, the use of variable interest entities, anti-monopoly regulatory actions, and oversight on cybersecurity and data privacy, as well as the lack of inspection by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, on our auditors, which may impact our ability to conduct certain businesses, accept foreign investments, or list on a U.S. or other foreign exchange. These risks could result in a material adverse change in our operations and the value of the ADSs, significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause such securities to significantly decline in value. For a detailed description of risks related to doing business in China, “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Doing Business in China.”
PRC government’s oversight and control over offerings conducted overseas by, and foreign investment in, China-based issuers may affect our operations. Implementation of industry-wide regulations, including data security or anti-monopoly related regulations, in this nature may cause the value of such securities to significantly decline. For more details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Doing Business in China—The PRC government’s significant oversight over our and the VIE’s business operation could result in a material adverse change in our operations and the value of the ADSs.”
Risks and uncertainties arising from the evolving legal and regulatory environment in China, including risks and uncertainties regarding the enforcement of laws and regulations in China, could result in a material adverse change in our operations and the value of the ADSs. For more details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Doing Business in China—Uncertainties in the interpretation and enforcement of PRC laws and regulations could limit the legal protections available to you and us.”
6
Table of Contents
The Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act
Pursuant to the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, or the HFCAA, if the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, determines that we have filed audit reports issued by a registered public accounting firm that has not been subject to inspections by the PCAOB for two consecutive years, the SEC will prohibit our shares or the ADSs from being traded on a national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter trading market in the United States. On December 16, 2021, the PCAOB issued a report to notify the SEC of its determination that the PCAOB was unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong, including our auditor. On May 26, 2022, the SEC conclusively listed us as a Commission-Identified Issuer under the HFCAA following the filing of the annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB vacated its December 16, 2021 determination and removed mainland China and Hong Kong from the list of jurisdictions where it is unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms. Each year, the PCAOB will determine whether it can inspect and investigate completely audit firms in mainland China and Hong Kong, among other jurisdictions. If PCAOB determines in the future that it no longer has full access to complete inspection and investigation over accounting firms in mainland China and Hong Kong and we continue to use an accounting firm headquartered in one of these jurisdictions to issue an audit report on our financial statements filed with the SEC, we would be identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer following the filing of the annual report on Form 20-F for the relevant fiscal year. There can be no assurance that we would not be identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer for any future fiscal year, and if we were so identified for two consecutive years, we would become subject to the prohibition on trading under the HFCAA. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Doing Business in China—The ADSs will be delisted and prohibited from trading in the U.S. under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, or the HFCAA, if the PCAOB is unable to inspect or fully investigate auditors located in China.”
Permissions Required from the PRC Authorities for Our Operations
The VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries currently conduct operations in the PRC, and we consolidate the financial results of such operations under U.S. GAAP as a result of the contractual arrangements. Our operations in China are governed by PRC laws and regulations. As of the date of this annual report, our PRC subsidiaries, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries have obtained the requisite licenses and permits from the PRC government authorities that are material for the business operations of our subsidiaries and the VIE in China, including, among others, Civil Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Operational Certificates required for using UAVs in aerial spraying, aerial photography, remote pilot training, flight show, aerial media solutions and other purposes. Given the uncertainties of interpretation and implementation of relevant laws and regulations and the enforcement practice by relevant government authorities, we may be required to obtain additional licenses, permits, filings or approvals for our business operations in the future. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Doing Business in China—Uncertainties exist with respect to the interpretation and implementation of the PRC Foreign Investment Law and its Implementation Regulations and how they may impact the viability of our current corporate structure, corporate governance and business operations” and “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Doing Business in China—We may be adversely affected by the complexities, uncertainties and changes in PRC regulations on technology companies.”
Furthermore, in connection with our previous issuance of securities to foreign investors, under current PRC laws, regulations and regulatory rules, as of the date of this annual report, we, our PRC subsidiaries and the VIE, (i) are not required to obtain permissions from the China Securities Regulatory Commission, or the CSRC, for our listing, (ii) are not required to go through cybersecurity review by the Cyberspace Administration of China, or the CAC, and (iii) have not been asked to obtain such permissions by any PRC authority.
Cash and Asset Flows through Our Organization
Our offshore holding company is permitted under PRC laws and regulations to provide funding to our PRC subsidiary only through loans or capital contributions, subject to the approval of government authorities and limits on the amount of capital contributions and loans.
For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2024 and 2025, EHang Holdings made capital contributions of RMB150.3 million, RMB79.3 million and RMB24.3 million (US$3.5 million), respectively, to its subsidiaries. No other transfers, dividends or distributions of cash or assets were made between EHang Holdings and EHang Holdings’ subsidiaries, on the one hand, and the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries, on the other hand, except for the foregoing capital contributions.
7
Table of Contents
EHang Holdings is a Cayman Islands holding company with no material operations of its own. The VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries currently conduct operations in the PRC, and we consolidate the financial results of such operations under U.S. GAAP as a result of the contractual arrangements. As a result, although other means are available for us to obtain financing at the holding company level, EHang Holdings’ ability to pay dividends and to service any debt it may incur may depend upon dividends paid by its subsidiaries. Among them, our Hong Kong subsidiary Ehfly Technology’s source of dividend depends on dividends paid by its PRC subsidiaries, which in part depends on payments from the VIE under the contractual arrangements with the VIE.
Current PRC regulations permit our PRC subsidiaries, such as the WFOE, to pay dividends to us only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, the VIE and the WFOE are required to set aside at least 10% of their respective accumulated profits each year, if any, to fund certain reserve funds until the total amount set aside reaches 50% of their respective registered capital. The WFOE and the VIE may also allocate a portion of their after-tax profits based on PRC accounting standards to employee welfare and bonus funds at their discretion. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. Furthermore, if the WFOE incurs debt on its own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict its ability to pay dividends or make other payments to us. In addition, the PRC tax authorities may require us to adjust our taxable income under the contractual arrangements we currently have in place in a manner that would materially and adversely affect the WFOE’s ability to pay dividends and other distributions to us. Any limitation on the ability of our subsidiary to distribute dividends to us or on the ability of the VIE to make payments to the WFOE may restrict our ability to satisfy our liquidity requirements. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—PRC Regulation—Dividend Distribution.”
Additionally, the VIE receives substantially all of its revenues in RMB and the PRC government imposes controls on the convertibility of the RMB into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China. Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account items, such as profit distributions and trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval from the State Administration of Foreign Exchange of the PRC, or the SAFE by complying with certain procedural requirements. Dividends payments to us by Ehfly Technology, our Hong Kong subsidiary, in foreign currencies are subject to the condition that the remittance of such dividends outside of the PRC complies with certain procedures under PRC foreign exchange regulations, such as the overseas investment registrations by our shareholders or the ultimate shareholders of our corporate shareholders who are PRC residents. Approval by or registration with appropriate government authorities is required where RMB is to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out of China to pay capital expenses such as the repayment of loans denominated in foreign currencies. The PRC government may also at its discretion restrict access in the future to foreign currencies for current account transactions. If the foreign exchange control system prevents us from obtaining sufficient foreign currencies to satisfy our foreign currency demands, the WFOE may not be able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to us and our access to cash generated from its operations will be restricted. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Doing Business in China—Governmental control of currency conversion may limit our ability to utilize our operating revenues effectively and affect the value of your investment.”
None of our subsidiaries has declared or paid any dividend or distribution to us. We have never declared or paid any dividend on our ordinary shares. We currently intend to retain most, if not all, of our available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business. As a result, we do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. See “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Dividend Policy.” For the Cayman Islands, PRC and U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to an investment in the ADSs or Class A ordinary shares, see “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation.”
Under the current laws of the Cayman Islands, EHang Holdings is not subject to tax on income or capital gains. Upon payments of dividends to our shareholders, no Cayman Islands withholding tax will be imposed. For purposes of illustration, the following discussion reflects the hypothetical taxes that might be required to be paid in Mainland China and Hong Kong, assuming that: (i) the VIE has taxable earnings, and (ii) we determine to pay a dividend in the future.
8
Table of Contents
Tax Calculation(1)
Hypothetical pre-tax earnings in the VIE(1) 100
Tax on earnings at statutory rate of 25% at WFOE level(2) (25 )
Amount to be distributed as dividend from WFOE to Ehfly Technology(3) 75
Withholding tax at a treaty rate of 5% (3.75 )
Amount to be distributed as dividend at Ehfly Technology level and net distribution to EHang Holdings(4) 71.25
Notes:
(1) For purposes of this example, the tax calculation has been simplified. The hypothetical book pre-tax earnings amount is assumed to equal Chinese taxable income.
(2) Certain of our subsidiaries and the VIE qualifies for a 15% preferential income tax rate in China. However, such rate is subject to qualification, is temporary in nature, and may not be available in a future period when distributions are paid. For purposes of this hypothetical example, the table above reflects a maximum tax scenario under which the full statutory rate would be effective.
(3) China’s Enterprise Income Tax Law imposes a withholding income tax of 10% on dividends distributed by a Foreign Invested Enterprise to its immediate holding company outside of Mainland China. A lower withholding income tax rate of 5% is applied if the Foreign Invested Enterprise’s immediate holding company is registered in Hong Kong or other jurisdictions that have a tax treaty arrangement with Mainland China, subject to a qualification review at the time of the distribution. There is no incremental tax at Ehfly Technology level for any dividend distribution to EHang Holdings.
(4) If a 10% withholding income tax rate is imposed, the withholding tax will be 7.5 and the amount to be distributed as dividend at Ehfly Technology level and net distribution to EHang Holdings will be 67.5.
The table above has been prepared under the assumption that all profits of the VIE will be distributed as fees to our PRC subsidiaries under tax neutral contractual arrangements. If, in the future, the accumulated earnings of the VIE exceed the service fees paid to our PRC subsidiaries (or if the current and contemplated fee structure between the intercompany entities is determined to be non-substantive and disallowed by Chinese tax authorities), the VIE could make a non-deductible transfer to our PRC subsidiaries for the amounts of the stranded cash in the VIE. This would result in such transfer being non-deductible expenses for the VIE but still taxable income for the PRC subsidiaries. Our management believes that there is only a remote possibility that this scenario would happen.
Should all tax planning strategies fail the VIE could, as a matter of last resort, make a non-deductible transfer to the WFOE for amounts of stranded cash in the VIE. This would result in the double taxation of earnings: once at the VIE level (non-deductible expense) and again at the WFOE level (for presumptive earnings on the transfer). This has the impact of reducing the amount available above from 71.25% to approximately 53% of pre-tax income, respectively. Management believes this scenario to be remote.
Financial Information Relating to the VIE
The following tables present the condensed consolidating schedule showing the results of operations, financial position and cash flows for our holding company, EHang Holdings, EHang Holdings’ subsidiaries other than the WFOE, the WFOE, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries, eliminating adjustments and consolidated totals as of December 31, 2024 and 2025 and for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2024 and 2025.
9
Table of Contents
Selected Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations Data
For the year ended December 31,
2023 2024 2025
EHang Holdings Other subsidiaries WFOE VIE and VIE’s subsidiaries Eliminating adjustments Consolidated totals EHang Holdings Other subsidiaries WFOE VIE and VIE’s subsidiaries Eliminating adjustments Consolidated totals EHang Holdings Other subsidiaries WFOE VIE and VIE’s subsidiaries Eliminating adjustments Consolidated totals
(RMB in thousands)
Revenues — 5,346 109,581 32,808 (30,309 ) 117,426 — 885 450,037 123,960 (118,730 ) 456,152 — 5,099 484,611 160,250 (231,979 ) 417,981
- Third-party revenues — 5,346 102,855 9,225 — 117,426 — 885 449,714 5,553 — 456,152 — 4,534 406,776 6,671 — 417,981
- Inter-company revenues(1) — — 6,726 23,583 (30,309 ) — — — 323 118,407 (118,730 ) — — 565 77,835 153,579 (231,979 ) —
Cost of revenues — (3,450 ) (62,372 ) (5,467 ) 29,174 (42,115 ) — — (284,671 ) (3,850 ) 112,315 (176,206 ) — (1,835 ) (350,322 ) (23,174 ) 214,504 (160,827 )
- Third-party cost of revenues — 394 (39,846 ) (2,663 ) — (42,115 ) — — (172,636 ) (3,570 ) — (176,206 ) — (1,270 ) (274,031 ) 114,474 — (160,827 )
- Inter-company cost of revenues(1) — (3,844 ) (22,526 ) (2,804 ) 29,174 — — — (112,035 ) (280 ) 112,315 — — (565 ) (76,291 ) (137,648 ) 214,504 —
Gross profit — 1,896 47,209 27,341 (1,135 ) 75,311 — 885 165,366 120,110 (6,415 ) 279,946 — 3,264 134,289 137,076 (17,475 ) 257,154
Sales and marketing expenses — (7,627 ) (43,184 ) (10,004 ) 426 (60,389 ) — (7,275 ) (99,896 ) (24,997 ) 1,141 (131,027 ) (1,181 ) (8,161 ) (77,795 ) (35,054 ) 171 (122,020 )
General and administrative expenses (5,246 ) 206 (136,544 ) (8,508 ) — (150,092 ) (16,040 ) (5,819 ) (198,543 ) (12,996 ) — (233,398 ) (13,569 ) (425 ) (246,769 ) (8,865 ) (20 ) (269,648 )
Research and development expenses — — (150,457 ) (16,861 ) 3 (167,315 ) — — (182,880 ) (20,578 ) 3,993 (199,465 ) — — (165,570 ) (30,144 ) 1,133 (194,581 )
Total operating expenses (5,246 ) (7,421 ) (330,185 ) (35,373 ) 429 (377,796 ) (16,040 ) (13,094 ) (481,319 ) (58,571 ) 5,134 (563,890 ) (14,750 ) (8,586 ) (490,134 ) (74,063 ) 1,284 (586,249 )
Other operating income — 839 2,648 2,746 — 6,233 — 1,259 19,594 9,016 — 29,869 — 1,983 3,772 6,628 — 12,383
Operating (loss) income (5,246 ) (4,686 ) (280,328 ) (5,286 ) (706 ) (296,252 ) (16,040 ) (10,950 ) (296,359 ) 70,555 (1,281 ) (254,075 ) (14,750 ) (3,339 ) (352,073 ) 69,641 (16,191 ) (316,712 )
Share of losses from subsidiaries(2) (290,785 ) (292,422 ) — — 583,207 — (298,463 ) (290,987 ) — — 589,450 — (343,051 ) (346,625 ) — — 689,676 —
(Loss) income from the VIEs (5,829 ) (5,829 ) (5,829 ) — 17,487 — 65,749 65,749 65,749 — (197,247 ) — 61,053 61,053 61,053 — (183,159 ) —
Interest and investment income 160 4,220 4,077 27 — 8,484 18,978 1,255 9,707 659 — 30,599 35,025 3,442 20,035 86 — 58,588
Interest expenses — — (2,728 ) (202 ) — (2,930 ) — — (3,125 ) (250 ) — (3,375 ) — — (5,510 ) (466 ) — (5,976 )
Amortization of debt discounts — — (12,023 ) — — (12,023 ) — — — — — — — — — — — —
Foreign currency exchange gains (losses), net — 342 (46 ) 98 — 394 — (882 ) (392 ) 86 — (1,188 ) — 888 451 (130 ) (35 ) 1,174
Other non-operating income — 1,525 257 184 — 1,966 — 2,630 1,756 308 (24 ) 4,670 — 2,056 522 232 — 2,810
Other non-operating expenses — (4 ) (147 ) (63 ) — (214 ) — — (685 ) (1,240 ) 1 (1,924 ) (14,254 ) (1 ) (1,201 ) — — (15,456 )
(Loss) income before income tax and income (loss) from equity method investment (301,700 ) (296,854 ) (296,767 ) (5,242 ) 599,988 (300,575 ) (229,776 ) (233,185 ) (223,349 ) 70,118 390,899 (225,293 ) (275,977 ) (282,526 ) (276,723 ) 69,363 490,291 (275,572 )
10
Table of Contents
For the year ended December 31,
2023 2024 2025
EHang Holdings Other subsidiaries WFOE VIE and VIE’s subsidiaries Eliminating adjustments Consolidated totals EHang Holdings Other subsidiaries WFOE VIE and VIE’s subsidiaries Eliminating adjustments Consolidated totals EHang Holdings Other subsidiaries WFOE VIE and VIE’s subsidiaries Eliminating adjustments Consolidated totals
(RMB in thousands)
Income tax (expenses) benefits — (181 ) (25 ) — — (206 ) — (105 ) (281 ) — — (386 ) — (263 ) (4,329 ) 3,248 5,753 4,409
(Loss) income before income (loss) from equity method investment (301,700 ) (297,035 ) (296,792 ) (5,242 ) 599,988 (300,781 ) (229,776 ) (233,290 ) (223,630 ) 70,118 390,899 (225,679 ) (275,977 ) (282,789 ) (281,052 ) 72,611 496,044 (271,163 )
(Loss) income from equity method investments — — (1,568 ) 8 — (1,560 ) — — (194 ) (3,884 ) (275 ) (4,353 ) — — (1,003 ) (4,245 ) — (5,248 )
Net (loss) income (301,700 ) (297,035 ) (298,360 ) (5,234 ) 599,988 (302,341 ) (229,776 ) (233,290 ) (223,824 ) 66,234 390,624 (230,032 ) (275,977 ) (282,789 ) (282,055 ) 68,366 496,044 (276,411 )
Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interest — 421 189 31 — 641 — 576 (320 ) — — 256 — 791 (357 ) — — 434
Net (loss) income attributable to ordinary shareholders (301,700 ) (296,614 ) (298,171 ) (5,203 ) 599,988 (301,700 ) (229,776 ) (232,714 ) (224,144 ) 66,234 390,624 (229,776 ) (275,977 ) (281,998 ) (282,412 ) 68,366 496,044 (275,977 )
11
Table of Contents
Selected Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets Data
As of December 31,
2024 2025
EHang Holdings Other subsidiaries WFOE VIE and VIE’s subsidiaries Eliminating adjustments Consolidated totals EHang Holdings Other subsidiaries WFOE VIE and VIE’s subsidiaries Eliminating adjustments Consolidated totals
Cash and cash equivalents 180,573 257,338 166,100 6,866 — 610,877 12,730 28,814 194,137 20,719 — 256,400
Short-term investments 513,683 — — — — 513,683 761,115 82,117 — — — 843,232
Restricted short-term deposits — — 30,295 — — 30,295 — — 29,655 — — 29,655
Accounts receivable, net — — 52,074 6,106 — 58,180 — — 100,265 6,217 — 106,482
Inventories — 1,917 75,236 834 (2,300 ) 75,687 — 1,935 108,577 2,319 (11,197 ) 101,634
Prepayments and other current assets — 1,627 62,755 3,924 (8 ) 68,298 — 4,785 107,653 28,495 (11 ) 140,922
Amounts due from subsidiaries, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries(3) 13,697 58,567 104,153 86,496 (262,913 ) — 13,697 136,315 122,042 79,816 (351,870 ) —
Property and equipment, net and intangible assets, net — 1,297 56,673 3,436 (1,182 ) 60,224 — 4,258 201,044 61,259 (8,511 ) 258,050
Right-of-use assets, net — — 128,433 — — 128,433 — — 116,468 — — 116,468
Land use right, net — — — — — — — — 11,347 — — 11,347
Investment in subsidiaries(2) 263,309 24,199 — — (287,508 ) — 290,609 113,129 76,887 — (480,625 ) —
Others — 2,919 21,284 15,830 (1,212 ) 38,821 — 2,919 70,107 36,644 17,673 127,343
Total assets 971,262 347,864 697,003 123,492 (555,123 ) 1,584,498 1,078,151 374,272 1,138,182 235,469 (834,541 ) 1,991,533
Short-term bank loans — — 15,750 — 48,500 64,250 — — 179,611 — 50,000 229,611
Short-term debt — — 50,000 — (50,000 ) — — — 50,000 — (50,000 ) —
Amounts due to the Company, subsidiaries, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries(3) 76 74,878 105,780 82,179 (262,913 ) — — 76,251 176,375 99,244 (351,870 ) —
Accounts payable — — 124,376 3,070 — 127,446 — — 131,216 1,293 — 132,509
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 9,334 836 101,652 31,919 6,455 150,196 9,224 7,808 203,804 39,877 2,726 263,439
Contract liabilities — 1,865 65,303 1,848 (6,455 ) 62,561 — 2,291 56,490 2,058 — 60,839
Lease liabilities – current & non-current — — 138,246 — — 138,246 — — 130,524 — — 130,524
Long-term bank loans — — 13,500 7,000 — 20,500 — — 77,700 5,000 — 82,700
Net interest of subsidiaries and the VIEs(2) 6,209 6,209 6,209 — (18,627 ) — — — — — — —
Others — 7,904 54,993 2,588 — 65,485 — 6,848 16,166 2,645 (2,090 ) 23,569
Total liabilities 15,619 91,692 675,809 128,604 (283,040 ) 628,684 9,224 93,198 1,021,886 150,117 (351,234 ) 923,191
Total shareholders’ equity (deficit)(2) 955,643 256,172 21,194 (5,112 ) (272,083 ) 955,814 1,068,927 281,074 116,296 85,352 (483,307 ) 1,068,342
12
Table of Contents
Selected Condensed Consolidated Cash Flows Data
For the year ended December 31,
2023 2024 2025
EHang Holdings Other subsidiaries WFOE VIE and VIE’s subsidiaries Eliminating adjustments Consolidated totals EHang Holdings Other subsidiaries WFOE VIE and VIE’s subsidiaries Eliminating adjustments Consolidated totals EHang Holdings Other subsidiaries WFOE VIE and VIE’s subsidiaries Eliminating adjustments Consolidated totals
(RMB in thousands)
Net cash flow (used in) generated from operating activities(4) (18,778 ) (72,341 ) (12,161 ) 14,870 — (88,410 ) (13,165 ) 122,320 37,109 11,695 — 157,959 (64,845 ) (37,268 ) (111,131 ) 33,738 — (179,506 )
Cash flows from investing activities
Capital contribution (150,255 ) (500 ) — — 150,755 — (79,308 ) (80,516 ) — — 159,824 — (24,308 ) (128,000 ) — (153 ) 152,461 —
Redemption of short-term investments — — — — — — 444,759 — — — — 444,759 371,753 46,975 — — — 418,728
Purchase of short-term investments (56,694 ) — — — — (56,694 ) (885,706 ) — — — — (885,706 ) (600,989 ) (128,164 ) — — — (729,153 )
Proceeds received from maturity of short-term deposits — — — — — — 142,918 — 864 — — 143,782 — — — — — —
Payments for short-term deposits (14,164 ) — — — — (14,164 ) (129,207 ) — (864 ) — — (130,071 ) — — — — — —
Proceeds received from maturity of restricted short-term deposits — — — — — — — — — 43,942 — 43,942 — — 29,486 — — 29,486
Payments for restricted short-term deposits — — (33,437 ) — — (33,437 ) — — — (39,486 ) — (39,486 ) — — (29,126 ) — — (29,126 )
Other investing activities (2 ) 114 (7,502 ) (17,007 ) — (24,397 ) — 91 (41,267 ) (18,552 ) — (59,728 ) — (1,118 ) (178,230 ) (17,732 ) — (197,080 )
Net cash flow (used in) provided by investing activities (221,115 ) (386 ) (40,939 ) (17,007 ) 150,755 (128,692 ) (506,544 ) (80,425 ) (41,267 ) (14,096 ) 159,824 (482,508 ) (253,544 ) (210,307 ) (177,870 ) (17,885 ) 152,461 (507,145 )
Cash flows from financing activities
Capital contribution — 150,255 500 — (150,755 ) — — 79,308 80,516 — (159,824 ) — — 24,308 128,153 — (152,461 ) —
Proceeds from short-term bank loans — — 69,090 — — 69,090 — — 54,250 10,000 — 64,250 — — 249,143 — — 249,143
Repayment of a short-term bank loan — — (44,640 ) (5,154 ) — (49,794 ) — — (64,244 ) (4,846 ) — (69,090 ) — — (83,758 ) — — (83,758 )
Other financing activities 251,770 — (75,586 ) — — 176,184 688,043 — 18,154 — — 706,197 150,546 — 23,500 (2,000 ) — 172,046
13
Table of Contents
For the year ended December 31,
2023 2024 2025
EHang Holdings Other subsidiaries WFOE VIE and VIE’s subsidiaries Eliminating adjustments Consolidated totals EHang Holdings Other subsidiaries WFOE VIE and VIE’s subsidiaries Eliminating adjustments Consolidated totals EHang Holdings Other subsidiaries WFOE VIE and VIE’s subsidiaries Eliminating adjustments Consolidated totals
(RMB in thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 251,770 150,255 (50,636 ) (5,154 ) (150,755 ) 195,480 688,043 79,308 88,676 5,154 (159,824 ) 701,357 150,546 24,308 317,038 (2,000 ) (152,461 ) 337,431
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents — 562 — — — 562 — 5,819 — — — 5,819 — (5,257 ) — — — (5,257 )
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents 11,877 78,090 (103,736 ) (7,291 ) — (21,060 ) 168,334 127,022 84,518 2,753 — 382,627 (167,843 ) (228,524 ) 28,037 13,853 — (354,477 )
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the years 362 52,226 185,318 11,404 — 249,310 12,239 130,316 81,582 4,113 — 228,250 180,573 257,338 166,100 6,866 — 610,877
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the years 12,239 130,316 81,582 4,113 — 228,250 180,573 257,338 166,100 6,866 — 610,877 12,730 28,814 194,137 20,719 — 256,400
Notes:
(1) Represents the elimination of the intercompany transactions at the consolidation level.
(2) Represents the elimination of the investment among EHang Holdings, EHang Holdings’ subsidiaries other than the WFOE, the WFOE, and the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries.
(3) Represents the elimination of intercompany balances among EHang Holdings, EHang Holdings’ subsidiaries other than the WFOE, the WFOE, and the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries.
(4) For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2024 and 2025, the WFOE did not charge any service fee from the VIE as the cumulative earnings were retained for VIE’s business development. For the year ended December 31, 2023, cash paid by the WFOE to the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries was RMB37.2 million, which represented purchase of software and inventories. For the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2025, cash received by the WFOE from the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries was RMB4.5 million and RMB76.4 million (US$10.9 million), respectively, which represented sales of inventories. For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2024 and 2025, cash paid by other subsidiaries to the WFOE were RMB3.2 million, nil and RMB6.0 million (US$0.9 million), respectively, which represented purchase of inventories.
14
Table of Contents
A. [Reserved]
B. Capitalization and Indebtedness
Not applicable.
C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
D. Risk Factors
Below please find a summary of the principal risks we face, organized under relevant headings.
Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry
• Our future growth depends on the demand for, and customers’ willingness to adopt, our products and air mobility solutions.
• In the jurisdictions where we, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries sell and plan to sell products, the commercial use of eVTOL aircraft is subject to an uncertain or lengthy approval process; we cannot predict when regulations will change, and any new regulations may impose onerous requirements and restrictions with which we, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries, the eVTOL aircraft and potential customers may be unable to comply. As a result, we, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries may be limited in, or completely restricted from, growing business in the foreseeable future.
• We may be unable to make timely product deliveries due to limited production capacity.
• Our framework and conditional agreements may not result in material sales of our products.
• We have substantial customer concentration and we have experienced a significant increase in accounts receivable.
• Our technology platform may not perform in line with customer specifications or expectations; and
• We are a relatively young company with a short operating history, and we may not be able to sustain our rapid growth, effectively manage our growth or implement our business strategies.
Risks Relating to Our Corporate Structure
• If the PRC government finds that the contractual arrangements between the WFOE, the VIE and the VIE’s shareholders do not comply with PRC regulations relating to the relevant industries, or if these regulations or the interpretation of existing regulations change in the future, we could be subject to penalties or be forced to relinquish our interests in those operations.
• We rely on contractual arrangements with the VIE and the VIE’s shareholders for certain business operations in the PRC, which may not be as effective as direct ownership in providing operational control.
• Any failure by the VIE or the VIE’s shareholders to perform their obligations under our contractual arrangements with them would have a material and adverse effect on our business.
15
Table of Contents
• The shareholders of the VIE may have potential conflicts of interest with us, which may materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.
• We may lose the ability to use and enjoy assets held by the VIE that are material to certain business operations in the PRC if the VIE goes bankrupt or becomes subject to a dissolution or liquidation proceeding.
• Our dual-class share structure with different voting rights will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and could discourage others from pursuing any change of control transactions that holders of our Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may view as beneficial.
Risks Relating to Doing Business in China
• The PRC government’s significant oversight over our and the VIE’s business operation could result in a material adverse change in our operations and the value of the ADSs.
• Uncertainties in the interpretation and enforcement of PRC laws and regulations could limit the legal protections available to you and us.
• We may be adversely affected by the complexities, uncertainties and changes in PRC regulations on technology companies.
• The approval of and the filing with the CSRC or other PRC governmental authorities may be required in connection with our future offshore offerings under PRC law and if required, we cannot predict whether or how soon we will be able to obtain such approval or complete such filing.
• The ADSs will be delisted and prohibited from trading in the U.S. under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, or the HFCAA, if the PCAOB is unable to inspect or fully investigate auditors located in China.
• Increases in labor costs and enforcement of stricter labor laws and regulations in the PRC may adversely affect our business and our profitability.
• We rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our PRC subsidiaries to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have, and any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to make payments to us could have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business.
• The PCAOB had historically been unable to inspect our auditor in relation to their audit work performed for our financial statements and the inability of the PCAOB to conduct inspections of our auditor in the past has deprived our investors with the benefits of such inspections.
Risks Relating to the ADSs and Trading Market
• The trading price of the ADSs is likely to be volatile, which could result in substantial losses to investors.
• If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they adversely change their recommendations regarding the ADSs, the market price for the ADSs and trading volume could decline.
• The sale or availability for sale of substantial amounts of the ADSs could adversely affect their market price.
• We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules and, as a result, may rely on exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements that provide protection to shareholders of other companies.
16
Table of Contents
Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry
Our future growth depends on the demand for, and customers’ willingness to adopt, our products and air mobility solutions.
We operate in the new and evolving AAM industry. Our business and operating results depend in large part on the acceptance of and demand for our pilotless eVTOL aircraft and air mobility solutions. The success of these products and services are and will be subject to risks, including with respect to:
• the extent of market reception and adoption of pilotless eVTOL aircraft as air mobility solutions;
• our ability to navigate a new and evolving regulatory environment;
• our timely fulfillment of product orders;
• our ability to produce safe, high-quality and cost-effective eVTOL aircraft and provide after-sales services on an ongoing basis;
• the performance of our pilotless eVTOL aircraft relative to customer expectations and customers’ interest in and demand for our pilotless eVTOL aircraft and air mobility solutions; and
• our building a well-recognized and respected brand.
Our failure to manage the risks described above may discourage current or potential customers from purchasing our products or using our commercial solutions, and there may be downward price pressure on our products and commercial solutions. If the market for eVTOL aircraft or air mobility solutions does not develop as we expect or develops more slowly than we expect, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results will be materially and adversely affected.
In the jurisdictions where we, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries sell and plan to sell products, the commercial use of eVTOL aircraft is subject to an uncertain or lengthy approval process; we cannot predict when regulations will change, and any new regulations may impose onerous requirements and restrictions with which we, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries, the eVTOL aircraft and potential customers may be unable to comply. As a result, we, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries may be limited in, or completely restricted from, growing business in the foreseeable future.
We operate in a new and rapidly evolving industry, which is subject to extensive legal and regulatory requirements. As described below, in the jurisdictions relevant to us, the commercial use and delivery of our various eVTOL aircraft are, and in the near future are expected to continue to be, subject to an uncertain or lengthy approval process. In October 2023, December 2023, March 2024 and March 2025, we obtained the Type Certificate (“TC”), the Standard Airworthiness Certificate (“AC”), the PC and the Air Operator Certificate (“OC”), respectively, for EH216-S from the CAAC, demonstrating that EH216-S is qualified for conducting human-carrying commercial operations and mass production. Moreover, our TC application for our VT35 lift-and-cruise pilotless eVTOL aircraft to the CAAC was accepted in March 2025. However, PRC and U.S. regulations impose significant restrictions on UAVs. We cannot predict when these regulations will change, and any new regulations may impose onerous requirements and restrictions.
17
Table of Contents
In China, the CAAC, published the Guidance on UAV Airworthiness Assessment Based on Operation Risks, or the UAV Airworthiness Guidance, on January 25, 2019, which is based on the assessment, classification and management of operational risks of UAVs. As we operate in the new and evolving industry, we contribute to the rules and regulations as a member of the CAAC Special Expert Taskforce. On October 29, 2021, the CAAC further published the Civil Unmanned Aircraft System Airworthiness Certification Management Procedures (Draft for Comments), Civil Unmanned Aircraft System Safety Analysis Guidelines (Draft for Comment), and Civil Unmanned Aircraft Registration Management Procedures (Draft for Comment). Such draft UAV rules mainly cover the medium UAVs weigh between 25 kilograms and 150 kilograms, and large UAVs exceed 150 kilograms in weight. We submitted an application for the EH216-S Type Certification to the CAAC in December 2020, which was accepted by the CAAC in January 2021. Our EH216-S human-carrying pilotless eVTOL aircraft, as a special category aircraft under Section 21.17 of Certification Procedures for Civil Aviation Products and Parts, or CCAR-21, is required to meet the criteria set forth in Special Conditions for Type Certification of EH216-S Unmanned Aircraft System, or Special Conditions, promulgated by the CAAC on February 9, 2022. The Special Conditions provided clear safety requirements for the certification of EH216-S with respect to flight performance, aircraft structures, design and manufacture, propulsion system, data link, ground control station, etc. We have passed through the Type Certification phases of Concept Design, Requirements Definition, Compliance Planning, and Demonstration and Verification of Compliance to conduct tests, including laboratory tests, ground tests and inspections, flight tests and data analysis. On May 31, 2023, the Provisional Regulation for the Flight Administration of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles was promulgated by the State Council and the Central Military Commission and came into effect on January 1, 2024, which is the first administrative regulation on the management of unmanned aerial vehicles in China that stipulates the standards and requirements to apply for the operation certificate of UAVs. In October 2023, we obtained the TC for EH216-S from the CAAC. This demonstrates that the EH216-S’s model design complies with CAAC’s safety standards and airworthiness requirements, and that the EH216-S is qualified for conducting human-carrying commercial operations. However, we cannot assure you that we can satisfy the relevant requirements or standards under the detailed rules or regulations to be promulgated in the future, which may materially and adversely affect our business and future prospects.
Additionally, the EH216-S is subject to several operational restrictions under the TC and OC issued by the CAAC. These certifications currently prohibit the EH216-S from operating in adverse weather conditions, including rain, snow, thunderstorms, icing, sandstorms, and heavy fog, and limit operations to daytime only. In addition, the EH216-S is restricted to operating exclusively within segregated, uncontrolled airspace, over sparsely populated areas, and always within the sight of the ground crew. Takeoff and landing on water are also strictly prohibited. These restrictions are intended to ensure the safe operation of the EH216-S. Our ability to expand the commercial deployment and operational range of the EH216-S could be impeded unless the CAAC relaxes or removes these restrictions. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain such relaxation or removal in a timely manner, or at all. If these operational restrictions are not relaxed or removed in a timely manner, or at all, our ability to scale our operations, expand into new markets, or fully realize the commercial potential of the EH216-S could be materially and adversely affected.
Further, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries are required to obtain approvals from competent aviation authorities for flight activities or proposed flights in connection with our business. As such approvals are usually granted on a one-off basis or are only valid for a limited period of time and the competent aviation authority may exercise air traffic control under certain circumstances which may restrict us from operating our eVTOL aircraft from time to time, we cannot assure you that the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries will be able to obtain such approval for each matter on which we will work on with our customers or partners in the future. If such approval is not granted in a timely manner, we, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries, as well as our and their customers or partners will not be able to fly the eVTOL aircraft in the proposed flight routes.
As we sell our products internationally, we face challenges in quickly and sufficiently familiarizing ourselves with foreign regulatory environments and policy frameworks. If any new regulation is put in place, or a different interpretation of existing regulation is adopted, our ability to manufacture, market, sell or operate our products or to advertise or deliver air mobility solutions in general may be limited or otherwise affected. Failure to comply with applicable regulations or to obtain, maintain or renew the necessary permits, licenses, registrations or certificates could cause delays in, or prevent us from, manufacturing, marketing, selling and operating our products, meeting product demand and expectations, introducing new products or expanding our service coverage, and could materially and adversely affect our operation results. If we are found to be in violation of applicable laws or regulations, we could be subject to administrative punishment, including fines, injunctions, recalls or asset seizures, as well as potential criminal sanctions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
18
Table of Contents
We may be unable to make timely product deliveries due to limited production capacity.
Commercial production of our pilotless eVTOL aircraft requires timely and adequate supply of various types of raw materials and components, as well as mass production capacity and efficient manufacturing and assembly. We have limited experience in high-volume manufacturing of our pilotless eVTOL aircraft. We cannot assure you that we will be able to expand our production capacity efficiently and cost-effectively, or to procure sufficient raw materials and components to meet our production volume. While we are looking into expanding our manufacturing capacity through partnerships, such partnerships may not be successful, or we may not be able to do so in a timely manner to fulfill our backlog orders. While we obtain components from multiple sources whenever possible, some of the components used in our products are currently selected to be purchased from a single source to improve cost- efficiency. Disruption in the supply of components, whether or not from a single-source supplier, could temporarily disrupt commercial production of our products. We also outsource certain manufacturing activities to third party contract manufacturers. We may experience operational difficulties with our contract manufacturers, including reductions in the availability of production capacity, failure to comply with product specifications, insufficient quality control, failure to meet production deadlines, increases in manufacturing costs and longer lead time.
Any of the foregoing could result in our failure to make timely deliveries to our customers. Such failure would materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
Our framework and conditional agreements may not result in material sales of our products.
We have entered into a number of long-term agreements with customers relating to the sale of our products. Some of these agreements are conditional, and our counterparty is not obligated to purchase our products unless a number of conditions are satisfied. Some other agreements are framework agreements containing sales targets, but that does not obligate our counterparties to purchase our products at all. We expect the number of orders and pre-orders we receive under these framework agreements to depend on a number of factors, including changes in the regulatory environment, customers’ acceptance of and demand for our products and services and our production capacity. For the foregoing reasons, we may not receive substantial orders from our current or potential customers. As our long-term agreements may not result in material sales of our products, our future results of operations may not scale or otherwise meet our current expectations.
We have substantial customer concentration.
In 2023, 2024 and 2025, our largest customer accounted for 24%, 26% and 24% of our revenues, respectively. There are inherent risks whenever a large percentage of revenues are concentrated with a limited number of customers that mainly operate our pilotless eVTOL aircraft in tourism locations in China, rather than in broad, mainstream commercial operations. We are unable to predict the future level of demand for our products and/or services that will be generated by these customers. If our major customers were to cease purchasing our products or services, cancel existing orders or fail to make payments to us in a timely fashion, our business and results of operations will be materially and adversely affected.
Our technology platform may not perform in line with customer specifications or expectations.
Our eVTOL aircraft and other UAVs, as well as the related technology systems such as in-flight operating systems and on-the-ground infrastructure, may not perform in line with customers’ expectations or prescribed technical specifications, and our related support services may from time to time experience outages, service slowdowns or errors. For example, our eVTOL products may not be as easy to operate or maintain as customers expect, and customers may experience service failures or interruptions due to defects in software, infrastructure, components or engineering systems, or due to errors in product installation. In addition, certain orders and pre-orders of our eVTOL products are conditioned on their meeting with defined technical specifications (such as a specified cruising speed, operational range and payload capacity) according to agreed-upon delivery timetables. Future customers may also require performance specifications that we are unable to deliver. Some of these technical specifications prescribed by customers, such as those dependent on battery technology, are constrained by the pace of general technological advancement and the capabilities of our suppliers, which are largely beyond our control.
Our technology systems may contain design or manufacturing defects that result in unsatisfactory performance or require repair. Our technology systems use a substantial amount of algorithms and software to operate. Software products are inherently complex and may contain “bugs” that can unexpectedly interfere with intended operations, especially when first introduced. Defects may also occur in components, processes or infrastructure used in our products or for our services. While we have performed extensive internal testing on our software and hardware systems and have obtained the airworthiness certification, we have a limited frame of reference by which to evaluate the long-term performance of our technology systems. There can be no assurance that we will be able to detect and fix all defects in our hardware and software before we sell products and services to customers.
19
Table of Contents
If our technology systems are defective or otherwise fails to perform as expected or in accordance with prescribed technical specifications and timetable, or if our services experience outages or interruptions, our products may experience accidents and we may suffer adverse publicity, order cancelations, revenue declines, delivery delays, product recalls, product liability claims, and significant warranty and other expenses, decreases in customer confidence and loyalty, loss of market share to competitors, and harm to our reputation. These consequences could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects.
Our reputation and the trading price of the ADSs may be negatively affected by adverse publicity or detrimental conduct against us.
Adverse publicity concerning our failure or perceived failure to comply with legal and regulatory requirements, alleged accounting or financial reporting irregularities, regulatory scrutiny and further regulatory action or litigation could harm our reputation and cause the trading price of the ADSs to decline and fluctuate significantly. For example, after Wolfpack Research, an entity unrelated to us, issued a report containing various allegations about us in February 2021, the trading price of the ADSs declined sharply. The negative publicity and the resulting decline of the trading price of the ADSs also led to the filing of three putative shareholder class action lawsuits against us and some of our senior executive officers. Though unsuccessful, these lawsuits had further negative impact on the market price of the ADSs and diverted management’s attention from the day-to-day operations of our company. Additionally, in November 2023, short seller Hindenburg Research published a report containing untrue statements and misinterpretation of information regarding our business operations and financial conditions. Our audit committee has conducted an independent review of the allegations raised in the report with the assistance of independent counsel and the independent review is complete. Based on such independent review, our audit committee has concluded that the allegations in the report published by Hindenburg Research were not substantiated. The report also led to the filing of a securities class action complaint against us and certain of our officers and directors. See “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.” Our management and audit committee conducted additional procedures and actions to mitigate risks of the short seller allegations. However, we may be constrained in the manner in which we can proceed against the relevant short sellers by principles of freedom of speech, applicable state law or issues of commercial confidentiality.
We may continue to be the target of adverse publicity and detrimental conduct against us, including complaints, anonymous or otherwise, to regulatory agencies regarding our operations, accounting, revenues and regulatory compliance. Additionally, allegations against us may be posted on the internet by any person or entity which identifies itself or on an anonymous basis. We, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries may be subject to government or regulatory investigation or inquiries, or shareholder lawsuits, as a result of such third-party conduct and may be required to incur significant time and substantial costs to defend ourselves, and there is no assurance that we, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries will be able to conclusively refute each of the allegations within a reasonable period of time or at all. Our reputation may also be negatively affected as a result of the public dissemination of allegations or malicious statements about us, which in turn may materially and adversely affect the trading price of the ADSs.
We are a relatively young company with a short operating history, and we may not be able to sustain our rapid growth, effectively manage our growth or implement our business strategies.
We, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries have been providing UAV commercial solutions since 2014. Although we have experienced growth, our historical performance may not be indicative of our future performance due to our limited operating history. We are currently commercializing our products and air mobility solutions, and have a short history of accepting orders for our products and delivering them to customers for testing, training, demonstration and limited trial operation purposes. There is only a limited historical basis for making judgments on the demand for our products and services or our ability to produce and deliver products and air mobility solutions, or to become profitable in the future.
20
Table of Contents
You should consider our business and future prospects in light of the risks and challenges we face as a new entrant to a nascent industry and to overseas markets, including risks and challenges associated with our ability to:
• provide safe, convenient and effective air mobility solutions;
• maintain reliable, secure, high-performance and scalable infrastructure;
• identify suitable facilities to expand manufacturing capacity;
• navigate the evolving and complex regulatory environment across all the markets in which we operate;
• anticipate and adapt to changing market conditions, including technological developments and changes in the competitive landscape, and adjust, manage and execute our marketing and sales activities to cater to local economic and demographic conditions, cultural differences and customer preferences across all our current and future markets;
• successfully market our commercial solutions;
• improve and maintain our operational efficiency; and
• attract, retain and motivate talented employees.
If we fail to address any or all of these risks and challenges, our business may be materially and adversely affected.
As our business grows, we, the VIE or the VIE’s subsidiaries may adjust our product and service offerings. These adjustments may not bring about expected results and may instead have a material and adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. For example, we and the VIE historically manufactured and sold consumer drones while we and the VIE were developing our pilotless eVTOL aircraft and commercial solutions. Our consumer drone business was not successful. We and the VIE gradually phased out this business to focus on more innovative products and services. Our revenue structure may continue to evolve in response to market demand. Our growth is dependent on the development of such new products and services. We may not accurately identify market needs before we invest in the development of a new product or a new service. In addition, we might face difficulties or delays in the development process, which may result in losses in our market share and competitive advantages.
In pursuit of our growth strategy, we, the VIE or the VIE’s subsidiaries may enter into new strategic relationships to further penetrate our targeted markets. Should these relationships fail to materialize and develop into demand or orders for our products and services, or should we fail to work effectively with these companies, we may lose opportunities to generate sales growth and our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Our UAVs and commercial solutions are subject to safety standards, and the failure to satisfy such mandated safety standards or failure to design, manufacture and operate safe and high-performance products and related operating systems and infrastructure would have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.
Sales of our products must comply with applicable standards in the market where they are sold, including standards on design, manufacturing and operation. In China, for example, certain components of our products must pass various tests and undergo a certification process and be affixed with a China Compulsory Certificate, or CCC, before they can be installed on our products. We cannot assure you that we have obtained the CCC for all the components of our products that are listed in the CCC Product Catalogue. Failure to install components with a CCC may prevent us from selling the affected products and negatively affect our manufacturing and sales of our products. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—PRC Regulation” for further details. In the United States, the FAA oversees the safety of aircraft operations in the national airspace system and has the authority to grant AC and related exemptions to unmanned aircraft systems. If we fail to have our products satisfy applicable aerial vehicle standards in any jurisdiction where we operate, our business and operating results would be adversely affected. To achieve a high level of safety assurance, we have also established our own products safety standards. While we are committed to producing safe and high-quality products, there can be no assurance that our safety technology will be effective in preventing incidents related to product safety, such as accidents involving our products. Failure to ensure the safe operation of our products will affect our reputation and the sales of our products, which will ultimately adversely affect our business operation and financial results.
21
Table of Contents
We have incurred, and in the future may continue to incur, net losses.
We have incurred net losses in the past. In 2023, 2024 and 2025, we had net losses of RMB302.3 million, RMB230.0 million and RMB276.4 million (US$39.5 million), respectively. We had net operating cash outflows of RMB88.4 million and RMB179.5 million (US$25.7 million) in 2023 and 2025, respectively, and net operating cash inflows of RMB158.0 million in 2024. We expect our net losses to decrease in future periods as we continue to expand our business and operations. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review Prospect—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources” for more information on our liquidity and capital resources. We also expect to incur substantial costs and expenses as a result of being a public company.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to generate net profits or positive operating cash flows in the future. Our ability to achieve profitability depends in large part on, among other factors, our ability to increase orders and sales of our eVTOL aircraft and other UAVs, commercial solutions and services, achieve economies of scale, establish effective pricing strategies, effectively navigate the regulatory environments in different jurisdictions, and increase operational efficiency. If we are unable to generate adequate revenues or effectively manage our expenses, we may continue to incur significant losses in the future and may not be able to achieve or subsequently maintain profitability.
We may not be successful in competing in the UAV industry.
We operate in the AAM industry and provide various products and services. In addition to competing with other AAM companies, we compete with traditional industry players providing similar products and services, such as aircraft and ground transportation service providers. Many of our current and potential competitors, particularly international competitors, have significantly greater financial, technical, manufacturing, marketing, and other resources than we do and may be able to devote greater resources to the design, development, manufacturing, distribution, promotion, sale, and support of their products.
We expect competition in our industry to intensify in the future in light of increased demand for alternative transportation, continuing globalization, and consolidation in the global AAM industry. Factors affecting competition include, among others, ability to innovate, development speed, product quality, reliability, safety and features, pricing, and customer service. Increased competition may lead to lower product unit sales and increased inventory, which may result in downward price pressure and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results, and prospects.
Our ability to successfully compete in our industry will be fundamental to our future success in existing and new markets and will affect our market share. If our competitors introduce products or services that are superior in quality or performance and/or lower in price compared with our offerings, we may lose existing customers or be unable to attract new customers at prices that would allow us to generate attractive rates of return on our investment, if at all.
Any significant cybersecurity incident or disruption to our operating systems, command-and-control systems, or information systems and infrastructure could subject us to significant reputational, financial, legal and operational consequences.
We depend on our and the VIE’s integrated in-flight operating systems and on-the-ground infrastructure to operate our products and services. Any material disruption to or slowdown of our operating systems or infrastructure could cause our products to malfunction or result in outages or delays in our services, which could harm our brand and adversely affect our operating results.
Our command-and-control systems rely on our proprietary cloud database, which can store data collected under our clients’ approvals. Problems with our command-and-control systems or our telecommunications network providers could adversely affect our services and products. Our telecommunications network providers could decide to cease providing services to us without adequate notice. Any change in service levels of our telecommunications network or any errors, defects, disruptions or other performance problems with our operating systems or infrastructure could harm our brand and potentially affect our user data. If changes in technology cause our operating systems or infrastructure to become obsolete, or if our operating systems or command-and-control systems are inadequate to support our growth, we could lose customers, and our business and operating results could be adversely affected.
22
Table of Contents
We could be subject to breaches of security by hackers. Although we proactively employ multiple measures to defend our systems against intrusions and attacks, our measures may not prevent unauthorized access or use of sensitive data. A breach of our UAV operating systems or command-and-control systems may result in product damages, data losses and, in extreme cases, accidents or hijacking of our UAVs to perform unlawful activities.
A cybersecurity breach could harm our reputation and deter our customers and potential customers from using our products. In addition, any such breach could cause us to incur costs to correct the breaches or failures, expose us to uninsured liability, increase our risk of regulatory scrutiny, subject us to lawsuits and result in the imposition of material penalties and fines.
In addition, we rely on information technology systems that we or our third-party providers operate to process, transmit and store electronic information in our day-to-day operations. A successful cyberattack or other cybersecurity incident could result in the theft or destruction of our operational, financial and other data, or other misappropriation of assets, or otherwise compromise our confidential or proprietary information and disrupt our operations. Cybersecurity incidents are increasing in their frequency, sophistication, level of persistence and intensity, and are being conducted by sophisticated and organized groups and individuals with a wide range of motives and expertise. Cyberattacks could include wrongful conduct by hostile foreign governments, industrial espionage, wire fraud and other forms of cyber fraud, the deployment of harmful malware, denial-of-service, ransomware, social engineering fraud or other means to threaten data security, confidentiality, integrity and availability. For example, in July 2023, we experienced a cybersecurity incident that caused a temporary disruption in accessing specific approval processes within our internal and independently functioning approval OA system. To mitigate the impact, we undertook several measures, including promptly restored a backup version. The OA system has no direct interface with other operational or financial systems, and no sensitive data leakage was reported up to the date of this annual report. We believe the impacts of the cybersecurity incident were immaterial. We may also experience cybersecurity incidents that may remain undetected for an extended period. A successful cyberattack could cause serious negative consequences for us, including, without limitation, the disruption of operations, the misappropriation of confidential business information, including financial information, trade secrets, financial loss and the disclosure of corporate strategic plans. Although we devote resources to protect our information systems, we realize that cybersecurity incidents are a threat, and there can be no assurance that our efforts will prevent cybersecurity incidents that would result in business, legal, financial or reputational harm to us, or would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
An accident involving a UAV provided by us or another manufacturer or operator could harm the UAV industry.
An accident involving a UAV provided by us or another manufacturer or operator could cause regulatory agencies around the world to tighten restrictions on the use of UAVs, particularly over-populated areas, and could cause the public to lose confidence in our products and UAVs generally. There are risks associated with autopilot, flight control, communications and other advanced technologies, and, from time to time, there have been accidents associated with these technologies. The safety of certain cutting-edge technologies depends in part on user interaction, and users may not be accustomed to using such technologies. We, the VIE or the VIE’s subsidiaries could face unfavorable and tightened regulatory control and intervention on the use of autopilot and other advanced technologies and be subject to liability and government scrutiny to the extent accidents associated with our autonomous navigation systems occur. Should a high-profile accident occur resulting in substantial casualty or damages, either involving our UAVs or products offered by other companies, public confidence in and regulatory attitudes toward UAVs could deteriorate. Any of the foregoing could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and growth prospects.
23
Table of Contents
We may be compelled to undertake product recalls or take other actions, which could adversely affect our brand image and results of operations.
Our products may not perform in line with customers’ expectations. Any product defects, accidents or any other failure of our products to perform as expected could harm our reputation and result in adverse publicity, revenue loss, delivery delays and product recalls, which could harm our brand and reputation. Any product recall or lawsuit seeking significant monetary damages either in excess of or outside of our insurance coverage may have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. In the future, we may, voluntarily or involuntarily, initiate a recall if any of our products, including any systems or components sourced from our suppliers, prove to be defective or noncompliant with applicable laws and regulations. Such recalls, whether voluntary or involuntary and whether caused by systems or components engineered or manufactured by us or our suppliers, could incur significant expenses and adversely affect our brand image in our target markets. They may also inhibit or prevent commercialization of our current and future product candidates.
We may become subject to product liability claims or warranty claims, which could harm our financial condition and liquidity if we are not able to successfully defend or insure against such claims.
We may be exposed to significant product liability claims if our products do not perform as expected or malfunction. Any defects, errors, or failures in our products or the misuse of our products, operating systems and infrastructure could also result in injury, death or property damage. Our risks in this area are particularly pronounced given we have limited field experience in the operation of our products. A successful product liability claim against us could require us to pay a substantial monetary award. Moreover, a product liability claim could generate substantial negative publicity about our products and business and inhibit or prevent commercialization of our current and future models. Our insurance coverage might not be sufficient to cover all potential product liability claims. In addition, the same level of insurance coverage may not be available in the future at economical prices, or at all. Even if we are fully insured as it relates to a claim, the claim could nevertheless diminish our brand and divert management’s attention and resources, which could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and result of operations.
We generally provide standard warranties on our products. The term of a warranty is between six months to three years, depending on the product line and the specific part or component. The occurrence of any material defects in our products could make us liable for damages and warranty claims. In addition, we could incur significant costs to correct any defects or other problems, including costs related to product recalls. Warranty claims may also lead to litigation. Any negative publicity related to the perceived quality of our products could affect our brand image, decrease retailer, distributor and customer demand, and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
If we fail to successfully develop and commercialize new products, services and technologies that are well received by customers, our operating results may be materially and adversely affected.
Our future growth depends on whether we can continually develop and introduce new generations of our existing product lines and update our operating systems and infrastructure with enhanced functionalities and value-added services. This is particularly important in the current industry landscape where technologies and consumer preferences evolve rapidly, which may shorten the lifecycles of our existing products. We plan to upgrade our current models and introduce new models in order to continue to provide products with the latest technologies. As technological advancements can be complex and costly, we could experience delays in the development and introduction of new products and services in the future.
Our ability to roll out new and innovative products and services depends on a number of factors, including significant investments in research and development, quality control of our products and services, effective management of our supply chain and required certifications. We may need to devote more resources to the research and development of new or enhanced products, services and technologies, which may reduce our profitability. In addition, our research and development efforts may not yield the benefits we expect to achieve in a timely manner, or at all. To the extent that we are unable to execute our strategy of continuously introducing new and innovative products, diversifying our product portfolio and satisfying consumers’ changing preferences, we may not be able to grow our user base, and our competitive position and results of operations may be adversely affected. Even if we are able to keep up with technological changes and develop new models, our prior models may as a result become obsolete sooner than expected, potentially reducing our return on investment.
24
Table of Contents
We have limited experience in managing sales to multiple countries and we are subject to a variety of costs and risks due to our continued international expansion.
We delivered six, eight and five EH216 series products abroad in 2023, 2024 and 2025, respectively. We have entered into sales contracts with customers outside China. In 2023, we delivered our EH216 series products to customers in Japan, Brazil, Columbia, Saudi Arab and Qatar. In 2024, we delivered our EH216 series products to customers in Japan, Brazil, the United Arab Emirates and the Dominican Republic. In 2025, we delivered five units of the EH216 series products to customers in Malaysia, Thailand, South Korea and Japan. As international expansion is one of our core strategies, we expect our international sales to increase in the future. In markets outside China, we generally have less experience in marketing, selling and deploying our products. International expansion has required and will continue to require us to invest significant capital and other resources, and our efforts may not be successful. International sales and operations are subject to risks such as:
• limited brand recognition;
• costs associated with establishing new distribution networks;
• difficulty in finding qualified partners for overseas distribution;
• inability to anticipate changes in local market conditions, economic landscapes, and consumers’ preferences and customs;
• difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations;
• lack of familiarity with and understanding of the local legal, regulatory and policy frameworks, as well as burdens of complying with a wide variety of local laws and regulations, including those governing personal data protection and safety control;
• political and economic instability;
• trade restrictions;
• differing employment laws and practices, as well as potential labor disruptions;
• the imposition of government controls;
• lesser degrees of intellectual property protection;
• tariffs and customs duties and the classifications of our goods by applicable governmental bodies; and
• a legal system subject to undue influence or corruption.
Additionally, to export our products to certain jurisdictions, we may face challenges in coordinating with both PRC and the applicable foreign governments and regulatory authorities. Moreover, our eVTOL products may be required to obtain a TC or other relevant certifications from the aviation authorities of the importing country before they can be commercially operated in those jurisdictions. The process of obtaining such certifications can be time-consuming, costly, and subject to significant uncertainty, as it often involves rigorous technical reviews and compliance with local aviation standards, which may differ from those in the PRC. Delays or failures in securing the necessary certifications could hinder or prevent our ability to export and commercialize our products in certain markets, and our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results may be materially and adversely impacted.
The failure to manage any of these risks could negatively affect our international business and consequently our overall business and operating results. In addition, the concern over these risks may also prevent us from entering into, or marketing, selling or releasing certain of our products and commercial solutions and related services in, certain markets.
25
Table of Contents
We may rely on some third-party distributors for sales, marketing and distribution activities relating to our products.
Some of our business partners act as third-party distributors that sell, market and distribute our products to their customers. Such third-party distributors may contribute a substantial portion of our revenue. When goods are shipped to distributor, who acknowledged the receipt of goods, control of the goods is transferred to the distributor. We recognize the revenue once control passes to the distributor, and other conditions as set out in ASC 606 are met. We started our distributor model in 2024. Accordingly, we may be subject to a number of risks associated with third-party distributors. If our distributors are not able to effectively distribute our products to their downstream customers, their future purchases from us and our financial performance may in turn be adversely affected. Besides, our distributors may engage in various forms of misconduct, even if we prohibit them from doing so in our agreements with them, including but not limited to, unauthorized sales of products or distribution into regions that violate exclusive distribution rights, unauthorized or improper use of our brand name, inadequate promotion of our products. In addition, third-party distributors may terminate their arrangements with us on limited or no notice, or may change the terms of these arrangements in a manner that is unfavorable to us for reasons outside of our control; and any disagreements with our third-party distributors could lead to costly and time-consuming litigation or arbitration.
Our operations may be interrupted by production difficulties or delays due to mechanical failures, utility shortages or stoppages, fire, natural disaster or other calamities at or near our facilities.
Production difficulties, such as capacity constraints, mechanical and systems failures and the need for equipment upgrades, may suspend our production and/or reduce our output. There can be no assurance that we will not experience problems with our production facilities in the future or that we will be able to address any such problems in a timely manner. Problems with key equipment in one or more of our production facilities may affect our ability to produce our products or cause us to incur significant expenses to repair or replace such equipment. Scheduled and unscheduled maintenance programs may affect our production output. Any of these could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
We depend on a continuous supply of utilities, such as electricity and water, to operate our production facilities. Any disruption to the supply of electricity or other utilities may disrupt our production, or cause the deterioration or loss of our inventory. This could adversely affect our ability to fulfill our sales orders and consequently may have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
In addition, we are vulnerable to natural disasters and other calamities such as hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, earthquakes and other adverse weather and climate conditions. Although we have servers that are hosted in an offsite location, our backup system does not capture data on a real-time basis, and we may be unable to recover certain data in the event of a server failure. We cannot assure you that any backup systems will be adequate to protect us from the effects of fire, floods, typhoons, earthquakes, power loss, telecommunications failures, break-ins, war, riots, terrorist attacks or similar events. Any of the foregoing events may give rise to interruptions, breakdowns, system failures, technology platform failures or internet failures, which could cause the loss or corruption of data or malfunctions of software or hardware as well as adversely affect our ability to provide services on our platform.
Our success depends on the continuing efforts of our key employees, including our senior management members and other key personnel. If we fail to hire, retain and motivate our key employees, we could lose the innovation, collaboration and focus that contribute to our business.
We believe that our success depends substantially on the continued efforts of our key employees, including our senior management members and other qualified and key personnel. We rely on our executive officers, senior management and key employees to generate business and execute programs successfully. In addition, the relationships and reputation that members of our management and key employees have established and maintain with government personnel contribute to our ability to maintain good customer relations and to identify new business opportunities. The loss of any key personnel or our failure to attract additional talent could reduce our employee retention, disrupt our research and development activities and operations, and impair our revenue growth and competitiveness. If one or more of our executive officers or key employees were unable or unwilling to continue their services with us, we might not be able to replace them easily, in a timely manner, or at all, and we might lose the innovation, collaboration and focus that contribute to our business.
26
Table of Contents
Our business and prospects depend significantly on our ability to build our EHang brand.
Our business and prospects are heavily dependent on our ability to build, maintain and strengthen the EHang brand. If we do not continue to establish, maintain and strengthen our brand, we may lose the opportunity to build a critical mass of customers. Promoting and positioning our brand will likely depend significantly on our ability to provide high-quality products and commercial solutions and engage with our customers as intended. In addition, we expect that our ability to develop, maintain and strengthen the EHang brand will also depend heavily on the success of our user development and branding efforts. Such efforts mainly include building a community of engaged online and offline users as well as other branding initiatives, such as product shows and events. To promote our brand, we may be required to change our user development and branding practices, which could result in substantially increased expenses. If we do not develop and maintain a strong brand, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results will be materially and adversely impacted.
Our EHang brand could be subject to adverse publicity if incidents related to our products occur or are perceived to have occurred, whether or not we are at fault. In particular, given the popularity of social media, including WeChat and Weibo in China, any negative publicity, regardless of its truthfulness, could quickly proliferate and harm consumer perceptions of and confidence in our brand. Furthermore, we may be affected by adverse publicity related to our manufacturing or other partners, whether or not such publicity is related to their collaboration with us. Our ability to successfully position our brand could also be adversely affected by perceptions of the quality of our partners’ products and services. In addition, from time to time, our products and commercial solutions are evaluated and reviewed by third parties. Any unfavorable reviews could adversely affect consumer perceptions of our products and commercial solutions.
In addition, our brand may be negatively impacted by the misuse or misrepresentation of the EHang name by third parties. For example, there have been instances where third parties have impersonated EHang employees to conduct commercial activities, which could mislead customers and damage our reputation. Furthermore, insufficient protection of our brand name has led to the registration of companies in various regions using the EHang name to engage in similar business activities. Such unauthorized use of our brand by unrelated entities may cause confusion in the market, dilute our brand value, and adversely affect consumer trust and our competitive position. If we are unable to effectively prevent or address these issues, our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.
Weather and seasonality may have a material adverse effect on our operations.
Our sales of products and commercial solutions may be affected by weather and seasonality. Our commercial solutions are mainly delivered outdoors. Customers may choose alternative transportation in severe weather conditions in consideration of safety factors, even if our products are able to endure such conditions. As a result, our business, financial condition and operating results may be materially and adversely impacted by the weather conditions. Our operating results may vary from period to period due to many factors, including seasonal factors that may have an effect on the demand for our commercial solutions in the future. As a result, our quarterly results of operations and financial position at the end of a particular quarter may not necessarily be representative of the results we expect at year-end or in other quarters of a year. Our operating results would suffer if we did not achieve revenues consistent with our expectations due to seasonal demand and weather changes because many of our expenses are based on anticipated levels of annual revenues.
Any decline in the business of our business partners or the deterioration of our relationship with them could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
We collaborate with various business partners to promote our products and commercial solutions. There can be no guarantee that those business partners will continue to collaborate with us in the future. If we are unable to maintain good relationships with our business partners, or the business of our business partners declines, the reach of our products and services may be adversely affected and our ability to maintain and expand our user base may decrease.
27
Table of Contents
Most of the agreements with our business partners do not prohibit them from working with our competitors or from offering competing services. If our partners change their standard terms and conditions in a manner that is detrimental to our business, or if our business partners decide not to continue working with us, or choose to devote more resources to supporting our competitors or their own competing products, we may not be able to find a substitute on commercially favorable terms, or at all, and our competitive advantages may diminish.
We rely on external suppliers for raw materials and certain key externally sourced components and parts used in the assembly of our products, and have limited control over the quality of these components and parts.
We purchase certain key externally sourced components and raw materials, such as computers chips, batteries, motors and electronic displays, from external suppliers for use in our assembly, production and operations of our products. A continuous and stable supply of components and raw materials that meet our standards is crucial to our assembly, production and operations. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our existing relationships with our suppliers and continue to be able to stably source key components and raw materials at reasonable prices, or at all. We have integrated our suppliers’ technologies within our products such that having to change to an alternative supplier may cause significant disruption to our operations. The supply of key components could be interrupted for any reason, or there could be significant increases in the prices of these key components. Additionally, changes in business conditions, force majeure, governmental changes and other factors beyond our control, or that we do not presently anticipate, could also affect our suppliers’ ability to deliver components to us on a timely basis. If any of these events occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may be materially and adversely affected.
We cannot guarantee that the quality of components and parts manufactured by external suppliers will be consistent and maintained at a high standard. Any defects of or quality issues with these components or any noncompliance incidents associated with these third-party suppliers could result in quality issues with our products and hence compromise our brand image and results of operations. In extreme situations, we may be exposed to liabilities as a result of significant damages caused by certain components from external suppliers and we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain sufficient insurance coverage at an acceptable cost in the future. A successful claim brought against us in excess of our available insurance coverage may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
Safety issues or public perceptions of safety issues concerning lithium-ion batteries could have a material adverse impact on our business.
The battery packs installed on our products make use of lithium-ion cells. On rare occasions, lithium-ion cells can rapidly release the energy they contain by venting smoke and flames in a manner that can ignite nearby materials as well as other lithium-ion cells. While the battery packs used for our products are designed to passively contain any single cell’s release of energy without spreading to neighboring cells, a field or testing failure of our products could occur, which could result in accidents, casualty or damages, and subject us to lawsuits, product recalls, and/or redesign efforts. Also, negative public perceptions regarding the suitability of lithium-ion cells for aircraft applications or any future incident involving lithium-ion cells, even if such incident does not involve our products, could seriously harm our business. In addition, we store a significant number of lithium-ion cells at our facilities. Any mishandling of battery cells may cause disruption to the operation of our facilities. While we have implemented safety procedures related to the handling of the cells, a safety issue or fire related to the cells could disrupt our operations. Such damage or injury could lead to adverse publicity and potentially a safety recall.
We rely on third-party logistics providers to deliver our domestic sales orders and certain overseas orders. Inadequate third-party logistics services or failure to mitigate the risks of damage or disruption to our distribution logistics could adversely affect our business.
Our ability to transport and sell our products is critical to our success across our operations. We typically rely on third-party logistics service providers to deliver our domestic sales orders and certain overseas orders. Damage or disruption to our distribution logistics due to disputes, weather, natural disasters, fire, explosions, terrorism, pandemics or labor strikes could impair our ability to distribute or sell our products. Inadequate third-party logistics services could also potentially disrupt our distribution and sales and compromise our business reputation. Failure to take adequate steps to mitigate the likelihood or potential impact of such events, or to effectively manage such events if they occur, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, as well as require additional resources to restore our supply chain.
28
Table of Contents
If we fail to comply with environmental protection and work safety laws and regulations, we could become subject to fines or penalties or incur costs that could harm our business.
We are subject to numerous environmental protection and work safety laws and regulations. For more details, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—PRC Regulation—Environmental Protection and Work Safety.” We also could incur significant costs associated with civil or criminal fines and penalties for failure to comply with such laws and regulations. Environmental and social laws and regulations have tended to become increasingly stringent. There has been increased global focus on environmental and social issues and it is possible that China may potentially adopt more stringent standards or new regulations in these areas. To the extent regulatory changes occur in the future, they could result in, among other things, increased costs to our company. In addition, we may incur substantial costs in order to comply with current or future environmental protection and work safety laws and regulations. These current or future laws and regulations may impair our research, development or production efforts. Our failure to comply with these laws and regulations also may result in substantial fines, penalties or other sanctions.
If our business partners, contractors, suppliers, sales agents, dealers or third-party logistics services providers fail to use ethical business practices and comply with applicable laws and regulations, our brand image could be harmed due to negative publicity beyond our own control.
Our reputation is sensitive to allegations of unethical business practices. We do not control the business practices of our business partners, independent contractors and suppliers, sales agents, dealers or third-party logistics services providers. Accordingly, we cannot guarantee their compliance with ethical business practices, such as environmental responsibilities, fair wage practices, and compliance with child labor laws, among others. A lack of demonstrated compliance could lead us to seek alternative suppliers, sales agents or dealers, which could increase our costs and result in delayed delivery of our products, product shortages or other disruptions of our operations. Violation of labor or other laws by our suppliers, business partners, sales agent, dealers or third-party logistics services suppliers or the divergence of their labor or other practices from those generally accepted as ethical in the markets in which we do business could also attract negative publicity, diminish our brand image and reduce demand for our products and commercial solutions.
If customers modify our products or operating systems, the products may not operate properly, which may cause damage, create negative publicity and harm our business.
Our customers may try to modify our products or operating systems for various reasons, which could compromise the performance and safety of our products, as well as the safety of their passengers. During such modifications, they may use third-party parts that may not be compatible with our products. We do not test, nor do we endorse, such modification. In addition, the use of improper external cabling or unsafe charging outlets can expose our customers to injury from product malfunctioning. Any injuries or damages resulting from such modifications or misuses could result in adverse publicity, which would negatively affect our brand and harm our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.
A new health epidemic could significantly disrupt our operations and adversely affect our results of operations.
Our business could be significantly affected by public health epidemics that may hit China and/or other countries where we sell our products, such as the outbreak of coronavirus, avian influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, Zika virus, Ebola virus or other disease. For example, the severity of the past COVID-19 pandemic resulted in lock-downs, travel restrictions and quarantines imposed by governments across the world and materially affected general commercial activities on a global scale. In 2022, we experienced delayed fulfillments from suppliers as well as reduced demand for our products from the tourism sector, which suffered disproportionately from the pandemic. The majority of our revenue generated from sales of the EH216 series products are from a limited number of customers that mainly operate our products in tourism locations in China, rather than in broad, mainstream commercial operations. Therefore, in 2021 and 2022, we faced delayed collection of our accounts receivable from some of our customers later than the due dates. A COVID-19 outbreak may result in these customers ceasing purchases, canceling or reducing orders for our products or services, or failing to make payments owed to us in a timely manner or at all, which may materially and adversely impact our business and result of operations. The COVID-19 pandemic had caused an economic downturn in many countries. Such general economic slowdown may reduce the demand for our products and services. Any future outbreak of a contagious disease, and other adverse public health developments may restrict economic activities in affected regions, resulting in reduced business volume, temporary closure of our production facilities and offices or otherwise disrupt our business operations and adversely affect our results of operations.
29
Table of Contents
Heightened tensions in international relations, particularly between the United States and China, may adversely impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Recently there have been heightened tensions in international relations, particularly between the United States and China. These tensions have affected both diplomatic and economic ties among countries. Heightened tensions could reduce levels of trade, investments, technological exchanges, and other economic activities between the major economies. The existing tensions and any further deterioration in the relationship between the United States and China may have a negative impact on the general, economic, political, and social conditions in both countries and, given our reliance on the Chinese market, adversely impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
On August 9, 2023, the Biden administration released an executive order and an advanced notice of proposed rule-making, providing a conceptual framework for the Outbound Investment Security Program (“OISP”) focused on China. On June 21, 2024, the U.S. Department of the Treasury, or the Treasury, issued a proposed rule for the OSIP. On October 28, 2024, the Treasury issued a Final Rule to implement the executive order of August 9, 2023. The Final Rule became effective on January 2, 2025. The Final Rule targets investments by U.S. persons that involve natural persons and entities associated with “countries of concern,” currently China, including Hong Kong and Macau, and it imposes investment prohibition and notification requirements on a wide range of investments in companies engaged in certain types of activities relating to three sectors: (1) advanced microchips and microelectronics, (2) quantum computing, and (3) artificial intelligence systems, or collectively the Covered Activities, with persons from countries of concern engaged in these Covered Activities defined as “Covered Foreign Persons.” The OISP could apply to certain U.S. persons (including their controlled foreign entities, if applicable) outside the United States who may participate in investments through offshore transactions in accordance with Regulation S. Investments by U.S. persons subject to the Final Rule, which are defined as “covered transactions,” include acquisitions of equity interests, certain debt financing, joint ventures, and certain investments as a limited partner in a non-U.S. person pooled investment fund. The Final Rule excludes some investments from the scope of covered transactions, including those in publicly traded securities listed on a national stock exchange. The Final Rule is aimed at exerting greater U.S. government oversight over U.S. direct and indirect investments involving China, and may introduce new hurdles and uncertainties for cross-border collaborations, investments, and funding opportunities of China-based issuers including us. Because we are not involved in any Covered Activities, including that our aircraft do not rely on AI systems such as machine learning, neural networks or generative models for takeoff, navigation and landing, we do not believe that we are a Covered Foreign Person under the Final Rule. Accordingly, we do not believe that the Final Rule’s prohibitions and notification requirements are applicable to our securities offerings. However, if we were to be deemed a Covered Foreign Person engaged in Covered Activities, the Final Rule could limit our ability to raise capital from U.S. investors generally, in which case our ability to raise such capital may be significantly and negatively affected, which could be detrimental to our business, financial condition and prospects.
The OISP may be changed by executive actions of the U.S. government, including changes to the scope of activities and technologies applicable to notifiable or prohibited transactions or the scope and the availability of exceptions to the OISP’s prohibitions or notification requirements. Specifically, on January 20, 2025, the U.S. government issued a national security presidential memorandum, entitled “America First Trade Policy,” which, among other things, directs the Secretary of the Treasury and several other executive departments and offices of the U.S. government to review the OISP to determine if it includes “sufficient controls to address national security threats” and to determine whether the executive order implementing the OISP “should be modified or rescinded and replaced.” In addition, on February 21, 2025, U.S. President Donald J. Trump issued a memo entitled the “America First Investment Policy,” or the America First Memo. The America First Memo states that Executive Order 14105 is under review by President Trump’s administration and that the review will consider new or expanded restrictions on United States outbound investment in the PRC in sectors such as semiconductors, artificial intelligence, quantum, biotechnology, hypersonics, aerospace, advanced manufacturing, directed energy, and other areas implicated by the PRC’s national Military-Civil Fusion strategy. The America First Memo also states that the review will consider applying restrictions on a range of investment types including investments in publicly traded securities from sources including pension funds, university endowments and other limited partner investors. If related regulatory requirements are imposed in the future, they could be detrimental to U.S.-China relations, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and prospects.
30
Table of Contents
We, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries may need to defend ourselves against claims of intellectual property infringement, which may be time-consuming and costly.
Companies, organizations or individuals, including our competitors, may hold or obtain patents, trademarks or other proprietary rights that would prevent, limit or interfere with our ability to make, use, develop, sell or market our products, operating systems and infrastructure or their components, which could make it more difficult for us to operate our business. Companies holding patents or other intellectual property rights may bring suits alleging infringement of such rights by us, the VIE or the VIE’s subsidiaries or otherwise assert their rights against us, the VIE or the VIE’s subsidiaries. Moreover, our, the VIE’s or its subsidiaries’ applications and uses of trademarks relating to design, software or artificial intelligence technologies could be found to infringe upon existing trademark ownership and rights. We, the VIE or the VIE’s subsidiaries may also fail to apply for key trademarks in a timely manner. For example, there are some precedent registrations by several other Chinese companies of the trademark “ 亿航 ” (the Chinese characters for our brand, “EHang”) for vehicles and bicycles, which fall into the same class of products as remote aerial vehicles and aerospace transportation. Although we received a favorable judgement in a proceeding relating to such precedent registrations, we may continue to face intellectual property infringement claims in the future.
If we, the VIE or the VIE’s subsidiaries are determined to have infringed upon a third party’s intellectual property rights, the VIE or the VIE’s subsidiaries may be required to do one or more of the following:
• cease selling, incorporating certain components into, or using products or offering goods or services that incorporate or use the challenged intellectual property;
• pay substantial damages;
• seek a license from the holder of the infringed intellectual property right, which license may not be available on reasonable terms or at all;
• redesign our, the VIE’s or its subsidiaries’ products, operating systems and infrastructure, components or services; or
• establish and maintain alternative branding for our, the VIE’s or its subsidiaries’ products and services.
In the event of a successful claim of infringement against us, the VIE or the VIE’s subsidiaries and our, the VIE’s or its subsidiaries’ failure or inability to obtain a license to the infringed technology or other intellectual property right, our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, any litigation or claims, even if frivolous, could result in substantial costs, negative publicity and diversion of resources and management attention.
Our or the VIE’s intellectual property rights may not protect us effectively.
As of December 31, 2025, we and the VIE together owned 506 issued patents, 324 pending patent applications, 698 registered trademarks, and 25 registered software copyrights in relation to our and the VIE’s technologies. We cannot assure you that our or the VIE’s pending patent applications will be granted. Even if our or the VIE’s applications are successful, patents may be contested, circumvented or invalidated in the future.
In addition, the rights granted under any issued patents may not provide us with proprietary protection or competitive advantages. The claims under any patents that are issued from our or the VIE’s patent applications may not be broad enough to prevent others from developing technologies that are similar or that achieve results similar to ours or the VIE’s. It is also possible that the intellectual property rights of others could bar us or the VIE from licensing and exploiting any patents that are issued from our or the VIE’s pending applications. Numerous patents and pending patent applications owned by others exist in the fields in which we and the VIE have developed and are developing our technologies. These patents and patent applications might have priority over our or the VIE’s patent applications and could subject our or the VIE’s patent applications to invalidation. Finally, in addition to those who may claim priority, any of our or the VIE’s existing or pending patents may also be challenged by others on the basis that they are otherwise invalid or unenforceable.
31
Table of Contents
Implementation and enforcement of PRC laws on intellectual property rights have historically been deficient and ineffective. Accordingly, protection of intellectual property rights in China may not be as effective as in the United States or other developed countries. Furthermore, policing unauthorized use of proprietary technologies is difficult and expensive. We and the VIE rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and restrictions on disclosure to protect our and the VIE’s intellectual property rights. Despite our efforts to protect our and the VIE’s proprietary rights, third parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our or the VIE’s intellectual property or seek court declarations that they do not infringe upon our or the VIE’s intellectual property rights. Any unauthorized use of our or the VIE’s intellectual property by third parties may adversely affect our current and future revenues and our reputation. Monitoring unauthorized use of our and the VIE’s intellectual property is difficult and costly, and we cannot assure you that the steps we or the VIE have taken or will take will prevent misappropriation of our and the VIE’s intellectual property. From time to time, we or the VIE may have to resort to litigation to enforce our and the VIE’s intellectual property rights, which could result in substantial costs and diversion of our resources.
Failure to safeguard personal information could subject us to penalties, damage our reputation and brand, and harm our business and results of operations.
Through our UAVs, app and command-and-control systems, we log information about each UAV’s use, such as charge time, battery usage, mileage and location information, in order to aid us in vehicle diagnostics, repair and maintenance, as well as to help us customize and optimize the flying experience. Images and videos captured by cameras attached to our UAVs are stored on our servers, servers of third-party cloud storage providers or other servers designated by our customers. We, therefore, process, including but not limited to collect, store, process, use, transfer, provide, disclose and delete, personal data from our users in order to better understand and serve our users. Such personal data processing also enables our content feeds recommendation. Possession and use of our users’ flying behavior and data in conducting our business may subject us to legislative and regulatory oversight in China and other jurisdictions, such as the European Union and the United States. For example, in January 2018, the European Union promulgated the General Data Protection Regulation to further protect fundamental rights in privacy and personal information so that members of the general public have more control over their personal information. Regulations in relevant jurisdictions may require us to obtain user consent for the collection of personal information, restrict our use of such personal information and hinder our ability to expand our user base. In the event of a data breach or other unauthorized access to our user data, we may have obligations to notify users about the incident and we may need to provide some form of remedy for the individuals affected by the incident.
Concerns or claims about our practices with regard to the processing of personal information or other privacy-related matters, even if unfounded, could damage our reputation and results of operations. In the PRC, governmental authorities have enacted a series of laws and regulations to enhance the protection of privacy and data. The PRC Constitution, the PRC Criminal Law, the Civil Code of the PRC, the Cybersecurity Law of the PRC and relevant regulations require network operators, which may include us, to ensure the security and stability of the services provided via network and protect individual privacy and the security of personal data in general by requiring the consent of internet users prior to the processing of their personal data. Under the Cybersecurity Law, the owners and administrators of networks and network service providers are subject to various personal information security protection obligations, including restrictions on the collection and use of personal information of users, and they are required to take steps to prevent personal data from being divulged, stolen, or tampered with. Regulatory requirements regarding the protection of personal information are constantly evolving and can be subject to differing interpretations or significant changes, making the extent of our responsibilities in that regard uncertain. For example, on June 10, 2021, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, or SCNPC, promulgated the Data Security Law of the People’s Republic of China, or the Data Security Law, effective from September 1, 2021. The Data Security Law provides that data processing activities that affects or may affect national security shall be subject to a data security review procedure. On July 6, 2021, the General Office of the CPC Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council jointly promulgated the Opinions on Strictly Cracking Down on Illegal Securities Activities, which called for a heightened scrutiny over overseas-listed China-based companies of their compliance with the laws and regulations regarding data security, cross-border data flow and management of confidential information, and such laws and regulations are expected to undergo further changes, which may require increased information security responsibilities and stronger cross-border information management mechanism and process. We may need to adjust our business to comply with data security requirements and other laws and regulations from time to time.
32
Table of Contents
On August 20, 2021, the SCNPC promulgated the Personal Information Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China, or the Personal Information Protection Law, which integrates the scattered rules with respect to personal information rights and privacy protection and took effect on November 1, 2021. We may be required to make further adjustments to our business practices to comply with the personal information protection laws and regulations.
On November 14, 2021, the CAC publicly solicited opinions on the Administration Regulations on Cyber Data Security (Draft for Comments), or the Draft Data Security Regulations. On September 24, 2024, PRC State Council promulgated the Administration Regulations on Cyber Data Security, or the Cyber Data Security Regulation, which became effective on January 1, 2025. The Cyber Date Security Regulation stipulates that network data processors processing personal information of more than 10 million users shall also comply with the provisions governing important data processor, including but not limited to: important data processor shall specify the person in charge of network data security and the management body for network data security. The management body for network data security shall perform the following responsibilities of network data security protection: (a) formulating and implementing network data security management systems and operation procedures as well as emergency response plans for network data security incidents; (b) organizing activities such as network data security risk monitoring, risk assessment, emergency drills, publicity, education and training on a regular basis, and promptly disposing of network data security risks and incidents; and (c) accepting and handling complaints and reports about network data security. In addition, the person in charge of network data security shall have professional knowledge of network data security and relevant management experience and shall be a member of the management team of the network data processor, with the right to directly report the situation of network data security to the relevant competent authority. Any failure, or perceived failure to maintain the security of our user data or to comply with applicable PRC or foreign privacy, data security and personal information protection laws and obligations may result in civil or regulatory liability, including governmental or data protection authority enforcement actions and investigations, fines, penalties, enforcement orders requiring us to cease operating in a certain way, litigation, or adverse publicity, and may require us to expend significant resources in responding to and defending allegations and claims.
On December 31, 2021, the CAC, together with other regulatory authorities, published the Administrative Provisions on Algorithm Recommendation for Internet Information Services, or the Administrative Provisions on Algorithm Recommendation, effective on March 1, 2022. Pursuant to the Administrative Provisions on Algorithm Recommendation, users should be given an option to easily turn off algorithm recommendation services, and service providers shall, among others, establish and improve the management systems and technical measures for algorithm driven recommendation mechanism and regularly review, evaluate and verify the principle, models, data and application results of algorithms. The Company will closely monitor the regulatory development and adjust its business operation from time to time to comply with the regulations over algorithm.
Pursuant to the National Security Law issued by SCNPC on July 1, 2015, the state shall establish a national security review and supervision system to review, among other things, foreign investment, key technologies, internet and information technology products and services, and other important activities that are likely to impact national security of China. On December 28, 2021, the CAC together with other regulatory authorities officially announced the Cybersecurity Review Measures, which is consistent with the Cybersecurity Review Measures (Revision Draft for Comment) announced by the CAC on July 10, 2021. Pursuant to the Cybersecurity Review Measures, the procurement of network products and services by critical information infrastructure operators and the data processing activities conducted by network platform operators which affects or may affect national security shall be subject to cybersecurity review. Network platform operators mastering personal information of more than one million users must apply to the Cybersecurity Review Office for cybersecurity review if they intend to be listed abroad. On July 30, 2021, the State Council promulgated the Regulations on Security Protection of Critical Information Infrastructure, or the CIIO Regulations, which became effective on September 1, 2021. Pursuant to the CII Regulations, critical information infrastructure refers to any important network facilities or information systems of an important industry or field such as public communication and information service, energy, transport, water conservation, finance, public services, e-government affairs, science and technology industry for national defense and other industries and sectors that may seriously endanger national security, people’s livelihood and public interest in case of damage, function loss or data leakage. In addition, relevant administration departments of each critical industry and sector are responsible for formulating eligibility criteria and determining the critical information infrastructure in the respective industry or sector. The operators will be informed about the final determination as to whether they are categorized as critical information infrastructure operators, or CIIOs. As of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F, no detailed rules or interpretations have been issued and we have not been informed as a CIIO by any governmental authorities. Furthermore, the exact scope of CIIOs, under the current regulatory regime remains unclear, and the PRC governmental authorities may have discretion in the interpretation and enforcement of these laws and regulations. Therefore, it is uncertain whether we would be deemed as a CIIO under PRC law. If we are identified as CIIO, we will be subject to stricter requirements on business operations and cybersecurity compliance, and we may need to follow cybersecurity review procedure and apply with Cybersecurity Review Office before making certain purchases of network products and services, and if a cybersecurity review is applicable, we may be required to suspend providing any existing or new services to our users, and we may experience other disruptions of our operations.
33
Table of Contents
In addition, the PRC regulatory authorities have recently taken steps to strengthen the regulations on data protection and conducted several rounds of relevant inspections. We have not been informed by the CAC of any further requirements of rectification. As laws and regulations in China on the protection of privacy and data are constantly evolving, complying with new laws and regulations could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices in a manner materially adverse to our business.
Despite our efforts to comply with applicable laws, regulations and other obligations relating to privacy, data protection and information security, it is possible that our practices, offerings or platform could fail to meet certain requirements imposed on us by such laws, regulations or obligations. Any failure on our part to comply with applicable laws or regulations or any other obligations relating to privacy, data protection or information security, or any compromise of security that results in unauthorized access, collection, transfer, use or release of personally identifiable information or other data, or the perception or allegation that any of the foregoing types of failure or compromise has occurred, could damage our reputation, discourage new and existing users from using our platform or result in investigations, fines, suspension of our app, or other penalties by government authorities and private claims or litigation, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the interpretation and application of the aforementioned laws and regulations are often uncertain and in flux. Our practice may become inconsistent with these laws and regulations.
Our platform and internal systems depend on the ability of software and hardware developed and maintained internally and/or by third parties to store, retrieve, process and manage immense amounts of data, including personal information or other privacy-related matters. The software and hardware on which we rely may now or in the future contain undetected programming errors, bugs, or vulnerabilities which may result in errors or compromise our ability to protect the data of our users and in turn adversely affect our business, financial condition and operation results. Any systems failure or compromise of security that results in the unauthorized access to or release of the data, photo or messaging history of our users could significantly limit the adoption of our services, as well as harm our reputation and brand, result in litigation or regulatory investigations against us, and we could be subject to material liability or penalties. Additionally, we connect our platform with software development kit provided by third parties who may also process users’ data. The integrity of our user data also depends on their ability to secure and protect the data they process. The risk that these types of events could seriously harm our business is likely to increase as we expand the scope of services we offer and as we increase the size of our user base.
We may also become subject to laws and regulations affecting data protection, data privacy and/or information security in other jurisdictions by virtue of having users who reside in these jurisdictions, even if we do not have a physical presence there. Many jurisdictions have in the past adopted, and may in the future adopt, new laws and regulations, or amendments to existing laws and regulations, affecting data protection, data privacy and/or information security, such as the General Data Protection Regulation, or the GDPR, adopted by the European Union that became fully effective on May 25, 2018. The interpretation and application of these laws or regulations are often uncertain and in flux. We cannot guarantee you that our practice is consistent with these laws and regulations and our practice may become inconsistent with these laws and regulations; if so, we could be subject to fines and orders requiring that we change our practices, which could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Complying with new data laws and regulations could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices in a manner materially adverse to our business.
34
Table of Contents
If users allege that we have improperly used, released or disclosed their personal information, we could face legal claims and reputational damage. We may incur significant expenses to comply with privacy, consumer protection and security standards and protocols imposed by law, regulation, industry standards or contractual obligations. A major breach of our network security and systems could create serious negative consequences for our business and future prospects, including possible fines, penalties, reduced customer demand for our products, and harm to our reputation and brand. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—PRC Regulation” for further details.
The execution of our business plans requires a significant amount of capital. In addition, our future capital needs may require us to sell additional equity or debt securities that may dilute the equity interests of our shareholders or introduce covenants that may restrict our operations or our ability to pay dividends.
We will need significant capital to, among other things, conduct research and development, expand our manufacturing capacity, roll out new products and solutions and provide commercial services. We may also need significant capital to maintain our existing property and equipment. We believe that our balances of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted short-term deposits as of December 31, 2025 will be sufficient to meet our sustainable operations and material cash requirements, including capital expenditures, for at least the 12 months after the date of this annual report. Our expected sources of capital include both equity and debt financing. However, financing might not be available to us in a timely manner or on acceptable terms, or at all.
Our ability to obtain the necessary financing to carry out our business plan is subject to a number of factors, including general market conditions and investor acceptance of our business plans. These factors may make the timing, amount, terms and conditions of such financing unattractive or unavailable to us. If we are unable to raise sufficient funds, we will have to significantly reduce our spending, delay or cancel our planned activities, substantially change our current corporate structure, or even curtail or discontinue our operations.
In addition, our future capital needs and other business concerns could require us to sell additional equity or debt securities or obtain a credit facility. The sale of additional equity or equity-linked securities could dilute the equity interests of our shareholders. Additional indebtedness would increase our debt-service obligations and may be accompanied by covenants that would restrict our operations or our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.
We are subject to risks associated with strategic alliances or acquisitions. If we cannot manage the growth of our business or execute our strategies effectively, our business and prospects may be materially and adversely affected.
We have entered into strategic alliances with various business partners, and may in the future enter into joint research and development agreements or co-branding agreements with third parties to further our business purpose from time to time. These alliances could subject us to a number of risks, including risks associated with sharing proprietary information, non-performance by the third parties and increased expenses in establishing new strategic alliances, any of which may materially and adversely affect our business. We may have limited ability to monitor or control the actions of these third parties. If any of these strategic third parties suffer negative publicity or harm to their reputation from events relating to their business, we may also suffer negative publicity or harm to our reputation by virtue of our association with any such third party.
Although we currently do not have any specific acquisition plans, if appropriate opportunities arise, we may acquire additional assets, products, technologies or businesses that are complementary to our existing business. In addition to any required shareholders’ approval, we may also have to obtain approvals and licenses from relevant government authorities for the acquisitions and to comply with any applicable PRC laws and regulations, which could result in delays and increased costs, and may derail our business strategies if we fail to do so. Furthermore, past and future acquisitions and the subsequent integration of new assets and businesses into our own require significant attention from our management and could result in a diversion of resources from our existing business, which in turn could have an adverse effect on our business operations. Acquired assets or businesses may not generate the financial results we expect. Acquisitions could result in the use of substantial amounts of cash, potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, the occurrence of significant goodwill impairment charges, amortization expenses for other intangible assets and exposure to potential unknown liabilities of the acquired business. Moreover, the costs of identifying and consummating acquisitions may be significant.
35
Table of Contents
Our business could be adversely affected by trade tariffs or other trade barriers.
In recent years, the U.S. government imposed additional tariffs on goods from China, including new tariffs implemented in 2025. In response, China has imposed retaliatory tariffs on goods imported from the United States. Additionally, the European Union has imposed tariffs on imports of eVTOL aircraft originating from China. Historically, we had a limited scale of sales in Europe, North America, and South America. Revenue from these regions was relatively small and exhibited a decreasing trend, which has ceased entirely following the abovementioned 2025 tariff actions. Up to the date of this annual report, we did not have any other operations in the U.S. In addition, we currently do not plan to export our products to the United States or the European Union, and the potential impact of these tariffs on our business remains uncertain. Nonetheless, rising trade tensions, elevated tariffs, and other trade restrictions could significantly affect global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets. These factors could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries have limited insurance coverage, which could subject us to significant costs and business disruption.
We, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries have limited liability insurance coverage for our products and business operations. We may not be able to secure additional product liability insurance coverage on acceptable terms or at reasonable costs when needed. A successful liability claim against us, the VIE or the VIE’s subsidiaries due to injuries or damages suffered by our users could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and reputation. Even if unsuccessful, such a claim could cause us adverse publicity, require substantial costs to defend, and divert the time and attention of our management. In addition, we do not have any business disruption insurance. Any business disruption could result in substantial cost to us and diversion of our resources. Furthermore, China, the United States or any other jurisdiction relevant to our business may impose requirements for maintaining certain minimum liability or other insurance relating to the operation of our products. Such insurance policies could be costly, which would reduce the demand for our products. In addition, even where commercial insurance is available and maintained by operators of our products, such coverage may not be sufficient to fully cover all potential losses or liabilities arising from the operation of our eVTOL aircraft, given the novel nature of the technology and the evolving regulatory and risk landscape.
We identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting which, if not remediated appropriately or timely, could affect our ability to accurately report our results of operations, meet our reporting obligations or prevent fraud, and investor confidence in our company and the market price of the ADSs may be materially and adversely affected.
In connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2025, we and our independent registered public accounting firm, identified one material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. As defined in the standards established by the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, a “material weakness” is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
The material weakness identified is related to our lack of effective controls over revenue from air mobility solutions. Specifically, we did not effectively assess the probability to collect substantially all of the consideration from the customers prior to recognizing revenue. This material weakness, resulted in material errors in our previously announced unaudited financial information for the interim and annual periods, see “Item 15. Controls and Procedures-Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting”. Following the identification of the material weakness, we are in the process of designing and implementing measures to improve our internal control over financial reporting to remediate the material weakness. If our remedial measures are insufficient to address the material weaknesses, or if additional material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting are discovered or occur in the future, our financial statements may contain material misstatements and we could be required to restate our financial results.
We are subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or Section 404, requires that we include a report from management on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in our annual report on Form 20-F. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm must attest to and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
During the course of documenting and testing our internal control procedures, in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404, we may identify other weaknesses and deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting. If we fail to maintain the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404. Generally speaking, if we fail to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment, it could result in material misstatements in our financial statements and could also impair our ability to comply with applicable financial reporting requirements and related regulatory filings on a timely basis. As a result, our businesses, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, as well as the trading price of the ADSs, may be materially and adversely affected. Additionally, ineffective internal control over financial reporting could expose us to increased risk of fraud or misuse of corporate assets and subject us to potential delisting from the stock exchange on which we list, regulatory investigations and civil or criminal sanctions. We may also be required to restate our financial statements from prior periods.
36
Table of Contents
We are subject to anti-corruption, anti-bribery, anti-money laundering, financial and economic sanctions and similar laws, and noncompliance with such laws can subject us to administrative, civil and criminal fines and penalties, collateral consequences, remedial measures and legal expenses, all of which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and reputation.
We are subject to anti-corruption, anti-bribery, anti-money laundering, financial and economic sanctions and similar laws and regulations in various jurisdictions in which we conduct our business or sell our products, including the PRC anti-corruption laws and regulations, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA, the U.K. Bribery Act 2010, and other anti-corruption laws and regulations. The FCPA and the U.K. Bribery Act 2010 prohibit us and our officers, directors, employees and business partners acting on our behalf, including agents, from corruptly offering, promising, authorizing or providing anything of value to a “foreign official” for the purposes of influencing official decisions or obtaining or retaining business or otherwise obtaining favorable treatment. The FCPA also requires companies to make and keep books, records and accounts that accurately reflect transactions and dispositions of assets and to maintain a system of adequate internal accounting controls. The U.K. Bribery Act 2010 also prohibits non-governmental “commercial” bribery and soliciting or accepting bribes. The PRC anti-corruption laws and regulations prohibit bribery to government agencies, state or government owned or controlled enterprises or entities, to government officials or officials that work for state or government owned enterprises or entities, as well as bribery to non-government entities or individuals. There is uncertainty in connection with the implementation of PRC anti-corruption laws. A violation of these laws or regulations could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and reputation.
We have direct or indirect interactions with officials and employees of government agencies and state-owned affiliated entities in the ordinary course of business. We have also entered into joint ventures and/or other business partnerships with government agencies and state-owned or affiliated entities. These interactions subject us to an increased level of compliance-related concerns. We are in the process of implementing policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance by us and our directors, officers, employees, representatives, consultants, agents and business partners with applicable anti-corruption, anti-bribery, anti-money laundering, financial and economic sanctions and similar laws and regulations. However, our policies and procedures may not be sufficient, and our directors, officers, employees, representatives, consultants, agents, and business partners could engage in improper conduct for which we may be held responsible.
Non-compliance with anti-corruption, anti-bribery, anti-money laundering or financial and economic sanctions laws could subject us to whistleblower complaints, adverse media coverage, investigations, and severe administrative, civil and criminal sanctions, collateral consequences, remedial measures and legal expenses, all of which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and reputation. In addition, changes in economic sanctions laws in the future could adversely impact our business and investments in our shares.
We are involved in litigation from time to time and, as a result, we could incur substantial judgments, fines, legal fees or other costs.
We may be the subject of complaints or litigation from customers, suppliers, employees or other third parties for various actions. For example, we received a judgment against us in a dispute with a former employee and entered into a settlement with the former employee in April 2023. The damages sought against us in some of these litigation proceedings could be substantial. We cannot assure you that we will always have meritorious defenses to the plaintiffs’ claims. While the ultimate effect of these legal actions cannot be predicted with certainty, our reputation and the result of operations could be negatively impacted. The proceedings we may be involved in from time to time, could incur substantial judgments, fines, legal fees or other costs and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. See “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.”
Our and the VIE’s leased property interest may be defective and our right to lease the properties may be challenged, which could cause significant disruption to our business.
We and the VIE lease all the premises used in our operations from third parties. We and the VIE require the landlords’ cooperation to effectively manage the condition of such premises, buildings and facilities. In the event that the condition of the office premises, buildings and facilities deteriorates, or if any or all of our and the VIE’s landlords fail to properly maintain and renovate such premises, buildings or facilities in a timely manner or at all, the operation of our offices could be materially and adversely affected.
Moreover, certain lessors have not provided us and the VIE with valid ownership certificates or authorization of sublease for our and the VIE leased properties. Under the relevant PRC laws and regulations, if the lessors are unable to obtain certificate of title because such properties were built illegally or failed to pass the inspection or other reasons, such lease contracts may be recognized as void and as a result, we and the VIE may be required to vacate the relevant properties. In addition, if our and the VIE’s lessors are not the owners of the properties and they have not obtained consents from the owners or their lessors or permits from the relevant government authorities, our and the VIE’s leases could be invalidated. If this occurs, we and the VIE may have to renegotiate the leases with the owners or the parties who have the right to lease the properties, and the terms of the new leases may be less favorable to us and the VIE, or we and the VIE may be required to vacate the relevant properties if the terms of the new leases are not reached. We and the VIE may enter into new lease contracts with the lessors, and the terms of the new leases may be less favorable to us and the VIE, or we and the VIE may be required to vacate the relevant properties if the terms of the new leases are not reached.
Under PRC laws, all lease agreements are required to be registered with the local housing authorities. We and the VIE have not registered certain of our lease agreements with the relevant government authorities. Failure to complete these required registrations may expose our and the VIE’s landlords, lessors, us and the VIE to potential monetary fines.
37
Table of Contents
We have granted, and may continue to grant, restricted share units and other types of awards under our share incentive plan, which may result in increased share-based compensation expenses.
We adopted the 2015 Share Incentive Plan, or the 2015 Plan, the 2019 Share Incentive Plan, or the 2019 Plan, and the 2023 Share Incentive Plan, or the 2023 Plan (collectively, the “Plans”), to incentivize our employees, directors and consultants and align their interests with ours. We recognize expenses in our consolidated statement of loss in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Under the Plans, we are authorized to grant restricted share units and other types of awards. As of the date of this annual report, the maximum number of ordinary shares that may be issued pursuant to all awards granted under the 2015 Plan, the 2019 Plan, and the 2023 Plan is 8,867,053, 14,141,558, and 16,413,255, respectively. As of March 31, 2026, 6,041,825 restricted share units and 6,685,317 share options had been granted and were outstanding under the Plans. As of December 31, 2025, our unrecognized share-based compensation expenses relating to unvested awards amounted to RMB405,988 thousand (US$58,056 thousand), comprising RMB271,598 thousand (US$38,838 thousand) related to RSUs and RMB134,390 thousand (US$19,218 thousand) related to share options.
We believe the granting of share-based awards is of significant importance to our ability to attract and retain key personnel and employees, and we will continue to grant share-based awards to employees in the future. However, the number of shares reserved for issuance under our share incentive plan may not be sufficient to recruit new employees and to compensate existing employees. Furthermore, prospective candidates and existing employees often consider the value of the equity awards they receive in connection with their employment. Thus, our ability to attract or retain highly skilled employees may be adversely affected by declines in the perceived value of our equity or equity awards. To attract and retain qualified employees, our expenses associated with share-based compensation may increase, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
38
Table of Contents
It may be difficult for overseas authorities to conduct investigations or collect evidence within China.
Shareholder claims or regulatory investigations that are common in the United States may be subject to PRC laws and regulations. For example, in China, there are significant legal and other obstacles to providing information needed for regulatory investigations or litigations initiated outside China. Although the authorities in China may establish a regulatory cooperation mechanism with the securities regulatory authorities of another country or region to implement cross-border supervision and administration, such cooperation with the securities regulatory authorities in the United States may not be fully efficient in the absence of a mutual and practical cooperation mechanism. Furthermore, according to Article 177 of the PRC Securities Law, which became effective in March 2020, no overseas authorities, including the SEC, the PCAOB, and the U.S. Department of Justice, can directly conduct investigation or evidence collection activities within the PRC and no entity or individual in China may provide documents and information relating to securities business activities to overseas authorities without PRC government approval. On August 26, 2022, the PCAOB signed a Statement of Protocol with the China Securities Regulatory Commission and the Ministry of Finance of the People’s Republic of China, taking the first step toward opening access for the PCAOB to inspect and investigate registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong. The Statement of Protocol gives the PCAOB sole discretion to select the firms, audit engagements and potential violations it inspects and investigates and put in place procedures for PCAOB inspectors and investigators to view complete audit work papers with all information included and for the PCAOB to retain information as needed. In addition, the Statement of Protocol grants the PCAOB direct access to interview and take testimony from all personnel associated with the audits the PCAOB inspects or investigates. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB issued a report that vacated its December 16, 2021 determination that the positions taken by authorities in mainland China and Hong Kong prevented it from inspecting and investigating completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in those jurisdictions. However, the PCAOB may still lose such access to inspect and investigate completely accounting firms in mainland China and Hong Kong in the future. As of now, the general inability for overseas authorities to directly conduct investigation or evidence collection activities within China may further increase difficulties faced by you in protecting your interests.
Risks Relating to Our Corporate Structure
If the PRC government finds that the contractual arrangements between the WFOE, the VIE and the VIE’s shareholders do not comply with PRC regulations relating to the relevant industries, or if these regulations or the interpretation of existing regulations change in the future, we could be subject to penalties or be forced to relinquish our interests in those operations.
In January 2016, we obtained a controlling financial interest in the VIE because the WFOE entered into a series of contractual arrangements with the VIE and the VIE’s shareholders, which enable us to (i) have the power to direct significant activities of the VIE, (ii) receive economic benefits from the VIE that potentially could be significant to the VIE, and (iii) have an exclusive option to purchase all or part of the equity interests and assets in the VIE, when and to the extent permitted by PRC laws. As a result of these contractual arrangements, we are considered the primary beneficiary of the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries and thus consolidate their financial results under U.S. GAAP. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—C. Organizational Structure” for further details.
Our PRC legal counsel, Zhong Lun Law Firm, based on its understanding of the relevant laws and regulations, is of the opinion (i) the ownership structures of the WFOE and the VIE are in compliance with applicable PRC laws and regulations currently in effect; and (ii) each of the contractual arrangement is valid, legal and binding on the parties thereto under applicable PRC Laws currently in effect, and each party to the contractual arrangement is entitled to assert its respective rights and is obligated to perform its respective duties in accordance with the terms and conditions of each contractual arrangement, subject to applicable PRC Laws currently in effect. However, our PRC legal counsel has also advised us that there are certain uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current and future PRC laws, regulations and rules, and it remains uncertain whether any new PRC Laws pertaining to the VIE arrangements under the contractual arrangements will be adopted, or if adopted, their potential impact on such VIE arrangements. Accordingly, the PRC regulatory authorities may take a view that is contrary to the opinion of our PRC legal counsel.
If we or the VIE are found to be in violation of any existing or future PRC laws or regulations, or fail to obtain or maintain any of the required permits or approvals, the relevant PRC regulatory authorities would have discretion to take action in dealing with such violations or failures, including:
• revoking the business licenses and/or operating licenses of such entities;
39
Table of Contents
• shutting down our servers or blocking our website, or discontinuing or placing restrictions or onerous conditions on our operation through any transactions between the WFOE and the VIE;
• imposing fines, confiscating the income from the WFOE or the VIE, or imposing other requirements with which we or the VIE may not be able to comply;
• requiring us to restructure our ownership structure or operations, including terminating the contractual arrangements with the VIE and deregistering the equity pledges of the VIE, which in turn would affect our ability to consolidate, derive economic interests from, or to direct the significant activities of the VIE;
• restricting or prohibiting our use of the proceeds of our securities offerings to finance our business and operations in China, and taking other regulatory or enforcement actions that could be harmful to our business;
• confiscating any of our income deemed to be obtained through illegal operations;
• discontinuing or placing restrictions or onerous conditions on our operations;
• imposing additional conditions or requirements with which we may not be able to comply; or
• taking other regulatory or enforcement actions against us that could be harmful to our business.
The imposition of any of these penalties would result in a material and adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business. In addition, it is unclear what impact the PRC government actions would have on us and on our ability to consolidate the financial results of the VIE in our consolidated financial statements, if the PRC government authorities were to find our legal structure and contractual arrangements to be in violation of PRC laws and regulations. If the imposition of any of these government actions causes us to lose our right to direct the activities of the VIE or our right to receive substantially all the economic benefits and residual returns from the VIE and we are not able to restructure our ownership structure and operations in a satisfactory manner, we would no longer be able to direct the significant activities of over or consolidate the financial results of the VIE in our consolidated financial statements. Either of these results, or any other significant penalties that might be imposed on us in this event, would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our business may be significantly affected by the Foreign Investment Law.
On March 15, 2019, the National People’s Congress promulgated the Foreign Investment Law, which took effect on January 1, 2020 and replaced the trio of existing laws regulating foreign investment in China, namely, the PRC Equity Joint Venture Law, the PRC Cooperative Joint Venture Law and the Wholly Foreign-owned Enterprise Law, together with their implementation rules and ancillary regulations. Uncertainties still exist in relation to the interpretation and implementation of the Foreign Investment Law. The Foreign Investment Law does not explicitly classify whether variable interest entities that are controlled via contractual arrangements would be deemed as foreign invested enterprises if they are ultimately “controlled” by foreign investors. However, it has a catch-all provision under definition of “foreign investment” to include investments made by foreign investors in China through means stipulated by laws or administrative regulations or other methods prescribed by the State Council. Therefore, it still leaves leeway for future laws, administrative regulations or provisions to provide for contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment.
The Foreign Investment Law grants foreign invested entities the same treatment as PRC domestic entities, except for those foreign invested entities that operate in industries deemed to be either “restricted” or “prohibited” in the “negative list” to be published. The Foreign Investment Law provides that only foreign invested entities operating in foreign restricted or prohibited industries will require entry clearance and other approvals that are not required by PRC domestic entities or foreign invested entities operating in other industries. Pursuant to the latest version of the “negative list,” namely, the Special Management Measures (Negative List) for the Access of Foreign Investment (2024), which became effective on November 1, 2024, our principal business does not fall into “negative list” in respect of the “restricted” or “prohibited” categories for foreign investment. However, we cannot assure you that the “negative list” will not be updated in the future in any way adverse to our business. In the event that the VIE’s and/or its subsidiaries’ operations in the PRC are not treated as domestic investment and the contractual arrangement between the WFOE, the VIE and the VIE’s shareholders are classified as foreign investment in the “restricted” or “prohibited” industry in the “negative list” under the Foreign Investment Law, such contractual arrangements may be deemed as invalid and illegal, and we may be required to unwind such contractual arrangements and/or deconsolidate the financial results of the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries under U.S. GAAP.
40
Table of Contents
Furthermore, if future laws, administrative regulations or provisions mandate further actions to be taken by companies with respect to existing contractual arrangements, we may face substantial uncertainties as to whether we can complete such actions in a timely manner, or at all. In addition, the Foreign Investment Law provides that existing foreign invested enterprises established according to the existing laws regulating foreign investment may maintain their structure and corporate governance within five years after the implementation of the Foreign Investment Law, which means that we may be required to adjust the structure and corporate governance of certain of our PRC entities then. Failure to take timely and appropriate measures to cope with any of these or similar regulatory compliance challenges could materially and adversely affect our current corporate structure, corporate governance and business operations.
We rely on contractual arrangements with the VIE and the VIE’s shareholders for certain business operations in the PRC, which may not be as effective as direct ownership in providing operational control.
The VIE and its subsidiaries accounted for 7.9%, 1.2% and 1.6% of our consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2024 and 2025, respectively, after elimination of inter-company transactions. While we do not expect the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries to generate a significant portion of revenue on a consolidated basis, we have relied on and expect to continue to rely on contractual arrangements with the WFOE, the VIE and the VIE’s shareholders for certain business operations in the PRC. These contractual arrangements may not be as effective as direct ownership in providing us with over the power to direct the significant activities of the VIE. For example, the VIE and the VIE’s shareholders could breach their contractual arrangements with us by, among other things, failing to conduct the operations of the VIE in an acceptable manner or taking other actions that are detrimental to our interests.
If we had direct ownership in the VIE, we would be able to exercise our rights as shareholders to effect changes in the directors and senior management of the VIE, which in turn could implement changes, subject to any applicable fiduciary obligations, at the management and operational level. However, under the current contractual arrangements, we rely on the performance by the VIE and the VIE’s shareholders of their respective obligations under the contracts to direct the significant activities of the VIE. The VIE’s shareholders may act in a manner against the best interests of our company and may breach their obligations under these contracts. Such risks exist throughout the period in which we intend to operate certain portions of our business through the contractual arrangements with the VIE. If any dispute relating to these contracts remains unresolved, we will have to enforce our rights under these contracts through the operations of PRC laws and arbitrations, litigations and other legal proceedings and therefore will be subject to uncertainties in the PRC legal system. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Corporate Structure—Any failure by the VIE or the VIE’s shareholders to perform their obligations under our contractual arrangements with them would have a material and adverse effect on our business.” Therefore, our contractual arrangements with the VIE may not be as effective in ensuring our power to direct the significant activities of the VIE as direct ownership in the VIE would be.
Any failure by the VIE or the VIE’s shareholders to perform their obligations under our contractual arrangements with them would have a material and adverse effect on our business.
The WFOE has entered into a series of contractual arrangements with the VIE and the VIE’s shareholders. For a description of these contractual arrangements, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—C. Organizational Structure.” If the VIE or the VIE’s shareholders fail to perform their respective obligations under the contractual arrangements, we may have to incur substantial costs and expend additional resources to enforce such arrangements. We may also have to rely on legal remedies under PRC laws, including seeking specific performance or injunctive relief, and claiming damages, which may be difficult to enforce under PRC laws. For example, if the shareholders of the VIE refuse to transfer their equity interest in the VIE to us or our designee if we exercise the purchase option pursuant to these contractual arrangements, or if they otherwise act in bad faith toward us, then we may have to take legal actions to compel them to perform their contractual obligations.
41
Table of Contents
All of the agreements under our contractual arrangements are governed by PRC laws and provide for the resolution of disputes through arbitration in China. Accordingly, these contracts would be interpreted in accordance with PRC laws and any disputes would be resolved in accordance with PRC legal procedures. The legal system in the PRC is not as developed as in some other jurisdictions, such as the United States. As a result, uncertainties in the PRC legal system could limit our ability to enforce these contractual arrangements. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Doing Business in China—Uncertainties in the interpretation and enforcement of PRC laws and regulations could limit the legal protections available to you and us.” Meanwhile, there are very few precedents and little formal guidance as to how contractual arrangements in the context of a VIE should be interpreted or enforced under PRC laws. There remain significant uncertainties regarding the ultimate outcome of such arbitration should legal action become necessary. In addition, under PRC laws, rulings by arbitrators are final, parties cannot appeal the arbitration results in courts, and if the losing parties fail to carry out the arbitration awards within a prescribed time limit, the prevailing parties may only enforce the arbitration awards in PRC courts through arbitration award recognition proceedings, which would require additional expenses and delays. In the event we are unable to enforce these contractual arrangements, or if we suffer significant delays or other obstacles in the process of enforcing these contractual arrangements, we may not be able to direct the significant activities of the VIE, and our ability to conduct certain business through the VIE may be materially and adversely affected.
The shareholders of the VIE may have potential conflicts of interest with us, which may materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.
The shareholders of the VIE are Mr. Weixian Xia and Mr. Huazhi Hu, each a senior employee of our company. Conflicts of interest may arise from them in their roles as employees of our company and as shareholders of the VIE. The VIE’s shareholders may breach, or cause the VIE to breach, or refuse to renew, the existing contractual arrangements we have with them and the VIE, which would have a material and adverse effect on our ability to direct the significant activities of the VIE and receive economic benefits from them. For example, the shareholders may be able to cause our agreements with the VIE to be performed in a manner adverse to us by, among other things, failing to remit payments due under the contractual arrangements to us on a timely basis. We cannot assure you that when conflicts of interest arise any or all of these shareholders will act in the best interests of our company or such conflicts will be resolved in our favor.
Currently, we do not have any arrangements to address potential conflicts of interest between these shareholders and our company, except that we could exercise our purchase option under the exclusive option agreements with these shareholders to request them to transfer all of their equity interests in the VIE to a PRC entity or individual designated by us, to the extent permitted by PRC laws. The shareholders of the VIE have executed powers of attorney to appoint the WFOE to vote on their behalf and exercise voting rights as shareholders of the VIE, and such rights were reassigned to us in March 2021. If we cannot resolve any conflicts of interest or disputes between us and the shareholders of the VIE, we would have to rely on legal proceedings, which may be expensive, time-consuming and disruptive to our operations. There is also substantial uncertainty as to the outcome of any such legal proceedings.
The shareholders of the VIE may be involved in personal disputes with third parties or other incidents that may have an adverse effect on their respective equity interests in the VIE and the validity or enforceability of our contractual arrangements with them. For example, in the event that any shareholder of the VIE divorces his or her spouse, the spouse may claim that the equity interest of the VIE held by such shareholder is part of their community property and should be divided between such shareholder and his or her spouse. If such claim is supported by the court, the relevant equity interest may be obtained by the shareholder’s spouse or another third party who is not subject to obligations under our contractual arrangements, which could result in a loss of our power to direct the significant activities of the VIE. In addition, a judicial freeze was placed on the equity interests of the VIE in connection with an arbitration filed by a third party against Mr. Huazhi Hu, our founder, chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer, who was also a former shareholder of the VIE. The arbitration arose from a financial dispute between the third party and Mr. Huazhi Hu, and was unrelated to our company. The third party did not have any claim against the VIE. The VIE was involved in the arbitration only because the third party regarded equity interests of the VIE as potential assets of shareholders of the VIE. The parties to the arbitration have reached a settlement. In March 2021, the third party filed a petition with the court and the judicial freeze on the VIE’s equity interests had been released. In addition to the aforementioned arbitration, in October 2020, the VIE paid a guarantee deposit to a court in Guangzhou, China to lift the judicial freeze. For details, see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions.” If any of the equity interests of the VIE is similarly claimed by a third party with whom the current contractual arrangements are not binding, we could lose our power to direct the significant activities of the VIE or have to maintain such power by incurring unpredicted costs, which could cause significant disruption to our business and operations and harm our financial condition and results of operations.
42
Table of Contents
Contractual arrangements in relation to the VIE may be subject to scrutiny by the PRC tax authorities and they may determine that we or the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries, owe additional taxes, which could negatively affect our financial condition and the value of your investment.
Under applicable PRC laws and regulations, arrangements and transactions among related parties may be subject to audit or challenge by the PRC tax authorities. The Enterprise Income Tax Law requires every enterprise in China to submit its annual enterprise income tax return together with a report on transactions with its related parties to the relevant tax authorities. The tax authorities may impose reasonable adjustments on taxation if they have identified any related party transactions that are inconsistent with arm’s length principles. We may face material and adverse tax consequences if the PRC tax authorities determine the contractual arrangements among the WFOE, the VIE and the VIE’s shareholders were not entered into on an arm’s length basis in such a way as to result in an impermissible reduction in taxes under applicable PRC laws, rules and regulations, and adjust the income of the VIE in the form of a transfer pricing adjustment. A transfer pricing adjustment could, among other things, result in a reduction of expense deductions recorded by the VIE for PRC tax purposes, which could increase our tax expenses. In addition, the PRC tax authorities may impose late payment fees and other penalties on the VIE for the adjusted but unpaid taxes according to the applicable regulations. Our financial position could be materially and adversely affected if the VIE’s tax liabilities increase or if it is required to pay late payment fees and other penalties.
We may lose the ability to use and enjoy assets held by the VIE that are material to certain business operations in the PRC if the VIE goes bankrupt or becomes subject to a dissolution or liquidation proceeding.
As part of our contractual arrangements with the VIE, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries hold certain assets that are material to certain business operations in the PRC, including permits, domain names and IP rights, operating licenses, intangible assets and fixed assets. If the VIE goes bankrupt and all or part of its assets become subject to liens or rights of third-party creditors, we may be unable to continue some or all of our business activities, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Under the contractual arrangements, the VIE may not, in any manner, sell, transfer, mortgage or dispose of its assets or legal or beneficial interests in the business without our prior consent. If our consolidated affiliated entity undergoes a voluntary or involuntary liquidation proceeding, the independent third-party creditors may claim rights to some or all of these assets, thereby hindering our ability to operate our business, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our dual-class share structure with different voting rights will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and could discourage others from pursuing any change of control transactions that holders of our Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may view as beneficial.
Our authorized share capital is divided into Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares. In respect of matters requiring the votes of shareholders, holders of Class B ordinary shares are entitled to ten votes per share, while holders of Class A ordinary shares are entitled to one vote per share based on our dual-class share structure. Each Class B ordinary share is convertible into one Class A ordinary share at any time by its holder, while Class A ordinary shares are not convertible into Class B ordinary shares under any circumstances. Upon any sale, transfer, assignment or disposition of any Class B ordinary shares by their holder or a change of ultimate beneficial ownership of any Class B ordinary share to any person other than our founder, Mr. Huazhi Hu, or an affiliate controlled by our founder, such Class B ordinary shares shall be automatically and immediately converted into the same number of Class A ordinary shares.
As of March 31, 2026, Mr. Huazhi Hu, our founder, chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer, beneficially owned all of our issued and outstanding Class B ordinary shares. These Class B ordinary shares constituted approximately 25.7% of our total issued and outstanding share capital and 77.6% of the aggregate voting power of our total issued and outstanding share capital as of March 31, 2026. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—E. Share Ownership.”
43
Table of Contents
Although we have no current plan to issue additional Class B ordinary shares, our board of directors has the authority without further action by our shareholders to issue additional Class B ordinary shares, which will further dilute the voting power of our Class A ordinary shareholders. As a result of the dual-class share structure and the concentration of ownership, our founder has considerable influence over matters such as mergers, consolidations and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, election of directors, amendments to organizational documents and other significant corporate actions. Our founder may take actions that are not in the best interest of our other shareholders. This concentration of ownership may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company, which could have the effect of depriving our other shareholders of the opportunity to receive a premium for their shares as part of a sale of our company and may reduce the price of our ADSs. This concentrated control will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and could discourage others from pursuing any potential merger, takeover or other change of control transactions that holders of Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may view as beneficial.
In addition, our founder will continue to be able to control all matters submitted to our shareholders for approval even if his shareholdings represent substantially less than a majority of our outstanding common shares. This concentrated control will limit your ability to influence corporate matters for the foreseeable future, and, as a result, the market price of our Class A common shares could be adversely affected.
In July 2017, FTSE Russell and Standard & Poor’s announced that they would cease to allow most newly public companies utilizing dual- or multi-class capital structures to be included in certain of their indices. Affected indices include the Russell 2000 and the S&P 500, S&P MidCap 400 and S&P SmallCap 600, which together comprise the S&P Composite 1500. Under the announced policies, our dual-class share structure would make us ineligible for inclusion in any of these indices, and as a result, mutual funds, exchange-traded funds and other investment vehicles that attempt to passively track these indices will not be investing in our shares, which may depress these valuations or depress our trading volume compared to those of other similar companies that are included in these indices.
Risks Relating to Doing Business in China
The PRC government’s oversight over our and the VIE’s business operation could result in a material adverse change in our operations and the value of the ADSs.
We conduct business operations in China primarily through our PRC subsidiaries. Our and the VIE’s operations in China are governed by PRC laws and regulations. The PRC government’s oversight over our and the VIE’s business operation could result in a material adverse change in our and the VIE’s operations and the value of the ADSs. The Chinese government may intervene or influence our operations, or may adjust policies over offerings conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in China-based issuers, which could result in a material change in our operations and/or the value of the ADSs. Any actions by the Chinese government to exert more oversight and control over offerings that are conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in China-based issuers could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or become worthless.
There are uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of PRC laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, the laws and regulations governing our and the VIE’s business, or the enforcement and performance of our contractual arrangements with the VIE. These laws and regulations may be subject to change, and the rules and policies in China may evolve over time, which could result in a material adverse change in our operations and the value of the ADSs. New laws and regulations that affect existing and proposed future businesses may also be applied retroactively. Due to the uncertainty and complexity of the regulatory environment, we cannot assure you that we and the VIE would always be in full compliance with applicable laws and regulations, the violation of which may have adverse effect on our and the VIE’s business and our reputation.
Uncertainties in the interpretation and enforcement of PRC laws and regulations could limit the legal protections available to you and us.
The PRC legal system is a civil law system based on written statutes. Like other civil law jurisdictions, prior court decisions may be cited for reference but have limited precedential value in China. The PRC legal system continues to evolve, and its current framework may not cover all aspects of economic activities in China, including such activities that relate to or have an impact on our business. Implementation and interpretations of laws, regulations and rules involve uncertainties.
44
Table of Contents
From time to time, we, the VIE or the VIE’s subsidiaries may have to resort to administrative and court proceedings to enforce our legal rights. However, since PRC administrative and court authorities have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing statutory and contractual terms, it may be more difficult to evaluate the outcome of administrative and court proceedings and the level of protection we, the VIE or the VIE’s subsidiaries enjoy than in more developed legal systems. Furthermore, the PRC legal system is based in part on government policies and internal rules (some of which are not published in a timely manner or at all) that may have a retroactive effect. As a result, we, the VIE or the VIE’s subsidiaries may not always be aware of any potential violation of these policies and rules until sometime after the violation. Such uncertainties, including unpredictability towards the scope and effect of our, the VIE or the VIE’s subsidiaries’ contractual, property (including intellectual property) and procedural rights, and any failure to respond to changes in the regulatory environment in China could materially and adversely affect our business and impede our ability to continue our operations.
We may be adversely affected by changes in PRC regulations on technology companies.
The PRC government imposes licensing and permit requirements for companies in the technology industry. These laws, regulations and announcements continue to evolve, and their interpretation and enforcement involve certain uncertainties. As a result, in certain circumstances it may be difficult to determine what actions or omissions may be deemed to be in violation of applicable laws and regulations.
In addition, our mobile application is regulated by the Administrative Provisions on Mobile Internet Applications Information Services, or the App Provisions, promulgated by the Cyberspace Administration of China, or the CAC, effective on August 1, 2016. According to the App Provisions, the providers of mobile applications shall not create, copy, publish or distribute information and content that is prohibited by laws and regulations. However, we cannot assure that all the information or content displayed on, retrieved from or linked to our mobile applications complies with the requirements of the App Provisions at all times. If our mobile applications were found to be violating the App Provisions, we may be subject to administrative penalties, including warnings, service suspensions or removal of our mobile applications from relevant mobile application stores, which may materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.
The interpretation and application of existing PRC laws, regulations and policies and possible new laws, regulations or policies relating to the technology industry, particularly the policies relating to new energy vehicles, have created certain uncertainties regarding the legality of existing and future foreign investments in, and the businesses and activities of, internet businesses in China, including our business. We cannot assure you that we have obtained all the permits or licenses required for conducting our business in China or will be able to maintain or renew our existing licenses or obtain new ones.
Uncertainties exist with respect to the interpretation and implementation of the PRC Foreign Investment Law and its Implementation Regulations and how they may impact the viability of our current corporate structure, corporate governance and business operations.
The National People’s Congress approved the PRC Foreign Investment Law, or the Foreign Investment Law, on March 15, 2019 and the State Council approved the Regulation on Implementing the Foreign Investment Law, or the Implementation Regulations on December 12, 2019, effective from January 1, 2020, to replace prior laws regulating foreign investment in China, namely, the Sino-foreign Equity Joint Venture Enterprise Law, the Sino-foreign Cooperative Joint Venture Enterprise Law and the Wholly Foreign-invested Enterprise Law, together with their implementation rules and ancillary regulations. The Foreign Investment Law embodies an expected PRC regulatory trend to rationalize its foreign investment regulatory regime in line with prevailing international practice and the legislative efforts to unify the corporate legal requirements for both foreign and domestic investments. However, since the Foreign Investment Law and the Implementation Regulations are relatively new, uncertainties still exist in relation to its interpretation and implementation. For instance, under the Foreign Investment Law, “foreign investment” refers to the investment activities directly or indirectly conducted by foreign individuals, enterprises or other entities in China. Though it does not explicitly classify contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment, there is no assurance that foreign investment via contractual arrangement would not be interpreted as a type of indirect foreign investment activities under the definition in the future. In addition, the definition contains a catch-all provision which includes investments made by foreign investors through means stipulated in laws or administrative regulations or other methods prescribed by the State Council. Therefore, it still leaves leeway for future laws, administrative regulations or provisions promulgated by the State Council to provide for contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment. In any of these cases, it will be uncertain whether our contractual arrangements will be deemed to be in violation of the market access requirements for foreign investment under the PRC laws and regulations. Furthermore, if future laws, administrative regulations or provisions prescribed by the State Council mandate further actions to be taken by companies with respect to existing contractual arrangements, we may face substantial uncertainties as to whether we can complete such actions in a timely manner, or at all. Failure to take timely and appropriate measures to cope with any of these or similar regulatory compliance challenges could materially and adversely affect our current corporate structure, corporate governance and business operations.
45
Table of Contents
The approval of and the filing with the CSRC or other PRC governmental authorities may be required in connection with our future offshore offerings under PRC law and if required, we cannot predict whether or how soon we will be able to obtain such approval or complete such filing.
On February 17, 2023, the CSRC issued rules and regulations concerning the filing management of overseas listing, which came into effect on March 31, 2023, which include the Provisional Measures for the Administration of Overseas Issuance and Listing of Securities by Domestic Enterprises, or the New Filing Rules, and five supporting guidelines. The New Filing Rules dictate that enterprises that have been listed overseas prior to March 31, 2023 constitute “Existing Issuers.” Existing Issuers are required to complete filing procedure with the CSRC if and when they pursue any refinancing activities, securities offerings and listings outside of Mainland China, including but not limited to follow-on offerings, secondary listings, and listing by introduction in a different market, unless such securities are issued as equity incentive awards or in connection with conversion of public reserve funds into increased company capital, share dividends or share split. Although we are an Exiting Issuer and accordingly are not required to complete filing with the CSRC immediately, we may be subject to the CSRC filing procedures in the future in connection with our refinancing or other activities and, if required, we cannot predict whether we will be able to complete such filing procedures in time or at all. If we fail to complete such filing procedures, we may not conduct refinancing or other activities which are subject to the New Filing Rules, or we would be subject to sanctions by the CSRC or other PRC regulatory authorities. These regulatory authorities may impose fines and penalties on our operations in China, limit our ability to pay dividends outside of China, limit our operating activities in China, delay or restrict the repatriation of the proceeds from our offshore offerings into China or take other actions that could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects, as well as the trading price of the ADSs. In addition, there remains uncertainties as to the interpretation, application, and enforcement of the New Filing Rules and how they will affect our operations and our future financing. We cannot guarantee that new rules or regulations promulgated in the future will not impose any additional requirements on us or otherwise tighten the regulations on companies with VIE structures.
The ADSs will be delisted and prohibited from trading in the U.S. under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, or the HFCAA, if the PCAOB is unable to inspect or fully investigate auditors located in China.
Pursuant to the HFCAA, if the SEC determines that we have filed audit reports issued by a registered public accounting firm that has not been subject to inspections by the PCAOB for two consecutive years, the SEC will prohibit our shares or ADSs from being traded on a national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter trading market in the United States.
On December 16, 2021, the PCAOB issued a report to notify the SEC of its determination that the PCAOB was unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong and our auditor was subject to that determination. On May 26, 2022, the SEC conclusively listed us as a Commission-Identified Issuer under the HFCAA following the filing of our annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB removed mainland China and Hong Kong from the list of jurisdictions where it is unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms.
46
Table of Contents
Each year, the PCAOB will determine whether it can inspect and investigate completely audit firms in mainland China and Hong Kong, among other jurisdictions. If the PCAOB determines in the future that it no longer has full access to inspect and investigate completely accounting firms in mainland China and Hong Kong and we use an accounting firm headquartered in one of these jurisdictions to issue an audit report on our financial statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, we would be identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer following the filing of the annual report on Form 20-F for the relevant fiscal year. In accordance with the HFCAA, our securities would be prohibited from being traded on a national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter trading market in the United States if we are identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer for two consecutive years in the future. If our shares and ADSs are prohibited from trading in the United States, there is no certainty that we will be able to list on a non-U.S. exchange or that a market for our shares will develop outside of the United States. A prohibition of being able to trade in the United States would substantially impair your ability to sell or purchase the ADSs when you wish to do so, and the risk and uncertainty associated with delisting would have a negative impact on the price of the ADSs. Also, such a prohibition would significantly affect our ability to raise capital on terms acceptable to us, or at all, which would have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and prospects.
Increases in labor costs and enforcement of stricter labor laws and regulations in the PRC may adversely affect our business and our profitability.
China’s overall economy and the average wage level in China have increased in recent years and are expected to continue to grow. The average wage level for our employees has also increased in recent years. We expect that our labor costs, including wages and employee benefits, will continue to increase. Unless we are able to pass on these increased labor costs to our customers, our profitability and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
In addition, we have been subject to stricter regulatory requirements in terms of entering into labor contracts with our employees and paying various statutory employee benefits, including pensions, housing funds, medical insurance, work-related injury insurance, unemployment insurance and maternity insurance to designated government agencies for the benefit of our employees. Pursuant to the PRC Labor Contract Law and its implementation rules, employers are subject to stricter requirements in terms of signing labor contracts, minimum wages, paying remuneration, determining the term of employee’s probation and unilaterally terminating labor contracts. In the event that we decide to terminate some of our employees or otherwise change our employment or labor practices, the PRC Labor Contract Law and its implementation rules may limit our ability to effect those changes in a desirable or cost-effective manner, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
In October 2010, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress promulgated the PRC Social Insurance Law, which came into effect on July 1, 2011. In April 1999, the State Council promulgated the Regulations on the Administration of Housing Funds, which was amended in March 2002. Companies registered and operating in China are required under the Social Insurance Law and the Regulations on the Administration of Housing Funds to, apply for social insurance registration and housing fund deposit registration within 30 days of their establishment and, to pay for their employees’ different social insurance including pension insurance, medical insurance, work-related injury insurance, unemployment insurance and maternity insurance to the extent required by law. Recently, the PRC government enhanced its measures relating to social insurance collection, which lead to stricter enforcement.
On July 31, 2025, the PRC Supreme People’s Court promulgated the Interpretation (II) on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Labor Dispute Cases, which took effect on September 1, 2025. Pursuant to this interpretation, where an employer and an employee agree or the employee undertakes that social insurance contributions need not to be paid, the court shall deem such agreement or undertaking invalid. Where an employer fails to pay social insurance premiums in accordance with the law, and the employee requests to terminate the employment contract and for the employer to pay economic compensation, the people’s court shall uphold such requests in accordance with the law. The introduction of new judicial interpretations or changes in regulatory guidance in the future may result in certain aspects of our operations being deemed not fully compliant with evolving labor laws and regulations. We could be ordered by the competent labor authorities for rectification, and failure to comply with such orders may further subject us to administrative fines.
As the interpretation and implementation of labor-related laws and regulations are still evolving, we cannot assure you that our employment practices do not and will not violate labor-related laws and regulations in China, which may subject us to labor disputes or government investigations. We cannot assure you that we have complied or will be able to comply with all labor-related laws and regulations including those relating to obligations to make social insurance payments and contribute to the housing provident funds. We have not fully paid the social insurance payment and housing provident funds for all of our employees as required by applicable PRC regulations. We may be required to make up the contributions for our employees, and may be further subjected to late fees payment and administrative fines, resulting in financial condition and results of operations to be adversely affected.
We have made full provisions in respect of the outstanding amount of the social insurance fund contributions for current employees. As of the date of this annual report, we had not received any notification from the relevant PRC authorities requiring us to pay any shortfall with respect to the social insurance fund or imposing any administrative penalties on us, nor were we aware of any material employee complaints or involved in any material labour disputes with our employees with respect to the social insurance fund.
47
Table of Contents
We rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our PRC subsidiaries to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have, and any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to make payments to us could have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business.
We are a holding company, and we rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our PRC subsidiaries for our cash and financing requirements, including the funds necessary to pay dividends and other cash distributions to our shareholders and service any debt we may incur. If our PRC subsidiaries incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict its ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to us.
Under PRC laws and regulations, wholly foreign-owned enterprises in China, such as the WFOE, may pay dividends only out of their respective accumulated after-tax profits as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, a wholly foreign-owned enterprise is required to set aside at least 10% of its accumulated after-tax profits each year, if any, to fund certain statutory reserve funds, until the aggregate amount of such funds reaches 50% of its registered capital. At its discretion, a wholly foreign-owned enterprise may allocate a portion of its after-tax profits based on PRC accounting standards to staff welfare and bonus funds. These reserve funds and staff welfare and bonus funds are not distributable as cash dividends.
Our ability to pay dividends is primarily dependent on receiving distributions of funds from our PRC subsidiaries, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries. Relevant PRC statutory laws and regulations permit payments of dividends by our PRC subsidiaries, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries only out of their retained earnings, if any, as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. The results of operations reflected in the consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP differ from those reflected in the statutory financial statements of our PRC subsidiaries, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries.
In response to the persistent capital outflow and the Renminbi’s depreciation against the U.S. dollar, the People’s Bank of China and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or SAFE, have implemented a series of capital control measures, including stricter vetting procedures for China-based companies to remit foreign currency for overseas acquisitions, dividend payments and shareholder loan repayments. The PRC government may continue to strengthen its capital controls, and the WFOE’s dividends and other distributions may be subjected to tighter scrutiny in the future. Any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us could materially and adversely limit our ability to grow, make investments or acquisitions that could be beneficial to our business, pay dividends, or otherwise fund and conduct our business.
PRC regulation of loans to and direct investment in PRC entities by offshore holding companies and governmental control of currency conversion may delay or prevent us from using the proceeds of our offshore offerings to make loans to or make additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries, the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries, which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.
We are an offshore holding company conducting our operations in China through our PRC subsidiaries, VIE and its subsidiaries. We may make loans to our PRC subsidiaries, VIE and its subsidiaries, or we may make additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries, or we may establish new PRC subsidiaries and make capital contributions to these new PRC subsidiaries, or we may acquire offshore entities with business operations in China in an offshore transaction.
48
Table of Contents
Most of these activities are subject to PRC regulations and approvals. For example, loans by us to our wholly owned PRC subsidiaries to finance their activities cannot exceed statutory limits and must be registered with the local counterpart of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or SAFE. If we decide to finance our wholly owned PRC subsidiaries by means of capital contributions, these capital contributions are subject to the requirement of making necessary filings in the Foreign Investment Comprehensive Management Information System and registration with other governmental authorities in China. Due to the restrictions imposed on loans in foreign currencies extended to any PRC domestic companies, we are not likely to make such loans to the VIE, which is a PRC domestic company. SAFE promulgated the Circular on the Reforming of the Management Method of the Settlement of Foreign Currency Capital of Foreign-invested Enterprises, or SAFE Circular 19, effective on June 1, 2015, in replacement of the Circular on the Relevant Issues Concerning the Launch of Reforming Trial of the Administration Model of the Settlement of Foreign Currency Capital of Foreign-Invested Enterprises, the Notice From the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Relevant Issues Concerning Strengthening the Administration of Foreign Exchange Businesses, and the Circular on Further Clarification and Regulation of the Issues Concerning the Administration of Certain Capital Account Foreign Exchange Businesses. According to SAFE Circular 19, the flow and use of the RMB capital converted from foreign currency-denominated registered capital of a foreign-invested company is regulated such that RMB capital may not be used for the issuance of RMB entrusted loans, the repayment of inter-enterprise loans or the repayment of banks loans that have been transferred to a third party. Although SAFE Circular 19 allows RMB capital converted from foreign currency-denominated registered capital of a foreign-invested enterprise to be used for equity investments within China, it also reiterates the principle that RMB capital converted from the foreign currency-denominated capital of a foreign-invested company may not be directly or indirectly used for purposes beyond its business scope. Thus, it is unclear whether SAFE will permit such capital to be used for equity investments in China in actual practice. SAFE promulgated the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Reforming and Standardizing the Foreign Exchange Settlement Management Policy of Capital Account, or SAFE Circular 16, effective on June 9, 2016, which reiterates some of the rules set forth in SAFE Circular 19, but changes the prohibition against using RMB capital converted from foreign currency-denominated registered capital of a foreign-invested company to issue RMB entrusted loans to a prohibition against using such capital to issue loans to non-associated enterprises. Violations of SAFE Circular 19 and SAFE Circular 16 could result in administrative penalties. SAFE Circular 19 and SAFE Circular 16 may significantly limit our ability to transfer any foreign currency we hold, including the net proceeds from our securities offerings, to our PRC subsidiaries, which may adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business in China.
In light of the various requirements imposed by PRC regulations on loans to and direct investment in PRC entities by offshore holding companies, we cannot assure you that we will be able to complete the necessary government registrations or obtain the necessary government approvals on a timely basis, if at all, with respect to future loans by us to our PRC subsidiaries or with respect to future capital contributions by us to our PRC subsidiary. If we fail to complete such registrations or obtain such approvals, our ability to use the proceeds we received from our securities offerings and to capitalize or otherwise fund our PRC operations may be negatively affected, which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.
PRC regulations relating to the establishment of offshore special purpose vehicles by PRC residents may subject our PRC resident beneficial owners or our PRC subsidiaries to liabilities or penalties, limit our ability to inject capital into our PRC subsidiaries, limit the ability of our PRC liabilities to increase its registered capital or distribute profits to us, or may otherwise adversely affect us.
The SAFE promulgated the Circular on Relevant Issues Relating to Domestic Resident’s Investment and Financing and Round-Trip Investment through Special Purpose Vehicles, or SAFE Circular 37, in July 2014 that requires PRC residents or entities to register with SAFE or its local branch in connection with their establishment or control of an offshore entity established for the purpose of overseas investment or financing with such PRC residents or entities’ legally owned assets or equity interests in domestic enterprises or offshore assets or interests. On February 13, 2015, SAFE issued SAFE Circular No. 13, which took effect on June 1, 2015, pursuant to which, the power to accept SAFE registration was delegated from local SAFE to local qualified banks where the assets or interest in the domestic entity was located. SAFE Circular 37 is issued to replace the Notice on Relevant Issues Concerning Foreign Exchange Administration for PRC Residents Engaging in Financing and Roundtrip Investments via Overseas Special Purpose Vehicles, or SAFE Circular 75.
If our shareholders who are PRC residents or entities do not complete their registration pursuant to SAFE Circular 37 as required, our PRC subsidiaries may be prohibited from distributing their profits and proceeds from any reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation to us, and we may be restricted in our ability to contribute additional capital to our PRC subsidiaries. Moreover, failure to comply with the SAFE registration described above could result in liability under PRC laws for evasion of applicable foreign exchange restrictions.
49
Table of Contents
We have used our best efforts to notify PRC residents or entities who directly or indirectly hold shares in our Cayman Islands holding company and who are known to us as being PRC residents to complete the foreign exchange registrations. However, we may not be informed of the identities of all the PRC residents or entities holding direct or indirect interest in our company, nor can we compel our beneficial owners to comply with SAFE registration requirements. We cannot assure you that all other shareholders or beneficial owners of ours who are PRC residents or entities have complied with, and will in the future make, obtain or update any applicable registrations or approvals required by, SAFE regulations. Failure by such shareholders or beneficial owners to comply with SAFE regulations, or failure by us to amend the foreign exchange registrations of our PRC subsidiaries, could subject us to fines or legal sanctions, restrict our overseas or cross-border investment activities, limit the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to make distributions or pay dividends to us or affect our ownership structure, which could adversely affect our business and prospects.
The M&A Rules and certain other PRC regulations establish complex procedures for some acquisitions of Chinese companies by foreign investors, which could make it more difficult for us to pursue growth through acquisitions in China.
The Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Companies by Foreign Investors, or the M&A Rules, adopted by six PRC regulatory agencies in August 2006 and amended in September 2009, and some other regulations and rules concerning mergers and acquisitions established additional procedures and requirements that could make merger and acquisition activities by foreign investors more time consuming and complex, including requirements in some instances that shall obtained an approval from the MOFCOM in advance of any change-of-control transaction in which a foreign investor takes control of a PRC domestic enterprise. Moreover, the Anti-Monopoly Law requires that the MOFCOM shall be notified in advance of any concentration of undertaking if certain thresholds are triggered. In addition, the security review rules issued by the MOFCOM that became effective in September 2011 specify that mergers and acquisitions by foreign investors that raise “national defense and security” concerns and mergers and acquisitions through which foreign investors may acquire de facto control over domestic enterprises that raise “national security” concerns are subject to strict review by the MOFCOM, and the rules prohibit any activities attempting to bypass a security review, including by structuring the transaction through a proxy or contractual control arrangement. In the future, we may grow our business by acquiring complementary businesses. Complying with the requirements of the above-mentioned regulations and other relevant rules to complete such transactions could be time consuming, and any required approval processes, including obtaining approval from the MOFCOM or its local counterparts may delay or inhibit our ability to complete such transactions, which could affect our ability to expand our business or maintain our market share.
Future movements in exchange rates between U.S. dollars and Renminbi may adversely affect the value of our ordinary shares or the ADSs.
The value of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar and other currencies may fluctuate and is affected by, among other things, changes in political and economic conditions in China and by China’s foreign exchange policies. On July 21, 2005, the PRC government changed its decade-old policy of pegging the value of the Renminbi to the U.S. dollar, and the Renminbi appreciated more than 20% against the U.S. dollar over the following three years. Between July 2008 and June 2010, this appreciation halted and the exchange rate between the Renminbi and the U.S. dollar remained within a narrow band. Since June 2010, the Renminbi has fluctuated against the U.S. dollar, at times significantly and unpredictably. On November 30, 2015, the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) completed the regular five-year review of the basket of currencies that make up the Special Drawing Right, or the SDR, and decided that with effect from October 1, 2016, Renminbi is determined to be a freely usable currency and will be included in the SDR basket as a fifth currency, along with the U.S. dollar, the Euro, the Japanese yen and the British pound. With the development of the foreign exchange market and progress towards interest rate liberalization and Renminbi internationalization, the PRC government may in the future announce further changes to the exchange rate system and we cannot assure you that the Renminbi will not appreciate or depreciate significantly in value against the U.S. dollar in the future. It is difficult to predict how market forces, or PRC or U.S. government policy may impact the exchange rate between the Renminbi and the U.S. dollar in the future.
50
Table of Contents
Significant revaluation of the Renminbi may have a material and adverse effect on your investment. For example, if we decide to convert our Renminbi into U.S. dollars for the purpose of making payments for dividends on our ordinary shares or ADSs or for other business purposes, appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the Renminbi would have a negative effect on the U.S. dollar amount available to us.
Very limited hedging options are available in China to reduce our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. To date, we have not entered into any material hedging transactions in an effort to reduce our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. While we may decide to enter into hedging transactions in the future, the availability and effectiveness of these hedges may be limited, and we may not be able to adequately hedge our exposure or at all. In addition, our currency exchange losses may be magnified by PRC exchange control regulations that restrict our ability to convert Renminbi into foreign currency.
Governmental control of currency conversion may limit our ability to utilize our operating revenues effectively and affect the value of your investment.
The PRC government imposes controls on the convertibility of the Renminbi into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China. We receive substantially all of our revenues in Renminbi. Under our current corporate structure, our Cayman Islands holding company may rely on dividend payments from our PRC subsidiaries to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have. Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account items, including profit distributions, interest payments and trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval of SAFE if certain procedural requirements are complied with. Specifically, under the existing exchange restrictions, without prior approval of SAFE, cash generated from the operations of our PRC subsidiaries in China may be used to pay dividends to our company. However, approval from or registration with appropriate government authorities is required where Renminbi is to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out of China to pay capital expenses, such as the repayment of loans denominated in foreign currencies. As a result, we need to obtain SAFE approval to use cash generated from the operations of our PRC subsidiaries and consolidated affiliated entities to pay off their respective debt in a currency other than Renminbi owed to entities outside China, or to make other capital expenditure payments outside China in a currency other than Renminbi.
The PRC government has imposed more restrictive foreign exchange policies and stepped-up scrutiny of major outbound capital movements including overseas direct investments. More restrictions and substantial vetting processes are put in place by SAFE to regulate cross-border transactions falling under the capital account. For example, if a person (i) uses Renminbi to pay amounts due that should be settled in a foreign currency or (ii) makes payments in Renminbi on behalf of a third party in exchange for repayments in a foreign currency, such person may be subject to a fine of not more than 30% of the illegal payment. In severe cases, the fine could be increased to 100% of the illegal payment. If any of our shareholders or affiliates to whom SAFE regulations are applicable violates any of the foreign exchange policies, it may be subject to penalties from the relevant PRC authorities. Historically, certain minority shareholders invested in our company through payments in Renminbi to the VIE in lieu of payments in U.S. dollars outside of the PRC. In an uncertain event that we are deemed to have participated in our shareholders’ actions that are not in compliance with the relevant foreign exchange policies by the PRC regulatory authorities, we could be subject to restrictions on our ability to convert foreign currencies into Renminbi or vice versa, as well as monetary penalties. If the PRC foreign exchange control system prevents us from converting foreign currencies into Renminbi or vice versa, our ability to obtain sufficient foreign currencies to satisfy our foreign currency demands may be materially and adversely affected. For example, we may not be able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to our shareholders, including holders of the ADSs, and we may also encounter difficulties in remitting proceeds from our overseas financings and our revenue from the transactions with our overseas customers.
51
Table of Contents
Failure to comply with PRC regulations regarding the registration requirements for employee stock ownership plans or share option plans may subject the PRC plan participants or us to fines and other legal or administrative sanctions.
Pursuant to SAFE Circular 37, PRC residents who participate in share incentive plans in overseas non-publicly-listed companies may submit applications to SAFE or its local branches for the foreign exchange registration with respect to offshore special purpose companies. In the meantime, our directors, executive officers and other employees who are PRC citizens or who are non-PRC residents residing in the PRC for a continuous period of not less than one year, and who have been granted incentive share awards by us, may follow the Notices on Issues Concerning the Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in Stock Incentive Plan of Overseas Publicly-Listed Company, promulgated by the SAFE in 2012. Pursuant to the 2012 SAFE notices, PRC citizens and non-PRC citizens who reside in China for a continuous period of not less than one year who participate in any stock incentive plan of an overseas publicly listed company, are required to register with SAFE through a domestic qualified agent, which could be the PRC subsidiary of such overseas listed company, and complete certain other procedures. In addition, an overseas entrusted institution must be retained to handle matters in connection with the exercise or sale of stock options and the purchase or sale of shares and interests. We and our executive officers and other employees who are PRC citizens or who reside in the PRC for a continuous period of not less than one year and who have been granted restricted share units are subject to these regulations as our company has become an overseas listed company. Failure to complete the SAFE registrations may subject us to fines, and legal sanctions and may also limit our ability to contribute additional capital into our PRC subsidiaries and limit the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to distribute dividends to us. We also face regulatory uncertainties that could restrict our abilities to adopt additional incentive plans for our directors, executive officers and employees under PRC laws.
The State Administration of Taxation, or SAT, has issued certain circulars concerning employee share options and restricted shares. If our employees fail to pay or we fail to withhold their income taxes according to relevant laws and regulations, we may face sanctions imposed by the tax authorities or other PRC governmental authorities.
Discontinuation of any of the preferential tax treatments and government subsidies or imposition of any additional taxes and surcharges could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Each of the WFOE and the VIE is currently qualified as a high and new technology enterprise, or HNTE, and as such is eligible for a 15% preferential tax rate, which will expire in December 2026 and December 2028, respectively. The discontinuation of any of the preferential income tax treatment that we currently enjoy could have a material and adverse effect on our result of operations and financial condition. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain or lower our current effective tax rate in the future.
Our PRC subsidiaries have received various financial subsidies from PRC local government authorities. The financial subsidies result from discretionary incentives and policies adopted by PRC local government authorities. The discontinuation of such financial subsidies or imposition of any additional taxes could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
If we are classified as a PRC resident enterprise for PRC income tax purposes, such classification could result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders or ADS holders.
Under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law and its implementation rules, an enterprise established outside of the PRC with its “de facto management body” within the PRC is considered a “resident enterprise” and will be subject to PRC enterprise income tax on its global income at the rate of 25%. The implementation rules define the term “de facto management body” as the body that exercises full and substantial control and overall management over the business, production, personnel, accounts and properties of an enterprise. In 2009, the State Administration of Taxation issued a circular, known as SAT Circular 82, which provides certain specific criteria for determining whether the “de facto management body” of a PRC-controlled enterprise that is incorporated offshore is located in China. Although this circular only applies to offshore enterprises controlled by PRC enterprises or PRC enterprise groups, not those controlled by PRC individuals or foreigners, the criteria set forth in the circular may reflect the State Administration of Taxation’s general position on how the “de facto management body” text should be applied in determining the tax resident status of all offshore enterprises. According to SAT Circular 82, an offshore incorporated enterprise controlled by a PRC enterprise or a PRC enterprise group will be regarded as a PRC tax resident by virtue of having its “de facto management body” in China and will be subject to PRC enterprise income tax on its global income only if all of the following conditions are met: (i) the primary location of the day-to-day operational management is in the PRC; (ii) decisions relating to the enterprise’s financial and human resource matters are made or are subject to approval by organizations or personnel in the PRC; (iii) the enterprise’s primary assets, accounting books and records, company seals, and board and shareholder resolutions, are located or maintained in the PRC; and (iv) at least 50% of voting board members or senior executives habitually reside in the PRC.
52
Table of Contents
We believe none of our entities outside of China is a PRC resident enterprise for PRC tax purposes. However, the tax resident status of an enterprise is subject to determination by the PRC tax authorities and uncertainties remain with respect to the interpretation of the term “de facto management body.” If the PRC tax authorities determine that we are a PRC resident enterprise for enterprise income tax purposes, we will be subject to the enterprise income tax on our global income at the rate of 25% and we will be required to comply with PRC enterprise income tax reporting obligations. In addition, gains realized sale or other disposition of the ADSs or ordinary shares may be subject to PRC tax at a rate of 10% (in the case of non-PRC enterprise) or 20% in the case of non-PRC individuals (in each case, subject to the provisions of any applicable tax treaty), if such gains are deemed to be from PRC sources. These rates may be reduced by an applicable tax treaty, but it is unclear whether non-PRC shareholders of the WFOE would be able to claim the benefits of any tax treaties between their country of tax residence and the PRC in the event that the WFOE is treated as a PRC resident enterprise. Any such PRC tax may reduce the returns on your investment in the ADSs.
We may not be able to obtain certain benefits under the relevant tax treaty on dividends paid by our PRC subsidiaries to us through our Hong Kong subsidiary.
We are a holding company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands and as such rely on dividends and other distributions on equity from our PRC subsidiaries to satisfy part of our liquidity requirements. Pursuant to the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, a withholding tax rate of 10% currently applies to dividends paid by a PRC “resident enterprise” to a foreign enterprise investor, unless any such foreign investor’s jurisdiction of incorporation has a tax treaty with China that provides for preferential tax treatment. Pursuant to the Arrangement between the Mainland China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and Tax Evasion on Income, such withholding tax rate may be lowered to 5% if a Hong Kong resident enterprise owns no less than 25% of a PRC enterprise. Furthermore, the Administrative Measures for Non-Resident Enterprises to Enjoy Treatments under Tax Treaties, which became effective in August 2015, require non-resident enterprises to determine whether they are qualified to enjoy the preferential tax treatment under the tax treaties and file relevant report and materials with the tax authorities. There are also other conditions for enjoying the reduced withholding tax rate according to other relevant tax rules and regulations. See “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—PRC Taxation.” As of December 31, 2025, our PRC subsidiaries and the VIE located in the PRC reported accumulated loss and therefore they had no retained earnings for offshore distribution. In the future, we intend to re-invest all earnings, if any, generated from our PRC subsidiaries for the operation and expansion of our business in China. Should our tax policy change to allow for offshore distribution of our earnings, we would be subject to a significant withholding tax. We cannot assure you that our determination regarding our qualification to enjoy the preferential tax treatment could be challenged by the relevant tax authority and we may be unable to complete the necessary filings with the relevant tax authority and enjoy the preferential withholding tax rate of 5% under the arrangement with respect to dividends to be paid by our PRC subsidiary to our Hong Kong subsidiary.
We face uncertainty with respect to indirect transfers of equity interests in PRC resident enterprises by their non-PRC holding companies.
In February 2015, the State Administration of Taxation issued the Public Notice Regarding Certain Enterprise Income Tax Matters on Indirect Transfer of Properties by Non-Resident Enterprises, or SAT Public Notice 7. SAT Public Notice 7 extends its tax jurisdiction to not only indirect transfers but also transactions involving transfer of other taxable assets, through the offshore transfer of a foreign intermediate holding company. In addition, SAT Public Notice 7 provides certain criteria on how to assess reasonable commercial purposes and has introduced safe harbors for internal group restructurings and the purchase and sale of equity through a public securities market. SAT Public Notice 7 also brings challenges to both the foreign transferor and transferee (or other person who is obligated to pay for the transfer) of the taxable assets. Where a non-resident enterprise conducts an “indirect transfer” by transferring the taxable assets indirectly by disposing of the equity interests of an overseas holding company, the non-resident enterprise being the transferor, or the transferee, or the PRC entity which directly owned the taxable assets must report to the relevant tax authority such indirect transfer. Using a “substance over form” principle, the PRC tax authority may disregard the existence of the overseas holding company if it lacks a reasonable commercial purpose and was established for the purpose of reducing, avoiding or deferring PRC tax. As a result, gains derived from such indirect transfer may be subject to PRC enterprise income tax, and the transferee or other person who is obligated to pay for the transfer is obligated to withhold the applicable taxes, currently at a rate of 10% (subject to available preferential tax treatment under applicable tax treaties or similar arrangements) for the transfer of equity interests in a PRC resident enterprise. On October 17, 2017, the SAT issued the Announcement of the State Administration of Taxation on Issues Concerning the Withholding of Non-resident Enterprise Income Tax at Source, or SAT Bulletin 37, which came into effect on December 1, 2017. The SAT Bulletin 37 further clarifies the practice and procedure of the withholding of nonresident enterprise income tax.
53
Table of Contents
We face uncertainties on the reporting and consequences of future private equity financing transactions, share exchanges or other transactions involving the transfer of shares in our company by investors that are non-PRC resident enterprises. The PRC tax authorities may pursue such non-resident enterprises with respect to a filing or the transferees with respect to withholding obligation, and request our PRC subsidiaries to assist in the filing. As a result, we and non-resident enterprises in such transactions may risk being subject to filing obligations or being taxed under SAT Public Notice 7 and SAT Bulletin 37, and may be required to expend valuable resources to comply with them or to establish that we and our non-resident enterprises should not be taxed under these regulations, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
If the custodians or authorized users of controlling non-tangible assets of our company, including our corporate chops and seals, fail to fulfill their responsibilities, or misappropriate or misuse these assets, our business and operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Under PRC law, legal documents for corporate transactions are executed using the chops or seal of the signing entity or with the signature of a legal representative whose designation is registered and filed with the relevant branch of the Administration of Market Regulation.
Although we usually utilize chops to enter into contracts, the designated legal representatives of each of our PRC subsidiaries, VIE and its subsidiaries have the apparent authority to enter into contracts on behalf of such entities without chops and bind such entities. All designated legal representatives of our PRC subsidiaries, variable interest entity and its subsidiaries are members of our senior management team who have signed employment agreements with us or our PRC subsidiaries, VIE and its subsidiaries under which they agree to abide by various duties they owe to us. In order to maintain the physical security of our chops and chops of our PRC entities, we generally store these items in secured locations accessible only by the authorized personnel in the legal or finance department of each of our subsidiaries, VIE and its subsidiaries. Although we monitor such authorized personnel, there is no assurance such procedures will prevent all instances of abuse or negligence.
Accordingly, if any of our authorized personnel misuse or misappropriate our corporate chops or seals, we could encounter difficulties in maintaining control over the relevant entities and experience significant disruption to our operations. If a designated legal representative obtains control of the chops in an effort to obtain control over any of our PRC subsidiaries, VIE or its subsidiaries, we or our PRC subsidiaries, VIE and its subsidiaries would need to pass a new shareholders or board resolution to designate a new legal representative and we would need to take legal action to seek the return of the chops, apply for new chops with the relevant authorities, or otherwise seek legal redress for the violation of the representative’s fiduciary duties to us, which could involve significant time and resources and divert management attention away from our regular business. In addition, the affected entity may not be able to recover corporate assets that are sold or transferred out of our control in the event of such a misappropriation if a transferee relies on the apparent authority of the representative and acts in good faith.
The PCAOB had historically been unable to inspect our auditor in relation to their audit work performed for our financial statements and the inability of the PCAOB to conduct inspections of our auditor in the past has deprived our investors with the benefits of such inspections.
Our auditor, the independent registered public accounting firm that issues the audit report included elsewhere in this annual report, as an auditor of companies that are traded publicly in the United States and a firm registered with the PCAOB, is subject to laws in the United States pursuant to which the PCAOB conducts regular inspections to assess its compliance with the applicable professional standards. The auditor is located in mainland China, a jurisdiction where the PCAOB was historically unable to conduct inspections and investigations completely before 2022. As a result, we and investors in the ADSs were deprived of the benefits of such PCAOB inspections. The inability of the PCAOB to conduct inspections of auditors in China in the past has made it more difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of our independent registered public accounting firm’s audit procedures or quality control procedures as compared to auditors outside of China that are subject to the PCAOB inspections. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB issued a report that vacated its December 16, 2021 determination that the positions taken by authorities in mainland China and Hong Kong prevented it from inspecting and investigating completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in those jurisdictions. However, if the PCAOB determines in the future that it no longer has full access to inspect and investigate completely accounting firms in mainland China and Hong Kong, and we use an accounting firm headquartered in one of these jurisdictions to issue an audit report on our financial statements filed with the SEC, we and investors in the ADSs would be deprived of the benefits of such PCAOB inspections again, which could cause investors and potential investors in the ADSs to lose confidence in our audit procedures and reported financial information and the quality of our financial statements.
54
Table of Contents
Our PRC subsidiaries and the VIEs may be subject to monetary liability if their share capital is not fully paid up before statutory deadlines.
On December 29, 2023, an amendment to the PRC Company Law was promulgated by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, which took effect on July 1, 2024, shortening a company’s period for share capital contribution to five years. In addition, the State Administration for Market Regulation or SAMR has released the Provisions of the State Council on the Implementation of the Registered Capital Registration and Management System under the Company Law of the People’s Republic of China, released on July 1, 2024, which provides for an additional transition period of three years for companies incorporated before June 30, 2024. Under such rules, the share capital of all of our subsidiaries incorporated in the PRC, as well as Guangzhou EHang Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., or the VIE, and its subsidiaries, shall be paid up by June 30, 2032. In the event that the share capital is not fully paid up by the statutory deadlines, the registered shareholder(s) of the foregoing companies may be subject to the legal liability including: (a) liability for the interest loss incurred therefrom on the overdue capital contribution amount on the subsidiaries (and possible interest on such loss); and (b) the supplementary compensation liability to creditors of the subsidiaries within the outstanding principal of share capital and overdue contribution interest.
Risks Relating to the ADSs and Trading Market
The trading price of the ADSs is likely to be volatile, which could result in substantial losses to investors.
Since the ADSs became listed on the Nasdaq Global Market on December 12, 2019, the trading price of the ADSs has ranged from a low of US$3.32 to a high of US$129.80 per ADS. The trading price of the ADSs is likely to be volatile and could fluctuate widely due to multiple factors, some of which are beyond our control. This may happen because of broad market and industry factors, including the performance and fluctuation of the market prices of other companies with business operations located mainly in China that have listed their securities in the United States. In addition to market and industry factors, the price and trading volume for the ADSs may be highly volatile for factors specific to our own operations, including the following:
• variations in our revenues, earnings and cash flows;
• regulatory developments affecting us, our customers, or our industry;
• announcements of studies and reports relating to the quality of our products and service offerings or those of our competitors;
• announcements of new investments, acquisitions, strategic partnerships or joint ventures by us or our competitors;
• announcements of new products or service offerings and expansions by us or our competitors;
• changes in financial estimates by securities analysts;
• detrimental adverse publicity about us, our products or services or our industry;
• additions or departures of key personnel;
• detrimental negative publicity about us, our management or our industry;
55
Table of Contents
• release of lock-up or other transfer restrictions on our outstanding equity securities or sales of additional equity securities; and
• actual or potential litigation or regulatory investigations.
• the ADS being delisted and prohibited from trading in the U.S. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Doing Business in China—The ADSs will be delisted and prohibited from trading in the U.S. under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, or the HFCAA, if the PCAOB is unable to inspect or fully investigate auditors located in China.”
Any of these factors may result in large and sudden changes in the volume and price at which the ADSs will trade.
In the past, shareholders of public companies have often brought securities class action suits against companies following periods of instability in the market price of their securities. If we were involved in a class action suit, it could divert a significant amount of our management’s attention and other resources from our business and operations and require us to incur significant expenses to defend the suit, which could harm our results of operations. Any such class action suit, whether or not successful, could harm our reputation and restrict our ability to raise capital in the future. In addition, if a claim is successfully made against us, we may be required to pay significant damages, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they adversely change their recommendations regarding the ADSs, the market price for the ADSs and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for the ADSs will be influenced by research or reports that industry or securities analysts publish about our business. If one or more analysts who cover us downgrade the ADSs, the market price for the ADSs would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease to cover us or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause the market price or trading volume of the ADSs to decline.
The sale or availability for sale of substantial amounts of the ADSs could adversely affect their market price.
Sales of substantial amounts of the ADSs in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could adversely affect the market price of the ADSs and could materially impair our ability to raise capital through equity offerings in the future. We cannot predict what effect, if any, market sales of securities held by our significant shareholders or any other shareholder or the availability of these securities for future sale will have on the market price of the ADSs.
Because we do not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future, the holders of the ADSs must rely on price appreciation of the ADSs for a return on their investment.
We currently intend to retain most, if not all, of our available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business. As a result, we do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Therefore, the ADS holders should not rely on an investment in the ADSs as a source for any future dividend income.
Our board of directors has discretion as to whether to distribute dividends, subject to certain restrictions under Cayman Islands law, namely that our company may only pay dividends out of profits or share premium, and provided always that in no circumstances may a dividend be paid if this would result in our company being unable to pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business immediately following the date on which the dividend is paid. In addition, our shareholders may by ordinary resolution declare a dividend, but no dividend may exceed the amount recommended by our board of directors. Even if our board of directors decides to declare and pay dividends, the timing, amount and form of future dividends, if any, will depend on our future results of operations and cash flow, our capital requirements and surplus, the amount of distributions, if any, received by us from our subsidiaries, our financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. Accordingly, the return to ADS holders on the investment in the ADSs will likely depend entirely upon any future price appreciation of the ADSs. There is no guarantee that the ADSs will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which the ADS holders purchased the ADSs. The ADS holders may not realize a return on their investment in the ADSs and they may even lose their entire investment in the ADSs.
56
Table of Contents
Our memorandum and articles of association contain anti-takeover provisions that could have a material adverse effect on the rights of holders of our ordinary shares and ADSs.
Our memorandum and articles of association contain provisions which could limit the ability of others to acquire control of our company or cause us to engage in change-of-control transactions. These provisions could have the effect of depriving our shareholders and ADS holders of an opportunity to sell their shares or ADSs at a premium over prevailing market prices by discouraging third parties from seeking to obtain control of our company in a tender offer or similar transactions. Our board of directors has the authority, without further action by our shareholders, to issue preferred shares in one or more series and to fix their designations, powers, preferences, privileges, and relative participating, optional or special rights and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption and liquidation preferences, any or all of which may be greater than the rights associated with our ordinary shares, in the form of ADSs or otherwise. Preferred shares could be issued quickly with terms calculated to delay or prevent a change in control of our company or make removal of management more difficult. If our board of directors decides to issue preferred shares, the price of the ADSs may fall and the voting and other rights of the holders of our ordinary shares and ADSs may be materially and adversely affected.
You may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through U.S. courts may be limited, because we are incorporated under Cayman Islands law.
We are an exempted company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. Our corporate affairs are governed by our memorandum and articles of association, the Companies Act (As Revised) of the Cayman Islands and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders to take action against our directors, actions by our minority shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from the common law of England, the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority, but are not binding, on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors under Cayman Islands law are not as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a less developed body of securities laws than the United States. Some U.S. states, such as Delaware, have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law than the Cayman Islands. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action in a federal court of the United States.
Shareholders of Cayman Islands exempted companies like us have no general rights under Cayman Islands law to inspect corporate records (other than the memorandum and articles of association, our register of mortgages and charges and special resolutions of our shareholders) or to obtain copies of lists of shareholders of these companies. Our directors have discretion under our articles of association to determine whether or not, and under what conditions, our corporate records may be inspected by our shareholders, but are not obliged to make them available to our shareholders. This may make it more difficult for you to obtain the information needed to establish any facts necessary for a shareholder motion or to solicit proxies from other shareholders in connection with a proxy contest.
In addition, we conduct substantially all of our business operations in China, and substantially all of our directors and senior management are based in China. The SEC, U.S. Department of Justice and other authorities may face challenges in bringing and enforcing actions against non-U.S. companies and non-U.S. persons, including company directors and officers, in certain jurisdictions, including China. Additionally, shareholder claims that are common in the United States, including class action securities law and fraud claims, may be difficult to pursue as a matter of law or practicality in many jurisdictions, including China. For example, in China, there are significant legal and other obstacles to obtaining information needed for shareholder investigations or litigation outside China or otherwise with respect to foreign entities. Although the local authorities in China may establish a regulatory cooperation mechanism with the securities regulatory authorities of another country or region to implement cross-border supervision and administration, the regulatory cooperation with the securities regulatory authorities in the United States has not been fully efficient in the absence of a mutual and practical cooperation mechanism. According to Article 177 of the PRC Securities Law which became effective in March 2020, no foreign securities regulator is allowed to directly conduct investigation or evidence collection activities within the territory of the PRC. Accordingly, without the consent of the competent PRC securities regulators and relevant authorities, no organization or individual may provide the documents and materials relating to securities business activities to foreign securities regulators.
57
Table of Contents
As a result of all of the above, our public shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by our management, members of our board of directors or our controlling shareholders than they would as public shareholders of a company incorporated in the United States. For a discussion of significant differences between the provisions of the Companies Act of the Cayman Islands and the laws applicable to companies incorporated in the United States and their shareholders, see “Item 10. Additional Information—B. Memorandum and Articles of Association—Differences in Corporate Law.”
Certain judgments obtained against us by our shareholders may not be enforceable.
We are a Cayman Islands exempted company and substantially all of our assets are located outside of the United States. Most of our current operations are conducted in China. In addition, most of our current directors and officers are nationals and residents of countries other than the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an action against us or against these individuals in the United States in the event that you believe that your rights have been infringed under the U.S. federal securities laws or otherwise. Even if you are successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Cayman Islands and of China may render you unable to enforce a judgment against our assets or the assets of our directors and officers.
The voting rights of holders of ADSs are limited by the terms of the deposit agreement, and you may not be able to exercise your right to direct how the Class A ordinary shares which are represented by your ADSs are voted.
Holders of ADSs do not have the same rights as our registered shareholders. As a holder of the ADSs, you will not have any direct right to attend general meetings of our shareholders or to cast any votes at such meetings. You will only be able to exercise the voting rights which are carried by the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs indirectly by giving voting instructions to the depositary in accordance with the provisions of the deposit agreement. Under the deposit agreement, you may vote only by giving voting instructions to the depositary. If we instruct the depositary to ask for your instructions, then upon receipt of your voting instructions, the depositary will try, as far as is practicable, to vote the underlying Class A ordinary shares which are represented by your ADSs in accordance with your instructions. If we do not instruct the depositary to ask for your instructions, the depositary may still vote in accordance with instructions you give, but it is not required to do so. Under the deposit agreement for the ADSs, if you do not vote, the depositary may give us a discretionary proxy to vote the Class A ordinary shares underlying your ADSs at shareholders’ meetings if:
• we have timely provided the depositary with notice of meeting and related voting materials;
• we have instructed the depositary that we wish a discretionary proxy to be given;
• we have informed the depositary that there is no substantial opposition as to a matter to be voted on at the meeting; and
• a matter to be voted on at the meeting would not have a material adverse impact on shareholders.
The effect of this discretionary proxy is that if you do not vote at shareholders’ meetings, you cannot prevent the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs from being voted, except under the circumstances described above. This may make it more difficult for shareholders to influence the management of our company. Holders of our ordinary shares are not subject to this discretionary proxy. You will not be able to directly exercise your right to vote with respect to the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs unless you cancel and withdraw such shares and become the registered holder of such shares prior to the record date for the general meeting.
58
Table of Contents
Under our memorandum and articles of association, the minimum notice period required to be given by our company to our registered shareholders to convene a general meeting is ten calendar days. When a general meeting is convened, you may not receive sufficient advance notice of the meeting to withdraw the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs and become the registered holder of such shares to allow you to attend the general meeting and to vote directly with respect to any specific matter or resolution to be considered and voted upon at the general meeting. In addition, under our articles of association, for the purposes of determining those shareholders who are entitled to attend and vote at any general meeting, our directors may close our register of members and/or fix in advance a record date for such meeting, and such closure of our register of members or the setting of such a record date may prevent you from withdrawing the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs and becoming the registered holder of such shares prior to the record date, so that you would not be able to attend the general meeting or to vote directly. If we ask for your instructions, the depositary will notify you of the upcoming vote and will arrange to deliver our voting materials to you. We have agreed to give the depositary at least 45 days’ prior notice of shareholder meetings. Nevertheless, we cannot assure you that you will receive the voting materials in time to ensure that you can instruct the depositary to vote the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs. In addition, the depositary and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry out voting instructions or for their manner of carrying out your voting instructions. This means that you may not be able to exercise your right to direct how the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs are voted and you may have no legal remedy if the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs are not voted as you requested.
You may not receive dividends or other distributions on our ordinary shares and you may not receive any value for them, if it is illegal or impractical to make them available to you.
The depositary of the ADSs has agreed to distribute, subject to the terms of the deposit agreement, the cash dividends or other distributions it or the custodian receives on our Class A ordinary shares or other deposited securities underlying the ADSs, after deducting its fees and expenses. You will receive these distributions in proportion to the number of Class A ordinary shares your ADSs represent. However, the depositary is not responsible if it decides that it is unlawful or impractical to make a distribution available to any holders of ADSs. For example, it would be unlawful to make a distribution to a holder of ADSs if it consists of securities that require registration under the Securities Act but that are not properly registered or distributed under an applicable exemption from registration. The depositary may also determine that it is not feasible to distribute certain property. Additionally, the value of certain distributions may be less than the cost of distribution. In these cases, the depositary may determine not to distribute such property. We have no obligation to register under U.S. securities laws any ADSs, ordinary shares, rights or other securities received through such distributions. We also have no obligation to take any other action to permit the distribution of ADSs, ordinary shares, rights or anything else to holders of ADSs. This means that you may not receive distributions we make on our ordinary shares or any value for them if it is illegal or impractical for us to make them available to you. These restrictions may cause a material decline in the value of the ADSs.
You may experience dilution of your holdings due to inability to participate in rights offerings.
We may, from time to time, distribute rights to our shareholders, including rights to acquire securities. Under the deposit agreement, the depositary will not distribute rights to holders of ADSs unless the distribution and sale of rights and the securities to which these rights relate are either exempt from registration under the Securities Act with respect to all holders of ADSs, or are registered under the provisions of the Securities Act. The depositary may, but is not required to, attempt to sell these undistributed rights to third parties, and may allow the rights to lapse. We may be unable to establish an exemption from registration under the Securities Act, and we are under no obligation to file a registration statement with respect to these rights or underlying securities or to endeavor to have a registration statement declared effective. Accordingly, holders of ADSs may be unable to participate in our rights offerings and may experience dilution of their holdings as a result.
You may be subject to limitations on transfer of your ADSs.
Your ADSs are transferable on the books of the depositary. However, the depositary may close its books at any time or from time to time when it deems expedient in connection with the performance of its duties. The depositary may close its books from time to time for a number of reasons, including in connection with corporate events, such as a rights offering, or “for record date or processing purposes” in emergencies, and on weekends and public holidays. The depositary may refuse to deliver, transfer or register transfers of the ADSs generally when our share register or the books of the depositary are closed, or at any time if we or the depositary think it is advisable to do so because of any requirement of law or of any government or governmental body, or under any provision of the deposit agreement, or for any other reason.
59
Table of Contents
ADSs holders may not be entitled to a jury trial with respect to claims arising under the deposit agreement, which could result in less favorable outcomes to the plaintiffs in any such action.
The deposit agreement governing the ADSs representing our Class A ordinary shares provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, ADS holders waive the right to a jury trial of any claim they may have against us or the depositary arising out of or relating to our shares, the ADSs or the deposit agreement, including any claim under the U.S. federal securities laws.
If we or the depositary opposed a jury trial demand based on the waiver, the court would determine whether the waiver was enforceable based on the facts and circumstances of that case in accordance with the applicable state and federal law. To our knowledge, the enforceability of a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver in connection with claims arising under the federal securities laws has not been finally adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court. However, we believe that a pre-dispute contractual waiver of jury trial is generally enforceable, including under the laws of the State of New York, which govern the deposit agreement, by a federal or state court in the City of New York, which has non-exclusive jurisdiction over matters arising under the deposit agreement. In determining whether to enforce a pre-dispute contractual waiver of jury trial, courts will generally consider whether a party knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to a jury trial. We believe that this is the case with respect to the deposit agreement and the ADSs. It is advisable that you consult legal counsel regarding the jury waiver provision before entering into the deposit agreement.
If you or any other holders or beneficial owners of ADSs bring a claim against us or the depositary in connection with matters arising under the deposit agreement or the ADSs, including claims under federal securities laws, you or such other holder or beneficial owner may not be entitled to a jury trial with respect to such claims, which may have the effect of limiting and discouraging lawsuits against us and the depositary. If a lawsuit is brought against either or both of us and the depositary under the deposit agreement, it may be heard only by a judge or justice of the applicable trial court, which would be conducted according to different civil procedures and may result in different outcomes than a trial by jury would have, including results that could be less favorable to the plaintiffs in any such action.
Nevertheless, if this jury trial waiver provision is not permitted by applicable law, an action could proceed under the terms of the deposit agreement with a jury trial. No condition, stipulation or provision of the deposit agreement or ADSs serves as a waiver by any holder or beneficial owner of ADSs or by us or the depositary of compliance with any substantive provision of the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
We are a foreign private issuer within the meaning of the rules under the Exchange Act, and as such we are exempt from certain provisions applicable to United States domestic public companies.
Because we are a foreign private issuer under the Exchange Act, we are exempt from certain provisions of the securities rules and regulations in the United States that are applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, including:
• the rules under the Exchange Act requiring the filing of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or current reports on Form 8-K with the SEC;
• the sections of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents, or authorizations in respect of a security registered under the Exchange Act;
• the sections of the Exchange Act requiring principal shareholders to file public reports of their stock ownership and trading activities and liability for insiders who profit from trades made in a short period of time; and
• the selective disclosure rules by issuers of material nonpublic information under Regulation FD.
60
Table of Contents
We are required to file an annual report on Form 20-F within four months of the end of each fiscal year. In addition, we intend to publish our results on a quarterly basis through press releases, distributed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Nasdaq Stock Market. Press releases relating to financial results and material events will also be furnished to the SEC on Form 6-K. However, the information we are required to file with or furnish to the SEC will be less extensive and less timely compared to that required to be filed with the SEC by U.S. domestic issuers. As a result, you may not be afforded the same protections or information which would be made available to you were you investing in a U.S. domestic issuer.
We will incur increased costs as a result of being a public company, particularly after we have ceased to qualify as an “emerging growth company.”
We are a public company and expect to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company, including additional costs associated with our public company reporting obligations. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and the Nasdaq Stock Market, impose various requirements on the corporate governance practices of public companies. We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some corporate activities more time-consuming and costly. As we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” we expect to incur significant expenses and devote substantial management effort toward ensuring compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the other rules and regulations of the SEC. For example, as a result of being a public company, we need to increase the number of independent directors and adopt policies regarding internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures. In addition, operating as a public company makes it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. It may also be more difficult for us to find qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as executive officers. We cannot predict or estimate with any degree of certainty the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.
As a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands, we are permitted to adopt certain home country practices in relation to corporate governance matters that differ significantly from the Nasdaq Stock Market corporate governance listing standards; these practices may afford less protection to shareholders than they would enjoy if we comply fully with the Nasdaq Stock Market corporate governance listing standards.
As a Cayman Islands exempted company listed on Nasdaq Global Market, we are subject to the Nasdaq Stock Market corporate governance listing standards. However, Nasdaq Stock Market rules permit a foreign private issuer like us to follow the corporate governance practices of its home country. Certain corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our home country, may differ significantly from the Nasdaq Stock Market corporate governance listing standards. We have elected to follow our home country practice in lieu of certain corporate governance requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market. See “Item 16G. Corporate Governance.” As a result, our shareholders may be afforded less protection than they would otherwise enjoy under the Nasdaq Stock Market corporate governance listing standards applicable to U.S. domestic issuers.
We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules and, as a result, may rely on exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements that provide protection to shareholders of other companies.
We are a “controlled company” as defined under the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules because our founder, chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer, Mr. Huazhi Hu, owns more than 50% of our total voting power. For so long as we remain a controlled company under that definition, we may rely on certain exemptions from corporate governance rules, including the rule that a majority of our board of directors must be independent directors and that we have to establish a nominating committee and a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors. As a result, you will not have the same protection afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to these corporate governance requirements should we choose to rely on such exemptions. We currently do not plan to rely on these exemptions.
61
Table of Contents
If we are a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for any taxable year, our U.S. shareholders may be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences.
A non-U.S. corporation, such as our company, will be a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for any taxable year if either (i) at least 75% of its gross income for such year is passive income or (ii) at least 50% of the value of its assets (based on an average of the quarterly values of the assets) during such year is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income. A separate determination must be made after the close of each taxable year as to whether a non-U.S. corporation is a PFIC for that year. Although the law in this regard is unclear, we intend to treat the VIE and the VIE’s subsidiaries as being owned by us for U.S. federal income tax purposes, not only because we have the power to direct the significant activities of such entities but also because we are entitled to substantially all of their economic benefits and, as a result, we consolidate their results of operations in our consolidated financial statements.
Based on our analysis of our activities as well as the composition of our income and valuation of our assets, including goodwill, we do not believe we were a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for the taxable year ended December 31, 2025. The determination of whether we are a PFIC is a fact-intensive determination made on an annual basis and the applicable law is subject to varying interpretation. Since the value of our assets for purposes of the asset test may be determined by reference to the market price of the ADSs, fluctuations in the market price of the ADSs may cause us to become a PFIC for the current or subsequent taxable years. In addition, the composition of our income and assets will also be affected by our business plans including how quickly we use our cash and other liquid assets. If we determine not to deploy significant amounts of cash for active purposes or if it were determined that we do not own the stock of the VIE for U.S. federal income tax purposes, our risk of being a PFIC may substantially increase. In light of the foregoing, there can be no assurance that we were not, or will not be, a PFIC for any taxable year. Our U.S. counsel expresses no opinion with respect to our PFIC status for any taxable year.
U.S. Holders should consult with their tax advisors regarding the implications of owning stock in a PFIC. If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder (as defined in “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—U.S. Federal Income Taxation”) holds the ADS or a Class A ordinary share, certain adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences could apply to the U.S. Holder. See “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—U.S. Federal Income Taxation—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules.”