On September 26, 2023, Rodney Bell, Michael A. Roberts and Theresa Woods (collectively, the “Original Plaintiffs”), three of our shareholders, filed a complaint against the Company and certain of its directors and officers in the Third District Chancery Court (the “Chancery Court”) sitting in Greeneville, Tennessee (the “Shareholder Complaint”). The Shareholder Complaint alleges, among other things, that the Company’s shareholders had the right to vote on certain transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and sought an injunction against the consummation of the transactions until a shareholder vote was held. The court initially granted a temporary restraining order enjoining the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement from closing but later dissolved it on October 25, 2023. Thereafter, the parties to the Amended Merger Agreement completed the Omni Acquisition. On May 2, 2024, Original Plaintiff Michael Roberts, together with the Cambria County Employees Retirement System (together, “Plaintiffs”) filed a stipulation and proposed order seeking leave of court to file an amended class action complaint seeking damages, among other forms of relief. Upon receiving leave of court, on May 15, 2024, the Plaintiffs filed the amended complaint (“Second Amended Complaint”). Like the earlier Shareholder Complaint (and subsequent amendment), the Second Amended Complaint challenges the directors’ determination not to subject the Omni Acquisition to a shareholder vote and alleges that, in so doing, the Company and certain of its now former directors (collectively, “Defendants,” and together with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”) violated Tennessee corporate law. The Second Amended Complaint further alleges that certain of the Company’s now former directors breached their fiduciary duties to shareholders by depriving them of the right to vote on the Omni Acquisition. Thereafter, on June 14, 2024, Defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee (the “District Court”), Greeneville Division. Plaintiffs filed a motion to remand the case to the Chancery Court, and on March 31, 2025, the District Court granted the motion and remanded the case back to the Chancery Court. On September 12, 2025, the Parties informed the Chancery Court that they had reached an agreement in principle to resolve the Action (the “Settlement”). The entire settlement amount will be funded by the Company's D&O insurers. In exchange, the Plaintiffs and the class (as defined in the agreements memorializing the Settlement) will grant customary releases in favor of Defendants of all of their claims that were or could have been asserted in the Action. On March 6, 2026, the Chancery Court entered a Scheduling Order with Respect to Notice and Settlement Hearing, scheduling a hearing to, among other things, determine whether the Settlement should be approved and the Action dismissed with prejudice. The Settlement Hearing occurred on July 21, 2026. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Chancery Court orally granted Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and Approval of Plan of Allocation and Plaintiffs’ counsel’s Motion for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses, and for Service Awards to Plaintiffs. The Chancery Court advised the parties that a final written order memorializing the oral ruling and dismissing the Action with prejudice is forthcoming. By entering into the Settlement, the Defendants are in no way conceding or admitting liability for any of the claims that were or could have been asserted in the Action. The Defendants expressly have denied and continue to deny each and all of the claims asserted in the Action, and maintain that their conduct was at all times proper, in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, and in compliance with applicable law. Nevertheless, Defendants have determined to enter into the Settlement solely to put the claims to rest, finally and forever, and to eliminate the uncertainty, risk, costs, and burdens inherent in any litigation, including the Action. From time to time, we are also a party to other litigation incidental to and arising in the normal course of our business, most of which involve claims for personal injury and property damage related to the transportation and handling of freight, or workers’ compensation. We accrue for the estimated losses from these and other pending claims when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Based on the knowledge of the facts, we believe the resolution of such incidental claims and pending litigation, taking into account existing reserves, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. However, the results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict, and our view of these matters may change in the future as the litigation and related events unfold. For information regarding our legal proceedings, see Note 7—Commitments and Contingencies in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report.