← Back to HRTX filing summaryThis is the extracted source text from the SEC filing. Formatting may differ from the original document.
Except as discussed below, there are no material changes from the legal proceedings previously disclosed in our 2025 Annual Report during the three and six months ended June 30, 2026.
On June 14, 2022, the Company received a Paragraph IV notice of certification (the “Fresenius Kabi Notice”) from Fresenius Kabi advising that Fresenius Kabi had submitted an abbreviated new drug application (“ANDA”) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) seeking approval to manufacture, use or sell a generic version of CINVANTI in the U.S. prior to the expiration of U.S. Patent Nos.: 9,561,229; 9,808,465; 9,974,742; 9,974,793; 9,974,794; 10,500,208; 10,624,850; 10,953,018; and 11,173,118 (the “CINVANTI Patents”), which are listed in the FDA’s Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (the “Orange Book”). The Fresenius Kabi Notice alleges that the CINVANTI Patents are invalid, unenforceable and/or will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture, use or sale of the generic product described in Fresenius Kabi’s ANDA.
On July 27, 2022, the Company filed a complaint for patent infringement of the CINVANTI Patents against Fresenius Kabi and a related entity in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (the “Court”) in response to Fresenius Kabi’s ANDA filing. The complaint seeks, among other relief, equitable relief enjoining Fresenius Kabi from infringing the CINVANTI Patents. On May 15, 2024, the Court granted partial summary judgment of infringement for the Company and found no indefiniteness of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,561,229 and 9,974,794. On June 24, 2024, the parties commenced a four-day bench trial centered on Fresenius Kabi’s defense of obviousness of claims from U.S. Patent Nos. 9,561,229 and 9,974,794 that cover CINVANTI. Oral argument was held on August 29, 2024.
On December 3, 2024, the Court issued a ruling in the Company’s favor. The Court found that the Company’s U.S. Patent Nos. 9,561,229 and 9,974,794, which expire in 2035, are valid and would be infringed by Fresenius Kabi’s proposed generic product. In view of the decision, the Court ordered that the effective date of any final approval by the FDA of Fresenius Kabi’s ANDA shall not be a date earlier than September 18, 2035, the expiration date of each of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,561,229 and 9,974,794. On January 8, 2025, Fresenius Kabi filed notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On September 24, 2025, the briefing was completed. On July 21, 2026, the Company received notice that oral argument at the Federal Circuit is scheduled for September 10, 2026. The Company intends to vigorously enforce its intellectual property rights relating to CINVANTI.
On August 4, 2023, the Company received a Notice Letter (the “Mylan August Notice”) from Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Mylan”) advising that Mylan had submitted an ANDA to the FDA seeking approval to manufacture, use or sell a generic version of CINVANTI (“Mylan’s ANDA for a generic version of CINVANTI”) in the U.S. prior to the expiration of the CINVANTI Patents, which are listed in the Orange Book. On September 15, 2023, the Company filed a complaint for patent infringement of the CINVANTI Patents against Mylan in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware in response to the filing of Mylan’s ANDA for a generic version of CINVANTI. On May 6, 2025, the Company announced that it entered into a settlement agreement with Mylan to resolve the ongoing patent litigation in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware related to Mylan’s ANDA for a generic version of CINVANTI. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company has granted Mylan a license under the Orange Book-listed patents for CINVANTI to market a generic version of CINVANTI in the United States beginning June 1, 2032, or earlier under certain customary circumstances. In connection with the settlement, on May 6, 2025, the Court granted the Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware requesting that the Court dismiss the pending litigation between the parties.
On December 16, 2023, the Company received a Notice Letter (the “Mylan December Notice”) from Mylan advising that Mylan had submitted an ANDA to the FDA seeking approval to manufacture, use or sell a generic version of APONVIE in the U.S. (“Mylan’s ANDA for a generic version of APONVIE”) prior to the expiration of U.S. Patent Nos.: 9,561,229; 9,808,465; 9,974,742; 9,974,793; 9,974,794; 10,500,208; 10,624,850; 10,953,018; 11,173,118; and 11,744,800 (the “APONVIE Patents”), which are listed in the Orange Book. On January 11, 2024, the Company filed a complaint for patent infringement of the APONVIE Patents against Mylan in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware in response to Mylan filing its ANDA for a generic version of APONVIE. On May 6, 2025, the Company announced that it entered into a settlement agreement with Mylan to resolve the ongoing patent litigation in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware related to Mylan’s ANDA for a generic version of APONVIE. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company has granted Mylan a license under the Orange Book-listed patents for APONVIE to market a generic version of APONVIE in the United States beginning June 1, 2032, or earlier under certain customary circumstances. In connection with the settlement, on May 6, 2025, the Court granted the Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware requesting that the Court dismiss the pending litigation between the parties.
33
On December 11, 2023, the Company received a Paragraph IV notice of certification (the “Slayback Notice”) from Slayback Pharma LLC ("Slayback") (now owned by Azurity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Azurity”)) advising that Slayback had submitted a new drug application (“NDA”) under Section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to the FDA seeking approval to manufacture, use or sell a generic version of CINVANTI in the U.S. (“Slayback’s NDA”) prior to the expiration of the patents listed in the Orange Book. The Slayback Notice alleges that the CINVANTI Patents are invalid, unenforceable and/or will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture, use or sale of the generic product described in Slayback’s NDA. On January 24, 2024, the Company filed a complaint for patent infringement of the CINVANTI Patents against Slayback and a related entity in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey in response to Slayback’s NDA filing. The complaint seeks, among other relief, equitable relief enjoining Slayback from infringing those patents. On July 2, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey granted Slayback’s motion to transfer this matter to the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. On December 12, 2024, the Company filed a complaint against Slayback, Azurity, and related entities in the U.S. District Court for District of Delaware for patent infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 12,115,254 and 12,115,255. On May 23, 2025, the Company filed an amended complaint against Slayback, Azurity and related entities adding an allegation of patent infringement of U.S. Patent No. 12,290,520. On September 16, 2025, the parties entered into a stipulation (Case No. 24-1363, D.I. 119) limiting the issues for trial. On November 17, 2025, the parties commenced a two-day bench trial centered on Azurity’s §112 defenses of claims from U.S. Patent Nos. 12,115,255 and 12,290,520 that cover CINVANTI. On February 6, 2026, the post-trial briefing was completed, and, on March 24, 2026, the Court held closing arguments. On June 1, 2026, the Court issued a ruling holding that the asserted claims of the '255 Patent and the '520 Patent are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112. The Court also entered a final judgment declaring that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,561,229; 9,808,465; 9,974,742; 9,974,793; 9,974,794; 10,500,208; 10,624,850; 10,953,018; 11,173,118; and 11,744,800 are not infringed. On June 30, 2026, the Company appealed both final judgments to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On July 31, 2026, the appeals were consolidated. The consolidated appeal is in its early stages, and the parties have not yet submitted any briefing. The Company intends to vigorously enforce its intellectual property rights relating to CINVANTI.
On February 28, 2025, Azurity, Azurity Pharma India LLP, and Slayback requested Post-Grant Review ("PGR") of U.S. Patent Nos. 12,115,254 and 12,115,255 in PGR2025-00035 and PGR2025-00036, respectively. On April 14, 2025, the Petitions were accorded a filing date. On June 16, 2025, the Company filed a brief requesting discretionary denial of the Petitions in PGR2025-00035 and PGR2025-00036. On July 14, 2025, the Company filed its Patent Owner Preliminary Response. On August 14, 2025, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board discretionarily denied institution of Azurity’s PGRs.
On February 7, 2025, the Company received a Notice Letter (the “Qilu Notice”) from Qilu Pharmaceutical (Hainan) Co., Ltd and Qilu Pharma, Inc. (“Qilu”) advising that Qilu had submitted an ANDA to the FDA seeking approval to manufacture, use or sell a generic version of APONVIE in the U.S. (“Qilu’s ANDA for a generic version of APONVIE”) prior to the expiration of U.S. Patent Nos.: 9,561,229; 9,808,465; 9,974,742; 9,974,793; 9,974,794; 10,500,208; 10,624,850; 10,953,018; 11,173,118; 11,744,800, 11,878,074, 12,115,254, and 12,115,255 (the “Noticed APONVIE Patents”), which are listed in the Orange Book. On March 21, 2025, the Company filed a complaint for patent infringement of the Noticed APONVIE Patents against Qilu in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware in response to Qilu's ANDA for a generic version of APONVIE.
On June 11, 2025, the Company received a Notice Letter (the “Qilu CINVANTI Notice”) from Qilu advising that Qilu had submitted an ANDA to the FDA seeking approval to manufacture, use or sell a generic version of CINVANTI in the U.S. (“Qilu’s ANDA for a generic version of CINVANTI”) prior to the expiration of U.S. Patent Nos.: 9,561,229; 9,808,465; 9,974,742; 9,974,793; 9,974,794; 10,500,208; 10,624,850; 10,953,018; 11,173,118; 11,744,800; 12,115,254; 12,115,255; and 12,290,520 (the “Noticed CINVANTI Patents”), which are listed in the Orange Book for CINVANTI. On July 3, 2025, the Company filed a complaint for patent infringement of the Noticed CINVANTI Patents against Qilu in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware in response to Qilu’s ANDA for a generic version of CINVANTI.
On July 15, 2025, the Qilu CINVANTI and APONVIE litigations were consolidated. The Company entered into a settlement agreement with Qilu to resolve the ongoing patent litigation in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware related to Qilu’s ANDAs for generic versions of CINVANTI and APONVIE. In connection with the settlement, on November 6, 2025, the Court granted the Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware requesting that the Court dismiss the pending litigation between the parties.
On November 19, 2025, the Company received a Paragraph IV notice of certification (the “Baxter Notice”) from Baxter Healthcare Corporation (“Baxter”) advising that Baxter had submitted an ANDA to the FDA seeking approval to manufacture, use or sell a generic version of CINVANTI (“Baxter’s ANDA for a generic version of CINVANTI”) in the U.S. prior to the expiration of the
34
Noticed CINVANTI Patents, which are listed in the Orange Book. On December 23, 2025, the Company filed a complaint for patent infringement of the Noticed CINVANTI Patents against Baxter and a related entity in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware in response to the filing of Baxter’s ANDA for a generic version of CINVANTI. The Company entered into a settlement agreement with Baxter to resolve the ongoing patent litigation in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware related to Baxter’s ANDA for a generic version of CINVANTI. In connection with the settlement, on April 28, 2026, the Court granted the Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware requesting that the Court dismiss the pending litigation between the parties.
On June 26, 2026, the Company received a Paragraph IV notice of certification (the “Long Grove Notice”) from Long Grove Pharmaceuticals, LLC (“Long Grove”) advising that Long Grove had submitted an application seeking approval to manufacture, use, or sell a generic version of CINVANTI in the U.S. (“Long Grove’s NDA”) prior to the expiration of the Noticed CINVANTI Patents, which are listed in the Orange Book for CINVANTI. The Long Grove Notice alleges that the Noticed CINVANTI Patents are invalid, unenforceable and/or will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture, use or sale of the Long Grove NDA product. On August 7, 2026, the Company filed a complaint for patent infringement of the Noticed CINVANTI Patents against Long Grove and a related entity in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware in response to Long Grove’s NDA filing. The complaint seeks, among other relief, equitable relief enjoining Long Grove from infringing the Noticed CINVANTI Patents. The Company intends to vigorously enforce its intellectual property rights relating to CINVANTI.