Rio Tinto Plc
A global mining and metals company that digs up and sells iron ore, aluminium, copper, diamonds, lithium, and more, supplying the raw materials that go into everything from cars and buildings to phones. It was founded in 1873, when British investors bought ancient copper mines along the Río Tinto river in Spain — a name that means "Red River," for the rust-colored water that flows through the region's mineral-rich ground. Those same hills were mined by the Romans, who left behind water wheels and vast slag heaps, making this one of the oldest continuously worked mining sites on Earth.
SPONSORED ADR
20-F · Fiscal year ended Dec 31, 2020 · SEC filing ↗
The original filing sections are available below.
The information set forth under the headings: •“Financial Statements Note 29-Financial instruments and risk management” on pages 249 to 259; and •“Cautionary statement about forward-looking statements” on page 384 of the Annual report 2020 is incorporated herein by reference. Se…
The information set forth under the headings: •“Financial Statements Note 29-Financial instruments and risk management” on pages 249 to 259; and •“Cautionary statement about forward-looking statements” on page 384 of the Annual report 2020 is incorporated herein by reference. See above Item 3.D, “Principal Risks and Uncertainties” and Item 5.A, “Additional Financial information-Treasury management and financial instruments”.
Read original filing text →3.A Selected financial data The information set forth under the headings: •“Financial Review” on pages 31 to 38; •“Five-year Review” on page 109; and •“Shareholder Information-Dual listed companies structure” on pages 375 and 376 of the Annual report 2020 is incorporated herein…
3.A Selected financial data The information set forth under the headings: •“Financial Review” on pages 31 to 38; •“Five-year Review” on page 109; and •“Shareholder Information-Dual listed companies structure” on pages 375 and 376 of the Annual report 2020 is incorporated herein by reference. 2020 dividends The following chart sets out the amounts of interim and final dividends paid or payable on each share or American Depositary Shares (ADS) in respect of each financial year, but before deduction of any withholding tax. 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 Rio Tinto Group - US cents per share Interim 155.00 151.00 127.00 110.00 45.00 Special 93.00 61.00 243.00 — — Final 309.00 231.00 180.00 180.00 125.00 Total 557.00 443.00 550.00 290.00 170.00 Rio Tinto plc - UK pence per share Interim 119.74 123.32 96.82 83.13 33.80 Special 66.77 49.82 183.55 — — Final 221.86 177.47 135.96 129.43 100.56 Total 408.37 350.61 416.33 212.56 134.36 Rio Tinto Limited - Australian cents per share Interim 216.47 219.08 170.84 137.72 59.13 Special 119.63 88.50 338.70 — — Final 397.48 349.74 250.89 228.53 163.62 Total 733.58 657.32 760.43 366.25 222.75 Rio Tinto plc - US cents per ADS Interim 155.00 151.00 126.79 110.99 44.59 Special 93.00 61.00 243.00 — — Final 309.00 231.00 180.00 181.15 125.62 Total 557.00 443.00 549.79 292.14 170.21 3.B Capitalisation and indebtedness Not applicable. 3.C Reasons for the offer and use of proceeds Not applicable. 3.D Risk factors Emerging risks As a company, we are inherently exposed to long-term risks because of our long-life operations and growth pipeline. We track leading indicators of emerging risks and their likely impact on our long-term prospects. We proactively analyse the impact of these risks on our business model through plausible scenarios of the interplay between geopolitics, societal expectations and technology advancement. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought additional uncertainty globally and the recovery pathway remains unclear. Since early 2020, we have activated business resilience teams across our global operations, introduced strict health measures to protect our employees and communities, and adapted our systems to support a significant number of employees working from home. We continue to closely monitor the potential short-to-long-term impacts on our business. This includes impacts on our employees, supply chain, market demand and trade, as well as the resilience of global financial markets to support an economy recovery. 6 Emerging risks by nature are highly uncertain, with scope for rapid or non-linear evolution. The main categories of emerging risks, that we monitor continuously, and that could potentially have an impact (positive or negative) on the group are described below: Trade tensions: Trade is an essential part of our business, and the mining sector in general, as the majority of our products cross national borders. Throughout the year, we have seen the dynamics of geopolitics causing volatile market conditions including the introduction of tariffs on various goods between China and the US, tariffs on Canadian aluminium imports to the US, a targeted reduction on imports from Australia by China and tightening of foreign investment laws in Australia and Canada. Although we have not been significantly affected by these dynamics to date, we monitor these trends closely, and in particular the evolution of the relationship between Australia and China. Increasing societal and investor expectations: In 2020, we continued to see increasing expectations and focus on social equality, fairness and sustainability – and how companies address these issues. Financial institutions are also placing greater emphasis on environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations when making investment decisions. The increasing focus on ESG has the potential to shape the future of the mining industry, supply cost structures, demand for global commodities and capital markets. It has the potential to impact how we operate. Host communities and cultural heritage: We are committed to strengthening our relationships with host communities, including Traditional Owners and First Nations. Resource depletion: The continual replenishment of economically viable resources is essential for our future growth. Our past divestments, planned closures and uncertainty over resource assumptions – without reciprocal resource replenishment through exploration or acquisitions – could impact our growth options. Additionally, our ability to access resources could potentially be impacted as regulations evolve. Transition to a low-carbon future: Climate change constitutes an important part of our sustainability approach. Climate change risks have formed part of our strategic thinking and investment decisions for over two decades. The transition to a low-carbon future presents challenges for our portfolio over the short to long-term. Key areas of uncertainty include future climate change regulation and policies, the development of low-carbon technology solutions and the decarbonisation pathways across the steel sector. We are targeting a 15% reduction in absolute emissions from 2018 levels by 2030, with an ambition to reach net zero emissions by 2050 across our operations. Overall, our growth between now and 2030 will be carbon neutral. Please refer to our climate change report, available on our website, for further details. Structural change across commodity markets: The increasing focus on ESG investors and the developments of current geopolitical tensions, coupled with the transition to a low-carbon future, have the potential to structurally change the supply and demand of global commodities. Demand for our commodities could shift to 'greener' alternatives, with a higher dependence on recycling, ie secondary supply. Alternatively, an increased focus on ensuring supply security could see large volumes of supply enter the market, potentially impacting future margins. Technology advancement: Cyber attacks are becoming more prevalent and we have had to invest significantly in technology to enhance our cyber security. Principal Risks and Uncertainties We examine our principal risks and uncertainties to our business objectives within the strategic context of our geopolitical, societal and technological landscape. A principal risk is one or a combination of risks that can manifest externally or internally, be of any nature, and escalate from any area of the business. As such, we set expectations that all our leaders and team members understand their risks, assess them in line with Group policies and procedures, and respond. Where risks are material to the Group, they are escalated to the Executive Risk Management Committee and, as appropriate, to the Board or its committees. This requires a strong risk culture that we continue to develop and foster. The principal risks, uncertainties and trends outlined in this report should be considered as forward-looking statements and are made subject to the cautionary statement on page 384 of the Annual report 2020. We regularly assess the potential impact and likelihood of our principal risks to support the prioritisation of our efforts and resources. The assessment of these principal risks and the effectiveness of our associated controls reflect management’s current expectations, forecasts and assumptions and, by definition, involve subjective judgments and are subject to changes in our internal and external environments. The following describes both the inherent risks to our business and certain other threats, such as natural disasters and pandemics. In 2020, the on-going management and monitoring of these risks, controls and response plans has continued to be the responsibility of the Group’s Executive Risk Management Committee (RMC) and where required, a dedicated management committee chaired by an Executive member to oversee a specific principal risk. This year, we are providing greater transparency to our shareholders in disclosing where in our business (resources, assets or 7 relationships) the risk exists. Additionally, we identify the interconnectivity of our Strategic1, Economic2 and Operational3 principal risks within our investors’ Environment4, Social5 and Governance6 (ESG) approach. Footnotes: 1.Strategic – risks arising from uncertainties that may impact our ability to achieve our strategic objectives. 2. Economic – risks that directly impact financial performance and realisation of future economic benefits. 3. Operational – risks arising from our business that has potential to impact people, environment, community and operational performance including our supply chain. HSE risks are specific operational risks. 4. Environment – risks arising from business that have potential to impact on air, land, water, ecosystems and human health. 5. Social – risks arising from our business that have potential to impact on society, including health & safety. 6. Governance – risks arising from our workplace culture, business conduct and governance. 1. Living our corporate values Strategic and ESG Risk Living our values (Safety, Teamwork, Respect, Integrity and Excellence) goes to the heart of our Group’s performance, future prospects and reputation. Sharing and demonstrating our values through our behaviours together unlocks opportunities for high performance in all that we do. ThreatsCOVID-19 travel restrictions have reduced the ability to have face-to-face cultural and leadership development programmes. Hence, we are finding new ways to engage, induct and develop our people through use of virtual and online programmes. Trend 2. Geopolitics impacting trade and/or investment Strategic Risk International geopolitics may impact our ability to operate effectively and/or invest. ThreatsIncreased trade tensions may undermine rules-based trading system and lead to trade actions (increased tariffs and retaliation), potentially impacting key markets for our products. Trend 3. Transition to a low-carbon future Strategic and ESG Risk Climate change is a systemic challenge and will require co-ordinated actions between nations, industries and society. Our risk is that we do not adapt competitively to the requirements of a low-carbon future, including expectations of Scope 3 commitments in the products we produce and the way we operate our business, resulting in reputation damage with key stakeholders eroding investor confidence, market value and business resilience. ThreatsCurrent and emerging climate regulations have the potential to result in increased costs, change supply and demand dynamics for our products and create compliance risks, all of which could impact our financial performance and reputation. Trend 8 4. Execution of acquisitions and divestments Strategic Risk Acquisitions’ (or divestments’) actual realised value may vary materially from original business case. ThreatsValue is not realised from divestment or acquisition through changing or incorrect assumptions, unanticipated liabilities or integration costs. Trend 5. New ore resources Strategic and ESG Risk The success of our exploration programmes and/or acquisitions may be insufficient to offset depletion. ThreatsRecent assessment indicates a net decrease in our resources and reserves across all commodities. New large, long-life deposits are increasingly scarce and those that are known require advances in processing technology and/or significant capital investment in infrastructure. Trend 6. Strategic partnerships Strategic and ESG Risk Strategic partnerships play a material role in delivering our growth, production, cash or market positioning, and these may not always develop as planned. Strategic partnerships include our Traditional Owners, customers, joint ventures partners (managed and non-managed), governments and our suppliers. ThreatsDisruption to our partnerships may limit the expected benefits received by participants and lead to interruptions to our operations, development projects and exploration activities. For non-managed operations, the decisions of the controlling partners may cause adverse impacts to the value of our interest in the operation, or to our reputation, and may expose us to unexpected liabilities. Trend 7. Relationships with communities Strategic and ESG Risk We may not be viewed as a trusted partner by society and governments, affecting our ability to operate and grow through collaborative and mutually beneficial partnerships. Threats Access to land and resources may be impacted if we are not considered a trusted partner in certain regions. Other potential actions can include litigation exportation, export or foreign investment restrictions, increased government regulation and delays in approvals, which may threaten the investment proposition, title or carrying value of assets. Trend 9 8. Attract and retain requisite skilled people Strategic and ESG Risk Our ability to maintain our competitive position is dependent on attracting, developing and retaining services of a wide range of internal and external skilled and experienced personnel and contracting partners. ThreatsBusiness interruption or underperformance may arise from a lack of capability in people, standards, processes or systems to prevent, mitigate or recover from an interruption which results in a material loss to the Group. Trend 9. Commodity economics Economic Risk Commodity prices, driven by demand for and supply of our products, vary and may not be as expected over time. China is the largest market for our products and its growth pathway could affect demand for our products. ThreatsFalling commodity prices or adverse exchange rate movements reduce cash flow, limiting profitability and shareholder returns. These may trigger impairments and/or impact our credit ratings. Extended subdued prices may reflect a longer-term fall in demand for our products, and the reduced earnings and cash flow streams resulting from this may limit investment and/or growth opportunities. Unfavourable changes in the cost of production can arise, such as increased fuel prices. Trend 10. Access to capital through economic cycles Economic Risk External events and financial discipline may impact our ability to access capital and support our strategy. ThreatsOur ability to raise sufficient funds for capital investments during a major economic downturn. Trend 11. Resources to reserves Economic Risk Our estimates of ore resources and reserves may vary. The volume of material reported in Resource and Reserve is based on the geological, commercial and technical information available at the date of the report and is, by its nature, incomplete. As new information comes to light, the economic viability of some Ore Reserves and mine plans may be reassessed with material impacts (positive or negative). ThreatsInadequate knowledge of our Resources and Reserves increases production costs and ore loss within our production systems. Failure to capture the benefits of new technologies may reduce our volume of available Reserves. Trend 10 12. Capital project delivery Economic Risk Large capital investments require multi-year execution plans and are complex. Our ability to deliver projects to baseline plan – principally in terms of safety, cost and schedule – may vary due to changes in technical requirements (eg geotechnical), law and regulation, government or community expectations, or through commercial or economic assumptions proving inaccurate through the execution phase. ThreatsA delay or overrun in a project schedule and/or a significant safety or process safety incident could negatively impact our profitability, cash flow, ability to repay project-specific debt, asset carrying values, growth aspirations and relationships with key stakeholders. A failure to secure the required approvals (regulatory and from partners) may cause delays in project delivery with a corresponding increase in costs. In 2020, COVID-19 has affected the delivery of major projects due to restrictions on travel and supply chains, though some mitigation activities have reduced these impacts. Trend 13. Change in tax regulations Economic Risk The international tax policy landscape is becoming increasingly contentious with discussion related to digital taxes raising threats of trade wars and providing the impetus to implement significant changes to the global tax framework. ThreatsTax revenues play an important role in assisting governments to provide essential services and provide an opportunity for companies to contribute to the communities in which they operate. Tax policy settings are a relevant factor in investment decisions, particularly for industries that require significant upfront investment. Changes to the global tax framework must provide appropriate outcomes in the allocation of taxing rights between countries and provide certainty for companies seeking to invest. The potential for policy design that does not consider the features relevant to capital intensive industries or the adoption of unilateral approaches risks uncertainty, complexity and double taxation, which may adversely impact future investment decisions. Trend 14. Safety incident or major hazard event Operational and ESG Risk Our operations and projects are inherently hazardous, with the potential to cause illness or injury, damage to the environment, and disruption to communities. Major hazards include process safety, underground mining, surface mining and tailings and water storage. ThreatsFailure to manage our health, safety, environment or community risks could result in a catastrophic event or other long-term damage that could harm our financial performance and licence to operate. Trend 15. Cyber breach Operational Risk Cyber risk may disrupt our operations, affect how our employees work and/or breach data privacy and other sensitive information related to customers, contractors and suppliers. Cyber breaches can arrive from malicious external or internal attacks, but also inadvertently through human error. ThreatsThe growing volume and sophistication of cyber threats is increasing the likelihood of compromise, offset by significant improvements in the effectiveness of control measures. Trend 11 16. Physical impacts from climate change Operational and ESG Risk Our operating sites may be vulnerable to the physical impacts of climate change including extreme weather events, rising sea levels or extreme temperature impacts on operating environments. ThreatsClimate change has the potential to significantly reduce rainfall in areas where we operate which may lead to water shortages. Conversely, an extension of the tropical cyclone season in the Pilbara, Western Australia, would impact our iron ore operations. A significant warming trend, particularly influencing maximum temperatures, would also impact the way we operate. Trend 17. Water scarcity and management Operational and ESG Risk Water is a key part of our operational environmental footprint and a critical, shared resource for people, the environment and economic prosperity. In some regions where we work water scarcity is an inherent risk, like the Gobi Desert in Mongolia. In others, rainfall can vary greatly from year to year, such as Weipa in Queensland, Australia. Many of our sites are also experiencing changes in rainfall and water availability due to climate change. ThreatsOur water management causes unacceptable operational, environmental or community impacts. Sources of this risk exposure are diverse across geographies and commodities, with both financial and non-financial implications without proactive management in new asset developments, operations and closures. Trend 18. Natural disaster exposure Operational and ESG Risk A natural disaster occurs with significant operational interruption or damage to our assets and/or communities. ThreatsThis primarily includes major impacts to our Pilbara iron ore operations due to Category 5 cyclone storm surges hitting coastal operations and nearby communities, causing significant operational interruption or damage to mines, rail, port and/or other infrastructure. Non-financial impacts may include multiple fatalities or severe permanent impairment to multiple people. Other natural disasters that can affect our operations, depending on their location, include bush fire, drought, earthquakes and tsunami. In 2020, our Kennecott copper operation in Utah, US, was impacted by an earthquake. Trend 19. Closure, reclamation and rehabilitation Operational and ESG Risk Planning for the future of our sites after they cease operating is a core business function governed by our Closure Steering Committee. Estimated costs and liabilities are provided for, and updated annually, over the life of each operation. However, estimates may vary due to a number of factors that create either opportunities or challenges. ThreatsPlans and provisions for closure, reclamation and rehabilitation may vary over time due to changes in stakeholders’ expectations, legislation, standards, technical understanding and techniques. In addition, the expected timing of expenditure could change significantly due to changes in the business environment and orebody knowledge which might vary the life of an operation. Trend 12 20. Civil unrest Operational and ESG Risk Civil unrest may expose our employees and/or operations to significant threats or impact our key markets and customers, potentially resulting in compromised employee safety, and damage to or loss of assets. ThreatsWhere there is potential for civil unrest, our access or operational continuity may be disrupted. Our African and South American operations and exploration sites have the most exposure to this risk. Trend 21. COVID-19 Operational and ESG Risk The potential for transmission across our teams, communities and supply chains continues to be a threat that requires proactive management to guard against business impacts. ThreatsCOVID-19 transmission has the potential to compromise the health of employees, partners, communities and, in particular, vulnerable populations (eg elderly, First Nations, immuno-compromised people). A large-scale outbreak could lead to the complete shutdown of operations, affecting on the flow of products to customers. Trend 22. Breach of our policies, standards and procedures, laws or regulations Operational and ESG Risk This risk may greatly impact our reputation, licence to operate, and potentially exposes us financially. It is important that we foster a culture aligned with our values, provide education and guidance to employees, and implement proactive compliance monitoring. ThreatsInvestigations by regulatory authorities and litigation (regardless of the ultimate finding) may have a serious impact on our reputation. Fines may be imposed for breaching laws and/or regulations or for other inappropriate business conduct, as well as resulting in a loss in share price value and/or assets or loss of business. Other consequences could include the criminal prosecution of individuals and/or Group companies, imprisonment, and reputational damage to the Group. Trend 13
4.A History and development of the company The information set forth under the headings: •“Chairman’s Statement” on pages 7 to 9; •“Juukan Gorge” on pages 10 and 11; •“Our Strategy” on pages 22 and 23; •“Chief Financial Officer’s Statement” on pages 29 and 30; •“Financial Review…
4.A History and development of the company The information set forth under the headings: •“Chairman’s Statement” on pages 7 to 9; •“Juukan Gorge” on pages 10 and 11; •“Our Strategy” on pages 22 and 23; •“Chief Financial Officer’s Statement” on pages 29 and 30; •“Financial Review” on pages 31 to 38; •“Portfolio Management-Projects” on page 39; •“Portfolio Management-Material acquisitions and divestments” on page 39; •“Business Reviews-Business Development” on pages 40 and 41; •“Business Reviews-Iron Ore” on pages 43 to 45; •“Business Reviews-Aluminium” on pages 47 to 49; •“Business Reviews-Copper & Diamonds” on pages 51 to 53; •“Business Reviews-Energy & Minerals” on pages 55 to 57; •“Business Reviews-Innovation” on pages 58 and 59; •“Business Reviews-Commercial” on pages 60 and 61; •“Sustainability” on pages 62 to 91; •“Governance-Additional Statutory Disclosure-Operating and financial review” on pages 186 and 187; •“Financial Statements Note 2-Operating segments” on pages 223 to 226; and •“Financial Statements Note 36-Purchases and sales of subsidiaries, joint ventures, associates and other interests in businesses” on page 268; •“Rio Tinto Financial Information by Business Unit” on pages 306 to 309; •“Shareholder Information-Organisational structure” on page 375; •“Shareholder Information-History” on page 375; •“Shareholder Information-Nomenclature and financial data” on page 375; •“Shareholder Information-Dual listed companies structure” on pages 375 and 376; and •“Additional Information-Registered offices” on page 383 of the Annual report 2020 is incorporated herein by reference. In 2020 and 2019, the Group did not receive any public takeover offers by third parties in respect of Rio Tinto plc shares or Rio Tinto Limited shares or make any public takeover offers in respect of other companies’ shares. Rio Tinto’s Form 20-F and other filings can be viewed on the Rio Tinto website at www.riotinto.com as well as the SEC website at www.sec.gov. 4.B Business overview The information set forth under the headings: •“2020 at a Glance” on pages 2 and 3; •“Chairman’s Statement” on pages 7 to 9; •“Juukan Gorge” on pages 10 and 11; •“Chief Executive’s Statement” on pages 13 to 15; •“Our Business Model” on page 16; •“Our Stakeholders” on pages 18 and 19; •“Strategic Context” on pages 20 and 21; •“Our Strategy” on pages 22 and 23; 14 •“Key Performance Indicators” on pages 24 to 28; •“Chief Financial Officer’s Statement” on pages 29 and 30; •“Financial Review” on pages 31 to 38; •“Business Reviews-Business Development” on pages 40 and 41; •“Business Reviews-Iron Ore” on pages 43 to 45; •“Business Reviews-Aluminium” on pages 47 to 49; •“Business Reviews-Copper & Diamonds” on pages 51 to 53; •“Business Reviews-Energy & Minerals” on pages 55 to 57; •“Business Reviews-Innovation” on pages 58 and 59; •“Business Reviews-Commercial” on pages 60 and 61; •“Sustainability” on pages 62 to 91; •“Governance-Additional Statutory Disclosure-Government regulations” on page 189; •“Governance-Additional Statutory Disclosure-Environmental regulations” on page 189; •“Financial Statements Note 3-Operating segments-additional information” on pages 227 and 228; •“Metals and Minerals Production” on pages 339 and 340; •“Ore Reserves” on pages 341 to 347 and page 349; and •“Mines and Production Facilities” on pages 352 to 369 of the Annual report 2020 is incorporated herein by reference. See above Item 3.D, “Principal Risks and Uncertainties-22. Breach of our policies, standards and procedures, obligations or regulations” and below Item 5.A, “Additional financial information-Sales revenue” (Iron Ore, Aluminium, Copper & Diamonds, Energy & Minerals). Disclosure pursuant to Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 added Section 13(r) to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Section 13(r) to the Exchange Act requires an issuer to disclose in its annual reports whether it or any of its affiliates knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with the Government of Iran during the period covered by the report. The Company notes the following in relation to activities that took place in 2020, or in relation to activities the Company became aware of in 2020 relating to disclosable activities prior to the reporting period. The Company routinely takes action to protect its intellectual property rights in many countries throughout the world, including Iran. In connection with such protection efforts, the Company has used, directly or indirectly, intellectual property firms with an agent or branch office in Iran to assist with the filing of patent and trade-mark applications, prosecution activities and maintenance in Iran. Contact with the firms has been minimal and solely limited to these activities. Certain transactions related to patents, trademarks and copyright are authorised activities under US sanctions and regulations against Iran (including the filing of an application to obtain a patent or trade-mark in Iran) and the Company believes its limited activities in this regard are consistent with this authorisation. Rio Tinto acquired its interest in Namibia-based Rössing Uranium Limited (“Rössing”) in 1970. The Iran Foreign Investments Company (“IFIC”) acquired its original minority shareholding in Rössing in 1975. IFIC’s interest predates the establishment of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the U.S. economic sanctions targeting Iran’s nuclear, energy and ballistic missile programs. IFIC acquired a minority shareholding in Rössing in accordance with Namibian law. The Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control designated IFIC as a Specially Designated National on 5 November 2018. On 16 July 2019, the Company completed the sale of its entire interest 68.62 per cent stake in Rössing to China National Uranium Corporation Limited (“CNUC”) for an initial cash payment of $6.5 million and a contingent payment of up to $100 million. The contingent payment is linked to uranium spot prices and Rössing's net income until calendar year 2026. In addition, the Company will receive a cash payment if CNUC sells the Zelda 20 Mineral Deposit during a restricted period following completion. The total consideration is subject to a maximum cap of $106.5 million. Since the sale, Rio Tinto Marketing Pte Ltd has continued to purchase a quantity of uranium produced by Rössing pursuant to an ongoing marketing arrangement which will cease on 26 December 2026, in order to satisfy existing contractual commitments with customers. Rössing was neither a business partnership nor joint venture between the Company and IFIC. Rössing is a Namibian limited liability company with a number of shareholders which included Rio Tinto. 15 When the Company was a shareholder, IFIC had no uranium product off-take rights. Neither IFIC nor other Government of Iran entities had any supply contracts in place with Rössing and none received any uranium from Rössing. IFIC also did not have access to any technology through its investment in Rössing or rights to such technology. Rio Tinto had no power or authority to divest IFIC’s holding in Rössing. The Rössing board took steps in 2012 to terminate IFIC’s involvement in the governance of Rössing. When Rio Tinto was a shareholder in Rössing, IFIC was entitled under Namibian law to attend annual general meetings of Rössing, which they did attend. IFIC was represented on the board of Rössing by two directors. While this level of board representation did not provide IFIC with the ability to influence the conduct of Rössing’s business on its own, the Rössing board nonetheless determined that, in light of international economic sanctions, it would be in the best interest of Rössing to terminate IFIC’s involvement in board activity. Therefore, on 4 June 2012, at the annual general meeting of Rössing, the shareholders, including the Company, voted not to re-elect the two IFIC board members. This ended IFIC’s participation in Rössing board activities. While IFIC was entitled to its pro rata share of any dividend that the majority of the board declared for all shareholders in Rössing, IFIC had not received such monies since early 2008. Simply by maintaining its own shareholding in Rössing, the Company was not engaging in any activity intended or designed to confer any direct or indirect financial support for IFIC. While the Company does not view itself as actively transacting or entering into business dealings with an instrumentality of the Government of Iran or a Specially Designated National, this information has been provided to ensure transparency regarding the passive, minority shareholding in Rössing held by IFIC while the Company was a shareholder. 4.C Organisational structure The information set forth under the headings: •“Financial Statements Note 32-Principal subsidiaries” on pages 263 to 265; •“Financial Statements Note 33-Principal joint operations” on page 265; •“Financial Statements Note 34-Principal joint ventures” on page 266; •“Financial Statements Note 35-Principal associates” on pages 267 and 268; •“Shareholder Information-Organisational structure” on page 375; and •“Shareholder Information-Dual listed company structure” on pages 375 and 376 of the Annual report 2020 is incorporated herein by reference. 4.D Property, plant and equipment The information set forth under the headings: •“Key Performance Indicators” on pages 24 to 28; •“Portfolio Management-Projects” on page 39; •“Business Reviews-Iron Ore” on pages 43 to 45; •“Business Reviews-Aluminium” on pages 47 to 49; •“Business Reviews-Copper & Diamonds” on pages 51 to 53; •“Business Reviews-Energy & Minerals” on pages 55 to 57; •“Sustainability” on pages 62 to 91; •“Governance-Additional Statutory Disclosure-Environmental regulations” on page 189; •“Governance-Additional Statutory Disclosure-Greenhouse gas emissions” on page 189; •“Financial Statements Note 14-Property, plant and equipment” on pages 236 to 238; •“Metals and Minerals Production” on pages 339 and 340; •“Ore Reserves” on pages 341 to 347 and page 349; and •“Mines and Production Facilities” on pages 352 to 369 of the Annual report 2020 is incorporated herein by reference. 16
5.A Operating results The information set forth under the headings: •“Chairman’s Statement” on pages 7 to 9; •“Financial Review” on pages 31 to 38; •“Business Reviews-Iron Ore” on pages 43 to 45; •“Business Reviews-Aluminium” on pages 47 to 49; •“Business Reviews-Copper & Diamon…
5.A Operating results The information set forth under the headings: •“Chairman’s Statement” on pages 7 to 9; •“Financial Review” on pages 31 to 38; •“Business Reviews-Iron Ore” on pages 43 to 45; •“Business Reviews-Aluminium” on pages 47 to 49; •“Business Reviews-Copper & Diamonds” on pages 51 to 53; •“Business Reviews-Energy & Minerals” on pages 55 to 57 •“Business Reviews-Innovation” on pages 58 and 59; •“Business Reviews-Commercial” on pages 60 and 61; •“Sustainability” on pages 62 to 91; •“Governance-Additional Statutory Disclosure-Operating and financial review” on pages 186 and 187; •“Governance-Additional Statutory Disclosure-Government regulations” on page 189; •“Governance-Additional Statutory Disclosure-Environmental regulations” on page 189; and •“Financial Statements Note 29-Financial instruments and risk management” on pages 249 to 259 of the Annual report 2020 is incorporated herein by reference. Additional Financial Information 2020 net earnings of $9.8 billion were $1.8 billion higher than 2019 net earnings of $8.0 billion. Net earnings represent amounts attributable to owners of Rio Tinto. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) requires that the profit/(loss) for the period reported in the income statement should also include earnings/(losses) attributable to non-controlling interests in subsidiaries. The table below lists the principal factors driving the movement in net earnings between periods and reconciles to profit for the year. To provide additional insight into the performance of our business, we report underlying EBITDA and underlying earnings, which are defined in “Financial Statements Note 2-Operating segments” on pages 223 to 226 of the Annual report 2020. 17 Financial performance of 2020 compared to 2019 2020 vs 2019 $m $m 2019 net earnings 8,010 Prices(a) 3,407 Exchange rates(a) (103) Volume and mix(a) (452) General inflation(a) (251) Energy(a) 461 Operating cash cost movements(a) (450) One-off items(a) 153 Non-cash / other(a) (60) Total changes in underlying EBITDA 2,705 Decrease in depreciation and amortisation (pre-tax) in underlying earnings 275 Decrease in interest and finance items (pre-tax) in underlying earnings 143 Increase in tax on underlying earnings (839) Increase in underlying earnings attributable to outside interests (209) Total change in underlying earnings(b) 2,075 Decrease in net impairment charges 543 Decrease in losses on consolidation and disposal of interest in businesses 291 Movement in exchange differences and gains/losses on debt (1,064) Other (86) Total changes in exclusions from underlying earnings (316) 2020 net earnings 9,769 Profit attributable to non-controlling interests 631 Profit for the year 10,400 (a)These variances represent the impact on underlying EBITDA. (b)Earnings contributions from Group businesses and business segments are based on underlying earnings. Amounts excluded from net earnings in arriving at underlying earnings are described in “Financial Statements Note 2-Operating segments” on page 226 of the Annual report 2020. Prices Commodity price movements in 2020 increased underlying EBITDA by $3,407 million compared with 2019. This was primarily driven by the strength in pricing for iron ore (+$3,262 million) and copper (+$405 million) and was partly offset by lower prices for aluminium, alumina and bauxite (-$314 million). The 2020 monthly average Platts index for 62% iron fines adjusted to an FOB basis was 19% higher on average compared with 2019, driven by continued supply disruptions in the seaborne market and strong demand following record Chinese steel output. The average London Metal Exchange (LME) price for copper was 3% higher, while the LME aluminium price was 5% lower, compared with 2019. The gold price rose 27%. The midwest premium for aluminium in the US averaged $313 per tonne, 2% lower than in 2019. 18 Exchange rates Compared with 2019, on average, the US dollar was broadly flat against the Australian and Canadian dollars but strengthened by 12% against the South African rand. Currency movements, which lowered underlying EBITDA by $103 million relative to 2019, mainly related to exchange rate losses on receivables following the significant strengthening of the Australian dollar at 2020 year-end. Volumes and product mix Underlying EBITDA was $452 million lower than 2019 from movements in sales volumes and changes in product mix across the portfolio. Although iron ore shipments from the Pilbara rose by 1%, the year-on-year gains are mostly included in Other, reflecting recovery from the fire at Cape Lambert A port in 2019. Other key variances included lower gold volumes following a reduction in grades at Oyu Tolgoi and Kennecott, lower titanium dioxide feedstock volumes and lower sales of value added products in our aluminium business in line with market demand. Energy Average movements in energy prices compared with 2019 improved underlying EBITDA by $461 million, mainly due to lower diesel prices and reduced coal prices for two of our Pacific Aluminium smelters. Operating cash cost movements* The impact of higher cash operating costs, which we reflect on a unit cost basis, reduced underlying EBITDA by $450 million compared with 2019. There was continued respite on cost inflation for certain raw materials for Aluminium, in particular caustic soda, pitch, petroleum coke and alloys. However, this was outweighed by other cost pressures, notably fixed cost inefficiencies at Kennecott, due to the lower grades and the extended smelter maintenance, and higher unit cash costs at Oyu Tolgoi in line with lower output. * Operating cash cost improvements are derived from the difference between the current and prior year full cash cost of sales per unit multiplied by prior year volume sold. This financial performance indicator is used by management internally to assess performance and therefore is considered relevant to users of the accounts. Exploration and evaluation spend Our exploration and evaluation spend was largely unchanged at $625 million. This went to our greenfield programmes and highest value projects, particularly on evaluating the Resolution copper project in Arizona, advancing our Winu copper/gold deposit in Australia and progressing our Jadar lithium-borate project in Serbia. In addition, $82 million for iron ore feasibility studies in the Pilbara was recognised as capital expenditure. One off items One-off items aggregated to be $153 million less than in 2019. 2020 one-offs primarily reflected earlier than planned pot-lining replacement at the Kitimat aluminium smelter ($51 million) and an increased impact from curtailment of operations at RBM ($23 million). These were offset by the non-recurrence of 2019 events, including the $199 million charge at Escondida to reflect cancellation of existing coal powered energy contracts following a switch to renewables and $68 million for challenges faced at our ISAL and Kitimat aluminium smelters. Non-cash costs/other Movements in non-cash costs and other items, which lowered underlying EBITDA by $60 million compared with 2019, mainly reflected additional costs ($333 million) incurred from COVID-19 across the Group such as screening, equipment hire, roster changes, temporary relocation and hygiene. This was offset by recovery from the fire at the Cape Lambert A port in the Pilbara in 2019 ($184 million) and lower provisions in respect of legacy operations ($23 million). Depreciation and amortisation, net interest and tax The depreciation and amortisation charge was $275 million lower than 2019, mainly due to a lower asset base following impairments in 2019 and in the first half of 2020, together with accelerated depreciation in 2019 following the pot failures at Kitimat. Lower interest and finance items (pre-tax) were reflective of a lower level of net debt on average during the year, in part due to repayment of $526 million of Euro Bonds, which matured in May 2020. It also reflected more of our debt being at floating interest rates. 19 The 2020 effective corporate income tax rate on underlying earnings, excluding equity accounted units, was 29.5%, in line with 2019. The effective tax rate on underlying earnings in Australia was 32% in 2020 compared with 31% in 2019. We anticipate an effective tax rate on underlying earnings of approximately 30% in 2021. Further details of the taxation charge and tax reconciliation are disclosed in “Financial Statements Note 9-Taxation” on page 232 of the Annual report 2020. Items excluded from underlying earnings Refer to page 22 below for a detailed reconciliation between underlying earnings and net earnings. Profit Net earnings and underlying earnings refer to amounts attributable to the owners of Rio Tinto. The net profit attributable to the owners of Rio Tinto in 2020 was $9.8 billion (2019: $8.0 billion). We recorded a profit after tax in 2020 of $10.4 billion (2019: $7.0 billion) of which a profit of $0.6 billion (2019 loss: $1.0 billion) was attributable to non-controlling interests. Financial performance of 2019 compared to 2018 2019 net earnings of $8.0 billion were $5.6 billion lower than 2018 net earnings of $13.6 billion. The table below lists the principal factors driving the movement in net earnings between periods and reconciles to profit for the year. 2019 vs 2018 $m $m 2018 net earnings 13,638 Prices(a) 4,382 Exchange rates(a) 529 Volume and mix(a) (20) General inflation(a) (303) Energy(a) 75 Operating cash cost movements (a) (523) Higher exploration and evaluation spend(a) (136) One-off items (a) (16) Absence of underlying EBITDA from assets divested in 2018, including coking coal(a) (1,246) Non-cash / other(a) 319 Total changes in underlying EBITDA 3,061 Decrease in depreciation and amortisation (pre-tax) in underlying earnings (366) Decrease in interest and finance items (pre-tax) in underlying earnings 32 Increase in tax on underlying earnings (1,011) Increase in underlying earnings attributable to outside interests (151) Total change in underlying earnings(b) 1,565 Increase in net impairment charges (1,554) Decrease in gains on consolidation and gains on disposals (4,287) Movement in exchange differences and gains/losses on derivatives (904) Other (448) Total changes in exclusions from underlying earnings (7,193) 2019 net earnings 8,010 Profit attributable to non-controlling interests (1,038) Profit for the year 6,972 (a)These variances represent the impact on underlying EBITDA. 20 (b)Earnings contributions from Group businesses and business segments are based on underlying earnings. Amounts excluded from net earnings in arriving at underlying earnings are described in “Financial Statements Note 2-Operating segments” on page 226 of the Annual report 2020. Prices Commodity price movements in 2019 increased underlying EBITDA by $4,382 million compared with 2018. This was primarily driven by the strength in the iron ore price and was partly offset by lower prices for copper and aluminium. The Platts index for 62% iron fines was 39% higher on average compared with 2018 on a free on board (FOB) basis, driven by supply disruptions in the seaborne market and strong demand following record Chinese steel output. Average London Metal Exchange (LME) prices for copper and aluminium were 8% and 15% lower, respectively, compared with 2018, as global manufacturing activity slowed. The gold price was 10% higher. The 10% tariff on US imports of aluminium from Canada, in place from 1 June 2018, was removed on 19 May 2019, following agreement between the US and Canadian governments. The midwest premium for aluminium in the US averaged $320 per tonne - 24% lower than in 2018. Exchange rates Compared with 2018, on average the US dollar strengthened by 7% against the Australian dollar, by 3% against the Canadian dollar and by 9% against the South African rand. Currency movements increased underlying EBITDA by $529 million relative to 2018. Volumes Underlying EBITDA decreased by $20 million compared with 2018 from movements in sales volumes and changes in product mix. A 3% decline in iron ore shipments from the Pilbara, where we experienced weather disruptions and operational challenges at some of our mines in the first half of 2019, were mostly offset by increased bauxite shipments, improved aluminium product mix and higher by-product volumes (gold and molybdenum) from Rio Tinto Kennecott and Oyu Tolgoi. Energy Average movements in energy prices compared with 2018 improved underlying EBITDA by $75 million, mainly due to lower diesel prices. Operating cash cost movements* Our cash operating costs rose by $523 million compared with 2018 (on a unit cost basis), primarily reflecting an increase in iron ore unit costs, driven by the first half challenges. There was some respite on cost inflation for certain raw materials for Aluminium, in particular caustic soda and petroleum coke. However, this was partly offset by inflationary pressures on other costs. * Operating cash cost improvements are derived from the difference between the current and prior year full cash cost of sales per unit multiplied by prior year volume sold. This financial performance indicator is used by management internally to assess performance and therefore is considered relevant to users of the accounts. Exploration and evaluation spend We spent $136 million, or 28%, more on exploration and evaluation compared with last year. This went to our highest value projects, particularly on evaluating the Resolution copper project in Arizona, advancing our Winu copper/gold deposit in Australia and progressing our Falcon diamond project in Canada. One off items One-off items netted out to be $16 million less than in 2018. 2019 underlying EBITDA includes the impact of a $199 million charge at Escondida to reflect the cancellation of existing coal power contracts, a $68 million impact from the curtailment of operations at Richards Bay Minerals (RBM) and $68 million for operational challenges faced at our ISAL and Kitimat aluminium smelters. In 2018 we suspended operations for two months at Iron Ore Company of Canada before reaching a new labour agreement ($236 million impact). We also suspended production at Rio Tinto Iron & Titanium, following a fatality at our Sorel-Tracy plant and labour disruptions at RBM ($132 million impact). 21 Absence of underlying EBITDA from assets divested in 2018, including coking coal In 2019 underlying EBITDA decreased by $1,246 million due to significant divestments in 2018 primarily the coking coal business and the Grasberg copper mine. Non-cash costs/other Following implementation of IFRS 16 "Leases" on 1 January 2019, a large proportion of our lease expense comprises charges for depreciation and interest and is not included in cash operating costs. There was a consequent benefit to underlying EBITDA of $319 million from this change in treatment. Depreciation and amortisation, net interest and tax Our depreciation and amortisation charge was $366 million higher than 2018. This was primarily due to the inclusion of depreciation on leases brought on to the balance sheet on adoption of IFRS 16 and completion of the Amrun bauxite mine. The increase was partly offset by the impact of the weaker Australian and Canadian dollars against the US dollar, along with assets divested in 2018. Interest and finance items (pre-tax) were broadly in line with 2018. This was mainly due to the bond tender we completed in 2018, which reduced our gross debt by $1.9 billion equivalent and incurred $94 million in early redemption costs in 2018. In 2019, there was also a lower level of average net debt and an increase in capitalised interest. This was offset by the inclusion of interest expense on leases following adoption of IFRS 16 "Leases" in 2019. The 2019 effective corporate income tax rate on underlying earnings, excluding equity accounted units, was 30%, compared with 29% in 2018. The effective tax rate on underlying earnings in Australia was 31% in 2019 compared with 30% in 2018. We anticipate an effective tax rate on underlying earnings of approximately 30% in 2020. Items excluded from underlying earnings Refer below for a detailed reconciliation between underlying earnings and net earnings. Profit Net earnings and underlying earnings refer to amounts attributable to the owners of Rio Tinto. The net profit attributable to the owners of Rio Tinto in 2019 was $8.0 billion (2018: $13.6 billion). We recorded a profit after tax in 2019 of $7.0 billion (2018: $13.9 billion) of which a loss of $1.0 billion (2018 profit: $0.3 billion) was attributable to non-controlling interests. Exclusions from underlying earnings 2018-2020 Earnings contributions from Group businesses and business segments are based on underlying earnings. Amounts excluded from net earnings in arriving at underlying earnings are summarised in the discussion of year-on-year results below. 2020 2019 2018 $m $m $m Underlying earnings 12,448 10,373 8,808 Items excluded from underlying earnings Impairment charges (1,115) (1,658) (104) Net (losses)/gains on consolidation and disposal of interests in businesses — (291) 3,996 Foreign exchange and derivative (losses)/gains on US dollar net debt and intragroup balances and derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting (1,264) (200) 704 Gain on sale of wharf and land in Kitimat, Canada — — 569 Net losses from movements to closure estimates (non-operating and fully impaired sites) (300) — (335) Other exclusions — (214) — Net earnings 9,769 8,010 13,638 2020 Net impairment charges decreased by $543 million compared with 2019. We recognised $1,115 million of impairment charges in 2020, comprised of $472 million related to three of our Pacific Aluminium smelters (NZAS, Bell Bay and Boyne), $131 million related to the ISAL smelter in Iceland, $220 million for the Sohar smelter in Oman and $292 million related to our interest in the Diavik diamond mine. 22 In 2020, we recognised non-cash exchange and derivative losses of $1,264 million. This was mainly on US dollar debt in non-US dollar functional currency Group companies, intragroup balances, and on the revaluation of certain derivatives which do not qualify for hedge accounting. These losses compared with a 2019 loss of $200 million, giving rise to a negative year-on-year movement of $1,064 million. The exchange losses are largely offset by currency translation gains recognised in equity. The quantum of US dollar debt is largely unaffected and we will repay it from US dollar sales receipts. In 2020, we excluded net additional closure costs of $300 million from underlying earnings principally relating to a non-operating site (Gove), a fully impaired site (Argyle) and the net earnings impact in respect of increases to closure provisions following a reduction to the closure discount rate. These are included in other exclusions. 2019 Net impairment charges increased by $1.6 billion compared with 2018, primarily related to the Oyu Tolgoi underground project in Mongolia and the Yarwun alumina refinery in Queensland, Australia. We recognised an impairment charge of $0.8 billion (after tax and non-controlling interests) on the Oyu Tolgoi project, reflecting forecast delays to first production and increased capital spend on the development. We also recognised a $0.8 billion post-tax impairment charge on the Yarwun alumina refinery following ramp-up of the Amrun expansion at Weipa, which resulted in a reassessment of our cash generating units. Weipa is now considered to generate cash inflows largely independent from the downstream alumina operations with which, until 2019, it was aggregated for accounting purposes. In 2018, we recognised $0.1 billion of after tax charges, mainly relating to the carrying value of the ISAL aluminium smelter in Iceland following its reclassification to assets held for sale. In 2019, we recognised a further $0.1 billion post-tax charge as these assets were reclassified back out of assets held for sale. Gains on disposals were $4.3 billion lower than 2018. In 2019, we recognised a $0.3 billion loss (after tax) from the sale of Rössing Uranium, including a non-cash adjustment for historical foreign exchange losses. In 2018, we realised net gains of $4.0 billion (after tax), primarily from the sale of our Hail Creek and Kestrel coking coal businesses in Australia, the sale of our interest in the Grasberg copper mine in Indonesia and the formation of the ELYSIS joint venture in Canada. Exchange differences and gains/losses on derivatives were $0.9 billion lower than 2018. In 2019, these gave rise to a $0.2 billion after tax loss. This compared with gains of $0.7 billion in 2018 - mainly on US dollar debt in non-US dollar functional currency Group companies, intragroup balances and on the revaluation of certain derivatives which do not qualify for hedge accounting. These exchange gains are largely offset by currency translation losses recognised in equity. The quantum of US dollar debt is largely unaffected and we will repay it from US dollar sales receipts. There were $0.4 billion in other changes in items excluded from underlying earnings. In 2019, we recognised a $0.2 billion loss (after tax) related to provisions for obligations in respect of legacy operations. In 2018, we recognised a $0.6 billion gain on sale of surplus land at Kitimat and a $0.3 billion increase in the closure provision at the Argyle diamond mine. 2018 In 2018, we recognised $104 million of post-tax impairment charges, mainly relating to the carrying value of the ISAL aluminium smelter in Iceland following its reclassification to assets held for sale. 2018 net gains on consolidation and disposal of interests in businesses of $4.0 billion (post-tax) included the sale of our Hail Creek and Kestrel coking coal businesses in Australia, the sale of our interest in Grasberg in Indonesia and the formation of the ELYSIS joint venture in Canada. We created this joint venture in May with Alcoa to develop a carbon-free aluminium smelting process and recognised a gain of $141 million (post-tax) for the fair value uplift on forming the joint venture. In 2018, we recognised non-cash exchange and derivative gains of $0.7 billion. This was mainly on US dollar debt in non-US dollar functional currency Group companies, intragroup balances, and on the revaluation of certain derivatives which did not qualify for hedge accounting. The exchange gains were largely offset by currency translation losses recognised in equity. The quantum of US dollar debt was largely unaffected. Other exclusions of $0.2 billion included gains on the sale of surplus land at Kitimat in Canada ($0.6 billion), partially offset by charges recognised to increase closure provisions at ERA and Argyle in Australia ($0.3 billion). 23 Underlying Earnings by product group 2018-2020 2020 2019 2018 $m $m $m Iron Ore 11,398 9,638 6,531 Aluminium 471 599 1,347 Copper & Diamonds 763 554 1,054 Energy & Minerals(a) 577 611 995 Other operations (54) (89) (102) Other items/Intrasegment eliminations (477) (587) (690) Exploration and evaluation (216) (231) (193) Net interest (14) (122) (134) Group underlying earnings 12,448 10,373 8,808 Exclusions (2,679) (2,363) 4,830 Net Earnings 9,769 8,010 13,638 (a)Includes the Simandou iron ore project in Guinea and Iron Ore Company of Canada. Sales Revenue Consolidated sales revenue for 2020 of $44.6 billion was $1.4 billion or 3% higher than the prior period. Gross product sales (including the sales revenue of equity accounted units on a proportionately consolidated basis, after adjusting for sales to subsidiaries) increased from $45.4 billion to $47.0 billion. Rio Tinto’s sales revenue continues to be predominantly attributable to iron ore and aluminium. Prices 2020 2019 2018 Commodity Source Unit $ $ $ Average prices Iron ore 62% Fe Fines FOB Platts Index less Baltic Exchange Freight Rate dmt(a) 101.3 85.0 61.8 Aluminium LME(b) Tonne 1,702 1,791 2,110 Copper LME(b) Pound 2.81 2.73 2.97 Gold London Bullion Market (LBMA) Ounce 1,770 1,393 1,269 Year end spot price Aluminium Tonne 1,978 1,523 1,863 Copper Pound 3.51 2.79 2.70 Gold Ounce 1,888 1,523 1,282 (a)Dry metric tonne (b)LME cash price The above table shows published prices for Rio Tinto’s commodities for the last three years where these are publicly available, and where there is a reasonable degree of correlation between the published prices and Rio Tinto’s realised prices. Group sales revenue will not necessarily move in line with these published prices for a number of reasons which are discussed below. The discussion of revenues below relates to the Group’s gross product sales from sale of commodities, as included in the “Financial Statements Note 2-Operating segments” on pages 223 to 226 of the Annual report 2020. 24 Iron Ore 2020 gross product sales compared with 2019 Gross product sales increased by $3.4 billion (14%) to $27.5 billion in 2020. Gross product sales for our Pilbara operations included freight revenue of $1.5 billion (2019: $1.7 billion). The increase is attributable to the 2020 monthly average Platts index for 62% iron fines adjusted to an FOB basis was 19% higher on average compared with 2019, driven by continued supply disruptions in the seaborne market and strong demand following record Chinese steel output. We increased our iron ore shipments by 1% and production by 2% compared with 2019, whilst implementing strict measures to manage COVID-19. In 2020, we priced approximately 13% of sales by reference to the prior quarter’s average index lagged by one month with the remainder sold either on current quarter average, current month average or on the spot market. We made approximately 70% of sales including freight and 30% on an FOB basis. In 2020, we achieved an average iron ore price of $91.0 per wet metric tonne on an FOB basis (2019: $79.0 per wet metric tonne) across our product suite. This equates to $98.9 per dry metric tonne, assuming 8% moisture (2019: $85.9 per dry metric tonne), which compares with the monthly average Platts index for 62% iron fines converted to an FOB basis of $101.3 per dry metric tonne (2019: $84.9 per dry metric tonne). The slightly lower realised price compared to the Platts index was due to lower market premiums for lump and the effect of the sales priced by reference to the prior quarter’s average index lagged by one month in a rising price environment throughout 2020. 2019 gross product sales compared with 2018 Gross product sales increased by $5.4 billion (29%) to $24.1 billion in 2019. The gross product sales for our Pilbara operations included freight revenue of $1.7 billion (2018: $1.7 billion). The significant increase is attributable to higher prices as the Platts index for 62% iron fines was 39% higher on average compared with 2018 on a free on board (FOB) basis. This was partly offset by the effect of lower shipments from the Pilbara, which decreased 3% from the previous period to 327 million tonnes. In 2019, we priced approximately 76% of our sales with reference to the average index price for the month of shipment and 16% with reference to the prior quarter’s average index lagged by one month, with the remainder sold either on current quarter average, current month average or on the spot market. We made approximately 68% of sales including freight and 32% on an FOB basis. In 2019, we achieved an average iron ore price of $79.0 per wet metric tonne on an FOB basis (2018: $57.8 per wet metric tonne). This equates to $85.9 per dry metric tonne (2018: $62.8 per dry metric tonne). Aluminium 2020 gross product sales compared with 2019 Aluminium’s gross product sales are from aluminium and related products such as alumina and bauxite. Gross product sales decreased by 10% to $9.3 billion in 2020. This reflects the price declines in alumina and aluminium metal and reduced demand for value-added product (VAP), driven by market conditions from the impact of COVID-19. In 2020, we achieved an average realised aluminium price of $1,946 per tonne, 9% lower than 2019 ($2,132 per tonne). This comprised the LME price, a market premium and a product (VAP) premium. The cash LME price averaged $1,702 per tonne, 5% lower than 2019, even after a sharp recovery in the second half of 2020. In our key US market, the midwest premium dropped 2% to $313 per tonne on average in 2020. VAP represented 43% of the primary metal we sold, in line with market demand (2019: 51%), and generated product premiums averaging $213 per tonne of VAP sold (2019: $234 per tonne). Market demand for VAP rebounded in the fourth quarter of 2020, returning to normal levels. 25 2019 gross product sales compared with 2018 Aluminium’s gross product sales are from aluminium and related products such as alumina and bauxite. Gross product sales decreased by 15% to $10.3 billion in 2019. This reflects the significant price declines in alumina and aluminium metal offset by increases in third-party bauxite sales. In 2019 we achieved an average realised aluminium price of $2,132 per tonne (2018: $2,470 per tonne). This comprised the LME price, a market premium and a value-added product (VAP) premium. The cash LME price averaged $1,791 per tonne, 15% lower than 2018. In our key US market, the midwest premium dropped 24% to $320 per tonne on average in 2019. VAP represented 51% of the primary metal we sold (2018: 54%, excluding the Dunkerque smelter which we sold in 2018) and generated attractive product premiums averaging $234 per tonne of VAP sold (2018: $227 per tonne). We paid a 10% tariff on our Canadian aluminium exports to the United States under Section 232 until the tariff was removed on 19 May 2019. Copper & Diamonds 2020 gross product sales compared with 2019 Gross product sales of $5.4 billion was 7% lower than 2019. This reflected weak market conditions in the first half, COVID-19 restrictions and a 5.7 magnitude earthquake in Utah in March. In addition, delays in restarting the Kennecott smelter, following a planned shutdown, and a temporary reduction in copper and gold grades reduced sales volumes. Our average realised copper price increased by 3% to 283 US cents per pound, recovering in the second half from first half lows. 2019 gross product sales compared with 2018 Gross product sales of $5.8 billion was 10% lower than 2018. This reflected lower average realised copper prices and lower grades at all our operations, resulting in lower mined and refined copper production volumes. The impact was partly offset by higher throughput from Escondida, productivity improvements at Oyu Tolgoi and improvements in ore processed at Kennecott. Our average realised copper price decreased by 7% to 275 US cents per pound, which was comparable with an 8% decline in the LME price to 273 US cents per pound. Energy & Minerals 2020 gross product sales compared with 2019 Gross product sales for the product group in 2020 fell by 3% to $5.0 billion. This reflected the impact of COVID-19 restrictions and weaker market conditions in Minerals (titanium dioxide feedstocks and borates), partially offset by IOC shipping 8% higher volumes and benefiting from stronger pricing. 2019 gross product sales compared with 2018 Gross product sales for the product group in 2019 fell by 6% to $5.2 billion. Excluding the contribution from the divested coal business in 2018, 2019 revenue of $5.2 billion was 15% higher than 2018. The increase reflects the recovery in volumes at Rio Tinto Iron & Titanium and Iron Ore Company of Canada and higher prices for iron ore pellets and concentrate and titanium dioxide feedstocks. IOC production was 18% higher than 2018, when operations were impacted by a two-month strike. Titanium dioxide feedstock production was 8% higher than 2018, reflecting improved operational performance and the restart of furnaces. 26 Cash flow 2020 cash flow compared with 2019 We generated $15.9 billion in net cash from our operating activities, 6% higher than 2019. This increase was driven primarily by higher underlying EBITDA from higher iron ore prices, net of an increase in tax paid in line with profits, a modest rise in working capital (primarily higher prices in receivables), increased dividends paid to joint venture partners and lower dividends received from equity accounted units. We invested $6.2 billion in capital expenditure in 2020 which we funded from operating activities. We expect to continue funding our capital programme from internal sources, except for the Oyu Tolgoi underground development, which is project-financed. We generated $9.4 billion of free cash flow, 3% higher than 2019, reflecting our higher operating cash flow and consistent capital expenditure. Free cash flow is calculated using the following IFRS measures: For year ended 31 December 2020 $m 2019 $m Net cash generated from operating activities 15,875 14,912 Purchases of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets (6,189) (5,488) Sales of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets 45 49 Lease principal payments (324) (315) Free cash flow 9,407 9,158 We paid $6.1 billion in dividends to our shareholders. We also repurchased $0.2 billion of our shares, all of which were bought from the market in the UK in 2020. A full consolidated cash flow statement is contained in the Financial Statements on page 202 of the Annual report 2020. 2019 cash flow compared with 2018 We generated $14.9 billion in net cash from our operating activities, 26% higher than 2018. This increase was driven primarily by higher underlying EBITDA from higher iron ore prices and the ongoing management of working capital. We invested $5.5 billion in capital expenditure in 2019 which remains at the same level as 2018. Key projects included the Koodaideri iron ore mine and the completion of the primary production shaft at Oyu Tolgoi, along with sustaining capital spend. We generated $9.2 billion of free cash flow, 31% higher than 2018, reflecting our higher operating cash flow and consistent capital expenditure. Free cash flow now includes an adjustment to include lease principal repayments of $315 million following adoption in 2019 of IFRS 16 "Leases". Balance sheet at 31 December 2020 Our net debt, reconciled to IFRS measures in the Financial Statements Note 23 - Consolidated net (debt)/cash on page 243 of the Annual report 2020, of $0.7 billion decreased by $3.0 billion in 2020, reflecting dividend payments of $6.1 billion and $0.2 billion of share buy-backs, more than offset by our strong free cash flow. Our net gearing ratio (net debt to total capital) declined to 1% at 31 December 2020 (31 December 2019: 7%). Refer to page 36 of the Annual report 2020. Our total financing liabilities at 31 December 2020 were US$13.8 billion (31 December 2019: $14.3 billion) and the weighted average maturity was around nine years. At 31 December 2020, approximately 86% of these liabilities were at floating interest rates (94% excluding leases). The maximum amount within non-current borrowings maturing in any one calendar year was $1.8 billion, which matures in 2025. We had $12.9 billion in cash and cash equivalents plus other short-term cash investments at 31 December 2020 (31 December 2019: $10.6 billion) and we have $7.5 billion of fully committed Revolving Credit Facilities, which remained undrawn throughout the period, and mature in November 2023. 27 Provision for closure costs This year we have enhanced our disclosure on Provisions for close-down and restoration costs and environmental clean-up obligations, which at 31 December 2020, were $13.3 billion (31 December 2019: $11.1 billion). The principal movements during the year were currency appreciation ($0.7 billion), reduction in discount rate ($1.0 billion), changes to existing and new provisions ($0.6 billion) and drawdowns in the provision through spend ($0.4 billion). Of the $13.3 billion in provisions, $10.7 billion relates to operating sites and $2.6 billion is for legacy sites. Remaining lives of operations and infrastructure range from one to over 50 years with an average for all sites, weighted by present closure obligation, of around 17 years (2019: 18 years). The provisions are based on risk-adjusted cash flows. In September 2020, we completed a review of the discount rate used to present value the obligations and updated it to a real-rate of 1.5% (previously 2.0%), applied prospectively from that date. Financial instruments and risk management The Group’s policies with regard to financial instruments and risk management are clearly defined and consistently applied. They are a fundamental part of the Group’s long-term strategy covering areas such as foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, commodity price risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and capital management. Further details of our Financial instruments and risk management are disclosed in “Financial Statements Note 29-Financial instruments and risk management” on pages 249 to 259 of the Annual report 2020. The Annual report 2020 shows the full extent of the Group’s financial commitments, including debt. The risk factors to which the Group is subject are summarised above in Item 3.D, “Risk factors”. Dividend The 2020 interim dividend was 155.0 cents (2019: 151.0 US cents) and the final dividend was determined as 309.0 US cents (2019: 231.0 US cents) and a special dividend of 93.0 US cents per share. In addition, the directors of Rio Tinto announced and paid an interim special dividend in 2019 of 61.0 US cents per share. Dividends paid on Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited shares are equalised on a net cash basis; that is, without taking into account any associated tax credits. Dividends are determined in US dollars. Rio Tinto plc dividends are paid and declared in pounds sterling and Rio Tinto Limited dividends are declared and paid in Australian dollars, converted at exchange rates on 17 February 2021. Details relating to the dividend policy, determination and payment of dividends in sterling, Australian dollars and other currencies and on the payment of dividends to holders of American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) are included under the heading “Shareholder information-Markets” on page 377 of the Annual report 2020 and above in Item 3.A, “Selected financial data”. Capital and liquidity risk management The Group’s total capital is defined as equity attributable to owners of Rio Tinto plus equity attributable to non-controlling interests and net debt, as shown below: Total capital 2020 2019 $m $m Equity attributable to owners of Rio Tinto 47,054 40,532 Equity attributable to non-controlling interests 4,849 4,710 Net debt (Financial Statements Note 23 of the Annual report 2020) 664 3,651 Total capital 52,567 48,893 The Group’s material capital and evaluation projects are listed under the heading “Portfolio management” on page 39 of the Annual report 2020. We expect that contractual commitments for expenditure, together with other expenditure and liquidity requirements, will be met from internal cash flow and, to the extent necessary, from the existing facilities described in “Financial Statements Note 29-Financial instruments and risk management”, part A(b)(i) on pages 250 and 251 of the Annual report 2020. This note also provides further details of our liquidity and capital risk management. 28 Treasury management and financial instruments Details of our Treasury management and financial instruments are disclosed in “Financial Statements Note 29-Financial instruments and risk management” on pages 249 to 259 of the Annual report 2020. Foreign exchange The following sensitivities give the estimated effect on underlying earnings assuming that each exchange rate moves in isolation. The relationship between currencies and commodity prices is a complex one and movements in exchange rates can cause movements in commodity prices and vice versa. Where the functional currency of an operation is that of a country for which production of commodities is an important feature of the economy, such as the Australian dollar, there is a certain degree of natural protection against cyclical fluctuations, in that the currency tends to be weak, reducing costs in US dollar terms, when commodity prices are low, and vice versa. Earnings sensitivities – Exchange rate Average exchange rate for 2020 Effect on underlying EBITDA of 10% change in full year average US cents +/- $m Australian dollar 0.69 617 Canadian dollar 0.75 201 The exchange rate sensitivities quoted above include the effect on net operating costs of movements in exchange rates but exclude the effect of the revaluation of foreign currency financial assets and liabilities. They should therefore be used with caution. Further details of our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations and currency derivatives, and our approach to currency hedging, are contained within “Financial Statements Note 29-Financial instruments and risk management”, part A(b)(iv), on pages 254 to 255 of the Annual report 2020. Interest rates Details of our exposure to interest rate fluctuations are contained within “Financial Statements Note 29-Financial instruments and risk management”, part A(b)(v), on pages 255 to 256 of the Annual report 2020. Commodity prices The approximate effect on the Group’s underlying EBITDA of a ten per cent change from the full year average market price in 2020 for the following products would be: Average market price for 2020 Effect on underlying EBITDA of 10% change in full year average Commodity Unit $ +/- $m Iron ore 62% Fe Fines FOB dmt 101.3 2,318 Aluminium Tonne 1,702 577 Copper Pound 2.81 370 Gold Ounce 1,770 62 The sensitivities give the estimated impact on net EBITDA of changes in prices assuming that all other variables remain constant. These should be used with caution. As noted previously, the relationship between currencies and commodity prices is a complex one and changes in exchange rates can influence commodity prices and vice versa. Further details of our exposure to commodity price fluctuations are contained within “Financial Statements Note 29-Financial instruments and risk management”, on part A(b)(ii), on pages 251 to 253 of the Annual report 2020. Credit risks Details of our exposure to credit risks relating to financial receivables, financial instruments and cash deposits, are contained within “Financial Statements Note 29-Financial instruments and risk management”, part A(b)(iii), on pages 253 to 254 of the Annual report 2020. 29 Disposals and acquisitions Information regarding disposals and acquisitions is provided in “Financial Statements Note 36-Purchases and sales of subsidiaries, joint ventures, associates and other interests in businesses” on page 268 of the Annual report 2020. Critical accounting policies and estimates Many of the amounts included in the financial statements involve the use of judgment and/or estimates. These judgments and estimates are based on management’s best knowledge of the relevant facts and circumstances, having regard to previous experience, but actual results may differ from the amounts included in the financial statements. Information about such judgments and estimation is contained under “Judgments in applying accounting policies and key sources of estimation uncertainty” in “Financial Statements Note 1-Principal accounting policies” on page 208 of the Annual report 2020. 5.B Liquidity and capital resources The information set forth under the headings: •“Portfolio Management-Projects” on page 39; •“Business Reviews-Iron Ore-New projects and growth options” on page 45; •“Business Reviews-Aluminium-New projects and growth options” on page 49; •“Business Reviews-Copper & Diamonds-Other new projects and growth options” on page 53; •“Business Reviews-Energy & Minerals-New projects and growth options” on page 57; •“Financial Statements Note 21-Borrowings and other financial liabilities” on page 242; and •“Financial Statements Note 29-Financial instruments and risk management” on pages 249 to 259 of the Annual report 2020 is incorporated herein by reference. See Item 5.A, “Additional financial information-Financial instruments and risk management” and “Additional financial information-Capital and liquidity risk management” above. See Item 5.E and 5.F below which presents information in relation to our material off balance sheet arrangements and contractual commitments. 5.C Research and development, patents and licenses The information set forth under the headings: •“Business Reviews-Business Development” on pages 40 and 41; •“Business Reviews-Innovation” on pages 58 and 59; •“Governance-Additional Statutory Disclosure-Exploration, research and development” on page 189; and •“Financial Statements Note 4-Net operating costs (excluding items shown separately)” on page 228 of the Annual report 2020 is incorporated herein by reference. 5.D Trend information The information set forth under the headings: •“2020 at a Glance” on pages 2 and 3; •“Chairman’s Statement” on pages 7 to 9; •“Juukan Gorge” on pages 10 and 11; •“Chief Executive’s Statement” on pages 13 to 15; •“Our Business Model” on page 16; 30 •“Our Values” on page 17; •“Our Stakeholders” on pages 18 and 19; •“Strategic Context” on pages 20 and 21; •“Our Strategy” on pages 22 and 23; •“Key Performance Indicators” on pages 24 to 28; •“Chief Financial Officer’s Statement” on pages 29 and 30; •“Financial Review” on pages 31 to 38; •“Business Reviews-Business Development” on pages 40 and 41; •“Business Reviews-Iron Ore” on pages 43 to 45; •“Business Reviews-Aluminium” on pages 47 to 49; •“Business Reviews-Copper & Diamonds” on pages 51 to 53; •“Business Reviews-Energy & Minerals” on pages 55 to 57; •“Business Reviews-Innovation” on pages 58 and 59; and •“Business Reviews-Commercial” on pages 60 and 61 of the Annual report 2020 is incorporated herein by reference. 5.E Off-balance sheet arrangements Off balance sheet arrangements and contractual commitments Information regarding the Group’s off balance sheet arrangements and contractual commitments can be found below: –Post retirement commitments and funding arrangements is provided in “Financial Statements Note 42-Post-retirement benefits” on pages 274 to 279 of the Annual report 2020. –Information regarding the Group’s close-down and restoration obligations is provided in “Financial Statements Note 25-Provisions (including post-retirement benefits)” on page 244 and 245 of the Annual report 2020. –Information regarding contingent liabilities, guarantees and commitments is provided in “Financial Statements Note 30-Contingencies and commitments” on pages 259 to 261 of the Annual report 2020. –Information on the Group's commitments relating to leases is provided in “Financial Statements Note 22-Leases” on pages 242 and 243 of the Annual report 2020. –Information regarding the Group's obligation to its financial liabilities is provided in “Financial Statements Note 29-Financial instruments and risk management” on pages 249 to 259 of the Annual report 2020. –Information regarding taxes payable obligations is provided on the Group's balance sheet. Taxes payable include balances that relate to uncertain tax positions. This may mean the commitment is greater or less than that provided. We expect that these contractual commitments for expenditure, together with other expenditure and liquidity requirements, will be met from internal cash flows and, to the extent necessary, from existing facilities. Except as disclosed in “Financial Statements Note 20-Cash and cash equivalents” on page 241 of the Annual report 2020, there are no material legal or economic restrictions on the ability of our subsidiaries to transfer funds to the company in the form of cash dividends, loans, or advances. 31 5.F Tabular disclosure of contractual obligations The table below presents information in relation to our material off balance sheet arrangements and contractual commitments described in Item 5.E. <1 yr 1-3 yrs 3-5 yrs > 5 yrs Total At 31 December 2020 $m $m $m $m $m Expenditure commitments in relation to: Other (capital commitments) (3,021) (97) 0 (34) (3,152) (3,021) (97) 0 (34) (3,152) Long-term debt and other financial obligations*: Trade and other financial payables (5,251) (68) (53) (394) (5,766) Borrowings before Swaps (351) (1,410) (3,148) (7,477) (12,386) Lease liability payments (271) (386) (185) (724) (1,566) Expected Future Interest payments (525) (1,017) (896) (2,999) (5,437) Asset retirement obligations (776) (1,203) (1,433) (13,988) (17,400) Purchase obligations (3,100) (3,006) (2,090) (8,437) (16,633) Other (28) (23) (18) (162) (231) (10,302) (7,113) (7,823) (34,181) (59,419) Total (13,323) (7,210) (7,823) (34,215) (62,571) *Other contractual commitments that the Group has where the maturity profile is unknown include pension obligations of $3,055 million, taxes payable of $2,327 million and guarantees of $146 million. Taxes payable include balances that relate to uncertain tax positions. This may mean the commitment is greater or less than that provided. The Group also has short term lease commitments of $155 million and leases committed but not yet commenced of $125 million which have not been disclosed in the table above. 5.G Safe harbor The information set forth under the heading “Forward-looking statements” on page 384 of the Annual report 2020 is incorporated herein by reference.