A. [Reserved] B. Capitalization and Indebtedness Not Applicable. C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds Not Applicable. D. Risk Factors Risk Factor Summary Risks Related to Our Industry · Our results of operations and financial condition depend significantly on charter rates for dry bulk vessels, which may be highly volatile and are affected by macroeconomic factors outside of our control; · Global economic conditions and political instability may continue to negatively impact the dry bulk shipping industry and may materially affect our results of operations and financial condition; · A variety of shipping industry factors, including among our competitors, along with general economic conditions may cause a decline in the market values of our vessels which could limit the amount of funds that we can borrow, cause us to breach certain financial covenants in our credit facilities, result in impairment charges or losses on sale; · We are subject to complex laws and regulations, including environmental regulations, international safety regulations and vessel requirements imposed by classification societies that can adversely affect the cost, manner or feasibility of doing business; · The operation of dry bulk carriers entails certain operational risks that could affect our earnings and cash flow; · If our vessels call on ports or territories located in countries that are subject to restrictions, sanctions, or embargoes imposed by the U.S. government, the EU, the United Nations (“UN”) or other governments, it could lead to monetary fines or other penalties and adversely affect our reputation and the price for our common shares; · Fuel or bunker prices and marine fuel availability have adversely affected our profitability and may adversely affect our profitability in the future; · Failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”) and other anti-corruption laws could result in fines, criminal penalties, charter terminations and an adverse effect on our business; 1 Table of Contents · Our operating results are subject to seasonal fluctuations; and · Acts of piracy and attacks on ocean-going vessels could adversely affect our business. Risks Related to Our Company · We may face liquidity issues if conditions in the dry bulk market worsen for a prolonged period and cause us to fail to comply with the terms of our debt agreements which could adversely affect our business, including our ability to refinance our indebtedness and pay dividends; · An increase in the Secured Overnight Finance Rate (“SOFR”) could affect our earnings and cash flow; · We have considerable risks relating to the construction of our newbuilding vessels and the potential acquisition of the secondhand vessels that we have agreed to acquire; · We may not have adequate insurance to compensate us if we lose our vessels or they suffer significant damages or to compensate third parties for any damages to their property; · We depend upon third-party and/or affiliated managers to provide the technical management of our fleet; · The aging of our fleet and our practice of purchasing and operating secondhand vessels may result in increased operating costs and vessels off-hire, which could adversely affect our earnings; and · We may be unable to attract and retain qualified, skilled employees or crew necessary to operate our business. Risks Related to Taxation · A change in tax laws, treaties or regulations, or their interpretation could result in a significant negative impact on our earnings and cash flows from operations; and · The Internal Revenue Service could treat us as a “passive foreign investment company,” (or “PFIC”) which could have adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. shareholders. Risks Related to Our Relationships with Mr. Pappas and Other Parties · Members of management and our directors may have relationships and affiliations with other entities that could create conflicts of interest. Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure and Our Common Shares · We are a holding company and depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to distribute funds to us in order to satisfy our financial obligations and to make dividend payments; · We may need to raise additional capital in the future, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all or which may dilute our common stock or adversely affect its market price; · Our financing arrangements impose a number of restrictions on our ability to pay dividends, and we may not be able to pay dividends even though we have an established dividend policy; · The price of our common shares may be highly volatile; and · Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents could have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing a merger or acquisition, or could make it difficult for our shareholders to replace or remove our current Board of Directors, which could adversely affect the market price of our common shares. 2 Table of Contents The following risks relate principally to the industry in which we operate and our business in general. Other risks relate principally to the securities market and ownership of our common shares. The occurrence of any of the events described in this section could significantly and negatively affect our business, financial condition, operating results or the trading price of our common shares. Risks Related to Our Industry Our results of operations and financial condition depend significantly on charter rates for dry bulk vessels, which may be highly volatile and are affected by macroeconomic factors outside of our control. If we cannot charter our vessels on favorable terms, there could be a material adverse effect on our earnings and our ability to comply with our loan covenants. The dry bulk shipping industry continues to be cyclical with high volatility in charter rates and profitability among the various types of dry bulk vessels. In 2025, charter rates for dry bulk vessels decreased from 2024’s levels but were sustained above the 10-year average. The Baltic Dry Index (“BDI”), an index published by The Baltic Exchange of shipping rates for key dry bulk routes, decreased by 4.2% from 2024 levels and averaged 17.4% above the decade average, as measured by annual weighted averages of the BDI index. During 2025, there was elevated demand for commodities, compounded by the inefficiencies created by the partial closure of the Suez Canal and the trade tensions between major economies. See “Item 4. Information on the Company––B. Business Overview––The International Dry Bulk Shipping Industry” for further details. Charter rate fluctuations result from changes in the supply of and demand for vessel capacity and major commodities carried on water internationally. Because most factors affecting the supply of and demand for vessels are outside of our control and are unpredictable, the nature, timing, direction and degree of changes in charter rates are also unpredictable. Since we charter our vessels principally in the spot market, we are exposed to the spot market’s cyclicality and volatility. We may not be able to predict whether future spot rates will be sufficient to enable our vessels to be operated profitably. Factors that influence the demand for dry bulk vessel capacity include: supply of and demand for energy resources, commodities, and semi-finished consumer and industrial products and the location of consumption versus the location of their regional and global exploration, production or manufacturing facilities; the globalization of production and manufacturing; global and regional economic and political conditions and developments, including armed conflicts such as the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the conflict between Israel and Hamas, the conflict between the United States, Israel and Iran and related conflicts in the Middle East, the attacks on commercial vessels and effective shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz, the Houthi seizures and attacks on vessels traveling through the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden and terrorist activities; natural disasters and weather; pandemics; embargoes and strikes; disruptions and developments in international trade, including trade disputes or the imposition of tariffs on various commodities or finished goods; changes in seaborne and other transportation patterns, including the distance cargo is transported by sea; environmental and other legal regulatory developments; and currency exchange rates. Factors that influence the supply of dry bulk vessel capacity include: the number of newbuilding orders and deliveries including slippage in deliveries; number of shipyards and ability of shipyards to deliver vessels; port and canal congestion; speed of vessel operation; vessel casualties; the degree of recycling of older vessels, depending, among other things, on recycling rates and international recycling regulations; number of vessels that are out of service, namely those that are laid-up, dry docked, awaiting repairs or otherwise not available for hire; availability of financing for new vessels and shipping activity; changes in national or international regulations that may effectively cause reductions in the carrying capacity of vessels or early obsolescence of tonnage; and changes in environmental and other regulations that may limit the useful lives of vessels. In addition to the prevailing and anticipated freight rates, factors that affect the rate of newbuilding, scrapping and laying-up include newbuilding prices, secondhand vessel values in relation to scrap prices, costs of bunkers and other operating costs, costs associated with classification society surveys, normal maintenance costs, insurance coverage costs, the efficiency and age profile of the existing dry bulk fleet in the market, and government and industry regulation of maritime transportation practices, particularly environmental protection laws and regulations, given that they may impose technological and other requirements upon our vessels. As described above, many of the factors influencing the supply of and demand for shipping capacity are outside of our control, and we may not be able to correctly assess the nature, timing and degree of changes in industry conditions. If we are required to charter our vessels at a time when demand and charter rates are very low, we may not be able to secure employment for our vessels at all, or we may have to accept reduced and potentially unprofitable rates. If we are unable to secure profitable employment for our vessels, we may decide to lay-up some or all unemployed vessels until such time that charter rates become attractive again. During the lay-up period, we will continue to incur some expenditures, such as insurance and maintenance costs, for each such vessel. Additionally, before exiting lay-up, we will have to pay reactivation costs for any such vessel to regain its operational condition. As a result, adverse economic, political, social or other developments affecting charter rates could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and cash flows, ability to pay dividends and compliance with covenants in our credit facilities. 3 Table of Contents Global economic conditions and political instability may continue to negatively impact the dry bulk shipping industry and may materially affect our results of operations and financial condition. The world economy is currently facing a number of ongoing challenges as a result of recent geopolitical uncertainty, international hostilities and trade tensions between the United States and their major trading partners, which may generally reduce economic growth and disrupt global trade and shipping. Concerns over geopolitical issues, including acts of war and the increased presence of the U.S. or other armed forces in various regions, including Iraq, North Korea, Venezuela, North Africa, Ukraine, Israel, Palestine, Iran and the Middle East have contributed to increased volatility and diminished expectations for the economy and the markets going forward. Further, these factors, combined with volatile oil prices, declining business and consumer confidence, have precipitated fears of a possible economic recession. Domestic and international equity markets continue to experience heightened volatility and turmoil. The weakness in the global economy has caused, and may continue to cause, a decrease in worldwide demand for certain goods and, thus, shipping. Further, because we operate our vessels globally, our operations may be affected by the political and economic conditions, as well as any ongoing conflicts, occurring in the countries or regions in which our ships operate. Most recently, the escalating military conflict between the U.S., Israel and Iran has greatly increased the security risks to vessels operating in the Gulf region, leading to an effective shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz. On March 11, 2026, one of our Kamsarmax vessels, the Star Gwyneth, was struck a projectile near the Strait of Hormuz. As the Star Gwyneth suffered minimal damage, and the attack did not result in any pollution or injuries, we do not anticipate that this particular incident will materially impact our results of operations and financial condition. Depending on the duration and severity of the conflict, shipping in this region may experience prolonged disruption. The continued disruption of such critical trade routes could have significant impacts in the Middle East region and on the global economy, which may adversely impact oil markets and the demand for dry-bulk vessel capacity and charter rates. While much uncertainty remains regarding the global impact of the aforementioned conflicts, it is possible that such tensions could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operation and cash flows in the future, resulting again in constructive losses. Furthermore, it is possible that third parties with whom we have charter contracts may be impacted by events in Russia, Ukraine, Israel, Palestine, Iran and the Middle East, which could adversely affect our operations. Our business could also be materially and adversely impacted by trade tariffs, trade embargoes or other economic sanctions that limit trading activities by the United States or other countries against countries in the Middle East, Asia or elsewhere as a result of terrorist or other attacks, hostilities or diplomatic or political pressures. In 2022, in response to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, the United States and several European countries imposed various economic sanctions against Russia, prohibitions on imports of Russian energy products, including crude oil, petroleum, petroleum fuels, oils, liquefied natural gas and coal, and prohibitions on investments in the Russian energy sector by U.S. persons, among other restrictions. The geopolitical situation in Eastern Europe intensified in late February 2022, with the commencement of Russia’s military action against Ukraine. Three of our vessels’ loading operations were suspended by the Ukrainian port authorities at the outset of the war. While two of these vessels were able to safely navigate away following the implementation of a multilateral agreement to resume grain exports from the Black Sea regions in 2022, the third was treated as a constructive total loss by our war risk insurers in 2023 given its prolonged detainment. Our operations expose us to the risk that increased trade protectionism from the United States, China or other countries adversely affect our business. Trade tensions between the United States and China remain high and have escalated under the second Trump administration’s recent economic and trade-related proposals. For example, in early 2025, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”) put forward additional port fees under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 targeting China’s maritime, logistics and shipbuilding sectors. The U.S. port fees went into effect on October 14, 2025, and were structured to impact certain Chinese-built or operated vessels entering U.S. ports. In response to the U.S. port fees, China’s Ministry of Transport announced parallel Chinese port fees on vessels calling at Chinese ports which were built or flagged in the United States or owned or operated by U.S. enterprises, other organizations, or individuals, including those in which U.S. enterprises, other organizations, or individuals directly or indirectly hold 25% or more of the equity, voting rights or board seats. On November 10, 2025, U.S. and Chinese authorities suspended the application of each respective set of port fees for one year. Substantial uncertainty remains as to how the port fees will be assessed after the end of the suspension period, scheduled to begin November 10, 2026. As we have eight vessels under construction in Chinese shipyards, in addition to a number of Chinese-built vessels already being operated in our fleet, and we are a U.S.-listed, widely held public company, there is a risk that we could be subject to the port fees or similar measures should they go into effect following the end of the suspension period. 4 Table of Contents Further, on February 13, 2026, the second Trump administration released its Maritime Action Plan (the “MAP”) focused on reviving the U.S. shipping sector. Notably, the MAP proposes a “universal infrastructure or security fee,” which would apply more broadly than the USTR special port fees and would cover all internationally built vessels calling at U.S. ports. While specific figures have yet to be determined, the fees would be assessed on the weight of the imported tonnage arriving on the vessel. Currently, the MAP represents a policy plan for the administration, and it is unclear whether any of the initiatives contained therein will ultimately result in binding law or regulation. Given the uncertainties surrounding the implementation and potential magnitude of these proposed fees, as well as any retaliatory measures that other countries may adopt in response, the impact of such measures on our business is difficult to assess at this time. Additionally, the second Trump administration has imposed and may continue to impose additional tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, China and the EU. It is unknown whether and to what extent additional tariffs (or other new laws or regulations) will be adopted by the second Trump administration, or the effect that any such actions would have on us or our industry. If new tariffs, legislation and/or regulations are implemented, or if existing trade agreements are renegotiated, this could further compound disruptions and cost increases within the global shipping industry. Market uncertainty about the applicability of such measures could disrupt global shipping patterns and potentially increase congestion and costs at ports worldwide. The overall impact of such actions on our operations is not possible to fully predict at this time. Relatively weak global economic conditions have had and may continue to have a number of adverse consequences for dry bulk and other shipping sectors, including, among other things; low charter rates, particularly for vessels employed on short-term time charters or in the spot market; decreases in the market value of dry bulk vessels and limited secondhand market for the sale of vessels; limited financing for vessels; widespread loan covenant defaults; and declaration of bankruptcy by certain vessel operators, vessel owners, shipyards and charterers. The occurrence of one or more of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. An economic slowdown or changes in the economic and political environment in the Asia Pacific region could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. We anticipate a significant number of the port calls made by our vessels will continue to involve the loading or discharging of dry bulk commodities in ports in the Asia Pacific region. As a result, economic slowdown in the Asia Pacific region, particularly in China, may have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, all of our newbuilding vessels are being built at Chinese shipyards. We conduct a substantial portion of our business in China or with Chinese counter parties. A decrease in the level of imports to and exports from China could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Changes in the economic conditions of China, and policies adopted by the government to regulate its economy, tax matters and environmental concerns (such as achieving carbon neutrality) and their implementation by local authorities could affect our vessels that are either chartered to Chinese customers or that call to Chinese ports, our vessels that undergo dry docking and our newbuilding vessels that are being built at Chinese shipyards and the financial institutions with whom we have entered into financing agreements, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. A variety of shipping industry factors, including among our competitors, along with general economic conditions may cause a decline in the market values of our vessels which could limit the amount of funds that we can borrow, cause us to breach certain financial covenants in our credit facilities, result in impairment charges or losses on sale. The fair market values of dry bulk vessels have generally experienced high volatility. The fair market value of our vessels depends on a number of factors, including: prevailing level of charter rates, general economic and market conditions affecting the shipping industry, types, sizes and ages of vessels, supply of and demand for vessels, other modes of transportation, distressed asset sales, including newbuilding contract sales below acquisition costs due to lack of financing, cost of new buildings, governmental or other regulations, the need to upgrade vessels as a result of charterer requirements, technological advances in vessel design or equipment or otherwise, changes in environmental and other regulations that may limit the useful life of vessels, technological advances; and competition from other shipping companies and other modes of transportation. If the fair market value of our vessels declines, we might not be in compliance with various covenants in our ship financing facilities, some of which require the maintenance of a certain percentage of fair market value of the vessels securing the facility to the principal outstanding amount of the loans under the facility or a maximum ratio of total liabilities to market value adjusted total assets or a minimum market value adjusted net worth. In addition, if the fair market value of our vessels declines, our access to additional funds may be affected or we may need to record impairment charges in our consolidated financial statements or incur loss on sale of vessels which can adversely affect our financial results. Conversely, if vessel values are elevated at a time when we wish to acquire additional vessels, the cost of such acquisitions may increase and this could adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flow and financial condition. 5 Table of Contents We are subject to complex laws and regulations, including environmental regulations, international safety regulations and vessel requirements imposed by classification societies that can adversely affect the cost, manner or feasibility of doing business. Our operations are subject to numerous international, national, state and local laws, regulations, treaties and conventions in force in international waters and the jurisdictions in which our vessels operate or are registered, which can significantly affect the ownership and operation of our vessels. See “Item 4. Information on the Company––B. Business Overview––Environmental and Other Regulations in the Shipping Industry” for further details. Compliance with such requirements may require vessels to be altered, costly equipment to be installed (such as ballast water treatment systems or “BWTS”) or operational changes to be implemented and may decrease the resale value or reduce the useful lives of our vessels or require us to obtain certain permits or authorizations prior to commencing operations. Such compliance costs could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. If any vessel does not comply (i.e. fails to maintain its class or fails any annual, intermediate or special survey) the vessel may be unable to trade between ports, may be unemployable and uninsurable until such failures are remedied or may be liable to penalties, which could negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, given frequent regulatory changes, we cannot predict their effect on our ability to do business, the cost of complying with them, or their impact on vessels’ useful lives or resale value. Our failure to comply with any such conventions, laws, or regulations could cause us to incur substantial liability. Climate change and related legislation or regulations may adversely impact our business, including potential financial, operational and physical impacts. Growing concern about the sources and impacts of global climate change has led to the proposal or enactment of a number of domestic and foreign legislative and administrative measures, as well as international agreements and frameworks, to monitor, regulate and limit carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions. Although the Paris Agreement, which was adopted under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change in 2015, does not specifically require controls on GHG emissions from ships, it is possible that countries seek to impose such controls as they implement the Paris Agreement or any new treaty that may be adopted in the future. In the European Union, emissions are regulated under the EU Emissions Trading System (the “EU ETS”), an EU-wide trading scheme for industrial GHG emissions, while carbon intensity of the fuel which the vessels burn is regulated under the Fuel EU Maritime regulation (the “FuelEU”). In addition, in June 2021, the IMO adopted amendments to MARPOL Annex VI that entered into force on November 1, 2022 and require ships to reduce GHG emissions using technological and operational approaches to improve energy efficiency and that provide important building blocks for future GHG reduction measures. These requirements and any passage of additional climate control legislation or other regulatory initiatives by the IMO, the European Union, the United States or other countries where we operate, or any treaty adopted at the international level, that restrict emissions of GHGs could require us to make significant financial expenditures, including the installation of pollution controls and the purchase of emissions credits, as well as have other impacts on our business or operations, that we cannot predict with certainty at this time. Regarding the purchase of emission credits, until now the relevant cost is fully covered by the vessels’ charterers in accordance with the charter party agreements (for time charter) or by including same in the freight (for voyage charter). While as of February 25, 2026, we have Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems (“EGCS” or “scrubbers”) fitted on 136 of the 141 vessels in our fleet on a fully delivered basis, pursuant to IMO sulfur cap regulations, we may be required in the future to expend more capital to modify, upgrade or replace vessels as a result of new climate- or GHG-related rules and regulations. For example, we are installing energy-saving devices in some of our ships to reduce consumption and improve our Carbon Intensity Indicator (“CII”), a metric used to evaluate emissions intensity of ships. In July 2023, the IMO adopted the 2023 IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from ships. The initial strategy identifies levels of ambition to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In April 2025, the Marine Environment Protection Committee of the IMO (“MEPC”) approved the draft legal text of the IMO Net-Zero Framework to be included as a new chapter in MARPOL Annex VI. The Net-Zero Framework includes a new fuel standard for ships and a global GHG emission pricing mechanism. These regulations were slated for adoption in October 2025; however MEPC agreed to adjourn the meeting on adoption until 2026. As a result, the Net-Zero Framework may be subject to further changes. Adoption of the Net-Zero Framework and other regulatory measures implementing the IMO GHG framework may require us to incur additional capital expenditures to comply with the relevant regulations. Even in the absence of climate control legislation and regulations, our business and operations may be materially affected to the extent that climate change results in sea level changes or more frequent or intense weather events. For additional information see “Item 4. Information on the Company––B. Business Overview––Environmental and Other Regulations in the Shipping Industry”. 6 Table of Contents Increasing scrutiny and changing expectations from investors, lenders, charterers and other market participants with respect to our ESG practices may impose additional costs on us or expose us to additional risks. Companies across all industries are facing increasing scrutiny relating to their ESG policies from investor advocacy groups, certain institutional investors, lenders, charterers and other market participants (collectively, the “Market Participants”), who, in recent years, have focused on the implications and social cost of their investments. Market Participants may incorporate ESG metrics and criteria into their lending and investment decisions, potentially affecting our access to and cost of capital. The commercial tradability of our vessels could also be affected should our vessels fail to comply with charterers' ESG requirements.If we do not adapt to or comply with such evolving expectations and standards, or are perceived to have failed to respond appropriately to the growing concern surrounding ESG issues, regardless of whether there is a legal requirement to do so, we may suffer from reputational damage and our business, financial condition and/or stock price could be materially and adversely affected. Overall, it is likely that we will incur additional costs and require additional resources to monitor, report and comply with wide-ranging ESG requirements. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. Please see “Item 4. Information on the Company––B. Business Overview––Our ESG Performance” for additional information with respect to our ongoing ESG efforts. Increased inspection procedures, tighter import and export controls and new security regulations could increase costs and cause disruption of our business. International shipping is subject to security and customs inspection and related procedures in countries of origin, destination and trans-shipment points. Under the U.S. Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002 (the “MTSA”), the United States Coast Guard (“USCG”) issued regulations requiring the implementation of certain security requirements aboard vessels operating in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and at certain ports and facilities. These security procedures can result in the seizure of contents of our vessels, delays in the loading, offloading, trans-shipment or delivery and the levying of customs duties, fines or other penalties against us. Changes to inspection procedures could impose additional financial and legal obligations on us, could also impose additional costs and obligations on our customers and may, in certain cases, render the shipment of certain types of cargo uneconomical or impractical. These additional costs could reduce the volume of goods shipped, resulting in a decreased demand for vessels and have a negative effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and our ability to pay dividends. The operation of dry bulk carriers entails certain operational risks that could affect our earnings and cash flow. The international shipping industry faces risks inherent to global operations. Our vessels and their cargoes risk damage or loss as a result of events including, but not limited to, marine disasters, bad weather, mechanical failures, human error, environmental accidents, war, terrorism, piracy and other circumstances or events. In addition, transporting cargoes across a wide variety of international jurisdictions creates a risk of business interruptions due to political circumstances in foreign countries, hostilities, labor strikes and boycotts, the potential for changes in tax rates or policies, and the potential for government expropriation of our vessels. Any of these events may result in loss of revenues, increased costs and decreased cash flows to our customers, which could impair their ability to make payments to us under our charters. Furthermore, the operation of dry bulk carriers has certain unique risks as: (i) dry bulk cargo itself and its interaction with the vessel can be an operational risk, (ii) dry bulk cargoes are often heavy, dense and easily shifted and react badly to water exposure, and (iii) dry bulk carriers are often subjected to battering treatment during unloading operations with grabs, jackhammers (to pry encrusted cargoes out of the hold) and small bulldozers, causing damage to the vessel. Vessels damaged due to treatment during unloading procedures may be more susceptible to breach at sea. Hull breaches in dry bulk carriers may lead to the flooding of the vessels’ holds. If flooding occurs in the forward holds, the bulk cargo may become so waterlogged that the bulkhead may buckle under the resulting pressure, leading to loss of a vessel. If we are unable to adequately maintain our vessels, we may be unable to prevent these events. If our vessels suffer damage, they may need to be repaired at a drydocking facility for substantial and unpredictable costs that may not be fully covered by insurance. Space at drydocking facilities is sometimes limited, and not all drydocking facilities are conveniently located. The total loss or damage of any of our vessels or cargoes could harm our reputation as a safe and reliable vessel owner and operator. Any of these circumstances or events may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. 7 Table of Contents If our vessels call on ports or territories located in countries that are subject to restrictions, sanctions, or embargoes imposed by the United States government, the EU, the UN or other governments, it could lead to monetary fines or other penalties and adversely affect our reputation and the price for our common shares. The United States, the European Union, the United Nations and other governments and their agencies impose sanctions and embargoes on certain countries and maintain lists of countries, individuals or entities they consider to be state sponsors of terrorism, involved in prohibited development of certain weapons or engaged in human rights violations. The applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations vary in their application, as they do not all apply to the same covered persons or proscribe the same activities, and such sanctions and embargo laws and regulations may be amended or expanded over time. From time to time on charterers’ instructions, our vessels have called and may again call at ports located in countries subject to sanctions and embargoes imposed by the United States, the European Union, the United Nations and other governments and their agencies, including ports in Iran and Russia. We endeavor to take precautions to ensure that our customers do not enter any countries or conduct any trade which would breach U.S. government, EU, UN or any applicable sanctions regulation. However, on such customers’ instructions, and without our consent, there is a risk that our vessels may call on ports in countries or territories that violate such sanctions or embargoes.Any violation of sanctions or embargo laws and regulations could result in fines or other penalties and could result in some investors deciding, or being required, to divest their interest, or not to invest, in us. Additionally, some investors may decide to divest their interest, or not to invest, in us simply because our vessels called a sanctionable area, even if that call would not breach any applicable sanctions regulation, or we do business with companies that do business in sanctioned countries. Moreover, our charterers may violate applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations as a result of actions that do not involve us or our vessels, and those violations could in turn negatively affect our reputation. War, terrorism, civil unrest and governmental actions in these and surrounding countries may adversely affect investor perception of the value of our common stock. Fuel, or bunker, prices and marine fuel availability have adversely affected our profitability and may adversely affect our profitability in the future. Since we expect to primarily employ our vessels in the spot market, we expect that vessel fuel, known as bunkers, will be one of the largest single expense items in our shipping operations for our vessels. Changes in fuel prices have historically had an adverse effect on our profitability and may adversely affect our profitability in the future. The price and supply of fuel are unpredictable and fluctuate based on events outside our control, including geopolitical developments (such as the ongoing conflicts between Russia and Ukraine, between Israel and Hamas and between the United States, Israel and Iran and related conflicts in the Middle East), supply and demand for oil and gas, actions by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and other oil and gas producers, war and unrest in oil producing countries and regions, regional production patterns and environmental concerns. Further, fuel may become much more expensive in the future, which may reduce our profitability and the competitiveness of our business versus other forms of transportation, such as truck or rail. Lastly, if sulfur emissions regulations are relaxed in the future, or if the cost differential between low sulfur fuel and high sulfur fuel is lower than anticipated, this may decrease our Time Charter Equivalent (“TCE”) rate and as a result, we may experience a material adverse effect on our earnings. The smuggling of drugs or other contraband onto our vessels may lead to governmental claims against us. Our vessels may call in ports where smugglers attempt to hide drugs and other contraband on vessels, with or without the knowledge of crew members. To the extent our vessels are found with contraband, whether inside or attached to the hull of our vessel and whether with or without the knowledge of any of our crew, we may face governmental or other regulatory claims or restrictions which could have an adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. 8 Table of Contents Maritime claimants could arrest one or more of our vessels, which could interrupt our cash flow. Crew members, suppliers of goods and services to a vessel, shippers of cargo and other parties may be entitled to a maritime lien against a vessel for unsatisfied debts, claims or damages. In many jurisdictions, a claimant may seek to obtain security for its claim by arresting a vessel through foreclosure proceedings. The arrest or attachment of one or more of our vessels could interrupt our cash flow and require us to pay large sums of money to have the arrest or attachment lifted. In addition, in some jurisdictions, such as South Africa, under the “sister ship” theory of liability, a claimant may arrest both the vessel which is subject to the claimant’s maritime lien and any “associated” vessel, which is any vessel owned or controlled by the same owner. Claimants could attempt to assert “sister ship” liability against one vessel in our fleet for claims relating to another of our vessels. Governments could requisition our vessels during a period of war or emergency, resulting in a loss of earnings. A government could requisition one or more of our vessels for title or for hire. Requisition for title occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and becomes its owner, while requisition for hire occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and effectively becomes its charterer at dictated charter rates. Generally, requisitions occur during periods of war or emergency, although governments may elect to requisition vessels in other circumstances. Although we would be entitled to compensation in the event of a requisition of one or more of our vessels, the amount and timing of payment would be uncertain. Government requisition of one or more of our vessels may negatively impact our revenues. Failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”) and other anti-corruption laws could result in fines, criminal penalties, charter terminations and an adverse effect on our business. We may operate in a number of countries throughout the world, including countries known to have a reputation for corruption. We are committed to doing business in accordance with applicable anti-corruption laws, including the FCPA. We are subject, however, to the risk that we, our affiliated entities or respective officers, directors, employees and agents may take actions determined to be in violation of such anti-corruption laws. Any such violation could result in substantial fines, sanctions, civil and/or criminal penalties and curtailment of operations in certain jurisdictions, and might adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. In addition, actual or alleged violations could damage our reputation and ability to do business. Furthermore, detecting, investigating, and resolving actual or alleged violations is expensive and time- and attention-consuming for our senior management. Because we collect most of our revenues in U.S. dollars but incur a portion of our expenses in other currencies, exchange rate fluctuations could have an adverse impact on our results of operations. We collect most of our revenues in U.S. dollars, and the majority of our expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars. However, a portion of our ship operating and administrative expenses are denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. If our expenditures on such costs and fees were significant, and the U.S. dollar were weak against such currencies, our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to pay dividends could be adversely affected. Our operating results are subject to seasonal fluctuations. We operate our vessels in markets that have historically exhibited seasonal variations in demand and, as a result, in charter rates. This seasonality may result in volatility in our operating results to the extent that we enter into new charter agreements or renew existing agreements during a time when charter rates are weaker or we operate our vessels on the spot market or index-based time charters, which may result in quarter-to-quarter volatility in our operating results. The dry bulk sector is typically stronger during the second half of the year in anticipation of increased consumption of coal and other raw materials in the northern hemisphere. In addition, unpredictable weather patterns in these months tend to disrupt vessel scheduling and supplies of certain commodities. Since we charter our vessels principally in the spot market, our revenues from our dry bulk carriers are historically weaker during the fiscal quarters ended March 31 and June 30, and stronger during the fiscal quarters ended September 30 and December 31. 9 Table of Contents Acts of piracy and attacks on ocean-going vessels could adversely affect our business. Acts of piracy and attacks have affected ocean-going vessels trading in certain regions of the world, such as the South China Sea, the Gulf of Aden, the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea. Piracy continues to occur in the Gulf of Aden, off the coast of Somalia, and increasingly in the Gulf of Guinea. We consider potential acts of piracy to be a material risk to the international shipping industry, and protection against this risk requires vigilance. Our vessels regularly travel through regions where pirates are active. Furthermore, geopolitical conflicts have also resulted in attacks on ships, mining of waterways and other efforts to disrupt international shipping. The Houthi seizures and attacks on commercial vessels in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden have impacted the global economy as some companies have decided to reroute vessels to avoid the Suez Canal and Red Sea. In 2024, one of the vessels that we later acquired in the Eagle Merger suffered limited damage from an attack in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. The recent attacks on vessels near the Strait of Hormuz, including the attack on our vessel, the Star Gwyneth, effectively shut down the Strait of Hormuz, forcing companies to reroute their vessels to avoid the waterway. Such attacks and related conflicts have disrupted and could continue to disrupt supply chains and cause instability in the global economy. We may not be adequately insured to cover losses from acts of terrorism, piracy, regional conflicts and other armed actions, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay dividends. Crew costs could also increase in such circumstances. Our financial results and operations may be adversely affected by COVID-19 or another epidemic and related governmental responses thereto. In 2020, the initial outbreak of COVID-19 resulted in numerous actions taken by governments and governmental agencies in an attempt to mitigate the spread or any resurgence of the virus, including travel bans, quarantines, and other emergency public health measures such as lockdown measures. These measures resulted in a significant reduction in global economic activity and extreme volatility in the global financial markets. They negatively impacted regional and global economies and trade patterns in markets in which we operate, the way we operate our business, and the businesses of our charterers and suppliers. For example, we had increased expenses due to increased operational costs associated with crew rotation and related logistical complications, our decision to supply our vessels with spares or other supplies and the reduced availability of attending engineers for overhauling or maintenance due to travel restrictions and quarantine rules and expenses, and days in which our vessels were unable to earn revenue in order to deviate to certain ports on which we would ordinarily not call during a typical voyage. While many of these measures have since been relaxed, we cannot predict whether and to what degree such measures will be reinstituted in the event of future epidemics, which may adversely affect global economic activity and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s future business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition, the carrying value of the Company’s assets, the fair values of the Company’s vessels, and the Company’s ability to pay dividends. Risks Related to Our Company We may face liquidity issues if conditions in the dry bulk market worsen for a prolonged period and cause us to fail to comply with the terms of our debt agreements which could adversely affect our business, including our ability to refinance our indebtedness and pay dividends. If the dry bulk shipping market declines over a prolonged period of time, we may have insufficient liquidity to fund ongoing operations or satisfy our obligations under our credit facilities, which may lead to a default under one or more of our credit facilities. In addition, our outstanding debt agreements impose on us certain operating and financial restrictions and require us or our subsidiaries to maintain various financial ratios. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects––B. Liquidity and Capital Resources––Senior Secured Credit Facilities––Credit Facility Covenants” for further details. Therefore, we may need to seek permission from our lenders in order to engage in certain corporate actions, which permission we may be unable to obtain. This may prevent us from taking actions that are in our best interest and from executing our business strategy and may limit our ability to pay dividends and finance our future operations. Further, a breach of any of the covenants in, or our inability to maintain the required financial ratios under, our debt agreements could result in a default thereunder. If a default occurs under our credit facilities, the lenders could elect to declare the outstanding debt, together with accrued interest and other fees, to be immediately due and payable and foreclose on the collateral securing that debt, which could constitute all or substantially all of our assets (considering the cross default provisions included in our debt agreements), which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. 10 Table of Contents An increase in the Secured Overnight Finance Rate could affect our earnings and cash flow. We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates because obligations under our bank loans and lease financings bear interest at rates that fluctuate with the financial markets, and our interest expense is affected by changes in the general level of interest rates. As a result, a change in market interest rates could have an adverse effect on our earnings and cash flow. As of December 31, 2025, our obligations under our bank loans and lease financings bear interest at SOFR plus a margin. SOFR averaged 5.01% and 5.15% in 2023 and 2024, respectively, and decreased to an average of 4.24% during 2025. In order to manage our exposure to interest rate fluctuations under SOFR, we may from time to time use interest rate derivatives to effectively fix some of our floating rate debt obligations. No assurance can, however, be given that the use of these derivative instruments, if any, may effectively protect us from adverse interest rate movements. The use of such interest rate derivatives may affect our results through mark to market valuation of these derivatives. Also, adverse movements in interest rate derivatives may require us to post cash as collateral, which may impact our free cash position. For additional information, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects––B. Liquidity and Capital Resources––Senior Secured Credit Facilities.” We have considerable risks relating to the construction of our newbuilding vessels and the potential acquisition of secondhand vessels that we have agreed to acquire. As of February 25, 2026, we had contracts for eight newbuilding vessels with expected deliveries between April and September 2026. Additionally, we recently entered into a conditional sale and purchase agreement with Diana Shipping Inc. (“Diana”) to acquire 16 secondhand vessels from Diana (the “Diana Purchase Agreement”). See “Item 4. Information on the Company––A. History and Development of the Company––Significant Changes to Our Fleet During the Years 2024-2026”. The success of such transactions will depend on a variety of factors, many of which may not be within our control. Vessel construction projects are generally subject to risks of delay or cost overruns that are inherent in any large construction project, which may be caused by numerous factors, including shortages of equipment, materials or skilled labor, unscheduled delays in the delivery of ordered materials and equipment or shipyard construction, failure of equipment to meet quality and/or performance standards, financial or operating difficulties experienced by equipment vendors or the shipyard, unanticipated actual or purported change orders, inability to obtain required permits or approvals, unanticipated cost increases between order and delivery, design or engineering changes and work stoppages and other labor disputes, adverse weather conditions or any other events of force majeure. Significant cost overruns or delays could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The Diana Purchase Agreement in particular is conditioned upon the success of Diana’s offer to acquire Genco Shipping & Trading Ltd. (“Genco”). Genco has previously rejected Diana’s proposal and, as of the date of this report, has not agreed to any transaction with Diana. The failure to complete the construction projects or potential vessel acquisitions in a timely manner, or at all, may reduce our expected revenue from such vessels, and we may continue to incur costs and expenses related to delayed vessels, such as supervision expense and interest expense for the outstanding debt, if any. As of February 25, 2026, the total payments for our eight vessels under construction and installation of scrubber equipment were expected to be $287.8 million, of which we had already paid $81.2 million and we expect to fund our remaining newbuilding commitments through a combination of our own funds and the proceeds from our $130.0 million credit facility with E.SUN Commercial Bank Ltd (the “ESUN $130.0 million Facility”), as mentioned in “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Senior Secured Credit Facilities”. The aggregate purchase price for the 16 secondhand vessels included in the Diana Purchase Agreement is $470.5 million and we expect to fund the acquisition through a combination of available cash and new debt financing. There can be no guarantee that we will be able to obtain such financing on a timely basis or on acceptable terms. If we are unable to complete such financing, we may be required to seek alternative financing, which could be more expensive or impose more restrictions on us. We rely on our information systems to conduct our business, and failure to protect these systems against security breaches could adversely affect our business. The safety and security of our vessels and efficient operation of our business, including processing, transmitting and storing electronic and financial information, depends on computer hardware and software systems, which are increasingly vulnerable to security breaches and other disruptions. Our vessels rely on information systems for a significant part of their operations, including navigation, provision of services, propulsion, machinery management, power control, communications and cargo management. We have in place safety and security measures on our vessels and onshore operations to secure our vessels against cybersecurity attacks and any disruption to their information systems. However, these measures and technology may not adequately prevent security breaches which are constantly evolving and have become increasingly sophisticated as attackers employ emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence (“AI”). If security threats are not recognized or detected until they have been launched, we may be unable to anticipate these threats and may not become aware in a timely manner of such a security breach, which could exacerbate any damage we experience. 11 Table of Contents A disruption to the information system of any of our vessels, whether or not it is caused by a malicious actor, could lead to, among other things, incorrect routing, collision, grounding and propulsion failure. Beyond our vessels, we rely on industry accepted security measures and technology to securely maintain confidential and proprietary information maintained on our information systems. However, these measures and technology may not adequately prevent security breaches. In addition, the foregoing events could result in violations of applicable privacy and other laws. If confidential information is inappropriately accessed and used by a third-party or an employee for illegal purposes, we may be responsible to the affected individuals for any losses they may have incurred as a result of misappropriation. In such an instance, we may also be subject to regulatory action, investigation or liable to a governmental authority for fines or penalties associated with a lapse in the integrity and security of our information systems. We may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against and remedy any potential or existing security breaches and their consequences. A cyber-attack could also lead to litigation, fines, other remedial action, heightened regulatory scrutiny and diminished customer confidence. In addition, our remediation efforts may not be successful, and we may not have adequate insurance to cover these losses. The unavailability of the information systems or the failure of these systems to perform as anticipated for any reason could disrupt our business and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. For example, in July 2024, a software update by CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (“CrowdStrike”), a cybersecurity technology company, caused widespread crashes of Windows systems into which it was integrated. Our systems both in the office and on the vessels were briefly affected by the CrowdStrike software update, but immediate remedial action by the Company restored the systems quickly. Although we have not experienced any material impacts as a result of the CrowdStrike software update, we could in the future experience similar third-party software-induced interruptions to our operations which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, cyber-attacks against the Ukrainian government and other countries in the region have been reported in connection with the conflicts between Russia and Ukraine. To the extent such attacks have collateral effects on global critical infrastructure or financial institutions or us, such developments could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. At this time, it is difficult to assess the likelihood of such threat and any potential impact. We are subject to certain risks with respect to our counterparties on contracts. We have entered into, and may enter in the future into, various contracts, including charter parties and contracts of affreightment with our customers, newbuilding contracts with shipyards, contracts for the purchase of secondhand vessels, credit facilities with our lenders and operating leases as charterers. These agreements subject us to counterparty risks. The ability of each of our counterparties to perform its obligations under a contract with us will depend on a number of factors that are beyond our control and may include, among other things, general economic conditions, the condition of the maritime industry, the overall financial condition of the counterparty, charter rates received for specific types of vessels, and various expenses. Should our counterparties fail to honor their obligations under agreements with us, we could sustain significant losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We may not have adequate insurance to compensate us if we lose our vessels or they suffer significant damages or to compensate third parties for any damages to their property. In the event of a casualty to a vessel or other catastrophic event, we rely on our insurance to pay the insured value of the vessel or the damages incurred. Through our management agreements with our technical managers, we procure insurance for the vessels in our fleet against those risks that we believe the shipping industry commonly insures against. This insurance includes marine hull and machinery insurance, protection insurance and indemnity insurance, which include pollution risks and crew insurances, and war risk insurance. Currently, the amount of coverage for liability for pollution, spillage and leakage available to us on commercially reasonable terms through protection and indemnity associations and providers of excess coverage is $1.0 billion per vessel per occurrence. We may not be adequately insured against all risks. We may not be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage for our fleet in the future, and we may not be able to obtain certain insurance coverages. The insurers may not pay particular claims. Our insurance policies may contain deductibles for which we will be responsible and limitations and exclusions which may increase our costs or lower our revenue. Moreover, insurers may default on claims they are required to pay. In addition, we may be subject to increased premium payments, or calls, in amounts based on our claim records and the claim records of our fleet managers as well as the claim records of other members of the protection and indemnity associations (P&I Associations) through which we receive insurance coverage for tort liability, including pollution-related liability. Our payment of these calls and any significant loss or liability for which we are not insured could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. 12 Table of Contents We depend upon third-party and/or affiliated managers to provide the technical management of our fleet. We have contracted the technical management of certain portion of our fleet, including crewing, maintenance, and repair services, to third-party and/or affiliated technical management companies. The failure of these technical managers to perform their obligations could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to pay dividends. Although we may have rights against our third-party and/or affiliated managers if they default on their obligations to us, our shareholders will share that recourse only indirectly to the extent that we recover funds. The aging of our fleet and our practice of purchasing and operating secondhand vessels may result in increased operating costs and vessels off-hire, which could adversely affect our earnings. Our current business strategy includes additional growth which may, in addition to constructing newbuilding vessels, include the acquisition of modern secondhand vessels. While we expect that we would typically inspect secondhand vessels prior to acquisition, this does not provide us with the same knowledge about their condition that we would have had if these vessels had been built for and operated exclusively by us. Generally, we, as a purchaser of secondhand vessels will not receive the benefit of warranties from the builders for the secondhand vessels that we acquire. In addition, unforeseen maintenance, repairs, special surveys or dry docking may be necessary for acquired secondhand vessels, which could also increase our costs and reduce our ability to employ the vessel to generate revenue. In general, the cost of maintaining a vessel in good operating condition increases with the age of the vessel. As our vessels age, they will typically become less fuel-efficient and more costly to maintain than more recently constructed vessels due to improvements in engine technology. Cargo insurance rates increase with the age of a vessel, making older vessels less desirable to charterers. Governmental regulations and safety or other equipment standards related to the age of vessels may also require expenditures for alterations or the addition of new equipment to our vessels and may restrict the type of activities in which our vessels may engage. As our vessels age, market conditions may not justify those expenditures or may not enable us to operate our vessels profitably during the remainder of their useful lives. In addition, if new dry bulk carriers are built that are more efficient or more flexible or have longer physical lives than our vessels, competition from these more technologically advanced vessels could adversely affect the amount of charter hire payments we receive for our vessels once their initial charters expire and the resale value of our vessels could significantly decrease. We may be subject to litigation that, if not resolved in our favor and not sufficiently insured against, could have a material adverse effect on us. From time to time we are involved in various litigation matters. These matters may include, among other things, contract disputes, shareholder litigation, personal injury claims, environmental claims or proceedings, asbestos and other toxic tort claims, property casualty claims, employment matters, governmental claims for taxes or duties, and other litigation that arises in the ordinary course of our business. Although we intend to defend these matters vigorously, we cannot predict with certainty the outcome or effect of any claim or other litigation matter, and the ultimate outcome of any litigation or the potential costs to resolve them may have a material adverse effect on us. Insurance may not be applicable or sufficient in all cases and/or insurers may not remain solvent which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. We may have difficulty managing our planned growth properly. Historically, we have grown through acquisitions of secondhand vessels and constructing newbuilding vessels. One of our strategies is to continue expanding our operations and fleet. Our future growth will primarily depend upon a number of factors, some of which may not be within our control, including our ability to: identify suitable dry bulk carriers, including newbuilding slots at shipyards and/or shipping companies for acquisitions at attractive prices; obtain required financing for our existing and new operations; identify businesses engaged in managing, operating or owning dry bulk carriers for acquisitions or joint ventures; integrate any acquired dry bulk carriers or businesses successfully with our existing operations, including obtaining any approvals and qualifications necessary to operate vessels that we acquire; hire, train and retain qualified personnel and crew to manage and operate our growing business and fleet; identify new markets; enhance our customer base; and improve our operating, financial and accounting systems and controls. Our failure to effectively identify, acquire, develop and integrate any dry bulk carriers or businesses could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. 13 Table of Contents The number of employees that perform services for us and our current operating and financial systems may not be adequate as we implement our plan to expand our fleet size in the dry bulk sector, and we may not be able to effectively hire more employees or adequately improve those systems. In addition, our growth through acquisitions and investments bears inherent risks including: the possibility that we may not receive a favorable return on our investments or that we may incur losses therefrom, or the original investment may become impaired; failure to satisfy or set effective strategic objectives; our assumption of known or unknown liabilities or other unanticipated events or circumstances, the diversion of management’s attention from normal daily operations of the business; difficulties in integrating the operations, technologies, products and personnel of an acquired company or its assets; difficulties in supporting acquired operations, difficulties or delays in the transfer of vessels, equipment or personnel; failure to retain key personnel, unexpected capital equipment outlays and related expenses; insufficient revenues to offset increased expenses associated with acquisitions; under-performance problems with acquired assets or operations, issuance of common shares that could dilute our current shareholders; recording of goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets that will be subject to periodic impairment testing and potential impairment charges against our future earnings; the opportunity cost associated with committing capital in such investments; undisclosed defects, damage, maintenance requirements or similar matters relating to acquired vessels; and becoming subject to litigation. We may not be able to address these risks successfully without substantial expense, delay or other operational or financial issues. Any delays or other such operations or financial issues could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. We cannot give any assurance that we will be successful in executing our growth plans, obtain appropriate financings on a timely basis or on terms we deem reasonable or acceptable or that we will not incur significant expenses and losses in connection with our future growth. We may be unable to attract and retain qualified, skilled employees or crew necessary to operate our business. Our success depends in large part on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled and qualified personnel, both shoreside personnel and crew. In crewing our vessels, we require technically skilled employees with specialized training who can perform physically demanding work. Competition to attract and retain qualified crew members and shoreside personnel is intense due to the increase in the size of the global shipping fleet. In addition, if we are not able to obtain higher charter rates to compensate for any crew cost and salary increases, or if we cannot hire, train and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees, we may be unable to manage, maintain and grow our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Our use of artificial intelligence technology may result in operational challenges, legal liability, reputational concerns and privacy and competitive risks. While we currently have limited use of AI, we are continuously exploring the use of AI technology across our operations to further enhance automation, efficiencies and decision making. Expanded use of AI moving forward may result in operational challenges, legal liability, reputational and ethical concerns and privacy and competitive risks, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations or reputation. Expanding the use of AI may also require us to incur additional costs to minimize potentially harmful or unintended consequences, to comply with applicable and emerging laws and regulations, to maintain or extend our competitive position, and to address any ethical, reputational, technical, operational, legal, competitive or regulatory issues which may arise as a result of any of the foregoing. Regulation of AI is rapidly evolving worldwide as legislatures and regulators increasingly focus on these emerging technologies. For example, the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (the “EU AI Act”) establishes, among other things, a risk-based governance framework for regulating AI systems operating in the EU. This framework categorizes AI systems into different categories based on the risks associated with such systems’ intended purposes, prohibiting AI systems with “unacceptable” risks and regulating AI systems with “high” or “limited” risks. There is a risk that our future AI-powered solutions may require us to comply with the applicable requirements of the EU AI Act, which may result in additional costs, increase our risk of liability and fines or otherwise adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and future prospects. 14 Table of Contents Risks Related to Taxation A change in tax laws, treaties or regulations, or their interpretation could result in a significant negative impact on our earnings and cash flows from operations. We are an international company that conducts business throughout the world. Tax laws and regulations are highly complex and subject to interpretation. Consequently, a change in tax laws, treaties or regulations, or in the interpretation thereof, or in and between countries in which we operate, could result in a materially high tax expense or higher effective tax rate on our worldwide earnings, and such change could be significant to our financial results. If any tax authority successfully challenges our operational structure, intercompany pricing policies or the taxable presence of our key subsidiaries in certain countries, or if the terms of certain income tax treaties are interpreted in a manner that is adverse to our structure, or if we lose a material tax dispute in any country, our effective tax rate on our worldwide earnings from our operations could increase substantially and our earnings and cash flows from these operations could be materially adversely affected. We and our subsidiaries may be subject to taxation in the jurisdictions in which we and our subsidiaries conduct business. Such taxation would result in decreased earnings. Investors are encouraged to consult their own tax advisors concerning the overall tax consequences of the ownership of our common shares arising in an investor’s particular situation under U.S. federal, state, local and foreign law. The Internal Revenue Service could treat us as a “passive foreign investment company,” (or “PFIC”) which could have adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. shareholders. As further described under “Item 10. Additional Information––E. Taxation––U.S. Federal Income Taxation of U.S. Holders” we believe that we currently are not a PFIC, and we do not expect to become a PFIC in the future. However, there is no direct legal authority under the PFIC rules addressing our characterization of income from our voyage and time chartering activities nor our characterization of contracts for newbuilding vessels, if any. Moreover, the determination of PFIC status for any year can only be made on an annual basis after the end of such taxable year and will depend on the composition of our income, assets and operations from time to time. Because of the above-described uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service will not challenge the determination made by us concerning our PFIC status or that we will not be a PFIC for any taxable year. If we were classified as a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. shareholder owns common shares (regardless of whether we continue to be a PFIC), the U.S. shareholder would be subject to special adverse rules, including taxation at maximum ordinary income rates plus an interest charge on both gains on sale and certain dividends, unless the U.S. shareholder makes an election to be taxed under an alternative regime. Certain elections may be available to U.S. shareholders if we were classified as a PFIC. Changes in tax laws and unanticipated tax liabilities could materially and adversely affect the taxes we pay, results of operations and financial results. We are subject to income and other taxes in the United States and foreign jurisdictions, and our results of operations and financial results may be affected by tax and other initiatives around the world. For instance, there is a high level of uncertainty in today’s tax environment stemming from global initiatives put forth by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (“OECD”) two-pillar base erosion and profit shifting project. In October 2021, members of the OECD put forth two proposals: (i) Pillar One reallocates profit to the market jurisdictions where sales arise versus physical presence; and (ii) Pillar Two compels multinational corporations with €750 million or more in annual revenue to pay a global minimum tax of 15% on income received in each country in which they operate. The reforms aim to level the playing field between countries by discouraging them from reducing their corporate income taxes to attract foreign business investment. Over 140 countries agreed to enact the two-pillar solution to address the challenges arising from the digitalization of the economy and, in 2024, these guidelines were declared effective and must now be enacted by those OECD member countries. It is possible that these guidelines, including the global minimum corporate tax rate measure of 15%, could increase the burden and costs of our tax compliance, the amount of taxes we incur in those jurisdictions and our global effective tax rate, which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial results. 15 Table of Contents Risks Related to Our Relationships with Mr. Pappas and Other Parties Members of management and our directors may have relationships and affiliations with other entities that could create conflicts of interest. Our directors and officers have a fiduciary duty to manage our business in a manner that is beneficial to us and our shareholders. They are not, however, required to work full-time on our affairs. Certain of our directors and executive officers also serve as directors and officers of other entities (e.g., Oceanbulk Maritime S.A, PST Tankers LLC, Augustea Group Holding SpA, Interchart Shipping Inc. and Seatankers Management Norway AS). While we do not expect our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Petros Pappas, to have any material relationship with any companies in the dry bulk shipping industry other than us, he will continue to be involved in other areas of the shipping industry. These responsibilities and relationships could create conflicts of interest between us and these counterparties, and it is not certain that any of these conflicts of interest will be resolved in our favor. In addition, our executive officers may devote less time to us than if they were not engaged in other business activities and may owe fiduciary duties to the shareholders of other companies with which they may be affiliated, including those companies listed above. Their other business activities may create conflicts of interest in matters involving or affecting us and our customers, which could result in an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We use our best efforts to ensure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations in addressing such conflicts of interest. Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure and Our Common Shares We are a holding company and depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to distribute funds to us in order to satisfy our financial obligations and to make dividend payments. We are a holding company, and our subsidiaries conduct all of our operations and own all of our operating assets. We have no significant assets other than the equity interests in our subsidiaries. Our ability to satisfy our financial obligations and to make dividend payments in the future depends on our subsidiaries and their ability to distribute funds to us. If we are unable to obtain funds from our subsidiaries, our Board of Directors may exercise its discretion not to declare or pay dividends. We do not intend to obtain funds from other sources to pay dividends. Furthermore, certain of our outstanding financing arrangements restrict the ability of some of our subsidiaries to pay us dividends under certain circumstances, such as if an event of default exists. We may need to raise additional capital in the future, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all or which may dilute our common stock or adversely affect its market price. We may require additional capital to expand our business and increase revenues, add liquidity in response to negative economic conditions, meet unexpected liquidity needs, and reduce our outstanding debt. To the extent our existing capital and borrowing capabilities are insufficient, we will need to raise additional funds through debt or equity financings, including offerings of our common stock, securities convertible into our common stock, or rights to acquire our common stock or curtail our growth and reduce our assets or restructure arrangements with existing security holders. Any equity or debt financing, or additional borrowings, if available at all, may be on terms that are not favorable to us. Equity financings could result in dilution to our stockholders, and the securities issued in future financings may have rights, preferences, and privileges that are senior to those of our common stock. To the extent that an existing shareholder does not purchase shares of voting stock, that shareholder’s interest in our Company will be diluted, representing a smaller percentage of the vote in our Board of Directors’ elections and other shareholder decisions. If our need for capital arises because of significant losses, the occurrence of these losses may make it more difficult for us to raise the necessary capital. If we cannot raise funds on acceptable terms if and when needed, we may not be able to take advantage of future opportunities, grow our business or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements. Our financing arrangements impose a number of restrictions on our ability to pay dividends, and we may not be able to pay dividends even though we have an established dividend policy. Under the terms of a number of our outstanding financing arrangements, we are subject to various restrictions on our ability to pay dividends. Our financing arrangements prevent us from paying dividends if an event of default exists under our credit facilities or if certain financial ratios are not met. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects––B. Liquidity and Capital Resources––Senior Secured Credit Facilities––Credit Facility Covenants” for further details. Subject to these restrictions, any dividends paid must be declared in accordance with our dividend policy, as adopted and amended by our Board of Directors, see “Item 8. Financial Information––A. Consolidated statements and other financial information—Dividend Policy” for further details. The timing and amount of dividends, if any, will depend on our earnings, financial condition, cash requirements and availability, restrictions in our loan agreements, applicable provisions of Marshall Islands law , and other factors, many of which may be beyond our control. Furthermore, the dry bulk shipping industry is volatile, and we cannot predict with certainty the amount of cash, if any, that will be available for distribution as dividends in any period. 16 Table of Contents The laws of the Republic of Marshall Islands generally prohibit the payment of dividends other than from surplus (retained earnings and the excess of consideration received for the sale of shares above the par value of the shares), or if there is no surplus, from the net profits for the current and prior fiscal year, or while a company is insolvent or would be rendered insolvent by the payment of such a dividend. We may not have sufficient surplus or net profits in the future to pay dividends and our subsidiaries may not have sufficient funds or surplus to make distributions to us. We can give no assurance that dividends will be paid at any level or at all. Changes to the definition of “foreign private issuer” under U.S. securities laws could cause us to lose our FPI status and become subject to increased regulatory and reporting burdens. We currently qualify as a “foreign private issuer” or FPI as defined in Rule 3b-4 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which entitles us to certain exemptions from disclosure, corporate governance and reporting requirements imposed on U.S. domestic issuers. On June 4, 2025, the SEC published a concept release soliciting public comment on whether to amend the eligibility criteria for foreign private issuer status, and on December 18, 2025, the Holding Foreign Insiders Accountable Act was enacted, which will require our directors and officers to comply with the share ownership and transaction reporting obligations of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act beginning March 18, 2026. The concept release outlines several potential approaches to narrow FPI eligibility, including updating the existing shareholder and business contacts tests, adding minimum non-U.S. trading volume requirements or requiring incorporation in jurisdictions with robust regulatory frameworks. If the SEC were to adopt any of these approaches, we may no longer qualify as an FPI and would become subject to similar regulatory and reporting requirements applicable to U.S. domestic issuers. Compliance with these additional requirements could impose material additional costs. Our reliance upon FPI exemptions may afford less protection to holders of our common shares. Nasdaq Global Select Market’s (“Nasdaq”) corporate governance rules require, subject to exceptions, listed companies to have, among other things, a majority of their board members be independent and independent director oversight of executive compensation, nomination of directors and corporate governance matters. As an FPI, we may follow the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, our home country, with respect to the foregoing requirements. For example, although our Board of Directors currently includes eight members who are independent under the Nasdaq rules, we may in the future have less than a majority of directors who would be deemed independent, as permitted under Marshall Islands law. In addition, as an FPI we are not required to comply with all of the periodic disclosure and current reporting requirements of the Exchange Act applicable to U.S. domestic companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act. See “Item 16G. Corporate Governance” for further details. Because we are organized under the laws of the Marshall Islands and because substantially all of our assets are located outside of the United States, it may be difficult to serve us with legal process or enforce judgments against us, our directors or our management. We are organized under the laws of the Marshall Islands and substantially all of our assets are located outside of the United States. In addition, the majority of our directors and officers are non-residents of the United States and all or a substantial portion of the assets of these non-residents are located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an action against us or against our directors and officers in the United States if you believe that your rights have been infringed under U.S. federal or state securities laws or otherwise. Even if you are successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Marshall Islands and of other jurisdictions may prevent or restrict you from enforcing a judgment against our assets or the assets of our directors or officers. Furthermore, there may be doubt that the courts of the Marshall Islands or of the non-U.S. jurisdictions in which our offices are located would enter judgments in original actions brought in those courts predicated on U.S. federal or state securities laws. We are incorporated in the Marshall Islands, which does not have a well-developed body of corporate law, and, as a result, shareholders may have a more limited ability to protect their interests. Our corporate affairs are governed by our Fourth Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (the “Articles of Incorporation”) and our Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”) and by the Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act (the “MIBCA”). The provisions of the MIBCA resemble provisions of the corporation laws of a number of states in the United States. However, there have been few judicial cases in the Marshall Islands interpreting the MIBCA. The rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under the laws of the Marshall Islands are not as clearly established as the rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under statutes or judicial precedent in existence in the United States. 17 Table of Contents The rights of shareholders of companies incorporated in the Marshall Islands may differ from the rights of shareholders of companies incorporated in the United States. While the MIBCA provides that it is to be interpreted according to the laws of the State of Delaware and other states with substantially similar legislative provisions, there have been few, if any, court cases interpreting the MIBCA in the Marshall Islands and we cannot predict whether Marshall Islands courts would reach the same conclusions as United States courts. Thus, you may have more difficulty in protecting your interests in the face of actions by the management, directors or controlling shareholders than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a United States jurisdiction that has developed a relatively more substantial body of case law. Additionally, the Republic of the Marshall Islands does not have a legal provision for bankruptcy or a general statutory mechanism for insolvency proceedings. As such, any bankruptcy action involving our Company would have to be initiated outside of the Marshall Islands, and our shareholders and creditors may experience delays in their ability to recover their claims after any such insolvency or bankruptcy. There is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the Marshall Islands would (a) recognize or enforce judgements of courts of the United States based on civil liability provisions of applicable U.S. federal and state securities laws or (b) impose liabilities in original actions brought in the Republic of the Marshall Islands, based on these laws. Furthermore, the level of legal protection in the United States may be lower than comparable jurisdictions and there may be fewer judicial cases in the Republic of the Marshall Islands interpreting the rights of creditors. The international nature of our operations may make the outcome of any bankruptcy proceedings difficult to predict. We are incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands and certain of our subsidiaries are also incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, Liberia, Singapore and Delaware, United States, and we conduct operations in countries around the world. The Marshall Islands has passed an act implementing the U.N. Commission on Internal Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency, or the Model Law. The adoption of the Model Law is intended to implement effective mechanisms for dealing with issues related to cross-border insolvency proceedings and encourages cooperation and coordination between jurisdictions. Notably, the Model Law does not alter the substantive insolvency laws of any jurisdiction and does not create a bankruptcy code in the Marshall Islands. Instead, the Act allows for the recognition by the Marshall Islands of foreign insolvency proceedings, the provision of foreign creditors with access to courts in the Marshall Islands, and the cooperation with foreign courts. Consequently, in the event of any bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceedings involving us or one of our subsidiaries, bankruptcy laws other than those of the United States could apply. We have limited operations in the United States. If we become a debtor under the United States bankruptcy laws, bankruptcy courts in the United States may seek to assert jurisdiction over all of our assets, wherever located, including property situated in other countries. There can be no assurance, however, that we would become a debtor in the United States or that a United States bankruptcy court would be entitled to, or accept, jurisdiction over such bankruptcy case or that courts in other countries that have jurisdiction over us and our operations would recognize a United States bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction if any other bankruptcy court would determine it had jurisdiction. As a Marshall Islands corporation and with some of our subsidiaries being Marshall Islands entities and also having subsidiaries in other offshore jurisdictions, our operations may be subject to economic substance requirements, which could impact our business. We are a Marshall Islands corporation and some of our subsidiaries are Marshall Islands entities. The Marshall Islands has enacted economic substance laws and regulations with which we may be obligated to comply. We believe that we and our subsidiaries are compliant with the Marshall Islands economic substance requirements. However, if there were a change in the requirements or interpretation thereof, or if there were an unexpected change to our operations, any such change could result in noncompliance with the economic substance legislation and related fines, financial or other penalties, spontaneous disclosure regarding information to foreign tax officials, increased monitoring and audits, and dissolution of the non-compliant entity, which could be struck from the register of companies in related jurisdictions. Any of the foregoing could be disruptive to our business and could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows or operating results. 18 Table of Contents EU Finance ministers rate jurisdictions for tax rates and tax transparency, governance and real economic activity. Countries that are viewed by such finance ministers as not adequately cooperating, including by not implementing sufficient standards in respect of the foregoing, may be put on a “grey list” or a “blacklist”. Effective as of October 17, 2023, the Marshall Islands has been designated as a cooperating jurisdiction for tax purposes. However, we do not know (i) if the EU will act to add the Republic of the Marshall Islands to the list of non-cooperative jurisdictions in the future, (ii) how quickly the EU would react to any changes in legislation or regulations of the relevant jurisdictions, including the Marshall Islands, or (iii) how EU banks or other counterparties would react while we or any of our subsidiaries remain as entities organized and existing under the laws of listed countries, in such a scenario. If the Marshall Islands is added to the list of non-cooperative jurisdictions in the future and sanctions or other financial, tax or regulatory measures were applied by European Member States to countries on the list or further economic substance requirements were imposed by the Marshall Islands, our business could be harmed. Future sales of our common shares could cause the market price of our common shares to decline. Our Articles of Incorporation authorize us to issue 300,000,000 common shares, of which 113,424,507 shares were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2025. In addition, certain shareholders hold registration rights, see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions––A. Major Shareholders.”. Sales of a substantial number of our common shares in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, may depress the market price for our common shares. These sales could also impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of our equity securities in the future. We intend to issue additional common shares in the future. Our shareholders may incur dilution from any future equity offering and upon the issuance of additional common shares pursuant to our equity incentive plans. We may fail to meet the continued listing requirements of Nasdaq, which could cause our common shares to be delisted. There can be no assurance that we will remain in compliance with Nasdaq’s listing qualification rules, or that our common shares will not be delisted, which could have an adverse effect on the market price of, and the efficiency of the trading market for, our common shares and could cause a default under certain senior secured credit facilities. The price of our common shares may be highly volatile. The price of our common shares may fluctuate due to factors such as: actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly and annual results and those of other public companies in our industry; mergers and strategic alliances in the dry bulk shipping industry; market conditions in the dry bulk shipping industry; changes in market valuations of companies in our industry; changes in government regulation; the failure of securities analysts to publish research about us, or shortfalls in our operating results from levels forecast by securities analysts; announcements concerning us or our competitors; and the general state of the securities markets. Hence, the market for our common shares may be unpredictable and volatile. Further, there may be no continuing active or liquid public market for our common shares. Consequently, you may not be able to sell the common shares at prices equal to or greater than those paid by you, or you may not be able to sell them at all. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market, securities class-action litigation has often been instituted against companies. Such litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects. There can be no guarantee that our stock price will remain at current levels. Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents could have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing a merger or acquisition, or could make it difficult for our shareholders to replace or remove our current Board of Directors, which could adversely affect the market price of our common shares. Several provisions of our Articles of Incorporation and our Bylaws could make it difficult for our shareholders to change the composition of our Board of Directors in any one year, preventing them from changing the composition of management. In addition, the same provisions may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that shareholders may consider favorable. These provisions include: authorizing our Board of Directors to issue “blank check” preferred stock without shareholder approval; providing for a classified Board of Directors with staggered, three-year terms; establishing certain advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our Board of Directors or for proposing matters that can be acted on by shareholders at shareholder meetings; prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors; limiting the persons who may call special meetings of shareholders; authorizing the removal of directors only for cause and only upon the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our outstanding common shares entitled to vote for the directors; and establishing supermajority voting provisions with respect to amendments to certain provisions of our Articles of Incorporation and our Bylaws. These anti-takeover provisions could substantially impede the ability of public shareholders to benefit from a change in control and, as a result, may adversely affect the market price of our common shares and your ability to realize any potential change of control premium. 19 Table of Contents