Set forth below are certain risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this Report. These are not the only risks we face. Additional risks that are currently unknown or believed not to be material may also impact actual results. These risks should be carefully considered together with the other information set forth in this Report and our other filings with the SEC. Risk Factors Summary Risks Related to Our Business & Industry •We are adversely affected by decreases in the supply of and/or demand for live events. •We may be adversely affected by adverse changes in our relationships with ticket buyers, sellers, and/or partners. •We may be adversely affected by changes to internet search engine algorithms and mobile app marketplace rules. •We may be adversely affected if we fail to adapt to the impact of AI on how consumers search for live event tickets. •We face intense competition in the ticketing industry, and we may be adversely affected if we are unable to attract ticket buyers and sellers to our platform. •We may be adversely affected if we do not continue to maintain and improve our platform, or to successfully develop new and improved solutions and enhancements. •We may be adversely affected if we are unable to maintain and enhance our reputation and brand. •We may be adversely affected by extraordinary events, including disease epidemics, or the effects of inflation. •We may be adversely affected if any completed or future business acquisition is unsuccessful. •We may be adversely affected if we are unable to manage the risks associated with the growth of our international operations. •Our financial performance in certain periods may not be indicative of, or comparable to, our financial performance in other periods due to seasonality and other factors. •Impairment of our goodwill and certain indefinite-lived trademarks has adversely affected, and may in the future adversely affect, our financial results and condition. Risks Related to Government Regulation & Litigation •We depend on the ability of ticket holders to sell their tickets on the secondary market unencumbered, and our business and industry may be adversely affected by unfavorable legislative outcomes. •Our processing of personal data and other sensitive information could give rise to liabilities as a result of governmental regulation, litigation, and conflicting legal requirements, including those relating to personal privacy, data security, and AI. •We may be adversely affected by unfavorable outcomes in legal proceedings in which we, ticket sellers, or our partners are or may in the future be involved. 49 Risks Related to Information Technology, Cybersecurity & Intellectual Property •We may be adversely affected by system interruptions and the lack of integration and redundancy in our and third-party information systems and infrastructure. •We may be adversely affected if our information technology systems, or those of third parties with whom we conduct business, are compromised. •Our payment system depends on third-party providers and is subject to risks that may adversely affect our business. Risks Related to Our Indebtedness •Our credit facility imposes restrictions that limit management’s discretion in operating our business, which could impair our ability to satisfy our debt obligations. •We may be unable to generate sufficient cash flows and/or obtain additional financing when necessary or desirable. Risks Related to the Ownership of Our Securities & Organizational Structure •The interests of our significant stockholders may conflict with those of us or our other stockholders. •Our principal assets are the equity interests in our subsidiaries, and we are accordingly dependent upon our subsidiaries’ cash flows to satisfy our obligations. Risks Related to Being a Public Company •The market price and trading volume of our securities may be volatile. •We previously identified and remediated a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”), and we may identify additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls. •We are an “emerging growth company” (“EGC”) and an SRC, and our reliance on certain reporting requirement exemptions available to EGCs and/or SRCs could make our securities less attractive to investors. •The issuance of new shares of Class A common stock, including upon the exercise of outstanding warrants, would increase the number of shares eligible for resale in the public market and dilute the ownership and voting power of our existing stockholders. Risk Factors Risks Related to Our Business & Industry We are adversely affected by decreases in the supply of and/or demand for live events. The supply of live events depends on several factors, many of which are outside of our control. We rely on artists and sports teams to perform and play at live events, and scenarios such as artists deciding to perform less frequently or at smaller venues, sports league lockouts, promoters or event venues failing to correctly anticipate demand for particular events, or negative trends in the entertainment and/or sporting industries that cause a reduction in the number or availability of live events adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Our business also depends on demand for and attendance at live events, which is affected by, among other things, discretionary consumer and corporate spending. Many factors impact such spending, including economic conditions (e.g., unemployment levels, interest rates, inflation, and commodity prices), changes to tax rates/laws, public safety concerns, and other extraordinary events. Reduced discretionary spending, as well as other negative business or industry conditions or trends, can decrease demand for and attendance at live events, as well as reduce ticket sales, which adversely affect our revenue and operating results. 50 All of these risks may become more acute during periods of economic slowdown, recession, and uncertainty. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic and related economic slowdown materially and adversely impacted our business, including due to event restrictions and cancellations. While live events are now generally held at pre-pandemic scope and scale, there can be no assurance that the supply of and/or demand for such events will not be negatively impacted by any future economic slowdown, recession, or uncertainty, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We may be adversely affected by adverse changes in our relationships with ticket buyers, sellers, and/or partners. Our business depends on developing and maintaining deep and longstanding relationships with the parties that use our platform to buy and sell tickets, including ticket buyers, sellers, and partners. Any failure to do so on acceptable terms, or at all, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. For example, the loss of a significant Private Label Offering distribution partner in 2025 adversely affected both our Private Label Offering and total Marketplace order volumes and revenues. We may be adversely affected by changes to internet search engine algorithms or if we fail to adapt to the impact of AI on how consumers search for live event tickets. We rely heavily on internet search engines, such as Google, to generate traffic to our websites through a combination of organic and paid searches. Search engines frequently update and change the logic that determines the placement and display of a user’s search results such that the purchased or algorithmic placement of links to our websites can be negatively affected. For example, a search engine could, for competitive or other purposes, alter its search algorithms or results in a manner that causes our websites to be placed lower in its organic search query results. If a major search engine changes its algorithms in a manner that negatively impacts its ranking of our or our partners’ websites, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected. Further, our failure to successfully manage our search engine optimization could substantially decrease traffic to our websites, as well as increase costs if we were to replace free traffic with paid traffic, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Artificial intelligence has recently begun to disrupt the methods by which consumers have traditionally searched for live event tickets, and we expect this trend to continue. A failure by us to successfully adapt to this evolving landscape could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We may be adversely affected by changes to mobile app marketplace rules. We rely on mobile app marketplaces, such as Apple’s App Store and Google’s Play Store, to enable downloads of our mobile apps. Such marketplaces have in the past made, and may in the future make, changes (including to security, privacy, disclosure, age verification, and other requirements) that may impede access to our mobile apps or limit the features we can offer. For example, our mobile apps may receive unfavorable promotion and/or placement treatment compared to those of competing apps, including the order in which they appear within these marketplaces. Further, our Apple iOS and Google Android mobile apps are an increasingly important distribution channel for ticket sales. If either marketplace were to charge commissions or fees on our mobile app-based revenue, and we failed to negotiate favorable terms, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, certain mobile app marketplace rules are subject to legal challenges, which can create uncertainty and further complicate our ability to comply therewith. Similarly, if problems arise in our relationships with these or other such marketplaces, access to our mobile apps could be impeded and our user growth could be harmed. We face intense competition in the ticketing industry, and we may be adversely affected if we are unable to attract ticket buyers and sellers to our platform. We operate in an increasingly competitive industry and face significant and continuous competition from other national, regional, local, and international primary and secondary ticketing service providers to acquire and retain ticket buyers, sellers, and partners. We also compete with other professional ticket resellers in our Resale segment, as well as with providers of other avenues for entertainment, including restaurants, movies, and television, for the discretionary spending of consumers. This competition could lead to decreased sale volumes and/or profit margins, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. 51 Competitive variables that could lead to a decrease in ticket orders, prices, fees, and/or profit margins, certain of which have adversely affected our past financial performance, include: competitive offerings that include more favorable terms or pricing; increased marketing spending by our competitors; consolidation among competitors resulting in their increased market share; technological changes and innovations, such as consumers’ increasing use of AI to search for live event tickets, that we are unable to adopt or adapt to or are late in adopting or adapting to; other entertainment options or ticket inventory selections and varieties that we do not offer; increased pricing in the primary ticket marketplace, which could result in reduced profits for secondary ticket sellers; primary ticket marketplaces enacting policies that restrict or impede secondary ticket sales; and increased search engine marketing costs as competitors increase bid prices. We may be adversely affected if we do not continue to maintain and improve our platform, or to successfully develop new and improved solutions and enhancements. Our ability to attract and retain ticket buyers, sellers, and partners depends in large part on our ability to continue to provide a user-friendly and effective platform, develop and improve our platform, and introduce compelling new solutions and enhancements. Our industry is characterized by rapidly changing technology, service, and product introductions, and changing demands of ticket buyers, sellers, and partners. Technological innovation in areas such as AI and machine learning may further accelerate these changes. While we spend substantial time and resources understanding and responding to these changes and demands, if we fail to adapt, competitors may be able to more successfully enhance their platforms, improve operational efficiency, and/or deliver more personalized user experiences. Developing new and improved solutions and enhancements is costly and complex, and the timetable for commercial release is difficult to predict and may vary from our historical experience. Our ability to effectively develop, adopt, or integrate emerging technologies, including AI and machine learning, may also impact our ability to remain competitive. In addition, after development, ticket buyers, sellers, and partners may not be satisfied with, or may perceive that their needs are not adequately addressed by, our solutions and enhancements. The success of a new solution or enhancement to our platform can depend on several factors, including timely completion and delivery, competitive pricing, adequate quality testing, platform integration, user awareness, and overall market acceptance and adoption. If we do not continue to maintain and improve our platform, or to successfully develop new and improved solutions and enhancements, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected. We may be adversely affected if we are unable to maintain and enhance our reputation and brand. Maintaining and enhancing our reputation and brand as a differentiated ticketing marketplace is critical in our ability to retain existing, and attract new, ticket buyers, sellers, and partners. The successful promotion of our brand requires significant investments of time, money, and effort, which may increase as our marketplace continues to expand and become more competitive. To the extent these investments yield increased revenue, it may not offset the increased expenses we incur. If we do not successfully maintain and enhance our brand and differentiate our marketplace from competitive products and services, our business may not grow, we may be unable to compete effectively, and we could lose existing, or fail to attract new, ticket buyers, sellers, or partners, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. There are also many factors outside of our control that could undermine and/or harm our reputation and brand. A negative perception of our marketplace could adversely affect our business, including as a result of: complaints or negative publicity and our responsiveness thereto; our inability to timely comply with applicable laws, regulations, and/or consumer protection-related guidance; the use of our platform to sell fraudulent or counterfeit tickets; the timing of refunds and/or payment reversals through our platform; actual or perceived disruptions or defects in our platform; cybersecurity incidents; a lack of awareness of our policies; or changes to our policies that third parties perceive as overly restrictive, unclear, or inconsistent with our values. If we are unable to maintain a reputable, user-friendly, and effective platform that provides tickets to desirable events, our ability to attract and retain ticket buyers, sellers, and partners could be impaired and our reputation, brand, and business could be adversely affected. 52 We may be adversely affected by extraordinary events, including public safety concerns or disruptions, mass-casualty incidents, acts of civil unrest, terrorist attacks, military actions, disease epidemics or other public health concerns, natural disasters, and severe weather events. The occurrence and threat of extraordinary events, including public safety concerns or disruptions, intentional or unintentional mass-casualty incidents, acts of civil unrest, terrorist attacks, military actions, disease epidemics or other public health concerns (and governmental responses thereto), natural disasters, and severe weather events, may deter or prevent artists, sports teams, promoters, or event venues from performing, playing, or operating and substantially decrease the demand for live events. Because Vegas.com is concentrated in Southern Nevada, which has recently experienced water and electricity shortages, it is particularly exposed to certain of these risks. The occurrence of extraordinary events has in the past adversely affected, and may in the future adversely affect, our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Event cancellations related to such events could also adversely affect our financial performance because we may be obligated to issue refunds or credits for previously purchased tickets. The global COVID-19 pandemic and related economic shutdown resulted in significant disruption to our business, the entertainment and sporting industries, and the global economy in 2020 and 2021. The pandemic led governments and other authorities around the world to impose measures intended to control its spread, including travel bans, border closings and restrictions, business closures, quarantines, and vaccine requirements. During the height of the pandemic, many artists, sports teams, promoters, and event venues around the world ceased performances, games, and operations. Because we depend on live events in order to generate revenue from ticket sales, the decreased supply of and demand for such events during the pandemic negatively impacted our business and financial condition. While live events are now generally held at pre-pandemic scope and scale, it is difficult to predict any future outbreaks of disease epidemics and whether restrictions could again be imposed. Any of these circumstances could again adversely affect the live events industry and our business and financial condition. We may be adversely affected if any completed or future business acquisition is unsuccessful. Our strategy has involved, and our future growth may continue to depend in part on, our selective acquisition of complementary businesses. For example, we acquired Wavedash and Vegas.com in 2023. However, we may be unable to identify suitable acquisition targets or make acquisitions at favorable prices in the future. Even if we identify a suitable acquisition target, our ability to successfully complete an acquisition depends on a variety of factors, which may include our ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms and requisite government approvals. Additionally, even if we complete an acquisition, our ability to successfully integrate the acquired business and realize the expected benefits of the acquisition is subject to additional risks and uncertainties. Further, our credit facility restricts our ability to make certain acquisitions. In connection with any future acquisition, we may take actions that could adversely affect our business, including: using a significant portion of our available cash; issuing equity securities, which would dilute the ownership and voting power of our existing stockholders; incurring substantial debt; incurring or assuming contingent liabilities, known or unknown; and incurring large accounting write-offs, impairments, or amortization expenses. In addition, acquisitions involve inherent risks that, if realized, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations, including those associated with: integrating the operations, financial reporting, technologies, and personnel of the acquired company; scaling of operations, systems and infrastructure and achieving synergies to meet the needs of the combined or acquired company; managing geographically dispersed operations; diverting management’s attention from other business concerns; entering new markets or lines of business in which we have limited or no direct experience, including the impact of newly applicable laws and regulations; and the potential loss of key employees, customers, and partners of the acquired company. Any of these risks could significantly affect our ability to complete acquisitions and expand our business. For example, each of our prior acquisitions involved certain of these risks, including, as applicable, those associated with integrating new lines of business, operating in new markets, and adhering to new legal and regulatory regimes. The success of these and any future acquisitions is based, in part, on our ability to overcome these risks. 53 We may be adversely affected if we are unable to manage the risks associated with the growth of our international operations. We have operations in Canada, Japan, and the United Kingdom, and we continue to strategically expand our international operations. Accordingly, we are subject to risks associated with doing business internationally, including, but not limited to: complying with a variety of newly applicable, and often changing and/or conflicting, laws and regulations, including those relating to anti-bribery, anti-corruption, anti-money laundering, data protection, and privacy; obtaining required governmental approvals, permits, and licenses; obtaining and enforcing our IP rights; staffing and managing our foreign operations; financial risks such as longer payment cycles, difficulty collecting accounts receivable, the impact of local and regional financial crises, and exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; preferences by local consumers for local competitors; and political and economic instability. We may also have difficulty expanding our business internationally because of the difficulties associated with obtaining local ticket supply and/or limited brand recognition, which could delay or limit the acceptance of our services by ticket buyers, sellers, and partners in new markets and increased marketing and other costs associated with establishing our brand. If we are unable to successfully expand internationally or manage the risks associated therewith, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected. Our financial performance in certain periods may not be indicative of, or comparable to, our financial performance in other periods due to seasonality and other factors. Our financial results and cash needs vary from period to period depending on, among other things: the number, location, venue type, and timing of certain live events; the popularity of and demand for certain artists, sports teams, tours, and events; artists’ decisions about when and where to perform; sports teams’ performances, and the length and team composition of playoff series and championship games; event cancellations; weather, seasonal, and other fluctuations in our operating results; the timing of guaranteed payments, investments, acquisitions, and financing activities; competitive dynamics; and the timing of disbursements of accounts payable to ticket sellers and partners. Because our results may vary significantly from period to period, our financial performance in one period may not be indicative of, or comparable to, our financial performance in other periods. Historically, we have experienced lower financial performance in the first, second, and third quarters, with slightly increased activity in the fourth quarter when all major sports leagues are in season, concert on-sales begin for the following year, and theater event orders increase during the holiday season. However, these fluctuations have recently become less predictable. In addition, the timing of top-grossing tours and events, as well as the number of sports games and the teams involved in playoff series and championship games, can impact the year-to-year comparability of quarterly results (and, in rare cases, annual results). The seasonality of our business could create cash flow management risks if we do not adequately anticipate and plan for periods of decreased activity, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations by negatively impacting our ability to execute on our strategy. We may be adversely affected if we are unable to attract, hire, motivate, and retain our senior management team and other highly skilled personnel. Our success depends upon the continued service of our senior management team and key technical employees, as well as our ability to continue to identify, attract, hire, integrate, develop, motivate, and retain highly skilled personnel for all areas of our organization. Each of our executive officers, key technical employees, and other personnel could terminate their relationship with us at any time. The loss of any member of our senior management team or key personnel could significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our business objectives and/or negatively impact our business and relationships. As such, effective succession planning and the execution of smooth personnel transitions is important to our long-term success. If we fail to effectively manage our hiring needs and execute smooth personnel transitions, our business may be adversely affected. Competition in our industry for qualified employees is intense. To attract top talent, we must offer competitive compensation arrangements and benefits packages, as well as periodically increase compensation levels in response to competition and inflation. If we fail to successfully attract, hire, and integrate new personnel, our efficiency and ability to meet forecasts, as well as employee morale, productivity, and retention, could suffer, which may adversely affect our business. 54 Impairment of our goodwill and certain indefinite-lived trademarks has adversely affected, and may in the future adversely affect, our financial results and condition. In accordance with U.S.GAAP, we test our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually, or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate that the fair value of such assets might be impaired. If an asset’s carrying amount exceeds its implied fair value, an impairment loss is recorded equal to the amount of the excess. As a result of our interim impairment test in the second quarter of 2025, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge of $320.4 million, which comprises a $297.4 million impairment of our goodwill and a $23.0 million impairment of certain indefinite-lived trademarks. As a result of our annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of 2025, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge of $402.6 million, which comprises a $363.3 million impairment of our goodwill and a $39.3 million impairment of certain indefinite-lived trademarks. For more detail, see Note 10, Goodwill - Net and Intangible Assets - Net, to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Report. As of June 30, 2026, the balance of our (i) goodwill (net of accumulated impairment charges and foreign currency translation adjustments) was $283.5 million, which represented 41.2% of our total assets, and (ii) trademarks (net of accumulated impairment charges and foreign currency translation adjustments) was $48.0 million, which represented 7.0% of our total assets. Due to market volatility, economic uncertainty, and inflationary concerns, there can be no assurance that our goodwill and/or indefinite-lived intangible assets will not be impaired again in the future. Impairment may result from, among other things, a significant decline in our expected cash flows, an adverse change in general economic conditions, and slower growth rates in our industry. Any such future impairment could adversely affect our financial condition. We may be adversely affected by the effects of inflation. Inflation can negatively impact our business by increasing our overall costs, particularly if we are unable to achieve commensurate increases to revenues. Inflation has resulted, and may continue to result, in elevated interest rates and capital costs, increased costs of labor, weakened exchange rates, reduced discretionary consumer and corporate spending, and other similar effects. As a result of inflation, we have experienced, and may continue to experience, increased costs. Although we may take measures to mitigate the effects of inflation, such measures may not be effective and, even if such measures are effective, there could be a difference in timing between the effects of inflation and of such measures. As a result, our business, financial condition (including liquidity), and results of operations may be adversely affected. Risks Related to Government Regulation & Litigation We are subject to extensive governmental regulation, and we may be adversely affected if we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations. Our operations are subject to federal, state, local, and international laws and regulations governing key aspects of our business such as advertising, anti-bribery, anti-corruption, anti-money laundering, competition, consumer protection, data protection, export taxation, IP, payments, privacy, ticketing, ticket resale, and unfair business practices. While we strive to conduct our operations in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, there can be no assurance that a particular law or regulation will not be interpreted or enforced in a manner contrary to our understanding of it. The promulgation of new and sometimes conflicting laws and regulations, as well as changes to existing laws and regulations or their interpretation, can make compliance more complex, costly, and challenging. Our failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations could result in governmental investigations, inquiries, litigation, proceedings, and fines against us, and/or individual private actions which, if material, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We depend on the ability of ticket holders to sell their tickets on the secondary market unencumbered. Our business depends on ticket holders’ ability to sell their tickets on the secondary market. Certain jurisdictions have regulated ticket resale by enacting resale price caps, prohibiting the resale of tickets above their face value, and even banning ticket transferability. Some primary ticketing companies and rights holders have enacted policies that similarly restrict ticket resale, including using technology to limit where and how a ticket can be resold, charging 55 incremental fees for the ability to resell a ticket, and partnering with other resale marketplaces on an exclusive basis. Such regulations and policies restrict or inhibit the ability of ticket holders to resell their tickets. This could result in reduced demand for our services, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Our processing of personal data and other sensitive information could give rise to liabilities as a result of governmental regulation, litigation, and conflicting legal requirements, including those relating to personal privacy, data security, and AI. In the ordinary course of business, we collect, receive, store, protect, use, transmit, share, and dispose of (collectively, “process”) personal data and other sensitive information. This subjects us to numerous federal, state, and international laws and regulations, industry standards, external and internal privacy and security policies, and contractual requirements addressing privacy, data protection, and the processing of such data and information. Many U.S. states, and the federal and local governments, have adopted data protection and security legislation, including laws relating to personal data privacy and data breach notification. Many U.S. states have also enacted comprehensive privacy laws that impose obligations on covered businesses, such as requiring privacy disclosures and giving residents certain rights with respect to their personal data (e.g., the right to access, correct, or delete such data and to opt out of certain data processing activities). Certain U.S. states also impose strict requirements on the processing of personal data, such as conducting data privacy impact assessments, and provide statutory fines for non-compliance. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act (the “CCPA”) applies to the personal data of California residents and requires covered businesses to provide specific privacy notice disclosures and honor requests to exercise certain privacy rights. The CCPA provides for statutory penalties and a private right of action for data breaches resulting from a failure to implement reasonable security procedures and practices. U.S. state and federal legislators continue to consider and enact similar laws, reflecting a trend toward more stringent privacy legislation in the United States. These and any future similar laws are likely to increase our compliance costs, particularly when they have conflicting requirements and evolving judicial interpretations, and may require us to further modify our data processing practices and policies. There has also been a noticeable uptick in U.S. class action litigation in which plaintiffs utilize laws, including the Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, state wiretapping laws, and other privacy laws and regulations, relating to the use of tracking technologies such as cookies and pixels, as well as AI-enabled ‘chatbots’ and customer service agents. This trend may lead legislatures to consider responsive regulation. Our inability or failure to obtain consent for these practices or to appropriately disclose them could result in adverse consequences, including class action litigation and mass arbitration demands. Personal and other user data is also increasingly subject to legislation and regulations in foreign jurisdictions in which we operate. For example, the Canadian Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (“PIPEDA”) is a comprehensive Canadian privacy and security law for organizations collecting, using, or disclosing information about identified individuals for commercial purposes. Certain Canadian provinces also have their own data protection regulations. Similarly, the United Kingdom, the European Union (the “EU”), and countries in the European Economic Area (the “EEA”) traditionally have taken broader views on, and imposed different legal obligations on companies as to, the types of data that are subject to privacy and data protection laws and regulations. For example, the EU General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR”) applies to companies that collect and use personal data in connection with the offering of goods or services to individuals in the EEA or the monitoring of their behavior. The United Kingdom has its own General Data Protection Regulation. Under the GDPR, companies may face bans on data processing, other corrective actions, monetary fines, and/or private litigation related to the processing of personal data. The Japanese Act on the Protection of Personal Information Act No. 57 of 2003, a Japanese law governing the handling of personal information, may also impose obligations on covered entities that are in addition to, or differ from, those in other jurisdictions (for example, it differs from the GDPR with respect to its approach to notifications and the cross-border transfer of personal data). Compliance with these and any other foreign data privacy laws and regulations may significantly increase our operational costs and our overall risk exposure. In the ordinary course of business, we transfer personal data from one jurisdiction to another. Certain European jurisdictions, including the United Kingdom, have enacted laws requiring that personal data be localized or limiting the transfer thereof to other jurisdictions, including the United States. Other jurisdictions have adopted or may 56 adopt similar data localization and/or cross-border data transfer restrictions. Although there are various mechanisms that may be used to transfer such data from the United Kingdom and the EEA to the United States in compliance with these restrictions, they are subject to legal challenges and there can be no assurance that we can satisfy or rely on them. If there were no lawful manner for us to make such transfers, or if the requirements for doing so were too onerous, we could face adverse consequences, including the interruption of our operations, the need to relocate our data processing activities, and penalties such as fines and injunctions. In addition, companies that transfer personal data out of the United Kingdom and the EEA have faced increased scrutiny from regulators and litigants, and certain of such companies have been ordered by European regulators to suspend or cease certain such data transfers for allegedly violating the GDPR’s cross-border data transfer restrictions. Regulators in the United States are also increasingly scrutinizing personal data transfers and have proposed and enacted certain data localization or transfer requirements. For example, the U.S. Department of Justice has issued a rule that places additional restriction on certain data transactions involving countries of concern (e.g., China, Russia, Iran) and covered persons (i.e., individuals and entities who are designated as such by the U.S. Attorney General or are considered “foreign persons” and are majority owned by, or organized under the laws of, a primary resident in, or a contractor of, a covered person or country of concern) that may impact certain business activities such as vendor, employee, and contractor engagements, data sharing, and investor agreements. Violations of the rule could lead to significant civil and criminal fines and penalties. We must also comply with certain industry standards and contractual obligations related to personal privacy, data security, and AI. For example, certain privacy laws, including the CCPA and the GDPR, require the imposition of specific contractual restrictions on service providers. We also publish privacy policies, marketing materials, and other statements related to compliance with certain certifications or self-regulatory principles concerning data privacy and security. U.S. regulators are increasingly scrutinizing these materials, and if they are found to be deficient, unfair, misleading, or misrepresentative of our practices, we could be subject to governmental enforcement actions or other adverse consequences. From time to time, our personnel use generative AI technologies in the course of their work. We use also use AI technologies in certain of our products. The disclosure and use of personal and/or confidential data in generative AI technologies, and the development and use of such technologies, present various privacy and data security risks and are subject to an increasing number of laws and regulations. Several jurisdictions, including in the United States and Europe, have enacted laws and regulations governing the development and use of AI, such as the EU’s AI Act, Colorado’s Artificial Intelligence Act, and the CCPA’s automated decision-making regulations, and we expect other jurisdictions will adopt similar laws. Certain consumer rights extended by privacy laws (e.g., the right to delete certain personal data and regulate automated decision-making) may also be incompatible with the use of AI technologies. Further, countries and states are applying their data and consumer protection laws to AI technologies, including generative AI and AI-enabled ‘chatbots.’ As a result, our use of these technologies could result in additional compliance costs, lawsuits, and regulatory actions. However, our inability to use these technologies, or limitations on such use, could result in a competitive disadvantage. The interpretation and application of many privacy and data protection laws are, and will likely remain, uncertain, and it is possible that these laws may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with each other and with our existing data management practices, policies, or product features. If so, in addition to the possibility of fines, lawsuits (including class action claims), additional reporting requirements and/or oversight, bans or restrictions on processing personal data, orders to destroy or not use personal data, and other claims and penalties, we could be required to change our business activities and practices or to modify our practices, policies, or products, which could adversely affect our business. In addition to government regulation, privacy advocacy and industry groups may propose new and different self-regulatory standards that legally or contractually apply to us. Any inability by us, or our service providers and partners, to adequately address privacy, data protection, and data security concerns or comply with applicable privacy, data protection, or data security laws, regulations, policies, and other obligations, could result in additional costs and liability to us and adversely affect our reputation, sales, and business. In addition, any compromise of our information security, including that results in the unauthorized access, acquisition, or release of personal or other user data, or the perception that such a compromise has occurred, could 57 harm our brand and reputation, discourage ticket sellers, buyers, and partners from using our platform, and result in litigation (including class claims) and/or fines and proceedings by governmental agencies, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We may be adversely affected by unfavorable outcomes in legal proceedings in which we, ticket sellers, or our partners are or may in the future be involved. Our results may be affected by the outcome of litigation. Unfavorable rulings in legal proceedings in which we, ticket sellers, or our partners may be involved could have a negative impact on us, including an impact that differs from expectations. We are currently, and from time to time in the future, we, ticket sellers, and our partners may be subject to various claims, investigations, legal and administrative cases, lawsuits, and similar proceedings (whether civil or criminal) by governmental agencies or private parties, the outcome of which can be difficult to predict. If we or they are unable to successfully defend against these proceedings, or if the results thereof are unfavorable, we or they may be required to pay significant monetary damages or be subject to fines, penalties, injunctions, or other censure that could directly or indirectly adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Even if we adequately address the issues raised by such a proceeding, or successfully defend a third-party lawsuit or counterclaim involving us, such proceeding, regardless of the outcome or merit thereof, could result in substantial costs and the diversion of management resources, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Our business and industry may be adversely affected by unfavorable legislative outcomes. The secondary ticket market is regulated by federal, state, and international governments. This can include requiring certain disclosures and refund practices, enacting price caps, prohibiting the resale of tickets above their face value, and even banning ticket transferability. For example, certain U.S. states and foreign jurisdictions have recently enacted, and additional U.S. states have proposed, price cap legislation. These laws, as well as any future laws, regulations, or unfavorable legislative outcomes, could impose additional restrictions and compliance costs on our business, as well as restrict ticket holders’ ability to sell their tickets on the secondary market, any of which could adversely affect our industry, business, financial condition, and operating results. Our business may be subject to sales tax and other indirect taxes in various jurisdictions. The application of indirect taxes such as sales and use, amusement, value-added, goods and services, business, and gross receipts to businesses like ours, and to ticket buyers and sellers on our marketplace, is a complex and evolving issue. Because significant judgment is required to evaluate applicable tax obligations, amounts recorded are subject to adjustment. In many cases, the ultimate tax determination is uncertain because it is unclear how new and existing statutes might apply to our business. One or more jurisdictions may seek to impose additional reporting, recordkeeping, or indirect tax collection obligations on businesses like ours that facilitate online marketplaces. The imposition of information reporting or tax collection requirements could decrease ticket seller activity on our platform, which would adversely affect our business. New legislation could require us, or ticket sellers on our marketplace, to incur substantial compliance costs, including in connection with tax calculation, collection, remittance, as well as audit requirements, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, we could become subject to sales and use tax and value-added tax audits in the future, and federal, state, local, or international tax authorities could assert that we are obligated to collect additional amounts as taxes on behalf of ticket sellers and remit those taxes to the proper authorities. We could also be subject to audits and assessments with respect to jurisdictions for which we have not accrued tax liabilities. A successful assertion that we should be collecting additional sales or other taxes in jurisdictions where we have not historically done so, and where we do not accrue for such taxes, could result in substantial tax liabilities for past sales and otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. 58 Risks Related to Information Technology, Cybersecurity & Intellectual Property We may be adversely affected by system interruptions and the lack of integration and redundancy in our and third-party information systems and infrastructure. The success of our operations depends, in part, on the integrity of our information systems and infrastructure, as well as affiliate and third-party computer systems, computer networks, and other communication systems. System interruptions and the lack of integration and redundancy in such information systems and infrastructure, both of our own ticketing and other computer systems and of affiliate and third-party software, computer networks, and other communications systems service providers on which we rely, may adversely affect our ability to operate our websites and mobile apps, process and fulfill transactions, respond to customer inquiries, and generally maintain cost-efficient operations. Similarly, due to our reliance on a network of technology systems, many of which are outside of our control, changes to interfaces upon which we rely, or a reluctance of our counterparties to continue supporting our systems, could lead, and in the past has led, to technology interruptions. Such interruptions could occur by virtue of a natural disaster, malicious action such as a cyberattack or intrusion, act of terrorism, military action, human error, or the other threats discussed in this “Risk Factors” section. In addition, the loss of certain key personnel could subject us to systems interruptions and require us to expend additional resources to continue to maintain our software and systems. The large infrastructure footprint that is required to operate our systems requires an ongoing investment of time, money, and effort to maintain or refresh hardware and software to ensure it remains at a level capable of servicing the demand and volume of our business. Failure to do so may result in system instability, degradation in performance, or unfixable security vulnerabilities that could adversely affect both our business and consumers. While we have backup systems for certain aspects of our operations, disaster recovery planning by its nature may not be sufficient for all eventualities. In addition, our insurance coverage may not adequately compensate for losses stemming from an extended interruption. If any of these events were to occur, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We may be adversely affected if our information technology systems, or those of third parties with whom we conduct business, are compromised. We process certain personal data and other sensitive or confidential information, including about ticket buyers and sellers and our employees. Penetration of our information technology systems, or the misappropriation or misuse of such data or information (including credit card and other personally identifiable information), could interrupt our operations and subject us to adverse consequences, including increased costs, litigation, and governmental enforcement actions. Cyberattacks, malicious internet-based activity, fraud, and similar evolving threats (including phishing attacks, malicious code, software bugs, malware attacks, ransomware attacks, denial-of-service attacks, credential stuffing attacks, and credential harvesting) threaten the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of our information technology systems. Such threats come from a variety of sources and are increasingly prevalent and difficult to detect. In addition, we rely on third parties to process certain information in a variety of contexts (e.g., cloud-based infrastructure, encryption technology, and employee email) and to provide certain hardware, software, and applications. These third parties’ information technology systems are subject to similar threats, and our ability to monitor their security practices is limited. If any of these third parties were to suffer a security incident or other interruption, we could experience adverse consequences. While we may be entitled to damages if a third party fails to satisfy its privacy- or security-related obligations to us, any award, assuming we are able to recover it, may be insufficient to cover our damages. Our past and future business acquisitions could also increase our exposure to these threats if our systems were negatively affected by vulnerabilities in an acquired entity’s systems. It may be difficult and/or costly to detect, investigate, mitigate, contain, and remediate a security incident, and our efforts to do so may not be successful. Actions taken by us or the third parties with whom we work to do so could result in outages, data losses, and business disruptions. Threat actors may also gain access to other networks and systems after a compromise of our networks and systems (for example, by using an initial compromise of one part of our environment to gain access to other parts of our environment, or by leveraging a compromise of our networks or systems to gain access to third-party networks or systems, such as through phishing or supply chain attacks). 59 We have devoted significant resources to the development of systems, practices, and policies designed to detect, mitigate, and remediate vulnerabilities in our information technology systems, protect against potential cybersecurity threats and their consequences, and protect sensitive information. However, such measures cannot provide absolute security or certainty. Advances in threat actor capabilities, technologies, methods, and tools, inadvertent violations of our practices or policies, or other developments could result in a compromise or breach of our systems and processes that are used to protect sensitive information. We may also experience delays in developing and deploying remedial measures designed to address identified vulnerabilities. In addition, laws in certain of the jurisdictions in which we operate require, and laws in other jurisdictions in which we may operate in the future may require, businesses in certain instances to notify affected individuals, governmental entities, and/or credit reporting agencies of cybersecurity incidents, including those affecting personal information. Certain of our contractual obligations contain similar requirements. Such requirements are inconsistent, and compliance in the event of a widespread cybersecurity incident may be complex, costly, and difficult to implement. These risks may increase not only as we expand our operations in new jurisdictions, but also as our business continues to involve greater numbers of ticket buyers, sellers, and partners. While we maintain general and cyber liability insurance policies, they may not cover, or may cover only a portion of, any response and remediation costs and potential claims related to cybersecurity incidents to which we are exposed, or they may be inadequate to indemnify us for all or any portion of liabilities that may be imposed. There can be no assurance that our existing insurance coverage will continue to be available on acceptable terms or in amounts sufficient to cover the potentially significant losses that may result from a cybersecurity incident or that the insurer will not deny coverage of any future claim. Any of these or similar threats could lead to a security incident or other interruption that results in the unauthorized, unlawful, or accidental acquisition, modification, destruction, loss, or disclosure of, or access to, our information technology systems, or those of third parties with whom we conduct business. If we or such a third party experience (or are perceived to have experienced) a significant incident or interruption, it may have adverse consequences on us, including: governmental enforcement actions; lawsuits (including class action claims); additional reporting requirements and/or oversight; bans or restrictions on processing sensitive information; indemnification obligations; negative publicity and reputational harm; the diversion of management resources; the interruption of our operations (including data availability); financial losses; and incidents of ticketing fraud or counterfeit tickets. Any of the foregoing could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We may be adversely affected if we are unable to adequately protect or enforce our intellectual property rights. Our proprietary technologies and information, including our software, informational databases, and other components that make up our products and services, are critical to our success. We seek to protect our proprietary technologies and information through a combination of methods, including intellectual property (“IP”) rights such as U.S. and foreign patents, trademarks, domain names, copyrights, and trade secrets, as well as through confidentiality agreements, IP assignment agreements, and other contractual restrictions with employees, customers, suppliers, affiliates, partners, and others. However, despite these efforts, there can be no assurance that our strategies to protect our IP rights will prevent the authorized use, infringement, misappropriation, dilution, or other violations thereof, particularly in foreign countries where laws may not protect such rights as fully as they do in the United States. A third party may also lawfully develop products or services substantially similar to ours. A failure to protect our IP rights in a meaningful manner, or challenges to our related contractual rights, could result in the erosion of our brand names or other IP, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our IP rights, protect our trade secrets, or determine the validity and scope of proprietary rights claimed by others. Any such litigation, regardless of the outcome or merit thereof, could result in substantial costs and divert the attention of management and other key technical resources, either of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We may face liability and costs for legal claims alleging that we infringe upon third-party IP rights. There can be no assurance that we do not, or will not, infringe upon or otherwise violate third-party IP rights. From time to time, we have been, and may in the future be, subject to legal claims and proceedings alleging that we 60 infringe upon or otherwise violate such rights. These claims and proceedings, regardless of the outcome or merit thereof, could result in substantial costs and divert the attention of management and other key technical resources, either of which could adversely affect our reputation and financial condition. In addition, the outcome of litigation is uncertain. As such, third parties asserting claims could secure a judgment against us awarding substantial damages, injunctive and/or other equitable relief, which could require us to rebrand, redesign, or reengineer our platform, products, or services, in addition to potentially blocking our ability to distribute, market, or sell our products and services. Our payment system depends on third-party providers and is subject to risks that may adversely affect our business. We rely on third-party providers to support our payment methods, as ticket buyers primarily use credit or debit cards to purchase tickets on our marketplace. Nearly all our revenue to date has been associated with payments processed through a single provider, which relies on banks and payment card networks to process transactions. If this payment processing provider or any of its vendors do not interoperate efficiently with our platform or if it or any of its vendors suffer any failure or experience a security incident, our payments systems and business could be adversely affected. Further, if this payment processing provider does not perform adequately, determines that certain types of transactions are prohibited, uses technology that does not interoperate efficiently with our platform, imposes new capital reserve requirements on us, or increases its fees, or if our relationship with it (or with the banks or payment card networks on which it relies) were to terminate or be suspended unexpectedly, our operating costs could increase, our margins could decrease, and ticket buyers may find our platform more difficult to use and, as a result, use our platform less. Our payment processing providers require us to comply with payment card network operating rules, which are set and interpreted by the payment card networks. These networks could adopt new, or modify or re-interpret existing, operating rules in ways that might prohibit us from providing certain services to ticket buyers or sellers, be costly to implement, or be difficult to follow. We are required to reimburse our providers for fines assessed by payment card networks if we, or ticket buyers or sellers using our platform, violate these rules (e.g., processing various types of transactions that may be interpreted as a violation of certain payment card network operating rules). Changes to these rules and requirements, or any change in our designation by payment card networks, could require a change in our business operations and limit or eliminate our ability to accept payment cards, any of which could adversely affect our business. We are also subject to the Payment Card Industry (“PCI”) Data Security Standard, which is designed to protect credit card account data as mandated by PCI entities. The PCI Data Security Standard requires companies to adopt certain measures to ensure the security of cardholder information, including using and maintaining firewalls, adopting proper password protections for certain devices and software, and restricting data access. We rely on vendors to handle PCI matters and to ensure PCI compliance. Despite our compliance efforts, we may become subject to claims that we have violated the PCI Data Security Standard based on past, present, or future business practices. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with the PCI Data Security Standard could subject us to fines, terminated banking relationships, and increased transaction fees. Under current credit, debit, and payment card practices and network rules, we are liable for fraudulent activity on the majority of our credit and debit card transactions. We are also exposed to financial crime risk, against which we do not currently carry insurance. Additionally, while we deploy sophisticated technology to detect fraudulent purchase activity, we may incur losses if we fail to prevent the use of fraudulent payment information on transactions. Fraudulent schemes are becoming increasingly sophisticated and common, and our ability to detect and combat such schemes may be negatively impacted by the adoption of new payment methods and technology platforms. If we or our payment processing providers fail to identify fraudulent activity, are unable to effectively combat the use of fraudulent payments on our platform, or otherwise experience increased levels of disputed credit card payments or transactions, and/or if we are unable to adequately mitigate these risks, our business, financial condition, and results of operations, as well as our brand, reputation, and ability to accept payments, could be adversely affected. Finally, the laws and regulations that govern payment methods and processing are complex and subject to change, and we may be required to expend considerable time and effort to determine their applicability. There can be no 61 assurance that we will be able to meet all compliance obligations, including obtaining any required licenses in the jurisdictions we service, and, even if we are able to do so, there could be costs and potential product changes involved in compliance that could negatively impact our business. Any actual or alleged non-compliance by us with existing or new laws and regulations could lead to reputational damage, litigation, increased costs or liabilities, damages, and/or the loss of our ability to offer payment services in certain markets. We cannot predict whether governments may take actions or impose restrictions that affect our ability to process payments or conduct our business in certain jurisdictions. A failure to predict how a given law or regulation related to money transmission, prepaid access, or similar topics will be applied to us could result in licensure, registration requirements, and administrative enforcement actions, as well as materially interfere with our ability to offer certain payment methods or to conduct our business in particular jurisdictions. Further, we may become subject to changing payment regulations and requirements that could affect the compliance of our current payment processes and increase the operational costs we incur to support payments. The foregoing could impose substantial additional costs, considerably delay the development or provision of our solutions, require significant and costly operational changes, or prevent us from providing our solutions in any given market. Risks Related to Our Indebtedness Our credit facility imposes restrictions that limit management’s discretion in operating our business, which could impair our ability to satisfy our debt obligations. Our credit facility includes restrictive covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to: incur additional debt; pay dividends and make distributions; make certain investments; prepay certain debt; create liens; enter into transactions with affiliates; modify the nature of our business; transfer and sell assets, including material IP; amend our organizational documents; and merge or consolidate. It also contains a springing financial covenant that requires compliance with a leverage ratio when borrowings under our revolving credit facility exceed certain levels. Our failure to comply with any of these covenants could lead to a default under our credit facility, which would entitle our lenders to accelerate and declare due and payable all amounts owed thereunder. As of June 30, 2026, our total debt, excluding unamortized debt discounts and debt issuance costs, was $388.1 million. Because our debt has a variable interest rate, we incur higher interest costs if interest rates increase. Interest rates increased significantly in 2023 and may continue to remain elevated in the future. Any increase in interest costs could adversely affect our financial condition. Our current debt and any future increases thereto could adversely affect our financial condition by: making it more difficult to satisfy our obligations; increasing our vulnerability to negative economic, regulatory, and industry conditions; limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for future net working capital, capital expenditures, strategic investments, acquisitions, and other purposes; requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flows from operating activities to fund payments on our debt, thereby reducing funds available for operations and other purposes; limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and industry; making us more vulnerable to interest rate increases; and placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt. We may be unable to generate sufficient cash flows and/or obtain additional financing when necessary or desirable. As of June 30, 2026, we had cash and cash equivalents of $136.7 million, which is available to us to fund our operating, investing, and financing activities. There can be no assurance that our business will generate sufficient cash flows from operating activities, or that we will be able to obtain financing, in an amount sufficient to fund our future operations or other liquidity needs. In the future, we may need and be unable to obtain additional debt or equity financing on favorable terms, if at all, which could hinder our ability to successfully compete and adversely affect our business. Specifically, we may be unable to, among other things: further develop and enhance our platform and solutions; continue to invest in our technology and marketing efforts; attract, hire, develop, motivate, and retain employees; respond to competitive pressures and/or unanticipated working capital requirements; or pursue acquisition opportunities. Our ability to obtain financing will depend on several factors, including general economic and capital market conditions (e.g., interest rates and inflationary concerns), credit availability from banks or other lenders, investor confidence, and 62 our results of operations. Further, if we were to raise additional equity financing, it would dilute the ownership and voting power of our existing stockholders, and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences, and privileges superior to those of our Class A common stock. Risks Related to the Ownership of Our Securities & Organizational Structure The interests of our significant stockholders may conflict with those of us or our other stockholders. As of June 30, 2026, affiliates of GTCR LLC (“GTCR”) and Eldridge Industries, LLC (“Eldridge”) beneficially owned approximately 34% and 24%, respectively, of our outstanding Class A common stock. For so long as they continue to do so, they will be able to exert significant influence over, and, acting together, may be able to cause or prevent a change of control and/or unsolicited acquisition of, our company. This ownership concentration could deprive our securityholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their securities as part of a potential acquisition and, ultimately, may affect the market price of our securities. In addition, we are party to a Stockholders’ Agreement, dated October 18, 2021 (as amended, the “Stockholders’ Agreement”), that gives affiliates of GTCR and Eldridge the right to designate the following number of nominees to our Board: •GTCR‘s affiliates have the right, but not the obligation, to nominate: (i) five directors, so long as they beneficially own at least 24% of the total number of shares of our common stock that were issued and outstanding on October 18, 2021 (the “Closing Amount”) (ii) four directors, so long as they beneficially own at least 18% but less than 24% of the Closing Amount; (iii) three directors, so long as they beneficially own at least 12% but less than 18% of the Closing Amount; (iv) two directors, so long as they beneficially own at least 6% but less than 12% of the Closing Amount; and (v) one director, until the date on which they beneficially own less than 5% of the number of shares of our common stock that they held on October 18, 2021. •Eldridge’s affiliates have the right, but not the obligation, to nominate: (i) three directors, so long as they beneficially own at least 12% of the Closing Amount; (ii) two directors, so long as they beneficially own at least 6% but less than 12% of the Closing Amount; and (iii) one director, until the date on which they own less than 5% of the number of shares of our common stock that they held on October 18, 2021. If the size of our Board is increased beyond nine members, GTCR’s affiliates will have the right to designate a number of nominees that give them the same percentage of total directors as set forth above (rounded up to the next whole number). Pursuant to the Stockholders’ Agreement, affiliates of GTCR and Eldridge have designated four and three, respectively, of our current eight directors, which enables them to exert significant influence over our business and affairs. GTCR, Eldridge, and their respective affiliates engage in a broad spectrum of activities and investments, including in our industry. In the ordinary course of their business, they may engage in activities where their interests conflict with those of us or our other stockholders, such as investing in or advising businesses that are our competitors, suppliers, or customers. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation (as amended, our “Charter”) provides that GTCR, Eldridge, their respective affiliates, and each of their respective directors, partners, principals, officers, members, managers, and employees (including any such person who serves as one of our directors and/or officers) have no duty to refrain from engaging in the same or similar business activities or lines of business in which we operate. In addition, GTCR, Eldridge, and their respective affiliates may pursue acquisition opportunities that are complementary to our business (and therefore would not be available to us), in addition to pursuing acquisitions, divestitures, and other transactions that they believe could enhance their respective investments, even though such transactions may involve risks to our other security holders and/or prove not to be beneficial. Our principal assets are the equity interests in our subsidiaries, and we are accordingly dependent upon our subsidiaries’ cash flows to satisfy our obligations. As a holding company, our principal assets are the equity interests in our subsidiaries, through which we conduct substantially all of our operations. Our ability to satisfy our obligations, including taxes, debt payments, and other expenses, is therefore dependent upon our subsidiaries’ earnings and their distribution of those earnings, or of loans 63 or other payments, to us. If our subsidiaries are unable to make such distributions, loans, or other payments, including because of their status as guarantors under our credit facility, restrictions under any other debt they may incur, and/or applicable laws and regulations related to the availability of sufficient surplus funds, our financial condition (including our liquidity) could be adversely affected and we may be unable to satisfy our obligations. Risks Related to Being a Public Company The market price and trading volume of our securities may be volatile. Securities markets worldwide experience significant price and volume fluctuations. This market volatility, as well as general economic, market, or political conditions, could reduce the market price of our securities despite our operating performance. The market price of our securities may fluctuate widely or decline significantly in the future in response to several factors, including, but not limited to: the realization of any of the risks discussed elsewhere in this Report; unfavorable market and economic conditions; the loss of investor confidence in the global financial markets and investing in general; adverse market reactions to indebtedness we may incur or securities we may issue in the future, including under the Incentive Award Plan; adverse market reactions to changes in our ownership or capital structure, including as a result of the Corporate Simplification; unanticipated declines or variations in our financial condition or results of operations; a failure to meet securities analysts’ earnings estimates; the publication of negative or inaccurate research reports about our business, industry, or securities and/or the failure of securities analysts to provide adequate coverage of our business or securities; changes in the market valuations of similar companies; speculation in the press or investment community about our business or industry; the trading activity of our largest stockholders; the number of shares of Class A common stock that are available for public trading; short sales, hedging, and other derivative transactions involving our securities; enacted or proposed changes to laws or regulations affecting our business or industry, or differing interpretations thereof; and increases in compliance or enforcement inquiries and investigations by regulatory authorities. We may be subject to securities class action litigation, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Other companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their securities and changes in their capital structure have been subject to securities class action litigation. We may be the target of this type of litigation in the future, which could result in substantial costs and divert the attention of management and other key resources that are needed to successfully run our business, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We previously identified and remediated a material weakness in our ICFR, and we may identify additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls. We are required to comply with SEC rules implementing Sections 302 and 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”), which require management to certify financial and other information in our periodic reports and provide an annual report on the effectiveness of our ICFR. Effective ICFR is necessary for us to provide reliable and timely financial reports and, together with adequate disclosure controls and procedures, is designed to reasonably detect and prevent fraud. However, internal controls may not detect and prevent all misstatements due to inherent limitations such as the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls, and/or fraud. Therefore, effective internal controls, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements. We are also required to report any material weaknesses in our ICFR. A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of deficiencies in ICFR such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In connection with the audit of our financial statements for each of the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, and 2020, we identified deficiencies in our ICFR related to the implementation of segregation of duties as part of our control activities, the establishment of clearly defined roles within our finance and accounting functions, and the number of personnel in those functions with an appropriate level of technical accounting and SEC reporting 64 experience, which, in the aggregate, constituted a material weakness. As of December 31, 2025, we concluded that the material weakness had been remediated. Although the material weakness in ICFR described above has been remediated, new material weaknesses could be identified in the future that, if not timely remediated, could result in errors in our financial statements that require a restatement or cause us to fail to meet our periodic reporting obligations, any of which could adversely affect investor confidence in us and the market price of our securities and/or lead to litigation or regulatory enforcement actions. Further, once we cease to be an EGC under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), unless we are a “non-accelerated filer” (as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act), we will be required to have our independent registered public accounting firm provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of our ICFR pursuant to Section 404 of SOX. This independent assessment could detect problems that our assessment might not. Undetected material weaknesses in our ICFR could lead to financial statement restatements and require us to incur significant remediation expenses. An adverse report may be issued if our independent registered public accounting firm is not satisfied with the level at which our internal controls are documented, designed, or operating. We are an EGC and an SRC, and our reliance on certain reporting requirement exemptions available to EGCs and/or SRCs could make our securities less attractive to investors. For as long as we continue to qualify as an EGC under the JOBS Act, we are permitted to utilize certain reporting requirement exemptions that are available to EGCs. These exemptions include: not being required to have our independent registered public accounting firm provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of our ICFR pursuant to Section 404 of SOX; reduced executive compensation disclosure in our annual reports and proxy statements; and not being required to hold a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation or golden parachute payments that were not previously approved. Similarly, for as long as we continue to qualify as an SRC, we are permitted to utilize certain reporting requirement exemptions that are available to SRCs. These exemptions include: reduced financial statement disclosure requirements in our periodic reports; reduced executive compensation disclosure in our annual reports and proxy statements; and not being required to include quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk in our periodic reports. If investors find our securities less attractive because of our reliance on these exemptions, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the market price of our securities may be more volatile. The JOBS Act also exempts EGCs from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies are required to do so. The JOBS Act provides that an EGC can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-EGCs, but that any such election is irrevocable. We have not elected to opt out of the extended transition period, which means that we are permitted to adopt new or revised financial accounting standards at the same time as private companies. This may make the comparison of our financial statements with those of a non-EGC, or an EGC that has elected to opt out of the extended transition period, difficult because of the potential differences in financial accounting standards used. We will remain an EGC until December 31, 2026 or such earlier date on which we have, during the preceding three-year period, issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities. We will cease to be eligible to qualify as an SRC beginning with the periodic report covering the first quarter of the fiscal year subsequent to our public float equaling or exceeding $250 million as of the last business day of our second fiscal quarter. We may not realize all of the expected benefits of the Corporate Simplification. We expect to realize certain benefits as a result of the Corporate Simplification, which was consummated over the two business days ending on October 31, 2025, including: retaining 100% of the future realized tax savings that, but for its termination, would have been payable to the other parties to the TRA; and realizing annual savings from reduced compliance and financial reporting costs associated with a single-class stock structure. However, these benefits are dependent on a number of factors, including applicable laws and the amount of our future taxable income. We may not ultimately realize all of the expected benefits of the Corporate Simplification on the anticipated timeline, or at all. 65 The issuance of new shares of Class A common stock, including upon the exercise of outstanding warrants, would increase the number of shares eligible for resale in the public market and dilute the ownership and voting power of our existing stockholders. As of June 30, 2026, the following warrants to purchase Class A common stock were outstanding and exercisable: (i) warrants to purchase 325,989 shares at an exercise price of $230.00 per share; (ii) warrants to purchase 950,000 shares at an exercise price of $200.00 per share; (iii) warrants to purchase 950,000 shares at an exercise price of $300.00 per share; and (iv) public warrants to purchase 338,342 shares at an exercise price of $230.00 per share. The issuance of new shares of Class A common stock (either on its own, such as the issuance in connection with the Corporate Simplification, or upon the exercise of these warrants) would increase the number of shares eligible for resale in the public market and dilute the ownership and voting power of our existing stockholders. Sales of substantial numbers of such shares, or the fact that such shares may be issued, could adversely affect the market price of our Class A common stock. Securities analysts may not publish favorable, or any, research reports about us, which could adversely affect the market price or trading volume of our securities. The trading market for our securities will be influenced to some extent by the research reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us. We do not control these analysts, and the analysts who publish information about us may have relatively little experience with our business or industry, which could affect their ability to accurately forecast our results and increase the likelihood that we fail to meet their estimates. If analysts provide inaccurate reports, issue unfavorable opinions regarding our business, industry, or securities, cease coverage of us, or fail to regularly publish reports regarding us or our securities, we could lose visibility in the market, which in turn could adversely affect the market price or trading volume of our securities. Provisions in our organizational documents may deter, delay, or prevent our acquisition by a third party. Provisions in our Charter and our amended and restated bylaws (as amended, our “Bylaws”) may make it more difficult or expensive for a third party to acquire control of us without the approval of our Board. These provisions, which may deter, delay, or prevent a merger, acquisition, tender offer, proxy contest, or other transaction that stockholders may consider favorable, include: (i) the sole ability of directors to fill a vacancy on our Board; (ii) advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and director nominations; (iii) limitations on stockholders’ ability to call special meetings and act by written consent; (iv) our Board’s ability to issue and designate the terms of new series of preferred stock without stockholder approval, which could be used, among other things, to institute a rights plan that would have the effect of significantly diluting the ownership of a potential hostile acquirer, likely preventing acquisitions that have not been approved by our Board; (v) the division of our Board into three classes, each of which serves staggered three-year terms; and (vi) the lack of cumulative voting for the election of directors. These provisions could discourage potential takeover attempts and reduce the price that investors are willing to pay for our securities. The exclusive forum provisions of our Charter may discourage lawsuits against our directors and officers. Our Charter provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by law and unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the “Chancery Court”) (or, in the event that the Chancery Court does not have jurisdiction, the U.S. federal district court for the District of Delaware or the other state courts of the State of Delaware) is the sole and exclusive forum for any: (i) derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf; (ii) action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any current or former director, officer, employee, or stockholder to us or our stockholders; (iii) action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”), our Charter, or our Bylaws, or as to which the DGCL confers jurisdiction on the Chancery Court; or (iv) action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine; provided that this provision, including for any “derivative action,” does not apply to suits to enforce a duty or liability created by the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, or any other claim for which the U.S. federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. Our Charter further provides that the U.S. federal district courts are the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. These exclusive forum provisions may have the effect of 66 discouraging lawsuits against our directors and officers. By becoming our stockholder, you are deemed to have notice of and consented to these exclusive forum provisions. There is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such a provision relating to causes of action arising under the Securities Act, and investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. The enforceability of similar provisions in other companies’ certificates of incorporation has been challenged in legal proceedings and it is possible that, in connection with any applicable action brought against us, a court could find such provisions to be inapplicable or unenforceable in such action. 67