From time to time, we may be involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. In December 2024, a shareholder class action complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against our Company, certain of our current and former officers and directors, and the underwriters of our IPO. Per a stipulated schedule, an amended complaint was filed on May 2, 2025, or the Amended Complaint. The Amended Complaint alleges that the registration statement on Form S-1 filed in connection with our IPO and the prospectus contained therein contained material misstatements or omissions in violation of federal securities laws. Pursuant to a stipulated order setting a response schedule, on June 26, 2025, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss all of the claims in the Amended Complaint, with plaintiff filing an opposition on August 18, 2025. Defendants filed their reply brief in support of the motion to dismiss on September 26, 2025. Following oral argument, on March 23, 2026, the court issued an order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss on all claims, with leave to amend the complaint. On April 20, 2026, plaintiff filed another amended complaint alleging the same claims under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Defendants subsequently filed a motion to dismiss the entire second amended complaint on May 19, 2026. Plaintiff filed an opposition to the defendants’ motion to dismiss on June 17, 2026. Defendants filed a reply brief in support of the motion to dismiss on July 2, 2026. A hearing on the motion to dismiss is scheduled for September 3, 2026. In addition, on May 14, 2025, a stockholder derivative complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against certain of our current and former officers and directors which was captioned Perez v. Seidenberg, et al., Case No. 3:25-cv-04163-PCP, or the Perez Action. On May 22, 2025, another stockholder derivative complaint was filed alleging the same claims against the same individual defendants captioned McDaniel v. Seidenberg, et al., Case No. 3:25-cv-04393-PCP, or the McDaniel Action, and together with the Perez Action, the Derivative Actions. The complaints filed in the Derivative Actions allege claims related to the allegations raised in the Amended Complaint. On June 2, 2025, the court entered a stipulation and order to stay the Perez Action pending the disposition of a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint in the related securities class action. On June 25, 2025, the court entered a stipulation and order to consolidate the Derivative Actions as In re Kyverna Therapeutics Derivative Litigation, Case No. 5:25-cv-04163-PCP. Finally, on July 22, 2025, the court entered a stipulation and order staying the consolidated derivative action pending the disposition of the motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint in the related securities class action. We believe we have good and substantial defenses to the claims in the Amended Complaint and the Derivative Actions, but there is no guarantee that we will be successful in these efforts. We are unable to determine whether any loss ultimately will occur or to estimate the range of such loss; therefore, no amount of loss has been accrued by us in our financial statements as of and for the quarter ended June 30, 2026. Regardless of outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us due to defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources, negative publicity, reputational harm and other factors.