A maker of salty snacks — Utz chips, On The Border, Zapp's, and Boulder Canyon — sold in stores across the country through a direct-to-store delivery network. The couple William and Salie Utz began the business in 1921 in the summer kitchen of their Hanover, Pennsylvania home, originally calling it Hanover Home Brand Potato Chips before adopting the family name. Salie perfected the kettle-cooked recipe while Bill peddled the first batches by horse-drawn carriage.
Utz Brands swung to a $10.1M net loss as a 15.1% SG&A increase and the absence of a prior-year warrant gain outweighed higher pricing.
Utz Brands agreed to be acquired, making the quarter's results a final snapshot before the company goes private. rose 1.4% to $371.8 million on higher pricing, but a 15.1% increase in selling, general and administrative expenses drove a net loss of $10.1 million, compared to a $10.5 million profit a year ago. The pending $14.25-per-share acquisition by Intersnack Group now defines the company's trajectory, suspending its financial outlook and capping public shareholders' upside.
Key takeaways
Selling, general and administrative expenses rose 15.1% to $101.3 million, driven by increased marketing and investments in geographic expansion, which pushed to a loss of $5.5 million from a $6.4 million profit a year ago.
swung to a $10.1 million loss from a $10.5 million profit in the prior-year quarter, largely because the prior-year period included a $12.5 million non-cash gain on that did not recur.
Section summaries
Management's Discussion and Analysis
Net sales rose 1.4% to $371.8M on higher pricing, but a 15.1% jump in SG&A drove a net loss of $16.0M.
⌄
increased 1.4% to $371.8M, driven by a 3.6% benefit from higher net price realization, partially offset by a 2.2% decline in .
was essentially flat at 25.9% as productivity savings offset supply chain cost inflation.
rose 1.4% to $371.8 million, as a 3.6% benefit from higher net price realization was partially offset by a 2.2% decline in volume and mix — a reversal from the prior quarter when volume grew and pricing declined.
was essentially flat at 25.9%, down 0.1 points , as productivity savings offset supply chain cost inflation.
rose 14.4% to $55.7 million, reflecting adjustments for supply chain and corporate transformation costs, though the company will not provide a 2026 outlook due to the pending acquisition.
fell 5.0% to $800.2 million, while remained negative at -$1.9 million, an improvement from -$10.6 million a year ago.
What changed
The recovery that began in Q1 FY2026 at 25.4% held at 25.9% in Q2, confirming that productivity savings are now offsetting inflation, though the margin remains below the 26.0% reported in Q2 FY2025.
The pricing-versus-volume dynamic reversed: Q1 FY2026 showed a 3.7% increase in net price realization and a 1.1% volume decline, and Q2 continued that pattern with a 3.6% pricing benefit and a 2.2% volume decline, ending the multi-quarter trend of buying volume growth with promotions.
The risk flagged in Q1 FY2026, when fell below , was not mentioned as having materialized; no was recorded, but the pending acquisition now supersedes that concern.
improved to -$1.9 million from -$10.6 million a year ago and -$26.0 million in Q1 FY2026, suggesting the seasonal drain is reversing as it did in the second half of FY2025.
What to watch
Track whether the Intersnack Group acquisition closes on the announced terms of $14.25 per share, or whether any regulatory, financing, or litigation obstacles delay or block the deal.
Monitor the $50 million termination fee provision and whether any alternative bidder emerges despite the merger agreement's no-shop restrictions.
Observe whether the volume decline accelerates as pricing remains the primary growth driver, or whether the 2.2% drop stabilizes in what may be the company's final quarters as a public entity.
Selling, general and administrative expenses surged 15.1% to $101.3M, primarily due to increased marketing and investments in geographic expansion.
The company reported a net loss of $16.0M compared to of $10.1M in the prior year, largely due to the SG&A increase and the absence of a $12.5M gain on warrant remeasurement.
rose 14.4% to $55.7M, reflecting adjustments for supply chain and corporate transformation costs.
The company will not provide an outlook for 2026 due to a definitive agreement to be acquired by Intersnack Group for $14.25 per share.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
For quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk, see Item 7A. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2025 filed on February 12, 2026. Our exposures to market risk have not chan…
⌄
For quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk, see Item 7A. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2025 filed on February 12, 2026. Our exposures to market risk have not changed materially since the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2025 filed on February 12, 2026.
From time to time, we are subject to legal actions arising from our normal business activities. Although we cannot predict with certainty the ultimate resolution of lawsuits, investigations and claims asserted against us, as of the date of this filing, we do not believe that we…
⌄
From time to time, we are subject to legal actions arising from our normal business activities. Although we cannot predict with certainty the ultimate resolution of lawsuits, investigations and claims asserted against us, as of the date of this filing, we do not believe that we are currently party to any currently pending material legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, or any such proceedings known to be contemplated by governmental authorities.
30
Pending merger with Intersnack Group creates material business disruption, deal-failure, and litigation risks.
⌄
Announcement and pendency of the merger may disrupt relationships with customers, suppliers, and independent operators, and hinder employee retention.
Failure to close the merger could leave the company with unrecovered costs, intensified business disruptions, and negative market perception.
The merger agreement restricts the company from soliciting alternative proposals and requires a $50 million in certain scenarios, potentially deterring superior offers.
Operational restrictions under the merger agreement may prevent the company from pursuing strategic actions outside the ordinary course of business.
The company and its directors face potential securities class action and derivative lawsuits that could delay or block the merger and incur substantial costs.
If completed, the merger will cash out Class A Common Stock holders, eliminating their participation in any future company growth.