Kearny Financial Corp.
A community bank serving New Jersey and parts of New York, Kearny Financial Corp. is the holding company behind Kearny Bank, which offers everyday checking and savings accounts plus home, multifamily, and commercial real estate loans to consumers, small businesses, and commercial clients. It got its start in 1884 as the Kearny Building and Loan Association, a thrift founded in the New Jersey town it still carries in its name to help local families turn small deposits into home loans. Despite later growing into a regional bank and even moving its headquarters to Fairfield, New Jersey, it kept the Kearny name—the town the original association was built to serve.
10-K · Fiscal year ended Jun 30, 2026 · SEC filing ↗
The original filing sections are available below.
Forward-Looking Statements This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements, which can be identified by the use of words such as “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “seek,” “expect” and words of similar meaning. These forward-look…
Forward-Looking Statements This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements, which can be identified by the use of words such as “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “seek,” “expect” and words of similar meaning. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: •statements of our goals, intentions and expectations; •statements regarding our business plans, prospects, growth and operating strategies; •statements regarding the quality of our loan and investment portfolios; and •estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits. These forward-looking statements are based on current beliefs and expectations of our management and are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change. We are under no duty to and do not take any obligation to update any forward-looking statements after the date of the Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements: •general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas, that are worse than expected; •the imposition of tariffs or other domestic or international governmental policies and retaliatory responses; •changes in the amount and trend of loan delinquencies and write-offs and changes in estimates and the methodologies for calculating the allowance for credit losses; •our ability to access cost-effective funding; •fluctuations in real estate values and both residential and commercial real estate market conditions; •demand for loans and deposits in our market area; •our ability to implement changes in our business strategies; •competition among depository and other financial institutions; •inflation and/or changes in the interest rate environment that reduce our margins and yields, or reduce the fair value of financial instruments or reduce the origination levels in our lending business, or increase the level of defaults, losses and prepayments on loans we have made and make whether held in portfolio or sold in the secondary markets; •adverse changes in the securities markets; •changes in laws or government regulations or policies affecting financial institutions, including changes in regulatory fees and capital requirements; •changes in monetary or fiscal policies of the U.S. Government, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board; •our ability to manage market risk, credit risk and operational risk in the current economic conditions; •significant increases in our loan losses; •our ability to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth opportunities; •our ability to successfully integrate any assets, liabilities, clients, systems and management personnel we have acquired or may acquire into our operations and our ability to realize related revenue synergies and cost savings within expected time frames and any goodwill charges related thereto; •changes in consumer demand, borrowing and savings habits; •changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by bank regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; •our ability to retain key employees; •technological changes; 2 Table of Contents •cyber-attacks, computer viruses and other technological risks that may breach the security of our websites or other systems to obtain unauthorized access to confidential information and destroy data or disable our systems; •technological changes that may be more difficult or expensive than expected; •the ability of third-party providers to perform their obligations to us; •the ability of the U.S. Government to manage federal debt limits; •changes in the financial condition, results of operations or future prospects of issuers of securities that we own; and •other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and operational factors affecting our operations, pricing products and services described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual future results may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements. General Kearny Financial Corp. (the “Company,” or “Kearny Financial”), is a Maryland corporation that is the holding company for Kearny Bank (the “Bank” or “Kearny Bank”), a nonmember New Jersey-chartered savings bank. The Company is a unitary savings and loan holding company, regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and conducts no significant business or operations of its own. The Bank’s deposits are federally insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund as administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Bank is primarily regulated by the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance (“NJDBI”) and, as a nonmember bank, the FDIC. References in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K to the Company or Kearny Financial generally refer to the Company and the Bank, unless the context indicates otherwise. References to “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to the Bank or the Company, or both, as the context indicates. The Company’s primary business is the ownership and operation of the Bank. The Bank is principally engaged in the business of attracting deposits from the general public and using these deposits, together with other funds, to originate or purchase loans for its portfolio and for sale into the secondary market. Our loan portfolio is primarily comprised of loans collateralized by commercial and residential real estate augmented by secured and unsecured loans to businesses and consumers. We also maintain a portfolio of investment securities, primarily comprised of U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities, obligations of state and political subdivisions, corporate bonds, asset-backed securities and collateralized loan obligations. We operate from our administrative headquarters in Fairfield, New Jersey and other administrative locations throughout the State of New Jersey. As of June 30, 2026, we had 40 branch offices. The Company maintains a website at www.kearnybank.com. We make available through that website, free of charge, copies of our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, amendments to those reports and proxy materials as soon as is reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files those materials with, or furnishes them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may access these materials by following the links under “Investor Relations” under the “Financials” tab at the Company’s website. Information on the Company’s website is not and should not be considered a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 3 Table of Contents Business Strategy Our objective is to enhance long-term shareholder value by growing a higher-performing commercial banking franchise supported by relationship-based deposits, disciplined balance sheet management, technology-enabled operating efficiencies and strong risk management practices. We seek to leverage our strong capital position, experienced management team, customer-focused culture and technology investments to drive sustainable earnings growth while continuing to meet the financial needs of our clients and communities. The key components of our business strategy are as follows: •Expand Commercial Banking Relationships We continue to focus on expanding our commercial banking franchise by growing relationships with small and middle-market businesses and professionals. We seek to increase commercial loan production across targeted asset classes, including commercial and industrial ("C&I") loans and owner-occupied commercial real estate loans, while deepening treasury management and deposit relationships with our business clients. We have continued to invest in treasury management, corporate banking and business development capabilities to better serve commercial clients and increase relationship-based deposits. Our relationship-based approach, local decision-making and experienced commercial banking team enable us to provide customized solutions that support our clients' evolving financial needs. •Grow and Deepen Core Deposit Relationships A core element of our strategy is to attract and retain stable, relationship-based deposits that support long-term growth and funding stability. We remain focused on growing commercial operating accounts and consumer transaction accounts while expanding existing customer relationships through personalized service and tailored product offerings. To support these efforts, we have invested in experienced corporate banking and specialty deposit teams focused on attracting new relationship-based deposits and expanding client relationships. By increasing core deposit relationships and reducing reliance on higher-cost funding sources, we seek to strengthen franchise value, improve funding flexibility and enhance our net interest margin over time. •Leverage Technology, Automation and Digital Innovation Technology continues to play a critical role in our growth strategy and operating model. We are committed to investing in digital banking, process automation, data analytics, artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies that enhance the client experience, improve employee productivity and support scalable growth. Our digital capabilities enable customers to interact with the Bank through multiple channels while maintaining the personalized service that remains central to our relationship banking model. We expect ongoing investments in technology to drive efficiencies across lending, deposits, operations, risk management and customer engagement. •Continue to Strengthen Asset Mix and Earnings Profile We seek to enhance long-term profitability through disciplined balance sheet management and strategic loan portfolio growth. Our lending strategy emphasizes higher-return commercial and consumer loan categories, including C&I loans, owner-occupied commercial real estate loans and home equity products. This approach is intended to improve earning asset yields, enhance risk-adjusted returns and better position the Bank across varying interest rate environments while maintaining strong underwriting standards and credit quality. •Drive Operational Efficiency and Improve Profitability We are committed to continuously enhancing operating efficiency and improving shareholder returns. Our initiatives include streamlining processes, increasing technology utilization, optimizing staffing levels and evaluating our branch network to ensure that resources are aligned with customer preferences and market opportunities. Through these efforts, we seek to improve productivity, support revenue growth, control expenses and create a more efficient and scalable operating model. Consistent with this strategy, we consolidated three branch locations during fiscal 2026 while continuing to maintain a strong presence within our markets. •Maintain Strong Capital, Liquidity and Risk Management We remain committed to maintaining strong capital, liquidity and risk management practices that support the safety and soundness of the Bank while providing flexibility to pursue growth opportunities. We maintain capital levels above applicable regulatory requirements and internal targets and preserve substantial on- and off-balance sheet liquidity sources. Our disciplined approach to risk management supports long-term financial strength and positions the Bank to serve customers and communities through changing economic and operating environments. 4 Table of Contents Market Area. At June 30, 2026, our primary market area consisted of the counties in which we currently operate branches, including Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Somerset and Union counties in New Jersey and Kings (Brooklyn) and Richmond (Staten Island) counties in New York. Our lending is concentrated in New Jersey and New York and our predominant sources of deposits are the communities in which our offices are located as well as the neighboring communities. Competition. We operate in a highly competitive market area with a large concentration of financial institutions and we face substantial competition in attracting deposits and in originating loans. A number of our competitors are significantly larger institutions with greater financial and technological resources and lending limits. Our ability to compete successfully is a significant factor affecting our growth potential and profitability. Our competition for deposits and loans comes from other insured depository institutions located in our primary market area as well as out-of-market depository institutions operating via online channels and from non-depository institutions including mortgage banks, finance companies, insurance companies, brokerage firms and financial technology companies. 5 Table of Contents Lending Activities General. Our loan portfolio is comprised of multi-family mortgage loans, nonresidential mortgage loans, commercial and industrial loans, construction loans, one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, home equity loans and other consumer loans. In recent years our lending strategies have placed increasing emphasis on the origination of commercial loans. Loan Portfolio Composition. The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio in dollar amounts and as a percentage of the total portfolio at the dates indicated. At June 30, 2026 2025 Amount Percent Amount Percent (Dollars In Thousands) Commercial loans: Multi-family mortgage $ 2,499,894 42.52 % $ 2,709,654 46.60 % Nonresidential mortgage 1,019,445 17.34 986,556 16.97 Commercial and industrial 223,927 3.81 138,755 2.39 Construction 263,200 4.48 177,713 3.06 One- to four-family residential mortgage 1,789,865 30.45 1,748,591 30.07 Consumer loans: Home equity loans 79,844 1.36 50,737 0.87 Other consumer 2,387 0.04 2,533 0.04 Total loans 5,878,562 100.00 % 5,814,539 100.00 % Less: Allowance for credit losses 45,496 46,191 Unaccreted yield adjustments 3,237 1,602 Total adjustments 48,733 47,793 Total loans, net $ 5,829,829 $ 5,766,746 The following table sets forth the composition of our real estate secured loans indicating the loan-to-value (“LTV”), by loan category, at June 30, 2026 and 2025: June 30, 2026 June 30, 2025 Balance LTV Balance LTV (Dollars in Thousands) Commercial mortgage loans: Multi-family mortgage $ 2,499,894 61 % $ 2,709,654 62 % Nonresidential mortgage 1,019,445 52 % 986,556 52 % Construction 263,200 57 % 177,713 56 % Total commercial mortgage loans 3,782,539 58 % 3,873,923 59 % One- to four-family residential mortgage 1,789,865 62 % 1,748,591 62 % Consumer loans: Home equity loans 79,844 47 % 50,737 51 % Total mortgage loans $ 5,652,248 59 % $ 5,673,251 60 % 6 Table of Contents Loan Maturity Schedule. The following table sets forth the maturities of our loan portfolio at June 30, 2026. Demand loans, loans having no stated maturity and overdrafts are shown as due in one year or less. Loans are stated in the following table at contractual maturity and actual maturities could differ due to prepayments. Amounts Due Within One Year 1 to 5 Years 5 to 15 Years Over 15 Years Total Due After One Year Total (In Thousands) Multi-family mortgage $ 422,473 $ 935,298 $ 1,067,785 $ 74,338 $ 2,077,421 $ 2,499,894 Nonresidential mortgage 126,855 533,540 317,256 41,794 892,590 1,019,445 Commercial and industrial 63,698 35,145 122,198 2,886 160,229 223,927 Construction 153,208 107,266 2,726 — 109,992 263,200 One- to four-family residential mortgage 5,674 27,574 176,153 1,580,464 1,784,191 1,789,865 Home equity loans 651 3,999 54,419 20,775 79,193 79,844 Other consumer 875 96 99 1,317 1,512 2,387 Total loans $ 773,434 $ 1,642,918 $ 1,740,636 $ 1,721,574 $ 5,105,128 $ 5,878,562 The following table shows the loans as of June 30, 2026 due after June 30, 2027 according to rate type and loan category: Fixed Rates Floating or Adjustable Rates Total (In Thousands) Multi-family mortgage $ 1,644,900 $ 432,521 $ 2,077,421 Nonresidential mortgage 665,474 227,116 892,590 Commercial and industrial 135,823 24,406 160,229 Construction 480 109,512 109,992 One- to four-family residential mortgage 1,683,361 100,830 1,784,191 Home equity loans 22,367 56,826 79,193 Other consumer 281 1,231 1,512 Total loans $ 4,152,686 $ 952,442 $ 5,105,128 Multi-Family and Nonresidential Real Estate Mortgage Loans. At June 30, 2026, multi-family mortgage loans totaled $2.50 billion, or 42.5% of our loan portfolio, while nonresidential mortgage loans totaled $1.0 billion, or 17.3% of our loan portfolio. We originate a variety of types of commercial mortgage loans, including multi-family and nonresidential property loans, as well as loans on mixed-use properties which combine residential and commercial space. We generally offer fixed-rate and adjustable-rate balloon mortgage loans on multi-family and nonresidential properties with final stated maturities ranging from three to 15 years with amortization terms which generally range from 15 to 30 years. Our commercial mortgage loans are primarily secured by properties located in New Jersey, New York and the surrounding states. Commercial and Industrial Business (C&I) Loans. At June 30, 2026, commercial and industrial business loans totaled $223.9 million, or 3.8% of our loan portfolio. We originate commercial term loans and lines of credit to a variety of clients in our market area. Our commercial term loans generally have terms of up to 10 years. Our commercial lines of credit have terms of up to two years and are generally floating-rate loans. To a lesser extent, we supplement our portfolio through the purchase of C&I loans from third parties. Construction Lending. At June 30, 2026, construction loans totaled $263.2 million, or 4.5% of our loan portfolio. Our construction lending includes loans to individuals, builders or developers for the construction of multi-family residential buildings or commercial real estate or for the construction or renovation of one- to four-family residences. Construction borrowers must hold title to the land free and clear of any liens. Financing for construction loans is limited to 80% of the anticipated appraised value of the completed property. Disbursements are made in accordance with inspection reports by our approved inspection firms. Terms of financing are generally limited to one year with an interest rate tied to the prime rate and may include a premium of one or more points. In some cases, we convert a construction loan to a permanent mortgage loan upon completion of construction. We have no formal limits as to the number of projects a builder has under construction or development and make a case-by-case determination on loans to builders and developers who have multiple projects under development. 7 Table of Contents One- to Four-Family Residential Mortgage Loans Held in Portfolio. At June 30, 2026, one- to four-family residential mortgage loans totaled $1.79 billion, or 30.4% of our loan portfolio. At June 30, 2026, $1.61 billion, or 90.1%, of our one- to four-family residential mortgage loans were secured by properties located within New Jersey and New York with the remaining $177.4 million, or 9.9%, secured by properties in other states. The fixed-rate residential mortgage loans that we originate for portfolio generally meet the secondary mortgage market standards of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”). In addition, we offer a first-time homebuyer program which provides financial incentives for persons who have not previously owned real estate and are purchasing a one- to four-family property in our primary lending area for use as a primary residence. One- to Four-Family Residential Mortgage Loans Held for Sale. As a complement to our residential one- to four-family portfolio lending activities, we operate a mortgage banking platform which supports the origination of one- to four-family mortgage loans for sale into the secondary market. The loans we originate for sale generally meet the secondary mortgage market standards of Freddie Mac. Such loans are generally originated by, and sourced from, the same resources and markets as those loans originated and held in our portfolio. Our mortgage banking business strategy resulted in the recognition of $932,000 in gains associated with the sale of $128.2 million of mortgage loans held for sale during the year ended June 30, 2026. As of that date, an additional $6.0 million of loans were held and committed for sale into the secondary market. Home Equity Loans. At June 30, 2026, our fixed-rate home equity loans and adjustable home equity lines of credit totaled $79.8 million, or 1.4% of our loan portfolio. These loans and lines of credit generally have terms of up to 20 years. Other Consumer Loans. At June 30, 2026, other consumer loans totaled $2.4 million, or 0.04% of our loan portfolio. Our consumer loan portfolio includes unsecured overdraft lines of credit and personal loans as well as loans secured by savings accounts and certificates of deposit on deposit with the Bank. Loans to One Borrower. New Jersey law generally limits the amount that a savings bank may lend to a single borrower and related entities to 15% of the institution’s capital funds. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2026, our legal loans to one borrower limit was approximately $107.4 million. At June 30, 2026, our largest single borrower had an aggregate outstanding loan exposure of approximately $79.5 million comprising six multi-family mortgage loans. At June 30, 2026, this lending relationship was current and performing in accordance with the terms of their loan agreements. 8 Table of Contents Loan Originations, Purchases, Sales and Repayments. The following table shows the principal balances of portfolio loans originated, purchased, acquired and repaid during the periods indicated: For the Years Ended June 30, 2026 2025 2024 (In Thousands) Loan originations: (1) Commercial loans: Multi-family mortgage $ 38,503 $ 132,104 $ 23,742 Nonresidential mortgage 127,690 128,153 79,938 Commercial and industrial 118,487 118,135 98,469 Construction 155,058 98,917 85,608 One- to four-family residential mortgage 153,996 144,328 131,529 Consumer loans: Home equity loans 43,525 29,735 18,011 Other consumer 1,450 1,392 4,007 Total loan originations 638,709 652,764 441,304 Loan purchases: Commercial loans: Nonresidential mortgage 14,026 — — Commercial and industrial 93,827 — — One- to four-family residential mortgage 65,647 730 60,341 Total loan purchases 173,500 730 60,341 Loan repayments (748,185) (587,795) (593,756) (Decrease) increase due to other items (941) 13,199 (728) Net increase (decrease) in loan portfolio $ 63,083 $ 78,898 $ (92,839) ________________________________________ (1)Excludes origination and sales of one- to four-family mortgage loans held for sale. Additional information about our loans is presented in Note 4 to the audited consolidated financial statements. Loan Approval Procedures and Authority. Senior management recommends, and the Board of Directors approves, our lending policies and loan approval limits. The Bank’s Loan Committee consists of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Lending Officer, Chief Credit Officer, Chief Risk Officer and other members of senior management. Loans which exceed certain thresholds, as defined within our policies, are submitted to the Bank’s Loan Committee and/or Board of Directors for approval. Asset Quality Collection Procedures on Delinquent Loans. We regularly monitor the payment status of all loans within our portfolio and promptly initiate collection efforts on past due loans in accordance with applicable policies and procedures. Delinquent borrowers are notified when a loan is 30 days past due. If the delinquency continues, subsequent efforts are made to contact the delinquent borrower and additional collection notices are sent. All reasonable attempts are made to collect from borrowers prior to referral to an attorney for collection. However, when a residential loan is 120 days delinquent and a commercial loan is 90 days delinquent, it is our general practice to refer it to an attorney for repossession, foreclosure or other form of collection action, as appropriate. In certain instances, we may modify the loan or grant a limited moratorium on loan payments to enable the borrower to reorganize their financial affairs as we attempt to work with the borrower to establish a repayment schedule to cure the delinquency. As to mortgage loans, if a foreclosure action is taken and the loan is not reinstated, paid in full or refinanced, the property is sold at judicial sale at which we may be the buyer if there are no adequate offers to satisfy the debt. Any property acquired as the result of foreclosure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure is classified as other real estate owned until it is sold or otherwise disposed of. When other real estate owned is acquired, it is recorded at its fair market value less estimated selling costs. The initial write-down of the property, if necessary, is charged to the allowance for credit losses. Adjustments to the carrying value of the properties that result from subsequent declines in value are charged to operations in the period in which the declines are identified. 9 Table of Contents Past Due Loans. A loan’s past due status is generally determined based upon its principal and interest (“P&I”) payment delinquency status in conjunction with its past maturity status, where applicable. A loan’s P&I payment delinquency status is based upon the number of calendar days between the date of the earliest P&I payment due and the as of measurement date. A loan’s past maturity status, where applicable, is based upon the number of calendar days between a loan’s contractual maturity date and the as of measurement date. Based upon the larger of these criteria, loans are categorized into the following past due tiers for financial statement reporting and disclosure purposes: Current (including 1-29 days past due), 30-59 days past due, 60-89 days past due and 90 or more days past due. Additional information about our past due loans is presented in Note 4 to the audited consolidated financial statements. Nonaccrual Loans. Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when contractual payments become 90 or more days past due or when we do not expect to receive all P&I payments owed substantially in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement, regardless of past due status. Loans that become 90 days past due but are well secured and in the process of collection, may remain on accrual status. Nonaccrual loans are generally returned to accrual status when all payments due are brought current and we expect to receive all remaining P&I payments owed substantially in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement. Payments received in cash on nonaccrual loans, including both the principal and interest portions of those payments, are generally applied to reduce the carrying value of the loan. Purchased Credit Deteriorated Loans (“PCD”). PCD loans are acquired loans that, as of the acquisition date, have experienced a more-than-insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination. Non-PCD loans are acquired loans that have experienced no or insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination. To distinguish between the two types of acquired loans, we evaluate risk characteristics that have been determined to be indicators of deteriorated credit quality. The determining criteria may involve loan specific characteristics such as payment status, debt service coverage or other changes in creditworthiness since the loan was originated, while others are relevant to recent economic conditions, such as borrowers in industries impacted by the pandemic. Additional information about our PCD loans is presented in Note 4 to the audited consolidated financial statements. Nonperforming Assets. The following table provides information regarding our nonperforming assets which are comprised of nonaccrual loans, accruing loans 90 days or more past due, nonaccrual loans held-for-sale and other real estate owned: At June 30, 2026 2025 (Dollars In Thousands) Nonaccrual loans $ 47,896 $ 45,597 Total nonperforming loans 47,896 45,597 Other real estate owned 5,519 — Total nonperforming assets $ 53,415 $ 45,597 Total nonaccrual loans to total loans 0.82 % 0.78 % Total nonperforming loans to total loans 0.82 % 0.78 % Total nonperforming loans to total assets 0.62 % 0.59 % Total nonperforming assets to total assets 0.70 % 0.59 % Total nonperforming assets increased by $7.8 million to $53.4 million at June 30, 2026 from $45.6 million at June 30, 2025. For those same comparative periods, the number of nonperforming loans increased to 52 loans from 48 loans. There were two properties in other real estate owned (“OREO”) at June 30, 2026 and no properties in OREO at June 30, 2025. Loan Review System. We maintain a loan review system consisting of several related functions including, but not limited to, classification of assets, calculation of the allowance for credit losses, independent credit file review as well as internal audit and lending compliance reviews. We utilize both internal and external resources, where appropriate, to perform the various loan review functions, all of which operate in accordance with a scope and frequency determined by senior management and the Audit and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors. As one component of our loan review system we engage a third-party firm which specializes in loan review and analysis functions. As part of their review process, our third-party review firm compares their review results with their client base to evaluate our risk assessment among our peers. This firm assists senior management and the Board of Directors in identifying potential credit weaknesses; in reviewing and confirming risk ratings or adverse classifications internally ascribed to loans by 10 Table of Contents management; in identifying relevant trends that affect the collectability of the portfolio and identifying segments of the portfolio that are potential problem areas; in verifying the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses; in evaluating the activities of lending personnel including compliance with lending policies and the quality of their loan approval, monitoring and risk assessment; and by providing an objective assessment of the overall quality of the loan portfolio. Currently, third-party loan reviews are being conducted quarterly and include non-performing loans as well as samples of performing loans of varying types within our portfolio. In addition, our loan review system includes functions performed by internal audit and compliance personnel. Internal audit resources perform credit review functions utilizing guidance from regulatory and Institute of Internal Auditors standards in addition to assessing the adequacy of, and adherence to, internal credit policies and loan administration procedures and adherence to regulatory guidance. Our compliance resources monitor adherence to relevant lending-related and consumer protection-related laws and regulations. Classification of Assets. In compliance with the regulatory guidelines, our loan review system includes an evaluation process through which certain loans exhibiting adverse credit quality characteristics are classified as Substandard, Doubtful or Loss. An asset is classified as Substandard if it is inadequately protected by the paying capacity and net worth of the obligor or the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard assets include those characterized by the distinct possibility that the insured institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as Doubtful have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified as Substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values. Assets, or portions thereof, classified as Loss are considered uncollectible or of so little value that their continuance as assets is not warranted. Assets which do not currently expose us to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant an adverse classification but have some credit deficiencies or other potential weaknesses are designated as Special Mention by management. “Substandard” and “doubtful” loans are generally referred to as Classified Assets, which possess greater risk characteristics than “special mention” loans. Non-classified assets are internally rated within one of four Pass categories or as Watch with the latter denoting a potential deficiency or concern that warrants increased oversight or tracking by management until remediated. Additional information about our classification of assets is presented in Note 4 to the audited consolidated financial statements. The following table discloses our designation of certain loans as special mention or adversely classified during each of the two years presented: At June 30, 2026 2025 (In Thousands) Substandard $ 88,120 $ 118,346 Doubtful 82 72 Total classified loans 88,202 118,418 Special mention 4,516 15,033 Total classified and special mention loans $ 92,718 $ 133,451 Individually Evaluated Loans. On a case-by-case basis, we may conclude that a loan should be evaluated on an individual basis based on its disparate risk characteristics. When we determine that a loan no longer shares similar risk characteristics with other loans in the portfolio, the allowance will be determined on an individual basis using the present value of expected cash flows or, for collateral-dependent loans, the fair value of the collateral as of the reporting date, less estimated selling costs, as applicable. If the fair value of the collateral is less than the amortized cost basis of the loan, we will establish an allowance for the difference between the fair value of the collateral, less costs to sell, at the reporting date and the amortized cost basis of the loan. 11 Table of Contents Allowance for Credit Losses - Loans A description of our methodology in establishing our allowance for credit losses is set forth in the section “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies - Allowance for Credit Losses.” Additional information about our allowance for credit losses is also presented in Note 5 to the audited consolidated financial statements. Our allowance for credit losses is maintained at a level necessary to cover lifetime expected credit losses in financial assets at the balance sheet date. The following table presents allowance for credit losses ratios, along with the components of their calculation, for the periods indicated: At June 30, 2026 2025 (Dollars in Thousands) Allowance for credit losses - loans $ 45,496 $ 46,191 Total loans outstanding $ 5,878,562 $ 5,814,539 Total non-performing loans $ 47,896 $ 45,597 Allowance for credit losses as a percent of total loans outstanding 0.77 % 0.79 % Allowance for credit losses to non-performing loans 94.99 % 101.30 % 12 Table of Contents The following table presents the ratio of net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans outstanding by loan category, along with the components of the calculation, for the periods indicated: For the Years Ended June 30, 2026 2025 2024 Net charge-offs (recoveries) Average loans outstanding Net charge- offs as a percent of average loans outstanding Net charge-offs (recoveries) Average loans outstanding Net charge- offs as a percent of average loans outstanding Net charge-offs (recoveries) Average loans outstanding Net charge- offs as a percent of average loans outstanding (Dollars in Thousands) Multi-family mortgage $ 1,208 $ 2,612,952 0.05 % $ — $ 2,686,965 — % $ 398 $ 2,675,429 0.01 % Nonresidential mortgage 5 999,160 — % 830 956,556 0.09 % 5,855 953,125 0.61 % Commercial and industrial 1,141 179,422 0.64 % 275 146,218 0.19 % 3,844 163,560 2.35 % Construction — 195,804 — % — 191,146 — % — 208,111 — % One- to four-family residential mortgage 28 1,742,853 — % — 1,748,806 — % (76) 1,704,957 — % Home equity loans 11 74,223 0.01 % 2 63,507 — % — 63,367 — % Other consumer — 2,497 — % 7 2,750 0.25 % — 2,800 — % Unaccreted yield adjustments — (729) — % — (6,365) — % — (18,853) — % Total $ 2,393 $ 5,806,182 0.04 % $ 1,114 $ 5,789,583 0.02 % $ 10,021 $ 5,752,496 0.17 % Our loan portfolio experienced an annualized net charge-off rate of 0.04% for the year ended June 30, 2026, an increase of two basis points from the 0.02% rate for the year ended June 30, 2025. 13 Table of Contents Allocation of Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans. The following table sets forth the allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) allocated by loan category and the percent of loans in each category to total loans receivable at the dates indicated. The ACL allocated to each category is the estimated amount considered necessary to cover lifetime expected credit losses inherent in any particular category as of the balance sheet date and does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in other categories. At June 30, 2026 2025 Amount Percent of Loans to Total Loans Amount Percent of Loans to Total Loans (Dollars In Thousands) Multi-family mortgage $ 22,561 42.52 % $ 24,906 46.60 % Nonresidential mortgage 7,830 17.34 6,938 16.97 Commercial and industrial 2,891 3.81 2,428 2.39 Construction 1,850 4.48 1,155 3.06 One- to four-family residential mortgage 9,584 30.45 10,180 30.07 Home equity loans 675 1.36 490 0.87 Other consumer 105 0.04 94 0.04 Total $ 45,496 100.00 % $ 46,191 100.00 % At June 30, 2026, the ACL totaled $45.5 million, or 0.77% of total loans, reflecting a decrease of $695,000 from $46.2 million, or 0.79% of total loans, at June 30, 2025. The decrease was largely attributable to net charge-offs of $2.4 million, partially offset by a provision for credit losses of $1.7 million. The ACL at June 30, 2026 was maintained at a level that was management’s best estimate of lifetime expected credit losses inherent in loans at the balance sheet date. The ACL is subject to estimates and assumptions that are susceptible to significant revisions as more information becomes available and as events or conditions effecting individual borrowers and the marketplace as a whole change over time. Additions to the ACL may be necessary if the future economic environment deteriorates from forecasted conditions. In addition, the banking regulators, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review our loan and foreclosed real estate portfolios, related ACL and valuation allowance for foreclosed real estate. The regulators may require the ACL to be increased based on their review of information available at the time of the examination, which may negatively affect our earnings. Additional information about the ACL at June 30, 2026 and 2025 is presented in Note 5 to the audited consolidated financial statements. Investment Securities At June 30, 2026, our investment securities portfolio totaled $1.07 billion and comprised 13.9% of our total assets. By comparison, at June 30, 2025, our securities portfolio totaled $1.13 billion and comprised 14.6% of our total assets. Additional information about our investment securities at June 30, 2026 is presented in Note 3 to the audited consolidated financial statements. The year-over-year net decrease in the securities portfolio totaled $62.0 million which largely reflected repayments and sales that were partially offset by purchases. The decrease in the portfolio included a $15.6 million increase in the fair value of the available for sale securities portfolio to an unrealized loss of $96.5 million at June 30, 2026 from an unrealized loss of $112.1 million at June 30, 2025. Our investment policy, which is approved by the Board of Directors, is designed to foster earnings and manage cash flows within prudent interest rate risk and credit risk guidelines, taking into consideration our liquidity needs, asset/liability management goals, and performance objectives. Our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Risk Officer and Treasurer/Chief Investment Officer are the senior management members of our Capital Markets Committee that are designated by the Board of Directors as the officers primarily responsible for securities portfolio management and all transactions require the approval of at least two of these designated officers. The investments authorized for purchase under the investment policy approved by our Board of Directors include U.S. government and agency mortgage-backed securities, U.S. government agency debentures, municipal obligations, corporate bonds, asset-backed securities, collateralized loan obligations and subordinated debt. 14 Table of Contents The carrying value of our mortgage-backed securities totaled $642.8 million at June 30, 2026 and comprised 60.0% of total investments and 8.4% of total assets as of that date. We generally invest in mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government agencies or government-sponsored entities. Mortgage-backed securities issued or sponsored by U.S. government agencies and government-sponsored entities are guaranteed as to the payment of principal and interest to investors. The carrying value of our securities representing obligations of state and political subdivisions totaled $4.5 million at June 30, 2026 and comprised 0.4% of total investments and less than 1.0% of total assets as of that date. Such securities primarily included highly-rated, fixed-rate bank-qualified securities representing general obligations of municipalities located within the U.S. or the obligations of their related entities such as boards of education or school districts. Each of our municipal obligations were consistently rated by Moody’s and S&P well above the thresholds that generally support our investment grade assessment with such ratings equaling A- or higher by S&P or A2 or higher by Moody’s, where rated by those agencies. In the absence of, or as a complement to, such ratings, we rely upon our own internal analysis of the issuer’s financial condition to validate its investment grade assessment. The carrying value of our asset-backed securities totaled $38.1 million at June 30, 2026 and comprised 3.6% of total investments and 0.5% of total assets as of that date. This category of securities is comprised entirely of structured, floating-rate securities representing securitized federal education loans with 97% U.S. government guarantees. Our securities represent the highest credit-quality tranches within the overall structures with each being rated AA+ or higher by S&P or Aa1 or higher by Moody’s, where rated by those agencies. The outstanding balance of our collateralized loan obligations totaled $233.7 million at June 30, 2026 and comprised 21.8% of total investments and 3.0% of total assets as of that date. This category of securities is comprised entirely of structured, floating-rate securities representing securitized commercial loans to large, U.S. corporations. At June 30, 2026, each of our collateralized loan obligations were consistently rated by Moody’s and/or S&P well above the thresholds that generally support our investment grade assessment with such ratings equaling AAA by S&P or Aaa by Moody’s, where rated by those agencies. The carrying value of our corporate bonds totaled $152.2 million at June 30, 2026 and comprised 14.2% of total investments and 2.0% of total assets as of that date. This category of securities consists of fixed-to-floating rate subordinated debt issued by community banks, primarily located in the Mid-Atlantic region of the U.S. At June 30, 2026, the majority of our subordinated debt holdings were rated by either Moody’s, S&P, DBRS, KBRA or EJR (collectively “NRSROs”) at or above the thresholds that generally support our minimum investment grade assessment at BBB-/Baa3 or higher by these NRSROs. Current accounting standards require that debt securities be categorized as held to maturity or available for sale, based on management’s intent as to the ultimate disposition of each security. These standards allow debt securities to be classified as held to maturity and reported in financial statements at amortized cost only if the reporting entity has the positive intent and ability to hold these securities to maturity. Securities that might be sold in response to changes in market interest rates, changes in the security’s prepayment risk, increases in loan demand, or other similar factors cannot be classified as held to maturity. We do not currently use or maintain a trading account. Securities not classified as held to maturity are classified as available for sale. These securities are reported at fair value and unrealized gains and losses on the securities are excluded from earnings and reported, net of deferred taxes, as adjustments to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of equity. As of June 30, 2026, our available for sale securities portfolio had a carrying value of $964.4 million or 90.0% of our total securities with the remaining $106.8 million or 10.0% of securities were classified as held to maturity. Other than securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or its agencies, we did not hold securities of any one issuer having an aggregate book value in excess of 10% of our equity at June 30, 2026. All of our securities carry market risk insofar as increases in market interest rates have caused, and may continue to cause, a decrease in their market value. We believe that unrealized and unrecognized losses on securities held at June 30, 2026, are a function of changes in market interest rates and credit spreads, not changes in credit quality. Therefore, no allowance for credit losses was recorded at that time. During the years ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, there were no sales of securities available for sale. During the year ended June 30, 2024, proceeds from sales of securities available for sale totaled $104.1 million and resulted in no gross gains and gross losses of $18.1 million. There were no sales of held to maturity securities during the years ended June 30, 2026, 2025 and 2024. 15 Table of Contents The following table sets forth the carrying value of our securities portfolio at the dates indicated: At June 30, 2026 2025 (In Thousands) Debt securities available for sale: Obligations of state and political subdivisions $ — $ — Asset-backed securities 38,062 59,498 Collateralized loan obligations 233,659 323,245 Corporate bonds 152,169 140,117 Total debt securities available for sale 423,890 522,860 Mortgage-backed securities available for sale: Collateralized mortgage obligations 24,121 — Residential pass-through securities 388,103 357,319 Commercial pass-through securities 128,255 132,790 Total mortgage-backed securities available for sale 540,479 490,109 Total securities available for sale 964,369 1,012,969 Debt securities held to maturity: Obligations of state and political subdivisions 4,487 7,553 Total debt securities held to maturity 4,487 7,553 Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity: Residential pass-through securities 90,178 100,482 Commercial pass-through securities 12,149 12,182 Total mortgage-backed securities held to maturity 102,327 112,664 Total securities held to maturity 106,814 120,217 Total securities $ 1,071,183 $ 1,133,186 16 Table of Contents The following table sets forth certain information regarding the carrying values, weighted average yields and maturities of our securities portfolio at June 30, 2026. This table shows contractual maturities and does not reflect re-pricing or the effect of prepayments. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without prepayment penalties. At June 30, 2026, securities with a carrying value of $50.5 million are callable within one year. At June 30, 2026 One Year or Less One to Five Years Five to Ten Years More Than Ten Years Total Securities Carrying Value Weighted Average Yield Carrying Value Weighted Average Yield Carrying Value Weighted Average Yield Carrying Value Weighted Average Yield Carrying Value Weighted Average Yield Fair Market Value (Dollars In Thousands) Debt securities: Obligations of state and political subdivisions $ 2,800 2.38 % $ 1,687 2.46 % $ — — % $ — — % $ 4,487 2.41 % $ 4,466 Asset-backed securities — — — — — — 38,063 4.76 38,063 4.76 38,063 Collateralized loan obligations — — 274 5.11 96,030 5.79 137,354 5.23 233,658 5.46 233,658 Corporate bonds — — 21,499 6.86 124,687 5.84 5,983 6.25 152,169 6.00 152,169 Mortgage-backed securities: Collateralized mortgage obligations (1) — — — — — — 24,121 5.43 24,121 5.43 24,121 Residential pass-through securities (1) — — — — 135 5.26 478,146 2.81 478,281 2.81 467,839 Commercial pass-through securities (1) — — 12,149 1.80 — — 128,255 3.02 140,404 2.93 139,058 Total securities $ 2,800 2.38 % $ 35,609 4.94 % $ 220,852 5.82 % $ 811,922 3.39 % $ 1,071,183 3.89 % $ 1,059,374 ________________________________________ (1)Government-sponsored enterprises. 17 Table of Contents Sources of Funds General. Retail deposits are our primary source of funds for lending and other investment purposes. In addition, we derive funds from principal repayments of loan and investment securities. Loan and securities payments are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows are significantly influenced by general interest rates and money market conditions. Wholesale funding sources including, but not limited to, borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLB”), wholesale deposits and other short-term borrowings are also used to supplement the funding for loans and investments. Deposits. Our current deposit products include interest-bearing and non-interest-bearing checking accounts, money market deposit accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit accounts ranging in terms from 30 days to five years. Certificates of deposit with terms ranging from six months to five years are available for individual retirement account plans. Deposit account terms, such as interest rate earned, applicability of certain fees and service charges and funds accessibility, will vary based upon several factors including, but not limited to, minimum balance, term to maturity, and transaction frequency and form requirements. Deposits are obtained primarily from within New Jersey and New York through the Bank’s network of retail branches, business relationship officers, and digital banking channels. We maintain a robust suite of commercial deposit products designed to appeal to small and mid-size businesses, non-profit organizations and government entities. Our team of experienced and dedicated business relationship officers serve as the primary points of contact for these commercial clients and act as both new business originators and relationship managers. The determination of interest rates on retail deposits is based upon a number of factors, including: (1) our need for funds based on loan demand, current maturities of deposits and other cash flow needs; (2) a current survey of a selected group of competitors’ rates for similar products; (3) our current cost of funds, yield on assets and asset/liability position; and (4) the alternate cost of funds on a wholesale basis. Interest rates are reviewed by senior management on a regular basis, with deposit product and pricing updated, as appropriate, during recurring and ad-hoc senior management meetings. Our liquidity could be reduced if a significant amount of certificates of deposit maturing within a short period were not renewed. At June 30, 2026 and 2025, certificates of deposit maturing within one year were $1.87 billion and $1.91 billion, respectively. Historically, a significant portion of the certificates of deposit remain with us after they mature. At June 30, 2026, $1.50 billion or 77.5% of our certificates of deposit were certificates of $100,000 or more compared to $1.50 billion or 76.0% at June 30, 2025. Excluding brokered certificates of deposit, $747.0 million or 63.1% of our certificates of deposit were certificates of $100,000 or more at June 30, 2026. The general level of market interest rates and money market conditions significantly influence deposit inflows and outflows. The effects of these factors are particularly pronounced on deposit accounts with larger balances. In particular, certificates of deposit with balances of $100,000 or greater are traditionally viewed as being a more volatile source of funding than comparatively lower balance certificates of deposit or non-maturity transaction accounts. In order to retain certificates of deposit with balances of $100,000 or more, we may have to pay a premium rate, resulting in an increase in our cost of funds. To the extent that such deposits do not remain with us, they may need to be replaced with wholesale funding. Our sources of wholesale funding included brokered certificates of deposit whose balances totaled approximately $757.2 million, or 13.3% of total deposits, at June 30, 2026. We utilize brokered certificates of deposit as an alternative to other forms of wholesale funding, including borrowings, when interest rates and market conditions favor the use of such deposits. For a portion of our short-term brokered certificates of deposit we utilized interest rate contracts to effectively extend their duration and to fix their cost. 18 Table of Contents The following table sets forth the distribution of average deposits for the periods indicated and the weighted average nominal interest rates for each period on each category of deposits presented: For the Years Ended June 30, 2026 2025 2024 Average Balance Percent of Total Deposits Weighted Average Nominal Rate Average Balance Percent of Total Deposits Weighted Average Nominal Rate Average Balance Percent of Total Deposits Weighted Average Nominal Rate (Dollars In Thousands) Non-interest-bearing deposits $ 649,262 11.44 % — % $ 597,197 10.75 % — % $ 595,266 11.14 % — % Interest-bearing demand 2,334,641 41.14 2.49 2,335,972 42.04 2.86 2,308,893 43.19 2.91 Savings 758,820 13.37 1.35 721,115 12.98 1.25 662,981 12.40 0.50 Certificates of deposit 1,931,632 34.04 3.12 1,902,026 34.23 3.39 1,778,682 33.27 2.92 . Total average deposits $ 5,674,355 100.00 % 2.27 % $ 5,556,310 100.00 % 2.53 % $ 5,345,822 100.00 % 2.29 % As of June 30, 2026 and 2025, the aggregate amount of certificates of deposit of $250,000 and over was $1.0 billion in each period, respectively. The following table presents the time remaining until maturity of those certificates of deposit as of June 30, 2026: At June 30, 2026 (In Thousands) Maturity Period Within three months $ 830,855 Three through six months 84,861 Six through twelve months 89,985 Over twelve months 15,840 Total certificates of deposit $ 1,021,541 The following table sets forth the amount and maturities of certificates of deposit at June 30, 2026: At June 30, 2026 Within One Year Over One Year to Two Years Over Two Years to Three Years Over Three Years to Four Years Over Four Years to Five Years Over Five Years Total (In Thousands) Interest Rate 0.00 - 0.99% $ 65,298 $ 8,944 $ 3,270 $ 1,201 $ 406 $ — $ 79,119 1.00 - 1.99% 56,439 1,903 — — — — 58,342 2.00 - 2.99% 44,312 4,464 171 3,445 6,977 — 59,369 3.00 - 3.99% 1,695,880 26,091 102 2,885 6,580 — 1,731,538 4.00 - 4.99% 12,285 — — — — — 12,285 5.00 - 5.99% — — — 23 — — 23 Total certificates of deposit $ 1,874,214 $ 41,402 $ 3,543 $ 7,554 $ 13,963 $ — $ 1,940,676 Additional information about our deposits is presented in Note 9 to the audited consolidated financial statements. 19 Table of Contents Borrowings. The sources of wholesale funding we utilize include borrowings in the form of advances from the FHLB as well as other forms of borrowings. We generally use wholesale funding to manage our exposure to interest rate risk and liquidity risk in conjunction with our overall asset/liability management process. Advances from the FHLB are typically secured by our FHLB capital stock and certain investment securities as well as residential and commercial mortgage loans that we choose to utilize as collateral for such borrowings. Additional information about our FHLB advances is included under Note 10 to the audited consolidated financial statements. At June 30, 2026, we had $950.0 million of FHLB advances outstanding at a weighted average interest rate of 3.85%. At June 30, 2025, we had $1.11 billion of FHLB advances outstanding, excluding a net fair value adjustment of $9,000, at a weighted average interest rate of 4.36%. Our FHLB advances mature as follows: At June 30, 2026 2025 (In Thousands) By remaining period to maturity: Less than one year $ 750,000 $ 906,500 One to two years 200,000 — Two to three years — 200,000 Three to four years — — Four to five years — — Greater than five years — — Total advances 950,000 1,106,500 Fair value adjustments — (9) Total advances, net of fair value adjustments $ 950,000 $ 1,106,491 At June 30, 2026, we utilized interest rate contracts to effectively extend the duration and fix the cost of our FHLB advances maturing in less than one year. Based upon the market value of investment securities and mortgage loans that are posted as collateral for FHLB advances at June 30, 2026, we are eligible to borrow up to an additional $351.6 million of advances from the FHLB as of that date. We are further authorized to post additional collateral in the form of other unencumbered investments securities and eligible mortgage loans that may expand our borrowing capacity with the FHLB up to 30% of our total assets. Additional borrowing capacity up to 50% of our total assets may be authorized with the approval of the FHLB’s Board of Directors or Executive Committee. In addition, we had the capacity to borrow additional funds totaling $835.0 million via unsecured overnight borrowings from other financial institutions and $1.30 billion from the FRB without pledging additional collateral. The balance of borrowings at June 30, 2026 included overnight line of credit borrowings from the FHLB totaling $200.0 million. There were no unsecured overnight borrowings from other financial institutions at June 30, 2026. Interest Rate Derivatives and Hedging We utilize derivative instruments in the form of interest rate swaps, caps and floors to hedge our exposure to interest rate risk in conjunction with our overall asset/liability management process. In accordance with accounting requirements, we formally designate all of our hedging relationships as either fair value hedges or cash flow hedges, and document the strategy for undertaking the hedge transactions and its method of assessing ongoing effectiveness. At June 30, 2026, our derivative instruments were comprised of interest rate swaps, caps and a floor with a total notional amount of $2.88 billion. These instruments are intended to manage the interest rate exposure relating to certain wholesale funding positions and assets that were outstanding at June 30, 2026. Additional information regarding our use of interest rate derivatives and our hedging activities is presented in Note 1 and Note 11 to the audited consolidated financial statements. 20 Table of Contents Subsidiary Activity At June 30, 2026, Kearny Bank was the only wholly-owned operating subsidiary of Kearny Financial Corp. As of that date, Kearny Bank had three wholly-owned subsidiaries, CJB Investment Company, 189-245 Berdan Avenue LLC and Kearny Wealth Management LLC. CJB Investment Company is a New Jersey Investment Company and remained active through the three-year period ended June 30, 2026. 189-245 Berdan Avenue LLC was formed during the year ended June 30, 2023 for the purpose of ownership and operation of commercial real estate. The Kearny Wealth Management LLC subsidiary was formed in February 2024 for the purpose of providing insurance brokerage services via a third-party service provider. Human Capital Resources At Kearny Financial Corp., our employees are fundamental to achieving our strategic objectives and delivering long-term value to clients, shareholders, and the communities we serve. We believe our success is driven by the quality, engagement, and dedication of our workforce and by fostering a culture rooted in integrity, accountability, collaboration, and service. We are committed to attracting, developing, and retaining talented employees and fostering a workforce with the skills, experience, and perspectives needed to serve our clients, support our communities, and drive long-term success. Our human capital strategy is focused on supporting employee growth and well-being, promoting a positive and inclusive workplace culture, and providing competitive compensation and benefits that align employee interests with organizational success. As of June 30, 2026, we employed 549 employees (502 full-time employees and 47 part-time) across our banking and corporate operations of which 57.0% were female and 43.0% were male. Kearny Bank employees had an average tenure of 8.3 years. Culture and Employee Engagement. Our culture is guided by our core values and emphasizes teamwork, professionalism, ethical conduct, accountability, and client service. We strive to maintain a workplace where employees feel respected, valued, and empowered to contribute their ideas and talents. Led by the Bank's Director of Engagement, our employee engagement initiatives are designed to strengthen workplace connections, support employee development, reinforce our culture and promote organizational effectiveness. Senior management and Human Resources regularly assess employee feedback, workforce trends, and talent development initiatives to foster employee engagement, support professional growth, and enhance overall organizational performance. During fiscal 2026, we conducted our third annual Employee Engagement Survey, which continues to provide valuable insights to guide future programming and employee-focused initiatives across the Bank. Talent Acquisition and Workforce Development. Our ability to attract and retain top talent is critical to our long-term success. We maintain a disciplined talent acquisition process designed to identify candidates who possess the skills, experience, and values necessary to support our strategic objectives and client-focused culture. We seek to broaden candidate pools by continuing to expand recruiting channels to attract high-quality talent throughout our operating footprint. Investing in employee development is a key component of our human capital strategy. We strive to create opportunities for career advancement and, whenever practical, promote from within to capitalize on the strength, experience, and institutional knowledge of our workforce. Our human capital efforts emphasize fair employment practices, equal opportunities, and a workplace culture that recognizes and rewards merit, performance and professional achievement. We support employee growth through education, training, and development programs that help employees enhance their skills, advance their careers and contribute to the Company’s long-term success. Training. We support professional development through leadership development programs, educational assistance, certification and licensing support, tuition reimbursement, career mentoring, employee resource groups, and access to more than 1,000 courses through the Kearny Bank Learning Center. Collectively, these resources help employees build the skills, knowledge, and experience, support career advancement opportunities, and contribute to the retention and development of a strong pipeline of future leaders across the organization. During fiscal 2026, we expanded our learning curriculum by introducing the Foundations of Management Series, a four-course program designed to strengthen leadership capabilities and to equip our managers with the skills, tools, and confidence needed to lead effectively. We also launched three new courses focused on strengthening business acumen and providing employees with the knowledge and resources necessary to build and deepen client relationships and support clients to achieve business objectives. 21 Table of Contents To support the Company's strategic focus on relationship growth, we continue to align employee training with the skills needed to become trusted advisors to our clients. Through a combination of webinars, instructor-led training, in-person workshops, and curated learning resources, employees gain the knowledge and tools necessary to strengthen client relationships and deliver exceptional client experience. Total Rewards. We offer a comprehensive total rewards program designed to attract, motivate, and retain qualified employees. Our compensation philosophy aligns pay with performance and market competitiveness while supporting both individual and organizational achievement. Employee compensation consists of a combination of base salary, incentive compensation opportunities , and, for eligible employees, equity-based awards. Our compensation programs are designed to attract, motivate and retain talented employees by aligning compensation with performance, organizational results and long-term success of the Company. We periodically review our compensation practices to support market competitiveness, internal consistency, and alignment with the Company's strategic objectives. We provide eligible employees with a broad range of benefits, including medical, dental and vision coverage, Flexible Spending Accounts, disability protection, life insurance, employee assistance resources, paid time off programs, and retirement benefits. Eligible employees may participate in our 401(k) plan, which includes a company matching contribution, and our Company-funded Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP"), which enables employees to share in the long-term success of the organization. Health and Wellness. Supporting the health and well-being of our employees remains an important component of our human capital strategy. We offer a variety of resources and benefits designed to support employees’ physical, emotional, and financial well-being. During fiscal 2026, we enhanced these efforts through weekly Wellness Wednesday programs, educational Lunch & Learn sessions, and hosted our annual health fair, which collectively promote healthy habits, well-being and employee engagement. Community Involvement. We also encourage employees to participate in charitable and community service activities that strengthen the communities we serve and reinforce our longstanding commitment to corporate citizenship, including opportunities to volunteer during working hours. Financial education remains a key priority for Kearny Bank and an important way we support individuals, families, businesses, and local organizations. Our team members lead seminars and outreach programs that offer practical guidance to help participants make informed financial decisions. Our efforts include financial literacy to both school age children and adults, fraud prevention seminars, first-time homebuyer education and support for women in business through our ChangeMakers initiative. By sharing practical knowledge and resources, Kearny Bank continues to strengthen financial confidence, promote economic empowerment, and deepen our community connections. We are also committed to various outreach programs to help the underserved populations such as backpack collections, food drives, toy donations, and professional attire drives for women re-entering the workforce. Performance Management and Leadership Development. We maintain a performance management framework that aligns employee performance with the organization’s strategic priorities, promotes accountability, and supports professional growth. Our review process emphasizes individual contributions, leadership, technical expertise, collaboration, integrity, and client service, while providing meaningful feedback and development opportunities. As part of our performance management program, we also invest in leadership development through coaching, targeted learning opportunities, and succession planning efforts designed to promote organizational continuity. 22 Table of Contents Supervision and Regulation Kearny Bank and Kearny Financial operate in a highly regulated industry. This system of regulation establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which a savings and loan holding company and New Jersey savings bank may engage and is intended primarily for the protection of the deposit insurance fund and depositors. Set forth below is a brief description of certain laws and regulations governing the activities and operations of Kearny Bank and Kearny Financial. The description does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to applicable laws and regulations. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including the imposition of restrictions on the operation of an institution and its holding company, the classification of assets by the institution and the adequacy of an institution’s allowance for credit losses. Any change in such regulation and oversight, whether in the form of regulatory policy, regulations, or legislation, including changes in the regulations governing savings and loan holding companies, could have a material adverse impact on Kearny Financial, Kearny Bank and their operations. The adoption of regulations or the enactment of laws that restrict the operations of Kearny Bank and/or Kearny Financial or impose burdensome requirements upon one or both of them could reduce their profitability and could impair the value of Kearny Bank’s franchise, resulting in negative effects on the trading price of our common stock. Regulation of Kearny Bank General. As a nonmember New Jersey savings bank with federally insured deposits, the activities of Kearny Bank are subject to extensive regulation by the NJDBI and the FDIC, including restrictions or requirements with respect to loans to one borrower, dividends, permissible investments and lending activities, liquidity, transactions with affiliates and community reinvestment. Both state and federal law regulate a savings bank’s relationship with its depositors and borrowers, especially in such matters as the ownership of savings accounts and the form and content of Kearny Bank’s mortgage documents. Kearny Bank must file reports with the NJDBI and FDIC concerning its activities and financial condition and obtain regulatory approvals prior to entering into certain transactions such as establishing new branches and mergers with or acquisitions of other depository institutions. The NJDBI and FDIC regularly examine Kearny Bank and prepare reports to Kearny Bank’s Board of Directors on any deficiencies found in its operations. The agencies have substantial discretion to take enforcement action with respect to an institution that fails to comply with applicable legal or regulatory requirements or engages in violations of law or regulation, or unsafe and unsound practices. Such actions can include, among others, the issuance of a cease and desist order, assessment of civil money penalties, removal of officers and directors and appointment of a receiver or conservator. Activities and Powers. Kearny Bank derives its lending, investment and other powers primarily from the applicable provisions of the New Jersey Banking Act and the related regulations. Under these laws and regulations, New Jersey savings banks, including Kearny Bank, generally may invest in real estate mortgages; consumer and commercial loans; specific types of debt securities, including certain corporate debt securities and obligations of federal, state and local governments and agencies; certain types of corporate equity securities and other specified assets. A savings bank may also invest pursuant to a leeway power that permits investments not otherwise permitted by the New Jersey Banking Act. Leeway investments must comply with a number of limitations on individual and aggregate amounts of investments. New Jersey savings banks may also exercise those powers, rights, benefits or privileges authorized for national banks, federal savings banks or federal savings associations either directly or through a subsidiary. New Jersey savings banks may exercise powers, rights, benefits and privileges of out-of-state banks, savings banks and savings associations either directly or through a subsidiary, but prior approval by the NJDBI is required before exercising any such power, right, benefit or privilege. The exercise of these lending, investment and activity powers is further limited by federal law and the related regulations. See “—Activity Restrictions on State-Chartered Banks” below. Activity Restrictions on State-Chartered Banks. Federal law and FDIC regulations generally limit the activities as principal and equity investments of state-chartered FDIC insured banks and their subsidiaries to those permissible for national banks and their subsidiaries, except such activities and investments that are specifically exempted by law or regulation, or approved by the FDIC. Before engaging as principal in a new activity that is not permissible for a national bank, or otherwise permissible under federal law or FDIC regulations, an insured bank must seek approval from the FDIC, subject to certain specified exceptions. The FDIC will not approve the activity unless the bank meets its minimum capital requirements and the FDIC determines that the activity does not present a significant risk to the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund. Certain activities of subsidiaries that are permitted for national banks only through a financial subsidiary are subject to additional requirements. Additionally, New Jersey parity provisions authorize New Jersey savings banks, subject to certain limitations, to exercise the powers, rights, benefits and privileges authorized for national or out-of-state banks, or federal or out-of-state savings banks or savings associations Federal Deposit Insurance. Kearny Bank’s deposits are insured to applicable limits by the FDIC. The general maximum deposit insurance amount is $250,000 per depositor per account ownership category. 23 Table of Contents The FDIC assesses insured depository institutions to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”). Under the FDIC’s risk-based assessment system, institutions deemed less risky pay lower assessments. Assessments for institutions of less than $10 billion of assets, such as Kearny Bank, are based on financial measures and supervisory ratings derived from statistical modeling estimating the probability of an institution’s failure within three years. Effective January 1, 2023, the assessment range for insured institutions of less than $10 billion in total assets is 2.5 to 32 basis points of total assets less tangible equity. The FDIC has authority to increase insurance assessments. Any significant increases would have an adverse effect on the operating expenses and results of operations of Kearny Bank. Management cannot predict what assessment rates will be in the future. Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that an institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, order or condition imposed by the FDIC. We do not currently know of any practice, condition or violation that may lead to termination of our deposit insurance. Regulatory Capital Requirements. FDIC regulations require nonmember banks to meet several minimum capital standards: a common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets ratio of 4.5%, a Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets ratio of 6.0%, a total capital to risk-based assets of 8.0%, and a Tier 1 capital to total assets leverage ratio of 4.0%. The current requirements implement recommendations of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain requirements of federal law. For purposes of the regulatory capital standards, common equity Tier 1 capital is generally defined as common stockholders’ equity and retained earnings. Tier 1 capital is generally defined as common equity Tier 1 capital and additional Tier 1 capital. Additional Tier 1 capital includes certain noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries. Total capital includes Tier 1 capital (common equity Tier 1 capital plus additional Tier 1 capital) and Tier 2 capital. Tier 2 capital is comprised of capital instruments and related surplus, meeting specified requirements, and may include cumulative preferred stock and long-term perpetual preferred stock, mandatory convertible securities, intermediate preferred stock and subordinated debt. Also included in Tier 2 capital is the allowance for credit losses limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets and, for institutions that have exercised an opt-out election regarding the treatment of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, up to 45% of net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair market values. Calculation of all types of regulatory capital is subject to deductions and adjustments specified in the regulations. At June 30, 2026, Kearny Bank has exercised the opt-out election regarding the treatment of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets for purposes of calculating risk-based capital ratios, all assets, including certain off-balance sheet assets, are multiplied by a risk weight factor assigned by the regulations based on the risks believed inherent in the type of asset. Higher levels of capital are required for asset categories believed to present greater risk. For example, a risk weight of 0% is assigned to cash and U.S. government securities, a risk weight of 50% is generally assigned to prudently underwritten first lien one- to four-family residential mortgages, a risk weight of 100% is assigned to commercial and consumer loans, a risk weight of 150% is assigned to certain past due loans and a risk weight of between 0% to 600% is assigned to equity interests depending on certain specified factors. In addition to establishing the minimum regulatory capital requirements, the regulations limit capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments to management if the institution does not hold a capital conservation buffer consisting of 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets above the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements. At June 30, 2026, Kearny Bank exceeded all regulatory capital requirements. In assessing an institution’s capital adequacy, the FDIC takes into consideration, not only these numeric factors, but also qualitative factors. The FDIC has the authority to establish higher capital requirements for individual institutions where deemed necessary. Depository institutions and their holding companies that have less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets and meet other qualifying criteria may elect to use the optional community bank leverage ratio framework, which requires maintaining a leverage ratio of greater than 9.0% to satisfy the regulatory capital requirements, including the risk-based requirements. A qualifying institution may opt in and out of the community bank leverage ratio framework on its quarterly call report. Kearny Bank did not opt into the community bank leverage ratio framework as of June 30, 2026. Regulations issued by the NJDBI establish generally similar regulatory capital standards for New Jersey-chartered savings banks such as Kearny Bank. 24 Table of Contents Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action. Federal law requires that federal bank regulatory authorities take prompt corrective action with respect to institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. For these purposes, the law establishes five capital categories: “well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” and “critically undercapitalized.” Qualifying banks that elect and comply with the community bank leverage ratio (as established by the regulatory agencies) are considered well-capitalized under the prompt corrective action regulations. The FDIC has adopted regulations to implement the prompt corrective action legislation. An institution is deemed to be well capitalized if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater and a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.5% or greater. Further, to be deemed well capitalized, the institution must not be subject to any written agreement, order or capital directive, or prompt corrective action directive issued by the FDIC to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure. An institution is deemed to be adequately capitalized if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater, a leverage ratio of 4.0% or greater and a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5% or greater. An institution is deemed to be undercapitalized if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, a leverage ratio of less than 4.0%, or a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of less than 4.5%. An institution is deemed to be significantly undercapitalized if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4.0%, a leverage ratio of less than 3.0% or a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of less than 3.0%. Critically undercapitalized status is triggered if an institution has a ratio of tangible equity (as defined in the regulations) to total assets that is equal to or less than 2.0%. Undercapitalized banks must adhere to growth, capital distribution (including dividend) and other limitations and are required to submit a capital restoration plan. A bank’s compliance with such a plan must be guaranteed by any company that controls the undercapitalized institution in an amount equal to the lesser of 5.0% of the institution’s total assets when deemed undercapitalized or the amount necessary to achieve the adequately capitalized status. If an undercapitalized bank fails to submit an acceptable capital restoration plan, it is treated as if it is significantly undercapitalized. Significantly undercapitalized banks must comply with one or more of a number of additional measures including, but not limited to, a required sale of sufficient voting stock to become adequately capitalized, a requirement to reduce total assets, cessation of taking deposits from correspondent banks, the dismissal of directors or officers, and restrictions on interest rates paid on deposits, compensation of executive officers, and capital distributions by the parent holding company. Critically undercapitalized institutions are subject to additional measures including, subject to a narrow exception, the appointment of a receiver or conservator within 270 days after such status is triggered. These actions are in addition to other discretionary supervisory or enforcement actions that the FDIC may take. As of June 30, 2026, Kearny Bank was well capitalized. Dividend Limitations. Federal regulations impose various restrictions or requirements on Kearny Bank to pay dividends to Kearny Financial. An institution that is a subsidiary of a savings and loan holding company, such as Kearny Bank, must file notice with the Federal Reserve Board at least thirty days before paying a dividend. The Federal Reserve Board may disapprove a notice if: (i) the institution would be undercapitalized following the capital distribution; (ii) the proposed capital distribution raises safety and soundness concerns; or (iii) the capital distribution would violate a prohibition contained in any statute, regulation, enforcement action or agreement or condition imposed in connection with an application. New Jersey law specifies that no dividend may be paid if the dividend would impair the capital stock of the savings bank. In addition, no dividend may be paid unless the savings bank would, after payment of the dividend, have a surplus of at least 50% of its capital stock (or if the payment of dividend would not reduce surplus). Transactions with Affiliates. Transactions between a depository institution (and, generally, its subsidiaries) and its affiliates are limited by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation W. An affiliate of an institution includes any company or entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the institution. In a holding company context, the parent holding company and any companies that are controlled by such parent holding company are affiliates of the institution. Generally, Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation W limit the extent to which the institution or its subsidiaries may engage in “covered transactions” with any one affiliate to 10% of such institution’s capital stock and surplus, and set an aggregate limit on all such transactions with all affiliates to an amount equal to 20% of such institution’s capital stock and surplus. The term “covered transaction” includes an extension of credit to, purchase of securities and assets from, or issuance of a guarantee or letter of credit to, an affiliate, among other types of transactions. In addition, loans or other extensions of credit by the institution to the affiliate are required to be collateralized in accordance with specified requirements. Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation W also require that transactions with affiliates generally be on terms and conditions that are substantially the same as, or at least as favorable to the institution as, those provided to non-affiliates. 25 Table of Contents Extension of Credit to Insiders. Kearny Bank’s authority to extend credit to its and its affiliates’ directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders, as well as to entities controlled by such persons, is governed by the requirements of Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O of the Federal Reserve Board. Among other things, subject to certain exceptions, these provisions generally require that extensions of credit to insiders: •be made on terms that are substantially the same as, and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than, those prevailing for comparable transactions with unaffiliated persons and that do not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features; and •not exceed certain limitations on the amount of credit extended to such persons, individually and in the aggregate, which limits are based, in part, on the amount of Kearny Bank’s regulatory capital and surplus. In addition, extensions of credit in excess of certain limits must be approved by Kearny Bank’s Board of Directors. Extensions of credit to executive officers are subject to additional limits based on the type of extension involved. Community Reinvestment Act. Under the Community Reinvestment Act (the “CRA”), every insured depository institution, including Kearny Bank, has a continuing and affirmative obligation consistent with its safe and sound operation to help meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community. The CRA requires the FDIC to assess the depository institution’s record of meeting the credit needs of its community and consider that record in its consideration of certain applications by the institution, such as for a merger or the establishment of a branch office. The FDIC may use an unsatisfactory CRA examination rating as the basis for denying such an application. Kearny Bank received a satisfactory CRA rating from the FDIC in its most recent CRA evaluation. In October 2023, the FDIC, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve Board issued a final rule to modernize the regulations implementing the CRA. The final rule, which takes effect in phases beginning January 1, 2026, with full applicability by January 1, 2027, revises the framework for evaluating an institution's CRA performance by, among other things, establishing new assessment areas for certain bank activities conducted outside of facility-based areas, introducing metrics-based benchmarks for evaluating retail lending performance, and updating community development definitions and qualifying activities. As a large bank under the final rule, Kearny Bank will be evaluated under a Retail Lending Test, a Retail Services and Products Test, a Community Development Financing Test and a Community Development Services Test. The Company is actively preparing for implementation of the updated CRA framework and does not currently expect the final rule to have a material adverse effect on its business or financial condition. Commercial Real Estate Lending Concentrations. The federal banking agencies have issued guidance on sound risk management practices for concentrations in commercial real estate lending. The particular focus is on exposure to commercial real estate loans that are dependent on the cash flow from the real estate held as collateral and that are likely to be sensitive to conditions in the commercial real estate market (as opposed to real estate collateral held as a secondary source of repayment or as an abundance of caution). The purpose of the guidance is not to limit a bank’s commercial real estate lending but to guide banks in developing risk management practices and capital levels commensurate with the level and nature of real estate concentrations. The guidance directs the FDIC and other federal bank regulatory agencies to focus their supervisory resources on institutions that may have significant commercial real estate loan concentration risk. A bank that has experienced rapid growth in commercial real estate lending, has notable exposure to a specific type of commercial real estate loan, or is approaching or exceeding the following supervisory criteria may be identified for further supervisory analysis with respect to real estate concentration risk: •Total reported loans for construction, land development and other land represent 100% or more of the bank’s capital; or •Total commercial real estate loans (as defined in the guidance) represent 300% or more of the bank’s total capital or the outstanding balance of the bank’s commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased 50% or more during the prior 36 months. The guidance provides that the strength of an institution’s lending and risk management practices with respect to such concentrations will be taken into account in supervisory guidance on evaluation of capital adequacy. Federal Home Loan Bank System. Kearny Bank is a member of the FHLB of New York, which is one of eleven regional Federal Home Loan Banks. Each FHLB serves as a reserve or central bank for its members within its assigned region. It is funded primarily from funds deposited by financial institutions and proceeds derived from the sale of consolidated obligations of the FHLB System. It makes loans to members pursuant to policies and procedures established by the Board of Directors of the FHLB. As a member, Kearny Bank is required to purchase and maintain stock in the FHLB of New York in specified amounts. The FHLB imposes various limitations on advances such as limiting the amount of certain types of real estate related collateral and limiting total advances to a member. 26 Table of Contents The FHLB of New York may pay periodic dividends to members. These dividends are affected by factors such as the FHLB’s operating results and statutory responsibilities that may be imposed such as providing certain funding for affordable housing and interest subsidies on advances targeted for low- and moderate-income housing projects. The payment of dividends, or any particular amount of dividend, cannot be assumed. Other Laws and Regulations Interest and other charges collected or contracted for by Kearny Bank are subject to state usury laws and federal laws concerning interest rates. Kearny Bank’s operations are also subject to federal laws (and their implementing regulations) applicable to credit transactions, such as the: •Truth-In-Lending Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers; •Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, requiring that borrowers for mortgage loans for one- to four-family residential real estate receive various disclosures, including good faith estimates of settlement costs, lender servicing and escrow account practices, and prohibiting certain practices that increase the cost of settlement services; •Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, requiring financial institutions to provide information to enable the public and public officials to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs of the community it serves; •Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, creed or other prohibited factors in extending credit; •Fair Credit Reporting Act, governing the use and provision of information to credit reporting agencies; and •Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies. The operations of Kearny Bank also are subject to the: •Truth in Savings Act, prescribing disclosure and advertising requirements with respect to deposit accounts; •Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records; •Electronic Funds Transfer Act, and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, governing automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers’ rights and liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic banking services; •Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (also known as “Check 21”), which gives substitute checks, such as digital check images and copies made from that image, the same legal standing as the original paper check; •Bank Secrecy Act and USA PATRIOT Act, which requires institutions to, among other things, establish anti-money laundering compliance programs, due diligence policies and controls to ensure the detection and reporting of money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit activity; •Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which places limitations on the sharing of consumer financial information by financial institutions with unaffiliated third parties. Specifically, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires all financial institutions offering financial products or services to retail customers to provide such customers with the financial institution’s privacy policy and provide such customers the opportunity to opt out of the sharing of certain personal financial information with unaffiliated third parties; and •Regulations requiring banking organizations to notify their primary federal regulator as soon as possible and no later than 36 hours of determining that a “computer-security incident” that arises to the level of a “notification incident” has occurred. A notification incident is a “computer-security incident” that has materially disrupted or degraded, or is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or degrade, the banking organization’s ability to deliver services to a material portion of its customer base, jeopardize the viability of key operations of the banking organization, or impact the stability of the financial sector. Bank service providers are also required to notify any affected bank to or on behalf of which the service provider provides services “as soon as possible” after determining that it has experienced an incident that materially disrupts or degrades, or is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or degrade, covered services provided to such bank for four or more hours. 27 Table of Contents Regulation of Kearny Financial General. Kearny Financial is a savings and loan holding company within the meaning of federal law. Kearny Financial maintained its savings and loan holding company status (rather than becoming a bank holding company), notwithstanding the June 2017 conversion of Kearny Bank to a New Jersey savings bank charter, through Kearny Bank exercising an election available to it under federal law. Kearny Financial is required to file reports with, and is subject to regulation and examination by, the Federal Reserve Board. Kearny Financial must also obtain regulatory approval from the Federal Reserve Board before engaging in certain transactions, such as mergers with or acquisitions of other depository institutions. In addition, the Federal Reserve Board has enforcement authority over Kearny Financial and its non-depository subsidiaries. That permits the Federal Reserve Board to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to pose a serious risk to Kearny Bank. This regulatory structure is intended primarily for protection of Kearny Bank’s depositors and not for the benefit of stockholders of Kearny Financial. The Federal Reserve Board has indicated that, to the greatest extent possible taking into account any unique characteristics of savings and loan holding companies and the requirements of federal law, its approach is to apply to savings and loan holding companies the supervisory principles applicable to the supervision of bank holding companies. The stated objective of the Federal Reserve Board is to ensure the savings and loan holding company and its non-depository subsidiaries are effectively supervised, can serve as a source of strength for and do not threaten the safety and soundness of, the subsidiary depository institution. Nonbanking Activities. As a savings and loan holding company, Kearny Financial is permitted to engage in those activities permissible under federal law for financial holding companies (if certain criteria are met and an election is submitted) and for multiple savings and loan holding companies. A financial holding company may engage in activities that are financial in nature, including underwriting equity securities and insurance, as well as activities that are incidental to financial activities or complementary to a financial activity. A multiple savings and loan holding company is generally limited to activities permissible for bank holding companies under Section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding Company Act and certain additional activities authorized by federal regulations, subject to the approval of the Federal Reserve Board. Mergers and Acquisitions. Kearny Financial must generally obtain approval from the Federal Reserve Board before acquiring, directly or indirectly, more than 5% of the voting stock of another savings institution or savings and loan holding company or acquiring such an institution or holding company by merger, consolidation, or purchase of its assets. Federal law also prohibits a savings and loan holding company from acquiring more than 5% of a company engaged in activities other than those authorized for savings and loan holding companies by federal law or acquiring or retaining control of a depository institution that is not insured by the FDIC. In evaluating an application for Kearny Financial to acquire control of a savings institution, the Federal Reserve Board considers factors such as the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of Kearny Financial and the target institution, the effect of the acquisition on the risk to the DIF, the convenience and the needs of the community served and competitive factors. A merger of another depository institution into Kearny Bank requires the prior approval of the NJDBI and FDIC, based on similar considerations. Consolidated Capital Requirements. Consolidated regulatory capital requirements identical to those applicable to the subsidiary depository institutions (including the community bank leverage ratio alternative) apply to savings and loan holding companies with $3 billion or more of consolidated assets, including Kearny Financial. Kearny Financial was in compliance with the holding company capital requirements and the capital conservation buffer as of June 30, 2026. Source of Strength Doctrine; Dividends. Federal law extended the source of strength doctrine, which has long applied to bank holding companies, to savings and loan holding companies. The Federal Reserve Board has promulgated regulations implementing the source of strength doctrine, which requires holding companies to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to their subsidiary depository institutions by providing capital, liquidity and other support in times of financial distress. Further, the Federal Reserve Board has issued a policy statement regarding the payment of dividends by bank holding companies that it has also applied to savings and loan holding companies. In general, the policy provides that dividends should be paid only out of current earnings and only if the prospective rate of earnings retention by the holding company appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. Regulatory guidance provides for prior consultation with Federal Reserve Board supervisory staff as to dividends in certain circumstances, such as when the dividend is not covered by earnings for the period for which it is being paid, when net income for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid over that period, is insufficient to fully fund the dividend or when the prospective rate of earnings retention by the holding company is inconsistent with its capital needs and overall financial condition. The ability of a holding company to pay dividends may be restricted if a subsidiary depository institution becomes undercapitalized. In addition, a subsidiary institution of a savings and loan holding company must file prior notice with the Federal Reserve Board, and receive its non-objection, before paying a dividend to the parent savings and loan holding company. Federal Reserve Board guidance also provides for regulatory review of certain stock redemption and repurchase proposals by holding companies. These regulatory policies could affect the ability of Kearny Financial to pay dividends, engage in stock redemptions or repurchases or otherwise engage in capital distributions. 28 Table of Contents Qualified Thrift Lender Test. In order for Kearny Financial to be regulated by the Federal Reserve Board as a savings and loan holding company (rather than as a bank holding company), Kearny Bank must remain a qualified thrift lender under applicable law or satisfy the domestic building and loan association test under the Internal Revenue Code. Under the qualified thrift lender test, an institution is generally required to maintain at least 65% of its portfolio assets (total assets less: (i) specified liquid assets up to 20% of total assets; (ii) intangible assets, including goodwill; and (iii) the value of property used to conduct business) in certain qualified thrift investments (primarily residential mortgages and related investments, including certain mortgage-backed and related securities) in at least nine months out of each 12 month period. As of June 30, 2026, Kearny Bank met the qualified thrift lender test. Acquisition of Control. Under the federal Change in Bank Control Act and its implementing regulations, a notice must be submitted to the Federal Reserve Board if any person (including a company), or group acting in concert, seeks to acquire control of a savings and loan holding company. An acquisition of control can occur upon the ownership, control, or holding with power to vote of 10% or more of a class of voting stock of a savings and loan holding company. Under the Change in Bank Control Act and its implementing regulations, the Federal Reserve Board has 60 days from the filing of a complete notice to act, taking into consideration certain factors, including the financial condition of the acquirer, and future prospects of the proposed acquirer, the competence and integrity of the proposed acquirer and the effects of the acquisition on competition. Any company that seeks to acquire “control” of Kearny Financial or Kearny Bank, within the meaning of the Home Owners’ Loan Act, must file an application, and receive the Federal Reserve Board’s prior approval under that statute. The Company would then be subject to regulation as a savings and loan holding company. The prior approval of the NJDBI would also be necessary for the acquisition of 25% of a class of the Company’s voting stock, or “control” as otherwise defined under New Jersey law. Incentive Compensation. In October 2022, the SEC adopted a final rule implementing the incentive-based compensation recovery (“clawback”) provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The final rule directs national securities exchanges and associations, including NASDAQ, to require listed companies to develop and implement clawback policies to recover erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation from current or former executive officers in the event of a required accounting restatement due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, and to disclose their clawback policies and any actions taken under these policies. On June 9, 2023, the SEC approved the NASDAQ proposed clawback listing standards, including the amendments that delayed the effective date of the rules to October 2, 2023. The Board of Directors of Kearny Financial approved the adoption of a clawback policy in October 2023, pursuant to the NASDAQ clawback listing standards. A copy of the Company’s clawback policy is included as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 29 Table of Contents
An investment in our securities is subject to risks inherent in our business and the industry in which we operate. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and all other information included in this Annual Re…
An investment in our securities is subject to risks inherent in our business and the industry in which we operate. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and all other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The risks described below may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. In addition to these risks and any other risks or uncertainties described in “Item 1. Business—Forward-Looking Statements” and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” there may be additional risks and uncertainties that are not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial that could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results. The value or market price of our securities could decline due to any of these identified or other risks. Past financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of future performance, and historical trends should not be used to anticipate results or trends in future periods. Interest Rate Changes in market interest rates and the interest rate environment may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We derive our income mainly from the difference or spread between the interest earned on loans, securities and other interest-earning assets and interest paid on deposits, borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities. As such, our earnings are highly sensitive to changes in market interest rates, which directly influence the relationship between the yields on our interest-earning assets and the costs of our interest-bearing liabilities. Because the repricing characteristics of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities are not perfectly matched, changes in market interest rates may alter the spread between asset yields and funding costs, resulting in fluctuations in net interest margin. In particular, if funding costs increase more rapidly than asset yields, or if asset yields decline more rapidly than funding costs, our net interest margin and net interest income could be adversely affected. Changes in interest rates may also affect the economic value of our assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity, which could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. We are unable to predict changes in market interest rates, which are affected by many factors beyond our control, including inflation, unemployment, money supply, governmental policy, monetary policy actions of the Federal Open Market Committee ("FOMC"), the imposition of tariffs, domestic and international events and changes in the United States and other financial markets. A significant portion of our assets consists of investment securities, which generally yield less than loans and are classified as available for sale, potentially contributing to increased volatility in our equity. Our net interest margin is lower than it would have been if a higher proportion of our interest-earning assets consisted of loans. Additionally, at June 30, 2026, $964.4 million, or 90.0% of our investment securities, are classified as available for sale and reported at fair value with unrealized gains or losses excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income, which affects our reported equity. Accordingly, given the significant size of the investment securities portfolio classified as available for sale and due to possible mark-to-market adjustments of that portion of the portfolio resulting from market conditions, we may experience greater volatility in the value of reported equity. Moreover, given that we actively manage our investment securities portfolio classified as available for sale, we may sell securities which could result in a realized loss, thereby reducing our net income. Changes in market interest rates also impact the value of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as well as the value of our derivatives portfolios. In particular, the unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale and changes in the fair value of interest rate derivatives serving as cash flows hedges are reported, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income which is a component of stockholders’ equity. Consequently, declines in the fair value of these instruments resulting from changes in market interest rates have, and may continue to, adversely affect stockholders’ equity. Loan repricing and refinancing risk may adversely affect borrower performance. As of June 30, 2026, a significant portion of our loan portfolio is scheduled to reset or mature during fiscal 2027. Many of these loans were originated in calendar 2021 and 2022 at interest rates below current market levels. As these loans reprice, mature, or require refinancing, borrowers may face higher borrowing costs and increased debt service obligations. Higher interest rates and tighter credit conditions may adversely affect borrowers' cash flows, financial condition, and ability to obtain replacement financing on acceptable terms. As a result, some borrowers may experience difficulty meeting their repayment obligations, which could lead to increased delinquencies or defaults. Any such deterioration in borrower performance could adversely affect our asset quality and operating results. 30 Table of Contents Asset Quality If our allowance for credit losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, our earnings will decrease. We make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans. In determining the required amount of the allowance for credit losses, we evaluate loans individually and establish credit loss allowances for specifically identified impairments. For loans not individually analyzed, we estimate losses and establish reserves based on reasonable and supportable forecasts and adjustments for qualitative factors. If the assumptions used in our calculation methodology are inaccurate, our allowance for credit losses may be insufficient to cover losses inherent in our loan portfolio, resulting in further additions to our allowance. Significant additions to our allowance could materially decrease our net income. In addition, bank regulators periodically review our allowance for credit losses and may require us to increase our provision for credit losses or recognize further loan charge-offs. Any increase in our allowance for credit losses or loan charge-offs as required by these regulatory authorities might have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Our commercial real estate lending exposes us to additional risk. Our commercial real estate (“CRE”) lending exposes us to greater risks than one- to four-family residential lending. Unlike single-family, owner-occupied residential mortgage loans, which generally are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from employment and other income sources, and are secured by real property whose value tends to be more easily ascertainable and realizable, the repayment of commercial real estate loans typically is dependent on the successful operation, occupancy levels, rental income and cash flows generated by the underlying property, all of which can be significantly affected by economic conditions. In addition, commercial real estate loans generally carry larger balances to single borrowers or related groups of borrowers than one- to four-family mortgage loans, which increases the financial impact of a borrower’s default. The risk exposure from our increased commercial real estate lending is also a function of the markets in which we operate. Our commercial real estate lending activity is generally focused on borrowers domiciled, and real estate located, within the states of New Jersey and New York. Regional risk factors and changes to local laws and regulations, including changes to rent regulations or foreclosure laws, may present greater risk than a more geographically diversified portfolio. Our increased commercial and industrial and construction loan originations exposes us to increased credit risk. We have increased our originations of commercial and industrial and construction loans, which generally have more risk than both one- to four-family residential and commercial mortgage loans. Since repayment of commercial and industrial and construction loans may depend on the successful operation of the borrower’s business or the successful completion of a construction project, repayment of such loans can be affected by adverse conditions in the real estate market or the local economy. If we continue to increase our originations of these loans, it may be necessary to increase the level of our allowance for credit losses because of the increased risk characteristics associated with these types of loans. Any such increase to our allowance for credit losses would adversely affect our earnings. We have a significant concentration in commercial real estate loans. If our regulators were to curtail our commercial real estate lending activities, our earnings and/or dividend paying capacity could be adversely affected. In 2006, the FDIC, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System issued joint guidance entitled “Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate Lending, Sound Risk Management Practices” (the “Guidance”). The Guidance provides that a bank’s commercial real estate lending exposure may receive increased supervisory scrutiny when total non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans, including loans secured by multi-family property, and construction loans, represent 300% or more of an institution’s total risk-based capital and the outstanding balance of the commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased by 50% or more during the preceding 36 months. Our level of non-owner occupied commercial real estate equaled 515% of Bank total risk-based capital at June 30, 2026, however our commercial real estate loan portfolio has decreased during the preceding 36 months. We may be required to record impairment charges with respect to our investment securities portfolio. We review our securities portfolio at the end of each quarter to determine whether the fair value is below the current carrying value. When the fair value of any of our investment securities has declined below its carrying value, we are required to assess whether we intend to sell, or it is more than likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If this assessment indicates that a credit loss exists, we would be required to record an impairment charge. 31 Table of Contents We elected the practical expedient of zero loss estimates for securities issued by U.S. government entities and agencies. A possible future downgrade of the sovereign credit ratings of the U.S. government and a decline in the perceived creditworthiness of U.S. government-related obligations could adversely impact the value of our investment securities portfolio. We cannot predict if, when or how any changes to the credit ratings or perceived creditworthiness of these organizations will affect economic conditions. A downgrade of the sovereign credit ratings of the U.S. government or the credit ratings of related institutions, agencies or instruments would significantly exacerbate the other risks to which we are subject and any related adverse effects on the business, financial condition and results of operations. At June 30, 2026, we had investment securities with fair values of approximately $1.06 billion. The valuation and liquidity of our securities could be adversely impacted by reduced market liquidity, increased normal bid-asked spreads and increased uncertainty of market participants, which could reduce the market value of our securities, including those with no apparent credit exposure. The valuation of our securities requires judgment and as market conditions change security values may also change. Significant negative changes to valuations could result in impairments in the value of our securities portfolio, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. Our investments in corporate and municipal debt securities, subordinated debt securities and collateralized loan obligations expose us to additional credit risks. The composition and allocation of our investment portfolio has historically emphasized U.S. agency mortgage-backed securities and U.S. agency debentures. While such assets remain a significant component of our investment portfolio at June 30, 2026, prior enhancements to our investment policies, strategies and infrastructure have enabled us to diversify the composition and allocation of our securities portfolio. Such diversification has included investing in corporate debt, municipal obligations, subordinated debt securities issued by financial institutions and collateralized loan obligations. With the exception of collateralized loan obligations, these securities are generally backed only by the credit of their issuers while investments in collateralized loan obligations generally rely on the structural characteristics of an individual tranche within a larger investment vehicle to protect the investor from credit losses arising from borrowers defaulting on the underlying securitized loans. While we have invested primarily in investment grade securities, these securities are not backed by the federal government and expose us to a greater degree of credit risk than U.S. agency securities. Any decline in the credit quality of these securities exposes us to the risk that the market value of the securities could decrease which may require us to write down their value and could lead to a possible default in payment. Funding Our reliance on wholesale funding could adversely affect our liquidity and operating results. Among other sources of funds, we rely on wholesale funding, including short- and long-term borrowings and brokered deposits, to provide funds with which to make loans, purchase investment securities and provide for other liquidity needs. On June 30, 2026, wholesale funding totaled $1.9 billion, or approximately 24.8% of total assets. In the future, this funding may not be readily replaceable as it matures, or we may have to pay a higher rate of interest to maintain it. Not being able to maintain or replace those funds as they mature would adversely affect our liquidity. Paying higher interest rates to maintain or replace funding would adversely affect our net interest margin and operating results. A lack of liquidity could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and result in regulatory limits being placed on the Company. Liquidity is essential to our business. We rely on our ability to gather deposits, make investments and effectively manage the repayment and maturity schedules of loans to ensure that there is adequate liquidity to fund our operations and pay our obligations. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale and maturities of loans and securities and other sources could have a substantial negative effect on liquidity. Our most important source of funds is deposits. Deposit balances can decrease when customers perceive alternative investments, cash management solutions or payment technologies as providing a more attractive risk/return, convenience or utility proposition. Such preferences may be influenced by changes in interest rates, local and national economic conditions, the availability and attractiveness of competing products, including U.S. dollar-denominated stablecoins and other digital asset-based alternatives, and perceptions regarding the stability of the financial services industry generally and our institution specifically. Further, the demand for deposits may be reduced due to a variety of factors such as demographic patterns, changes in customer preferences, reductions in consumers’ disposable income, the monetary policy of the FRB, regulatory actions that decrease customer access to particular products, or the emergence and increased adoption of alternative payment, savings and transaction platforms. In particular, the growing acceptance of U.S. dollar-denominated stablecoins and other digital asset-based payment technologies may provide consumers and businesses with alternatives to traditional bank deposits for storing value and conducting transactions. To the extent customers shift funds from bank deposits to stablecoins, money market funds or other competing cash management products, we could experience deposit outflows, increased funding competition and higher funding costs. Such developments could reduce a relatively low-cost source of funding, 32 Table of Contents negatively affect net interest income, liquidity and profitability, and require us to offer more competitive deposit rates or seek alternative funding sources. Other primary sources of funds consist of cash flows from operations, maturities and sales of investment securities. We have the capacity to borrow additional funds from the FHLB as well as from the FRB without pledging additional collateral, and via unsecured overnight borrowings from other financial institutions. Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance or capitalize our activities, or on terms that are acceptable, could be impaired by factors that affect us directly or the financial services industry or economy in general, such as disruptions in the financial markets, changes in the value of investment securities, negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry, a decrease in our business activity as a result of a downturn in markets, or adverse regulatory actions against us. Any decline in available funding could adversely impact our ability to originate loans, invest in securities, meet expenses, or to fulfill obligations such as repaying borrowings or meeting deposit withdrawal demands, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, business, financial condition and results of operations. A lack of liquidity could also attract increased regulatory scrutiny and potential restraints imposed on us by regulators. Depending on the capitalization status and regulatory treatment of depository institutions, including whether an institution is subject to a supervisory prompt corrective action directive, certain additional regulatory restrictions and prohibitions may apply, including restrictions on growth, restrictions on interest rates paid on deposits, restrictions or prohibitions on payment of dividends and restrictions on the acceptance of brokered deposits. Public funds deposits are a notable source of funds for us and a reduced level of those deposits may hurt our profits and liquidity position. Public funds deposits are a notable source of funds for our lending and investment activities. At June 30, 2026, $638.8 million, or 11.2% of our total deposits, consisted of public funds deposits from local government entities in the state of New Jersey, such as townships, counties, school districts and charter schools. These deposits are collateralized by letters of credit from the FHLB or through the pledge of eligible investment securities. Given our reliance on these typically high-average balance public funds deposits as a source of funds, our inability to retain such funds could adversely affect our liquidity. Further, our public funds deposits are primarily floating rate interest-bearing demand deposit accounts and therefore their pricing is more sensitive to changes in interest rates. If we are forced to pay higher rates on our public funds accounts to retain those funds, or if we are unable to retain such funds and we are forced to rely on other sources of funds for our lending and investment activities, such as borrowings from the FHLB, the interest expense associated with these other funding sources may be higher than the rates we are currently paying on our public funds deposits, which would adversely affect our net interest income. Economic and Market Area Changes in economic conditions, in particular an economic slowdown in the markets we operate in, could materially and negatively affect our business. Our business is directly impacted by factors such as economic, political and market conditions, broad trends in industry and finance, legislative and regulatory changes, changes in government monetary and fiscal policies and inflation, all of which are beyond our control. Any deterioration in economic conditions, whether caused by national or local concerns, in particular any further economic slowdown in the markets we operate in, could result in the following consequences, any of which could hurt our business materially: loan delinquencies may increase; problem assets and foreclosures may increase; demand for our products and services may decrease; low cost or non-interest bearing deposits may decrease; and collateral for loans made by us, especially real estate, may decline in value, in turn reducing customers’ borrowing power, and reducing the value of assets and collateral associated with our existing loans. Our success significantly depends upon the growth in population, income levels, deposits, and housing starts in our markets. If the communities in which we operate do not grow or if prevailing economic conditions locally or nationally are unfavorable, our business may not succeed. An economic downturn or prolonged recession may result in the deterioration of the quality of our loan portfolio and reduce our level of deposits, which in turn would hurt its business. If we experience an economic downturn or a prolonged economic recession occurs in the economy as a whole, borrowers will be less likely to repay their loans as scheduled. Unlike many larger institutions, we are not able to spread the risks of unfavorable local economic conditions across a large number of diversified economies. An economic downturn could, therefore, result in losses that materially and adversely affect our business. Inflation has had, and may continue to have a negative effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Although inflation has decreased significantly from the elevated levels experienced at the end of 2021 and through the first half of calendar 2024, inflation levels continue to exceed the Federal Reserve’s long-term target of 2.0%. Small to medium-sized businesses may be impacted more during periods of high inflation as they are not able to leverage economics of scale to mitigate cost pressures compared to larger businesses. Consequently, the ability of our business customers to repay their loans 33 Table of Contents may deteriorate, and in some cases this deterioration may occur quickly, which would adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, a prolonged period of inflation could cause wages and other costs to the Company to increase, which has and could continue to adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Interruption of our customers’ supply chains and federal funding could negatively impact their business and operations and impact their ability to repay their loans. Any material interruption in our customers’ supply chains, such as a material interruption of the resources required to conduct their business, such as those resulting from interruptions in service by third-party providers, trade restrictions, such as increased tariffs or quotas, embargoes or customs restrictions, reductions in federal subsidies or grants, social or labor unrest, natural disasters, epidemics or pandemics or political disputes and military conflicts, that cause a material disruption in our customers’ supply chains, could have a negative impact on their business and ability to repay their borrowings with us. In the event of disruptions in our customers’ supply chains, the labor and materials they rely on in the ordinary course of business may not be available at reasonable rates or at all. Additionally, changes in distribution of federal funds or freezing of federal funds, including reductions in federal workforce causing unemployment, could have an adverse effect on the ability of consumers and businesses to pay debts and/or affect the demand for loans and deposits. Acts of terrorism, severe weather, public health issues, geopolitical events and other external factors could impact our ability to conduct business. Financial institutions have been, and continue to be, targets of terrorist threats and other malicious activities designed to disrupt operations, compromise information systems and impair communications. In addition, the metropolitan New York area and northern New Jersey remain central targets for acts of terrorism and other disruptive events. Severe weather events, natural disasters, public health emergencies, military conflicts, geopolitical tensions and other external events may disrupt our operations, damage our facilities, impair access to critical infrastructure and technology systems, and adversely affect the communities and local economies in which we operate. These events may also impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans, increase loan delinquencies, nonperforming assets and foreclosures, reduce demand for our products and services, and decrease the value of collateral securing our loans, particularly real estate collateral. Such events may also result in increased expenses, operational disruptions, reductions in revenue and adverse impacts on our capital and liquidity levels. While we maintain business continuity and disaster recovery plans and regularly test our recovery procedures, there can be no assurance that such measures will be sufficient to prevent or mitigate the effects of these events. The occurrence of any such event, including a sudden or prolonged downturn in domestic or global markets resulting from these factors, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We face intense competition from other financial services and financial services technology companies, and competitive pressures could adversely affect our business or financial performance. We face intense competition in all of our markets and geographic regions and expect it to intensify in the future. Competition with financial services technology companies, or technology companies partnering with financial services companies, may be particularly intense, due to, among other things, differing regulatory environments. Competitive pressures may drive us to take actions that we might otherwise eschew, such as lowering the interest rates or fees on loans or raising the interest rates on deposits in order to keep or attract high-quality clients. These pressures also may accelerate actions that we might otherwise elect to defer, such as substantial investments in technology or infrastructure. The actions that we take in response to competition may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. These consequences could be exacerbated if we are not successful in introducing new products and other services, achieving market acceptance of our products and other services, developing and maintaining a strong client base, or prudently managing expenses. Information Security and Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies Cybersecurity threats, technology failures and information security risks could result in operational disruptions, financial losses and reputational harm. Information technology systems are critical to our business and support key functions, including client relationship management, financial reporting, securities investments, deposit processing, loan servicing and other operational activities. Despite the controls, policies and procedures we maintain to monitor and mitigate technology, operational and information security risks, our systems, as well as those of our third-party service providers, remain vulnerable to cybersecurity incidents, system failures, service interruptions, processing errors and other performance disruptions. The financial services industry has experienced an increase in the frequency and sophistication of cyber-attacks, including attempts to gain unauthorized access to systems, misappropriate assets or confidential information, corrupt data, disrupt operations and facilitate fraud. 34 Table of Contents We rely on third-party service providers, including core processors, cloud service providers, payment, clearing and settlement networks, and other technology partners, many of which are beyond our direct control. We also rely on senior management, information security personnel and external consultants to support the identification, assessment, monitoring and management of cybersecurity and information security risks, and our Board of Directors' oversight of such risks depends in part on information, analysis and recommendations provided by these individuals. Failures, disruptions, security breaches or unauthorized disclosures involving our systems, those of our third-party service providers, or deficiencies in the oversight, assessment or management of cybersecurity risks could impair our operations, disrupt client access to products and services, compromise sensitive information and expose us to fraud losses. In addition, our clients are increasingly targeted by cyber-attacks, identity theft and other fraudulent activity, which could result in account compromise, financial loss and reputational harm to us, regardless of whether the underlying event originates within our systems or those of third parties. Any such event could result in operational disruption, loss of customers, reputational damage, litigation, regulatory scrutiny, remediation costs and other liabilities, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our use of artificial intelligence, robotic process automation, and other emerging technologies may increase operational, compliance, cybersecurity, and third-party risks. We have made and expect to continue to make investments to integrate artificial intelligence (“AI”), including generative artificial intelligence, machine learning technologies, robotic process automation (“RPA”), and other emerging technologies into our solutions to enhance operational efficiency, scalability, customer service, and decision making. We also rely on third-party vendors, service providers, and business partners that use or support these technologies in delivering services to us. The use of AI and RPA introduces operational, compliance, cybersecurity, model risk, and third-party risks. These technologies may generate inaccurate, incomplete, biased, or unreliable outputs, experience design or programming errors, fail to operate as intended, or be improperly implemented, monitored, or governed. Such failures could result in processing errors, data inaccuracies, ineffective internal controls, customer service disruptions, regulatory compliance issues, reporting errors, or adverse customer outcomes. In addition, the use of AI and automation may increase risks related to data privacy, information security, fraud, and unauthorized access to confidential information. Our dependence on third-party technology providers exposes us to risks associated with vendor performance, operational resiliency, cybersecurity practices, service disruptions, and the availability of specialized technology providers. Furthermore, the legal and regulatory framework governing AI and other emerging technologies continues to evolve, and new laws, regulations, or supervisory expectations could increase compliance costs, restrict the use of certain technologies, or require changes to our governance and risk management practices. Failure to effectively manage these risks, whether by us or our third-party providers, could result in financial loss, regulatory scrutiny, litigation, reputational harm, or other adverse effects on our business and results of operations. As AI technologies continue to evolve, we may be required to invest in enhanced governance, monitoring, and compliance frameworks to manage these risks effectively. Regulatory Matters We operate in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes in federal and state laws and regulations. The financial services industry is extensively regulated. Federal and state banking regulations are designed primarily to protect the deposit insurance funds and consumers, not to benefit a company’s shareholders. These regulations may sometimes impose significant limitations on operations. The significant federal and state banking regulations that affect us are described under the heading “Item 1. Business—Regulation.” These regulations, along with the currently existing tax, accounting, securities, insurance, and monetary laws, regulations, rules, standards, policies, and interpretations control the methods by which financial institutions conduct business, implement strategic initiatives and tax compliance, and govern financial reporting and disclosures. New proposals for legislation continue to be introduced in the U.S. Congress that could further alter the regulation of the bank and non-bank financial services industries and the manner in which companies within the industry conduct business. In addition, federal and state regulatory agencies also frequently adopt changes to their regulations or change the manner in which existing regulations are applied. Future changes in federal policy and at regulatory agencies may occur over time through policy and personnel changes, which could lead to changes involving the level of oversight and focus on the financial services industry. These changes may require us to invest significant management attention and resources to make any necessary changes to operations to comply and could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. 35 Table of Contents The performance of our multi-family loans could be adversely impacted by regulation. Multifamily loans generally involve risks associated with legislation and government regulations involving rent control, rent stabilization and tenant protection measures, which are outside of our control and could impair the value of the collateral securing such loans or the future cash flows of such properties. In particular, certain of our multifamily loans are secured by properties located in New York City, where rent-regulation laws and related housing policies may limit a property owner's ability to increase rents, recover rising operating costs or otherwise enhance property cash flow. In addition, future legislative, regulatory or policy changes affecting rent-regulated housing, including expanded tenant protections or additional limitations on rent increases, could adversely affect the operating performance and value of multifamily properties. As a result, rental income may not increase sufficiently to offset rising expenses, including taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance costs. Any reduction in borrower cash flows or collateral values could impair a borrower's ability to repay its loan obligations and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Changes to tax laws and regulations could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. Changes in tax laws and/or regulatory requirements could be enacted. These changes in the law may be retroactive to previous periods and as a result could negatively affect our current and future financial performance. An increase in our corporate tax rate could have an unfavorable impact on our earnings and capital generation abilities. Similarly, the Bank’s clients could experience varying effects from changes in tax laws and such effects, whether positive or negative, may have a corresponding impact on our business and the economy as a whole. In addition, changes to regulatory requirements could increase our costs of regulatory compliance and may significantly affect the markets in which we do business, the markets for and value of our loans and investments, and our ongoing operations, costs and profitability. Business Issues We may be required to recognize goodwill impairment charges in future periods. At June 30, 2026, our goodwill totaled $113.5 million. We are required to periodically test our goodwill for impairment. The impairment testing process considers a variety of factors, including the current market price of our common stock, the estimated net present value of our assets and liabilities, and information concerning the terminal valuation of similarly situated insured depository institutions. If an impairment determination is made in a future reporting period, our earnings and the book value of goodwill will be reduced by the amount of the impairment. If an impairment loss is recorded, it will have little or no impact on the tangible book value of our common stock or our regulatory capital levels, but recognition of such an impairment loss could significantly restrict Kearny Bank’s ability to make dividend payments to Kearny Financial and therefore adversely impact our ability to pay dividends to stockholders. We cannot guarantee that our allocation of capital to various alternatives will enhance long-term stockholder value. Our business plan calls for us to execute a variety of strategies to allocate and deploy any excess capital including, but not limited to, continued organic balance sheet growth and diversification, and payment of regular cash dividends. Additionally, we will carefully consider acquisition opportunities to further deploy capital when we expect such opportunities to significantly enhance long-term shareholder value. If we are unable to effectively and timely deploy capital through these strategies, it may constrain growth in earnings and return on equity and thereby diminish potential growth in stockholder value. Our acquisitions and the integration of acquired businesses, may not result in all of the cost savings and benefits anticipated, which could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. We have in the past, and may in the future, seek to grow our business by acquiring other businesses. There is risk that our acquisitions may not have the anticipated positive results, including results relating to: correctly assessing the asset quality of the assets being acquired; the total cost and time required to complete the integration successfully; being able to profitably deploy funds acquired in an acquisition; or the overall performance of the combined entity. Acquisitions may also result in business disruptions that could cause clients to remove their accounts from us and move their business to competing financial institutions. It is possible that the integration process related to acquisitions could result in the disruption of our ongoing businesses or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies that could adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with clients and employees. The loss of key employees in connection with an acquisition could adversely affect our ability to successfully conduct our business. Acquisition and integration efforts could divert management attention and resources, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, the operation of the acquired branches may adversely affect our existing profitability, and we may not be able to achieve results in the future similar to those achieved by the existing banking business or manage growth resulting from the acquisition effectively. 36 Table of Contents Because the nature of the financial services business involves a high volume of transactions, we face significant operational risks. We operate in diverse markets and rely on the ability of our employees and systems to process a high number of transactions. Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from our operations, including but not limited to, the risk of fraud by employees or persons outside the Company, the execution of unauthorized transactions by employees, errors relating to transaction processing and technology, breaches of the internal control system and compliance requirements, and business continuation and disaster recovery. Insurance coverage may not be available for such losses, or where available, such losses may exceed insurance limits. This risk of loss also includes the potential legal actions that could arise as a result of an operational deficiency or as a result of noncompliance with applicable regulatory standards, adverse business decisions or their implementation, and client attrition due to potential negative publicity. In the event of a breakdown in the internal control system, improper operation of systems or improper employee actions, we could suffer financial loss, face regulatory action, and suffer damage to our reputation. Our risk management framework may not be effective in mitigating risk and reducing the potential for significant losses. Our risk management framework is designed to effectively manage and mitigate risk while minimizing exposure to potential losses. We seek to identify, measure, monitor, report and control our exposure to risk, including strategic, market, liquidity, compliance and operational risks. While we use a broad and diversified set of risk monitoring and mitigation techniques, these techniques are inherently limited because they cannot anticipate the existence or future development of currently unanticipated or unknown risks. Recent economic conditions and heightened legislative and regulatory scrutiny of the financial services industry, among other developments, have increased our level of risk. Accordingly, we could suffer losses as a result of our failure to properly anticipate and manage these risks. We could be adversely affected by failure in our internal controls. A failure in our internal controls could have a significant negative impact not only on our earnings, but also on the perception that clients, regulators and investors may have of us. We continue to devote a significant amount of effort, time and resources to continually strengthening our controls and ensuring compliance with complex accounting standards and banking regulations. The inability to attract and retain key personnel could adversely affect our business. The successful execution of our business strategy is partially dependent on our ability to attract and retain experienced and qualified personnel. Failure to do so could adversely affect our strategy, client relationships and internal operations.
Read original filing text →The Company and the Bank conduct business from their corporate headquarters at 120 Passaic Avenue in Fairfield, New Jersey and from administrative offices located in Fairfield, Clifton and Oakhurst, New Jersey. At June 30, 2026, the Company operated 40 branch offices located in…
The Company and the Bank conduct business from their corporate headquarters at 120 Passaic Avenue in Fairfield, New Jersey and from administrative offices located in Fairfield, Clifton and Oakhurst, New Jersey. At June 30, 2026, the Company operated 40 branch offices located in Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Somerset and Union counties, New Jersey and Kings and Richmond counties, New York. At June 30, 2026, 18 of our branch offices are leased with remaining terms between nine months and seven years. At June 30, 2026, our net investment in property and equipment totaled $42.4 million. Additional information regarding our properties as of June 30, 2026, is presented in Note 7 to the audited consolidated financial statements.
Read original filing text →We are, from time to time, party to routine litigation, which arises in the normal course of business, such as claims to enforce liens, condemnation proceedings on properties in which we hold security interests, claims involving the making and servicing of real property loans an…
We are, from time to time, party to routine litigation, which arises in the normal course of business, such as claims to enforce liens, condemnation proceedings on properties in which we hold security interests, claims involving the making and servicing of real property loans and other issues incident to our business. At June 30, 2026, there were no lawsuits pending or known to be contemplated against us that would be expected to have a material effect on operations or income.
Read original filing text →General This discussion and analysis reflects Kearny Financial Corp.’s consolidated financial statements and other relevant statistical data, and is intended to enhance your understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. You should read the information in th…
General This discussion and analysis reflects Kearny Financial Corp.’s consolidated financial statements and other relevant statistical data, and is intended to enhance your understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. You should read the information in this section in conjunction with the business and financial information regarding Kearny Financial Corp. and the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Our accounting policies are integral to understanding the results reported. We describe them in detail in Note 1 to our audited consolidated financial statements. In preparing the audited consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the dates of the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and revenues and expenses for the periods then ended. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. A material estimate that is particularly susceptible to significant changes relates to the determination of the allowance for credit losses. Allowance for Credit Losses. The determination of our allowance for credit losses on loans (“ACL”) is considered a critical accounting estimate by management because of the high degree of judgment involved in determining qualitative loss factors, the subjectivity of the assumptions used, and the potential for changes in the forecasted economic environment that could result in changes to the amount of the recorded ACL. See Note 1 to our audited consolidated financial statements for a detailed discussion of our accounting policies and methodologies for establishing the ACL. Management believes the following information may enable investors to better understand the changes in our ACL. Our ACL totaled $45.5 million and $46.2 million at June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The $695,000 decrease in our ACL was largely attributable to net charge-offs of $2.4 million, partially offset by a provision for credit losses of $1.7 million primarily driven by loan growth and an increase in reserves for individually evaluated loans. The quantitative component of our ACL, which is largely based on the national unemployment rate forecast, increased $152,000. The qualitative component of our ACL, which is largely based on management’s judgment of qualitative loss factors, increased $481,000. Our ACL totaled $45.5 million at June 30, 2026 and the amount allocated to our collectively evaluated multi-family and nonresidential mortgage loans was $29.3 million, of which $20.4 million was attributable to qualitative loss factors. Changes in management’s judgment of qualitative loss factors could result in a significant change to the ACL. As described in Note 1, qualitative loss factors are applied to each portfolio segment with the amounts judgmentally determined by the relative risk to the most severe loss periods identified in the historical loan charge-offs of a peer group of similar-sized regional banks. At June 30, 2026, the weighted average historical loss rate for multi-family and nonresidential mortgages loans during the most severe peer group loss periods was 1.62%. Management performed a hypothetical sensitivity analysis to understand the impact of a change in a key input on our ACL. At June 30, 2026, if the four-quarter national unemployment rate forecast had been 9% rather than an average of approximately 4.2%, our ACL as a percent of total loans would have increased 56 basis points from 0.77% to 1.33%. This sensitivity analysis includes the impact to both the quantitative and qualitative components of our ACL. Changes in quantitative inputs and qualitative loss factors may not occur in the same direction or magnitude across all segments of our loan portfolio and deterioration in some quantitative inputs and qualitative loss factors may offset improvement in others. This sensitivity analysis does not represent a change to our expectations of the economic environment but provides a hypothetical result to assess the sensitivity of the ACL to a change in a key input. This sensitivity analysis does not incorporate changes to management’s judgment of qualitative loss factors. Our ACL on individually analyzed loans is determined on an individual basis using the present value of expected cash flows discounted using the loan’s effective interest rate or, for collateral-dependent loans, the fair value of the collateral, less estimated selling costs, as applicable. Our ACL on individually analyzed loans decreased $1.3 million during the year ended June 30, 2026. 42 Table of Contents Financial Overview The following financial information and other data in this section are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and should be read together therewith: At June 30, 2026 2025 2024 (In Thousands) Balance Sheet Data: Cash and equivalents $ 114,823 $ 167,269 $ 63,864 Assets 7,682,205 7,740,450 7,683,461 Net loans receivable 5,829,829 5,766,746 5,687,848 Investment securities available for sale 964,369 1,012,969 1,072,833 Investment securities held to maturity 106,814 120,217 135,742 Goodwill 113,525 113,525 113,525 Deposits 5,709,625 5,675,217 5,158,123 Borrowings 1,150,000 1,256,491 1,709,789 Stockholders' equity 766,670 745,962 753,571 For the Years Ended June 30, 2026 2025 2024 (Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) Summary of Operations: Interest income $ 324,313 $ 324,476 $ 328,868 Interest expense 169,030 189,533 186,274 Net interest income 155,283 134,943 142,594 Provision for credit losses 1,698 2,366 6,226 Net interest income after provision for credit losses 153,585 132,577 136,368 Non-interest income 22,825 19,052 (1,993) Non-interest expenses 129,008 120,630 215,151 Income (loss) before taxes 47,402 30,999 (80,776) Income tax expense 11,138 4,924 5,891 Net income (loss) $ 36,264 $ 26,075 $ (86,667) Per Share Data: Net income (loss) per share - Basic $ 0.58 $ 0.42 $ (1.39) Net income (loss) per share - Diluted $ 0.57 $ 0.42 $ (1.39) Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (in thousands): Basic 62,866 62,508 62,444 Diluted 63,220 62,716 62,444 Cash dividends per share $ 0.44 $ 0.44 $ 0.44 Dividend payout ratio(1) 77.1 % 106.1 % (31.9) % ________________________________________ (1)Represents cash dividends declared divided by net income (loss). 43 Table of Contents At or For the Years Ended June 30, 2026 2025 2024 Performance Ratios: Return on average assets (ratio of net income to average total assets) 0.48 % 0.34 % (1.10) % Return on average equity (ratio of net income to average total equity) 4.80 % 3.49 % (10.51) % Return on average tangible equity (ratio of net income to average tangible equity)(1) 5.71 % 4.18 % (13.64) % Net interest rate spread 1.79 % 1.47 % 1.57 % Net interest margin 2.18 % 1.88 % 1.94 % Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities 116.50 % 115.21 % 114.73 % Efficiency ratio(2) 72.43 % 78.33 % 153.02 % Non-interest expense to average assets 1.70 % 1.58 % 2.73 % Asset Quality Ratios: Non-performing loans to total loans 0.82 % 0.78 % 0.70 % Non-performing assets to total assets 0.70 % 0.59 % 0.52 % Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding 0.04 % 0.02 % 0.17 % Allowance for credit losses to total loans 0.77 % 0.79 % 0.78 % Allowance for credit losses to non-performing loans 94.99 % 101.30 % 112.68 % Capital Ratios: Average equity to average assets 9.97 % 9.77 % 10.46 % Equity to assets at period end 9.98 % 9.64 % 9.81 % Tangible equity to tangible assets at period end(3) 8.62 % 8.27 % 8.43 % ________________________________________ (1)Average tangible equity equals average total stockholders’ equity reduced by average goodwill and average core deposit intangible assets. (2)Efficiency ratio equals non-interest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income. (3)Tangible equity equals total stockholders’ equity reduced by goodwill and core deposit intangible assets. 44 Table of Contents Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, 2026 and June 30, 2025 Executive Summary. Total assets decreased by $58.2 million, or 0.8%, to $7.68 billion at June 30, 2026 from $7.74 billion at June 30, 2025. The decrease primarily reflected decreases in cash and cash equivalents and investment securities, partially offset by an increase in net loans receivable. Investment Securities. Investment securities available for sale decreased by $48.6 million to $964.4 million at June 30, 2026 from $1.01 billion at June 30, 2025. This decrease was largely the result of principal repayments of $322.7 million, partially offset by purchases of $258.3 million and a $15.6 million increase in the fair value of the portfolio. Investment securities held to maturity decreased by $13.4 million to $106.8 million at June 30, 2026 from $120.2 million at June 30, 2025. The decrease was largely the result of principal repayments of $13.5 million. Additional information regarding investment securities at June 30, 2026 is presented under “Item 1. Business” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as in Note 3 to the audited consolidated financial statements. Loans Held-for-Sale. Loans held-for-sale totaled $6.0 million at June 30, 2026 as compared to $5.9 million at June 30, 2025 and are reported separately from the balance of net loans receivable. Loans held-for-sale consisted of residential mortgage loans in both respective periods. During the year ended June 30, 2026, we sold $128.2 million of residential mortgage loans, resulting in a net gain on sale of $932,000. Net Loans Receivable. Net loans receivable increased by $63.1 million, or 1.1%, to $5.83 billion at June 30, 2026 from $5.77 billion at June 30, 2025. The increase reflected growth across several lending categories, including commercial and industrial loans and construction loans, partially offset by a decline in multi-family mortgage loans resulting primarily from repayments and payoffs. The resulting shift in portfolio composition is consistent with our ongoing loan portfolio remix strategy and focus on expanding commercial banking relationships. Detail regarding the change in the loan portfolio is presented below: June 30, 2026 June 30, 2025 Increase/ (Decrease) (In Thousands) Commercial loans: Multi-family mortgage $ 2,499,894 $ 2,709,654 $ (209,760) Nonresidential mortgage 1,019,445 986,556 32,889 Commercial and industrial 223,927 138,755 85,172 Construction 263,200 177,713 85,487 Total commercial loans 4,006,466 4,012,678 (6,212) One- to four-family residential mortgage 1,789,865 1,748,591 41,274 Consumer loans: Home equity loans 79,844 50,737 29,107 Other consumer 2,387 2,533 (146) Total consumer loans 82,231 53,270 28,961 Total loans 5,878,562 5,814,539 64,023 Unaccreted yield adjustments (3,237) (1,602) (1,635) Allowance for credit losses (45,496) (46,191) 695 Net loans receivable $ 5,829,829 $ 5,766,746 $ 63,083 Commercial loan origination volume for the year ended June 30, 2026 totaled $439.7 million, consisting of $166.2 million of commercial mortgage loan originations, $118.5 million of commercial and industrial loan originations and $155.1 million of construction loan disbursements. Purchases of commercial business loans totaled $93.8 million for the same period. 45 Table of Contents One- to four-family residential mortgage loan origination volume, excluding loans held-for-sale, totaled $154.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2026 and was supplemented with loan purchases totaling $65.6 million. Home equity loan and line of credit origination volume for the same period totaled $43.5 million. Additional information about our loans at June 30, 2026 is presented under “Item 1. Business” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as in Note 4 to the audited consolidated financial statements. Nonperforming Assets. Nonperforming assets increased $7.8 million to $53.4 million, or 0.70% of total assets, at June 30, 2026 from $45.6 million, or 0.59% of total assets, at June 30, 2025. The increase in nonperforming assets was largely attributable to two foreclosed properties with an aggregate carrying value of $5.5 million that were transferred into other real estate owned. The remaining change was primarily attributable to an increase in nonperforming multi-family mortgage loans, partially offset by a decrease in nonperforming residential mortgage loans. Additional information about nonperforming loans and reportable loan modifications at June 30, 2026 is presented under “Item 1. Business” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as in Note 4 to the audited consolidated financial statements. Allowance for Credit Losses. At June 30, 2026, the ACL totaled $45.5 million, or 0.77% of total loans, reflecting a decrease of $695,000 from $46.2 million, or 0.79% of total loans, at June 30, 2025. The decrease was largely attributable to net charge-offs of $2.4 million, partially offset by a provision for credit losses of $1.7 million. Additional information about the allowance for credit losses at June 30, 2026 is presented under “Item 1. Business” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as in Note 1 and Note 5 to the audited consolidated financial statements. Other Assets. The aggregate balance of other assets, including premises and equipment, FHLB stock, interest receivable, goodwill, core deposit intangibles, bank owned life insurance, deferred income taxes, OREO and other assets, decreased by $7.0 million to $660.3 million at June 30, 2026 from $667.3 million at June 30, 2025. The decrease in other assets largely reflected a decrease in the market value of interest rate derivatives and a decrease in FHLB stock, partially offset by an increase in BOLI and the transfer of two foreclosed properties to other real estate owned. The remaining change generally reflected normal operating fluctuations within these line items. Deposits. Total deposits increased by $34.4 million, or 0.6%, to $5.71 billion at June 30, 2026 from $5.68 billion at June 30, 2025. Included in total deposits are brokered certificates of deposits (“CDs”) of $757.2 million and $757.7 million at June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The increase was driven by growth in deposits from our branch network and digital channels. Deposit balances at June 30, 2026 reflect a migration of $239.9 million from a consumer interest bearing product to a non-interest bearing product as part of the Company’s repricing strategy. The following table sets forth the distribution of, and changes in, deposits, by type, at the dates indicated: June 30, 2026 June 30, 2025 Increase/ (Decrease) (In Thousands) Non-interest-bearing deposits $ 788,015 $ 582,045 $ 205,970 Interest-bearing deposits: Interest-bearing demand 2,214,432 2,362,222 (147,790) Savings 766,502 754,376 12,126 Certificates of deposit (retail) 1,183,427 1,218,920 (35,493) Certificates of deposit (brokered) 757,249 757,654 (405) Interest-bearing deposits 4,921,610 5,093,172 (171,562) Total deposits $ 5,709,625 $ 5,675,217 $ 34,408 Uninsured deposits totaled $2.25 billion as of June 30, 2026, compared to $1.99 billion as of June 30, 2025. Excluding collateralized deposits of state and local governments, and deposits of the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary and holding company, uninsured deposits totaled $851.0 million, or 14.9% of total deposits, at June 30, 2026 compared to $813.8 million, or 14.3% of total deposits, at June 30, 2025. Additional information about our deposits at June 30, 2026 is presented under “Item 1. Business” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as in Note 9 to the audited consolidated financial statements. 46 Table of Contents Borrowings. The balance of borrowings decreased by $106.5 million, or 8.5%, to $1.15 billion at June 30, 2026 from $1.26 billion at June 30, 2025 which included overnight borrowings totaling $200.0 million and $150.0 million at June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The decrease was primarily driven by a net decrease in FHLB and other borrowings. Additional information about our borrowings at June 30, 2026 is presented under “Item 1. Business” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as in Note 10 to the audited consolidated financial statements. Other Liabilities. The balance of other liabilities, including advance payments by borrowers for taxes and other miscellaneous liabilities, decreased by $6.9 million to $55.9 million at June 30, 2026 from $62.8 million at June 30, 2025. The change in the balance of other liabilities generally reflected normal operating fluctuations within these line items. Stockholders’ Equity. Stockholders’ equity increased by $20.7 million to $766.7 million at June 30, 2026 from $746.0 million at June 30, 2025. The increase in stockholders’ equity during the year ended June 30, 2026 largely reflected net income of $36.3 million and $9.1 million in after-tax other comprehensive income, partially offset by $28.0 million in cash dividends. Other comprehensive income during the year ended June 30, 2026 was driven by an increase in the fair value of our available for sale securities, partially offset by a decrease in the fair value of our derivatives portfolio. Book value per share increased by $0.29 to $11.84 at June 30, 2026 while tangible book value per share increased by $0.30 to $10.07 at June 30, 2026. These increases were driven by the increase in stockholders’ equity, as described above. Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended June 30, 2026 and June 30, 2025 Net Income. Net income for the year ended June 30, 2026 was $36.3 million, or $0.57 per diluted share, an increase of $10.2 million from net income of $26.1 million, or $0.42 per diluted share, for the year ended June 30, 2025. The increase in net income reflected increases in net interest income and non-interest income, partially offset by increases in non-interest expense and income taxes. Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased by $20.3 million to $155.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2026. The increase between the comparative periods resulted from a decrease of $20.5 million in interest expense, partially offset by a decrease of $163,000 in interest income. Included in net interest income for the years ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, was purchase accounting accretion of $2.2 million and $2.4 million and loan prepayment penalty income of $2.1 million and $783,000. Net interest margin increased 30 basis points to 2.18% for the year ended June 30, 2026, from 1.88% for the year ended June 30, 2025. The increase reflected higher loan yields and balances and lower costs on interest-bearing liabilities, partially offset by lower yields and balances on investment securities and other interest-earning assets. 47 Table of Contents Details surrounding the composition of, and changes to, net interest income are presented in the table below which reflects the components of the average balance sheet and of net interest income for the periods indicated. We derived the average yields and costs by dividing income or expense by the average balance of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the years presented with daily balances used to derive average balances. No tax equivalent adjustments have been made to yield or costs. Non-accrual loans were included in the calculation of average balances, however interest receivable on these loans has been fully reserved for and therefore not included in interest income. The yields and costs set forth below include the effect of deferred fees, discounts and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income or expense. For the Years Ended June 30, 2026 2025 2024 Average Balance Interest Average Yield/ Cost Average Balance Interest Average Yield/ Cost Average Balance Interest Average Yield/ Cost (Dollars in Thousands) Interest-earning assets: Loans receivable (1) $ 5,806,182 $ 271,445 4.68 % $ 5,789,583 $ 262,992 4.54 % $ 5,752,496 $ 256,007 4.45 % Taxable investment securities(2) 1,200,665 46,976 3.91 1,270,262 53,247 4.19 1,438,200 63,313 4.40 Tax-exempt securities (2) 5,800 139 2.39 9,791 234 2.39 14,718 336 2.28 Other interest-earning assets(3) 113,880 5,753 5.05 119,224 8,003 6.71 131,019 9,212 7.03 Total interest-earning assets 7,126,527 324,313 4.55 7,188,860 324,476 4.51 7,336,433 328,868 4.48 Non-interest-earning assets 455,386 459,986 541,859 Total assets $ 7,581,913 $ 7,648,846 $ 7,878,292 Interest-bearing liabilities: Interest-bearing demand $ 2,334,641 $ 58,220 2.49 $ 2,335,972 $ 66,835 2.86 $ 2,308,893 $ 67,183 2.91 Savings 758,820 10,248 1.35 721,115 9,011 1.25 662,981 3,293 0.50 Certificates of deposit (retail) 1,196,452 40,056 3.35 1,213,015 46,888 3.87 1,278,535 41,762 3.27 Certificates of deposit (brokered) 735,180 20,137 2.74 689,011 17,524 2.54 500,147 10,176 2.03 Total interest-bearing deposits 5,025,093 128,661 2.56 4,959,113 140,258 2.83 4,750,556 122,414 2.58 FHLB advances 990,612 36,402 3.67 1,131,662 42,014 3.71 1,458,941 53,948 3.70 Other borrowings 101,712 3,967 3.90 149,041 7,261 4.87 184,768 9,912 5.36 Total borrowings 1,092,324 40,369 3.70 1,280,703 49,275 3.85 1,643,709 63,860 3.89 Total interest-bearing liabilities 6,117,417 169,030 2.76 6,239,816 189,533 3.04 6,394,265 186,274 2.91 Non-interest-bearing liabilities(4) 708,958 662,028 659,710 Total liabilities 6,826,375 6,901,844 7,053,975 Stockholders' equity 755,538 747,002 824,317 Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 7,581,913 $ 7,648,846 $ 7,878,292 Net interest income $ 155,283 $ 134,943 $ 142,594 Interest rate spread(5) 1.79 % 1.47 % 1.57 % Net interest margin(6) 2.18 % 1.88 % 1.94 % Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities 1.16 1.15 1.15 ________________________________________ (1)Loans held-for-sale and non-accruing loans have been included in loans receivable and the effect of such inclusion was not material. Allowance for credit losses has been included in non-interest-earning assets. (2)Fair value adjustments have been excluded in the balances of interest-earning assets. (3)Includes interest-bearing deposits at other banks and FHLB of New York capital stock. (4)Includes average balances of non-interest-bearing deposits of $649.3 million, $597.2 million and $595.3 million for the years ended June 30, 2026, 2025 and 2024, respectively. (5)Interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. (6)Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. 48 Table of Contents The following table reflects the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense to changes in volume and in prevailing interest rates during the years indicated. Each category reflects the: (1) changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by old rate); (2) changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by old volume); and (3) net change. The net change attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate has been allocated proportionally to the absolute dollar amounts of change in each. Year Ended June 30, 2026 versus Year Ended June 30, 2025 Year Ended June 30, 2025 versus Year Ended June 30, 2024 Increase (Decrease) Due to Increase (Decrease) Due to Volume Rate Net Volume Rate Net (In Thousands) Interest and dividend income Loans receivable $ 719 $ 7,732 $ 8,451 $ 1,688 $ 5,297 $ 6,985 Taxable investment securities (2,825) (3,445) (6,270) (7,145) (2,921) (10,066) Tax-exempt securities (95) — (95) (117) 15 (102) Other interest-earning assets (345) (1,905) (2,250) (803) (406) (1,209) Total interest-earning assets (2,546) 2,382 (164) (6,377) 1,985 (4,392) Interest expense: Interest-bearing demand (38) (8,578) (8,616) 795 (1,143) (348) Savings 489 748 1,237 316 5,402 5,718 Certificates of deposit 990 (5,209) (4,219) 3,756 8,718 12,474 Borrowings (7,041) (1,865) (8,906) (13,936) (649) (14,585) Total interest-bearing liabilities (5,600) (14,904) (20,504) (9,069) 12,328 3,259 Change in net interest income $ 3,054 $ 17,286 $ 20,340 $ 2,692 $ (10,343) $ (7,651) Provision for Credit Losses. The provision for credit losses decreased by $668,000 to $1.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2026, compared to $2.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2025. The provision for credit losses for the year ended June 30, 2026 was largely attributable to loan growth and increased reserves on individually evaluated loans. The provision for credit losses for the year ended June 30, 2025 was largely attributable to charge-offs, loan growth, and increased reserves on individually evaluated loans. Additional information regarding the allowance for credit losses and the associated provision recognized during the year ended June 30, 2026 is presented under “Item 1, Business” on this Annual Report on Form 10-K as well as in Note 1 and Note 5 to the audited consolidated financial statements. Non-Interest Income. Non-interest income increased $3.8 million to $22.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2026, compared to $19.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2025, primarily driven by $1.8 million in non-recurring pre-tax gains on the sale of properties held for sale in the current period, and increases in loan- and branch-related fees and charges. Fees and service charges increased $1.7 million to $4.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2026, compared to $2.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2025, primarily reflecting $932,000 of higher deposit and branch related fee income, and higher loan related fee income of $752,000. Other income increased $1.9 million to $5.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2026, compared to $3.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2025, primarily driven by non-recurring pre-tax gains of $1.8 million, as discussed above. The remaining changes in the other components of non-interest income between comparative periods generally reflected normal operating fluctuations within those line items. Non-Interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased by $8.4 million to $129.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2026 from $120.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2025, primarily driven by higher salary and benefits expense and other expense. 49 Table of Contents Salaries and employee benefits expense increased by $5.9 million to $76.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2026. This increase was primarily driven by higher salary expense and payroll taxes from annual merit increases, higher incentive compensation, non-recurring severance charges of $950,000 recorded in the current period, and the absence of a $427,000 non-recurring decrease in stock-based compensation recorded in the prior year period. Net occupancy expense of premises increased by $796,000 to $12.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2026. This increase was primarily driven by a non-recurring pre-tax expense of $250,000 associated with the consolidation of three branches, non-recurring branch maintenance expenses of $102,000, and higher snow removal expenses of $223,000. Equipment and systems expense increased $104,000 to $15.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2026. This increase was largely attributable to increases in technology expense associated with the Company’s ongoing digital banking initiatives. Advertising and marketing expense increased $508,000 to $2.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2026. This increase primarily reflects normal fluctuations in the timing of campaigns across various advertising formats supporting our loan and deposit growth initiatives. FDIC insurance premiums decreased $591,000 to $5.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2026, primarily driven by higher capital ratios. Other non-interest expense increased $1.8 million to $15.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2026, primarily driven by $242,000 in non-recurring professional fees incurred in the current period associated with our strategic initiative and partnership with The Lab Consulting, and higher professional fees, loan related expenses and $264,000 in non-recurring other real estate owned acquisition-related expenses. The remaining changes in the other components of non-interest expense between comparative periods generally reflected normal operating fluctuations within those line items. Provision for Income Taxes. Provision for income taxes increased by $6.2 million to $11.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2026, from $4.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2025. The increase in income tax expense was primarily driven by higher pre-tax income in the current period and the establishment of a valuation allowance of $1.6 million against a deferred tax asset related to certain legacy stock-based compensation awards. Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024 A comparison of our operating results for the years ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024 can be found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2025, filed with the SEC on August 21, 2025. 50 Table of Contents Liquidity and Commitments Liquidity, represented by cash and cash equivalents, is a product of operating, investing and financing activities. Our primary sources of funds are deposits, borrowings, cash flows from investment securities and loans receivable and funds provided from operations. While scheduled payments from the amortization and maturity of loans and investment securities are relatively predictable sources of funds, general interest rates, economic conditions and competition greatly influence deposit flows and prepayments on loans and securities. Liquidity, at June 30, 2026, included $114.8 million of short-term cash and equivalents and $964.4 million of investment securities available for sale which can readily be sold or pledged as collateral, if necessary. In addition, we have the capacity to borrow additional funds from the FHLB, FRB or via unsecured overnight borrowings. As of June 30, 2026, we had the capacity to borrow additional funds totaling $351.6 million and $1.30 billion from the FHLB and FRB, respectively, without pledging additional collateral. We had the ability to pledge additional securities to borrow an additional $702.5 million at June 30, 2026. As of that same date, we also had access to unsecured overnight borrowings with other financial institutions totaling $835.0 million, of which none was outstanding. Deposits increased $34.4 million to $5.71 billion at June 30, 2026 from $5.68 billion at June 30, 2025. The increase in deposit balances reflected a $171.6 million decrease in interest-bearing deposits, partially offset by a $206.0 million increase in non-interest-bearing deposits. Borrowings from the FHLB and other sources are generally available to supplement our liquidity position or to replace maturing deposits. As of June 30, 2026, our outstanding balance of FHLB advances, excluding fair value adjustments, totaled $950 million. As of the same date, we had $200.0 million outstanding via our overnight line of credit with the FHLB. The following table sets forth information concerning balances and interest rates on our short-term borrowings at and for the periods shown: At or For the Years Ended June 30, 2026 2025 2024 (Dollars in Thousands) Balance at end of year $ 950,000 $ 1,050,000 $ 1,400,000 Average balance during year $ 889,904 $ 1,024,959 $ 1,314,686 Maximum outstanding at any month end $ 1,165,000 $ 1,425,000 $ 1,490,000 Weighted average interest rate at end of year 3.84 % 4.46 % 5.47 % Weighted average interest rate during year 4.06 % 4.88 % 5.52 % The following table discloses our contractual obligations and commitments as of June 30, 2026: June 30, 2026 Less than One Year One to Three Years Over Three Years to Five Years Over Five Years Total (In Thousands) Contractual obligations Operating lease obligations $ 3,443 $ 4,620 $ 2,430 $ 1,160 $ 11,653 Certificates of deposit 1,874,214 44,945 21,517 — 1,940,676 Federal Home Loan Bank Advances 750,000 200,000 — — 950,000 Total contractual obligations $ 2,627,657 $ 249,565 $ 23,947 $ 1,160 $ 2,902,329 Commitments Undisbursed funds from approved lines of credit(1) $ 83,644 $ 24,517 $ 4,501 $ 96,689 $ 209,351 Construction loans in process(1) 35,272 139,069 — — 174,341 Other commitments to extend credit(1) 105,193 — — — 105,193 Total commitments $ 224,109 $ 163,586 $ 4,501 $ 96,689 $ 488,885 ________________________________________ (1)Represents amounts committed to customers. 51 Table of Contents In addition to the loan commitments noted above, the pipeline of loans held for sale included $19.1 million of in process loans whose terms included interest rate locks to borrowers that were paired with a best-efforts commitment to sell the loan to a buyer at a fixed price and within a predetermined timeframe after the sale commitment is established. In addition to the commitments noted above, we are party to standby letters of credit totaling approximately $138,000 at June 30, 2026 through which we guarantee certain specific business obligations of our commercial customers. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee by the customer. Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. We use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for on-balance-sheet instruments. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. At June 30, 2026, outstanding loan commitments relating to loans held in portfolio totaled $489.0 million compared to $319.1 million at June 30, 2025. Since some of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. For additional information regarding our outstanding lending commitments at June 30, 2026, see Note 16 to the audited consolidated financial statements. Capital Consistent with our goals to operate as a sound and profitable financial organization, Kearny Financial and Kearny Bank actively seek to maintain our well capitalized status in accordance with regulatory standards. As of June 30, 2026, Kearny Financial and Kearny Bank exceeded all capital requirements of the federal banking regulators and were considered well capitalized. The following table presents information regarding the Bank’s regulatory capital levels at June 30, 2026: June 30, 2026 Actual For Capital Adequacy Purposes To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio (Dollars in Thousands) Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) $ 716,311 14.38 % $ 398,556 8.00 % $ 498,196 10.00 % Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) $ 669,370 13.44 % $ 298,917 6.00 % $ 398,556 8.00 % Common equity tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) $ 669,370 13.44 % $ 224,188 4.50 % $ 323,827 6.50 % Tier 1 capital (to adjusted total assets) $ 669,370 8.83 % $ 303,109 4.00 % $ 378,886 5.00 % The following table presents information regarding the consolidated Company’s regulatory capital levels at June 30, 2026: June 30, 2026 Actual For Capital Adequacy Purposes Amount Ratio Amount Ratio (Dollars in Thousands) Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) $ 761,657 15.27 % $ 398,916 8.00 % Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) $ 714,716 14.33 % $ 299,187 6.00 % Common equity tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) $ 714,716 14.33 % $ 224,390 4.50 % Tier 1 capital (to adjusted total assets) $ 714,716 9.41 % $ 303,751 4.00 % For additional information regarding regulatory capital at June 30, 2026, see Note 14 to the audited consolidated financial statements. 52 Table of Contents Recent Accounting Pronouncements For a discussion of the expected impact of recently issued accounting pronouncements that have yet to be adopted by us, please refer to Note 2 to the audited consolidated financial statements.
Read original filing text →Management of Interest Rate Risk and Market Risk The majority of our assets and liabilities are sensitive to changes in interest rates and as such, interest rate risk is a significant form of market risk that we must manage. Interest rate risk is generally defined in regulatory…
Management of Interest Rate Risk and Market Risk The majority of our assets and liabilities are sensitive to changes in interest rates and as such, interest rate risk is a significant form of market risk that we must manage. Interest rate risk is generally defined in regulatory nomenclature as the risk to earnings or capital arising from the movement of interest rates and arises from several risk factors including re-pricing risk, basis risk, yield curve risk and option risk. We maintain an Asset/Liability Management (“ALM”) program in order to manage our interest rate risk. The program is overseen by the Board of Directors through its Interest Rate Risk Management Committee, which has assigned the responsibility for the operational aspects of the ALM program to our Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”), which is comprised of various members of the senior and executive management team. The quantitative analysis that we conduct measures interest rate risk from both a capital and earnings perspective. With regard to earnings, movements in interest rates and the shape of the yield curve significantly influence the amount of net interest income (“NII”) that we recognize. Movements in market interest rates, and the effect of such movements on the risk factors noted above, significantly influence the spread between the interest earned on our interest-earning assets and the interest paid on our interest-bearing liabilities. Our internal interest rate risk analysis calculates the sensitivity of our projected NII over a one year period utilizing a static balance sheet assumption through which incoming and outgoing asset and liability cash flows are reinvested into similar instruments. Product pricing and earning asset prepayment speeds are appropriately adjusted for each rate scenario. With regard to capital, our internal interest rate risk analysis calculates the sensitivity of our Economic Value of Equity (“EVE”) to movements in interest rates. EVE represents the present value of the expected cash flows from our assets less the present value of the expected cash flows arising from our liabilities adjusted for the value of off-balance sheet instruments. EVE attempts to quantify our economic value using a discounted cash flow methodology. The degree to which our EVE changes for any hypothetical interest rate scenario from its base case measurement is a reflection of our sensitivity to interest rate risk. For both earnings and capital at risk our interest rate risk analysis calculates a base case scenario that assumes no change in interest rates. The model then measures changes throughout a series of interest rate scenarios representing immediate and permanent, parallel shifts in the yield curve up and down 100, 200 and 300 basis points with additional scenarios modeled where appropriate. The model requires that interest rates remain positive for all points along the yield curve for each rate scenario which may preclude the modeling of certain falling rate scenarios during periods of lower market interest rates. 53 Table of Contents The following tables present the results of our internal EVE and NII analyses as of June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively: June 30, 2026 1 to 12 Months 13 to 24 Months Change in Interest Rates $ Amount of EVE % Change in EVE $ Amount of NII % Change in NII $ Amount of NII % Change in NII (Dollars in Thousands) +300 bps 635,587 (26.07) % 150,714 (9.87) % 172,690 (8.19) % +200 bps 705,738 (17.91) % 155,133 (7.23) % 177,111 (5.84) % +100 bps 784,867 (8.70) % 160,024 (4.31) % 182,384 (3.03) % 0 bps 859,697 — 167,225 — 188,091 — -100 bps 925,174 7.62 % 175,059 4.68 % 193,652 2.96 % -200 bps 966,194 12.39 % 183,851 9.94 % 195,631 4.01 % -300 bps 1,008,523 17.31 % 191,437 14.48 % 195,300 3.83 % June 30, 2025 1 to 12 Months 13 to 24 Months Change in Interest Rates $ Amount of EVE % Change in EVE $ Amount of NII % Change in NII $ Amount of NII % Change in NII (Dollars in Thousands) +300 bps 404,295 (37.02) % 147,989 (6.79) % 161,747 (8.17) % +200 bps 475,744 (25.89) % 150,539 (5.18) % 165,520 (6.03) % +100 bps 555,065 (13.54) % 153,195 (3.51) % 169,510 (3.77) % 0 bps 641,985 — 158,762 — 176,142 — -100 bps 728,863 13.53 % 162,406 2.30 % 181,671 3.14 % -200 bps 785,464 22.35 % 165,502 4.25 % 184,695 4.86 % -300 bps 852,184 32.74 % 168,238 5.97 % 185,248 5.17 % There are numerous internal and external factors that may contribute to changes in our EVE and its sensitivity. Changes in the composition and allocation of our balance sheet, or utilization of off-balance sheet instruments such as derivatives, can significantly alter the exposure to interest rate risk as quantified by the changes in the EVE sensitivity measures. Changes to certain external factors, most notably changes in the level of market interest rates and overall shape of the yield curve, can also alter the projected cash flows of our interest-earning assets and interest-costing liabilities and the associated present values thereof. Notwithstanding the rate change scenarios presented in the EVE and NII-based analyses above, future interest rates and their effect on net interest income are not predictable. Computations of prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on numerous assumptions, including relative levels of market interest rates, prepayments and deposit run-offs and should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. Certain shortcomings are inherent in this type of computation. Although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of re-pricing, they may react at different times and in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. The interest rate on certain types of assets and liabilities, such as demand deposits and savings accounts, may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while rates on other types of assets and liabilities may lag behind changes in market interest rates. Certain assets, such as adjustable-rate mortgages, generally have features which restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. In the event of a change in interest rates, prepayments and early withdrawal levels could deviate significantly from those assumed in the analyses set forth above. Additionally, an increase in credit risk may result as the ability of borrowers to service their debt may decrease in the event of an interest rate increase. 54 Table of Contents
Read original filing text →The Company’s consolidated financial statements are contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K immediately following Item 16.
The Company’s consolidated financial statements are contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K immediately following Item 16.
Read original filing text →