← Back to EOSE filing summaryThis is the extracted source text from the SEC filing. Formatting may differ from the original document.
From time to time, the Company may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of the Company’s operations. While the outcomes of these types of claims are uncertain, management does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Securities Class Action
On March 6, 2026, a class action lawsuit (the “Yung Complaint”) was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey by plaintiff Shui Shing Yung (“Plaintiff”) against the Company and two individual officers: the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its then acting Chief Financial Officer (with the Company, the “Yung Defendants”). The Yung Complaint alleges that the Yung Defendants violated federal securities laws by making knowingly false or misleading statements about the Company’s manufacturing capabilities and financial outlook. The Yung Complaint seeks compensatory damages for Plaintiff and the other members of the putative class, including interest thereon and attorney’s fees. Several alleged stockholders have filed motions seeking appointment by the Court as lead plaintiff; those motions are pending. The Company intends to vigorously contest this matter.
Shareholder Derivative Action
On March 13, 2026, a shareholder derivative lawsuit (the “Berger Complaint”) was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey by plaintiff Paul Berger against certain defendants including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the Company’s then acting Chief Financial Officer, and nine of the Company’s then current Directors (the “Berger Defendants”). The Berger Complaint alleges that the Berger Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by allowing the Company to make knowingly false or misleading statements about the Company’s manufacturing capabilities and financial outlook. The Berger Complaint seeks declaratory relief, unspecified corporate governance reforms, and compensatory damages, including interest thereon and attorney’s fees.
On March 25, 2026, a shareholder derivative lawsuit (the “Skaff Complaint”) was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey by plaintiff Ronald F. Skaff against certain defendants including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the Company’s then acting Chief Financial Officer, and nine of the then Company’s current Directors (the “Skaff Defendants”). The Skaff Complaint alleges that the Skaff Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by allowing the Company to make knowingly false or misleading statements about the Company’s manufacturing capabilities and financial outlook. The Skaff Complaint seeks declaratory relief, unspecified corporate governance reforms, and compensatory damages including interest thereon and attorney’s fees.
On May 13, 2026, the Berger Complaint and the Skaff Complaint were consolidated into a single action (the “Consolidated Derivative Action”). The Consolidated Derivative Action was then stayed pending resolution of the Yung Complaint, including appeals therefrom. The Company intends to vigorously contest this matter.