LOGC

CONTEXTLOGIC HOLDINGS INC. 1 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS ($ in millions, units and shares in thousands, except par value) (Unaudited) Successor Predecessor As of June 30, As of December 31, 2026 2025 Assets Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 11.0 $ 10.8 Accounts receivable, net 13.6 12.1 Inventories 13.4 10.9 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 1.7 1.0 Total current assets 39.7 34.8 Property, plant and equipment, net 395.6 321.4 Goodwill 148.0 28.1 Intangibles, net 378.3 16.8 Operating lease right-of-use assets 0.8 1.1 Finance lease right-of-use assets 0.4 0.4 Other inventories 5.4 5.2 Total assets $ 968.2 $ 407.8 Liabilities, Members' Equity and Stockholders’ Equity Current liabilities: Accounts payable $ 8.9 $ 8.4 Accrued liabilities 9.5 6.4 Current maturities of long- term debt 2.1 2.3 Current portion of operating lease liability 0.6 0.7 Current portion of finance lease liability 0.1 0.1 Total current liabilities 21.2 17.9 Long-term debt, net of current maturities 209.4 203.1 Long-term portion of operating lease liability 0.2 0.5 Long-term portion of finance lease liability 0.3 0.3 Asset retirement obligations 0.8 0.8 Other noncurrent liabilities 0.8 — Total liabilities 232.7 222.6 Commitments and contingencies (Note 14) Members' equity (Predecessor) Members’ units, Class A: 191 units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2025 181.0 Members’ units, Class B: 3 units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2025 1.5 Subscription note receivable (0.1 ) Retained earnings 1.0 Noncontrolling parent interest 1.8 Total Members Equity 185.2 Stockholders’ equity (Successor) Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value: 100,000 shares authorized as of June 30, 2026; No shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2026 — Common stock, $0.0001 par value: 3,000,000 shares authorized as of June 30, 2026; 45,744 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2026 — Additional paid-in capital 3,635.6 Accumulated deficit (3,343.8 ) Total stockholders’ equity 291.8 Noncontrolling interest (Note 15) 443.7 Total members' equity and stockholders' equity 735.5 185.2 Total liabilities, members' equity, and stockholders’ equity $ 968.2 $ 407.8 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements. 2 CONTEXTLOGIC HOLDINGS INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS ($ in millions, units and shares in thousands, except per unit and share data) (Unaudited) Successor Predecessor Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 Period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 Period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 Three Months Ended June 30, 2025 Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 Net sales $ 33.6 $ 45.7 $ 20.3 $ 33.8 $ 66.1 Cost of sales 21.1 29.4 13.2 20.1 40.5 Gross profit 12.5 16.3 7.1 13.7 25.6 Operating expenses: Selling expense 1.0 1.4 0.7 1.0 2.0 General and administrative 11.7 19.2 1.6 2.4 5.0 Transaction expenses 1.8 22.5 0.1 0.2 0.2 Total operating expenses 14.5 43.1 2.4 3.6 7.2 (Loss) income from operations (2.0 ) (26.8 ) 4.7 10.1 18.4 Other income (expenses) Interest and other income 0.1 0.1 — — — Interest and other expense, net (4.4 ) (6.2 ) (3.0 ) (5.4 ) (10.8 ) (Loss) income before benefit from income taxes (6.3 ) (32.9 ) 1.7 4.7 7.6 Benefit from income taxes — (41.9 ) — — — Net (loss) income (6.3 ) 9.0 1.7 4.7 7.6 Net (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest (Note 15) — — — — — Net income attributable to Parent Holdings Class A unitholders (Predecessor) $ 1.7 $ 4.7 $ 7.6 Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders (Successor) $ (6.3 ) $ 9.0 Net income per unit attributable to Class A unit, basic and diluted (Predecessor) $ 8.91 $ 24.62 $ 39.81 Basic and diluted weighted average Class A units outstanding (Predecessor) 190.9 190.9 190.9 Net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders, basic (Successor) $ (0.14 ) $ 0.20 Net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders, diluted (Successor) $ (0.14 ) $ 0.20 Weighted-average shares used in computing net income per share attributable to common stockholders, basic (Successor) 45,737 45,682 Weighted-average shares used in computing net income per share attributable to common stockholders, diluted (Successor) 45,737 45,690 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements. 3 CONTEXTLOGIC HOLDINGS INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS' EQUITY AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY ($ in millions, units in thousands) (unaudited) Successor Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 Common Stock Additional Paid-in Capital Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Accumulated Deficit Noncontrolling Interest Total Stockholders' Equity Shares Amount Balances as of March 31, 2026 45,730.5 $ — $ 3,635.4 $ — $ (3,337.5 ) $ 443.7 $ 741.6 Issuance of common stock upon settlement of restricted stock units 13.2 — — — — — — Stock-based compensation — — 0.1 — — — 0.1 Net loss — — — — (6.3 ) — (6.3 ) Deferred taxes arising from changes in ownership — — 0.1 — — — 0.1 Balances as of June 30, 2026 45,743.7 $ — $ 3,635.6 $ — $ (3,343.8 ) $ 443.7 $ 735.5 Predecessor Three Months Ended June 30, 2025 Class A Member Units Class B Member Units Subscription Note Receivable Accumulated Deficit Noncontrolling Parent Interest Total Members' Equity Units Amount Units Amount Balances as of March 31, 2025 191.0 $ 183.1 2.7 $ 1.1 $ (0.1 ) $ (7.3 ) $ 1.7 $ 178.5 Members' distributions — (2.1 ) — — — — — (2.1 ) Unit-based compensation expense — — — 0.1 — — — 0.1 Net income — — — — — 4.7 — 4.7 Balances as of June 30, 2025 191.0 $ 181.0 2.7 $ 1.2 $ (0.1 ) $ (2.6 ) $ 1.7 $ 181.2 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements. 4 CONTEXTLOGIC HOLDINGS INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBERS' EQUITY AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY ($ in millions, shares in thousands) (unaudited) Predecessor Period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 Class A Member Units Class B Member Units Subscription Note Receivable Retained Earnings Noncontrolling Parent Interest Total Members' Equity Units Amount Units Amount Balances as of January 1, 2026 190.9 $ 181.0 3.4 $ 1.5 $ (0.1 ) $ 1.0 $ 1.8 $ 185.2 Collection of subscription note receivable — — — — 0.1 — — 0.1 Unit-based compensation expense — — 0.4 0.1 — — — 0.1 Net income — — — — — 1.7 — 1.7 Balances as of February 26, 2026 190.9 $ 181.0 3.8 $ 1.6 $ — $ 2.7 $ 1.8 $ 187.1 Successor Period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 Common Stock Additional Paid-in Capital Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Accumulated Deficit Noncontrolling Interest Total Stockholders' Equity Shares Amount Balances as of February 27, 2026 26,941.2 $ — $ 3,484.3 $ — $ (3,352.8 ) $ — $ 131.5 Issuance of common stock upon settlement of restricted stock units 103.5 — — — — — — Stock-based compensation — — 0.6 — — — 0.6 Net income — — — — 9.0 — 9.0 Issuance of common stock - US Salt Acquisition 15,480.4 — 123.9 — — — 123.9 Issuance of Noncontrolling interest - US Salt Acquisition — — — — — 201.4 201.4 Issuance of common stock - Rights Offering 3,218.6 — 25.5 — — — 25.5 Issuance of subsidiary membership units - Rights Offering backstop — — — — — 89.3 89.3 Conversion of redeemable noncontrolling interest to noncontrolling interest — — — — — 153.0 153.0 Deferred taxes arising from changes in ownership — — 1.3 — — — 1.3 Balances as of June 30, 2026 45,743.7 $ — $ 3,635.6 $ — $ (3,343.8 ) $ 443.7 $ 735.5 Predecessor Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 Class A Member Units Class B Member Units Subscription Note Receivable Accumulated Deficit Noncontrolling Parent Interest Total Members' Equity Units Amount Units Amount Balances as of January 1, 2025 191.0 $ 184.5 2.2 $ 1.2 $ (0.2 ) $ (10.2 ) $ 1.7 $ 177.0 Members' distributions — (3.5 ) — — — — — (3.5 ) Collection of subscription note receivable — — — — 0.1 — — 0.1 Unit-based compensation expense — — 0.7 0.2 — — — 0.2 Repurchase of units — — (0.2 ) (0.2 ) — — — (0.2 ) Net income — — — — — 7.6 — 7.6 Balances as of June 30, 2025 191.0 $ 181.0 2.7 $ 1.2 $ (0.1 ) $ (2.6 ) $ 1.7 $ 181.2 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements. 5 CONTEXTLOGIC HOLDINGS INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in millions) (unaudited) Successor Predecessor Period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 Period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 Cash flows from operating activities: Net income $ 9.0 $ 1.7 $ 7.6 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: Depreciation, depletion, and amortization 13.3 2.7 7.3 Deferred income tax (41.9 ) — — Unit/Stock-based compensation 0.6 0.1 0.2 Long-term incentive plan expense 0.8 — — Other 0.7 0.2 0.9 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable, net (0.1 ) (1.3 ) 0.2 Inventory (0.7 ) (0.7 ) (1.0 ) Prepaid expenses and other current assets (0.1 ) 0.1 0.7 Other inventories (0.2 ) — (0.3 ) Accounts payable (3.6 ) (1.0 ) (1.8 ) Operating lease liabilities (0.3 ) (0.1 ) (0.4 ) Accrued liabilities 2.7 0.1 (1.3 ) Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (19.8 ) 1.8 12.1 Cash flows from investing activities: Purchases of property, plant and equipment (2.3 ) (1.3 ) (4.2 ) Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired (585.2 ) — — Net cash (used in) investing activities (587.5 ) (1.3 ) (4.2 ) Cash flows from financing activities: Proceeds from issuance of common stock from the backstopped rights offering, net of cost 25.5 — — Proceeds from issuance of subsidiary membership units from the backstopped rights offering 89.3 — — Proceeds from issuance of subsidiary membership units, prior to conversion (Note 15) 75.0 — — Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 215.0 — — Payment of debt issuance costs (3.6 ) — — Repayment of principal on term loan — — (4.2 ) Repayment of principal of finance leases obligations — — (0.1 ) Member's distributions — — (3.5 ) Proceeds from collection of unit subscription receivable — — 0.1 Repurchase of units — — (0.2 ) Other (0.2 ) — — Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 401.0 — (7.9 ) Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (206.3 ) 0.5 — Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 217.3 10.8 7.4 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 11.0 $ 11.3 $ 7.4 Supplemental cash flow disclosures: Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds $ — $ — $ — Cash paid for interest $ 5.9 $ — $ 10.7 Supplemental noncash investing and financing activities: Property, plant and equipment in accounts payable $ 0.9 $ 0.5 $ 0.6 Equity exchanged for ownership in US Salt (Note 3) $ 325.2 $ — $ — Conversion of redeemable noncontrolling interest to noncontrolling interest (Note 15) $ 153.0 $ — $ — The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements. 6 CONTEXTLOGIC HOLDINGS INC. Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS ContextLogic Holdings Inc. is a business ownership platform designed from first principles to combine the structural advantages of permanent public capital with the operating discipline, alignment, and long-term orientation typically associated with private ownership. ContextLogic's mission is to build a portfolio of high-quality, niche, and competitively advantaged businesses that generate sustainable, growing free cash flow that can be reinvested over long time horizons. ContextLogic Holdings Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries are referred to herein collectively as "ContextLogic," the "Company," "we," "our" or "us." The US Salt Acquisition On February 26, 2026 ContextLogic Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and majority owned subsidiary (“Holdings”) acquired US Salt Parent Holdings, LLC, a New York based company ("US Salt"), pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement ("Purchase Agreement", such acquisition the "US Salt Acquisition"). US Salt is a leading producer, packager, and distributor of evaporated and specialty salt products originally founded in 1893. The US Salt Acquisition is accounted for as a business combination under Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 805, Business Combinations, using the acquisition method of accounting, and ContextLogic has been determined to be the accounting acquirer. Refer to Note 3, Business Combinations, for more information. NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of Presentation and Consolidation The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP"), pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, regarding interim financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements and therefore should be read in conjunction with the Company’s December 31, 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the six and three months ended June 30, 2026 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period or the full fiscal year. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. For consolidated subsidiaries in which our ownership is less than 100% and for which we have control over the assets and liabilities and the management of the entity, the outside stockholders’ interests are shown as non-controlling interests. As a result of the significance of the relative operations of US Salt acquired in the US Salt Acquisition, US Salt is reflected as the Predecessor to the combined entity for financial statement purposes. Accordingly, all periods presented through the closing date of the US Salt Acquisition, February 26, 2026, reflect the historical balances and results of US Salt and all its majority or wholly owned subsidiaries ("Predecessor"). Periods presented after the closing of the US Salt Acquisition reflect the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary along with Holdings and Holdings' wholly owned subsidiaries, including US Salt ("Successor"). In accordance with the application of acquisition accounting, the assets and liabilities of US Salt acquired by the Company have been remeasured to fair value in the Successor periods. Certain costs were contingent solely upon the consummation of the US Salt Acquisition and are therefore not reflected in either the Predecessor or Successor income statements. These costs, totaling $4.8 million, consist of unit-based incentive compensation expense related to the accelerated vesting of US Salt time-vested and performance-vested incentive units that vested upon the change in control pursuant to pre-existing award agreements. These amounts were fully contingent upon the closing of the US Salt Acquisition and US Salt would not have recognized the expense absent consummation of the transaction. The vested awards were included in the outstanding shares acquired in the US Salt Acquisition; as a result, the fair value of the consideration exchanged for the ownership interests related to the incentive units subject to accelerated vesting is included in the consideration transferred. Refer to Note 15, Equity and Noncontrolling Interest, for additional information related to the incentive units. For the period from January 1 to February 26, 2026, the public company and parent-level items of the Company, distinct and separate from the operating results of US Salt, ("CLHI Corporate") had general and administrative expenses of $1.0 7 million, transaction expenses of $1.4 million, net interest and other income of $1.2 million, net loss of $1.2 million, accretion on CLHI Corporate's redeemable noncontrolling interest's preferred shares of $0.5 million, and a final net loss attributable to common stockholders of $1.7 million. Refer to Note 15, Equity and Noncontrolling Interest, for more information about CLHI Corporate's redeemable noncontrolling interest prior to the US Salt Acquisition. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2025 is derived from the audited consolidated financial statements, however, it does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. Use of Estimates The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgements that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Management evaluates these estimates on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment, and makes adjustments when facts and circumstances dictate. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from those estimates and assumptions. Significant changes, if any, in those estimates and assumptions will be reflected in the consolidated financial statements in future periods. These estimates, assumptions and judgements include, but are not limited to, revenue recognition, impairment analysis of goodwill, depletion of salt reserves, impairment of long-lived assets and finite-lived intangible assets, fair value of financial instruments, contingent liabilities, and uncertain tax positions. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies US Salt Long-Term Incentive Plan The Company accounts for awards under the US Salt 2026 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation. Because the LTIP awards may be settled in cash, a variable number of shares, other equity instruments, or some combination of the three based on a monetary value determined by reference to EBITDA performance rather than the fair value of the Company’s common stock or other equity instruments, the awards are classified as liability awards. Liability-classified awards are remeasured at fair value at each reporting date until settlement, with changes in fair value recognized as stock-based compensation expense over the requisite service period to the extent achievement of the applicable performance condition is considered probable. The Company recognizes compensation cost for the LTIP awards over the requisite service period from the grant date through December 31, 2030, if and when achievement of the applicable performance condition is considered probable. The Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur. The fair value of LTIP awards is estimated using an expected payout method based on the most likely performance scenario as of the applicable measurement date. The estimate incorporates the substantive terms of the awards, including the EBITDA-based performance condition and end-of-period true-up feature. Because the awards are liability-classified, the Company remeasures the LTIP liability at each reporting date until settlement, with changes in fair value recognized as stock-based compensation expense over the requisite service period to the extent achievement of the applicable performance condition is considered probable. Revenue recognition Revenue is recognized at the point in time when control is transferred to the customer. In general, control transfers to a customer when the product is shipped or delivered to the customer based upon applicable shipping terms, as the customer can direct the use and obtain substantially all the remaining benefits from the product at this point in time. The Company’s revenue is reported as net sales and is measured as the determinable transaction price, net of any variable consideration such as discounts, sales incentives, rights to return product, and any taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities. Refer to Note 4, Revenue, for further information. Cost of sales Cost of sales reflects the costs to produce our products, which primarily consists of labor, employee benefits, materials, depreciation and depletion, shipping and handling, and overhead. Cost of sales is capitalized in inventory and expensed when control is transferred to the customer. 8 Accounts receivable, net and allowance for expected credit losses Accounts receivable, net of allowance are uncollateralized customer obligations billed under contract terms. Accounts receivable are stated at their net realizable value. The Company estimates an allowance for credit losses based upon the evaluation of several factors including related ages of past due receivables, customer type, customer credit worthiness, knowledge of a customer’s financial conditions, historical collection experience, current economic factors, and other factors relevant to assessing the expected credit losses. The Company records uncollectible amounts against the allowance for credit losses once management determines the amount to be uncollectible. Concentration of credit and customer risk The Company’s financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash and accounts receivable. Cash balances at various times during the year may exceed the amount insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Company monitors the credit ratings of financial institutions where its cash deposits are held, and has not incurred any losses related to such deposits. The Company can, at times, be subject to a concentration of credit risk with respect to outstanding accounts receivable. The Company’s customers are located throughout the United States through various channels including national retail chains, pharmaceutical companies, food service operators, and independent distributors. Although the Company generally grants credit without collateral, management believes that its contract acceptance, billing and collection policies are adequate to minimize material credit risk. The Company has one major customer which accounted for 14.0% and 10.7% of accounts receivable as of June 30, 2026 (Successor) and December 31, 2025 (Predecessor), respectively. The Company also has one major customer, which accounts for 14.0%, 14.3%, 12.3%, 12.6%, and 13.0% of net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2026 (Successor), the period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 (Successor), the period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (Predecessor), and the three months and six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor), respectively. Inventories and other inventories Salt is reported as inventory at the point in time it is extracted from the brine well. Salt inventories, packaging, supplies, and maintenance materials are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost determined on standard costing method. Substantially all costs associated with the production of finished goods, such as labor, supplies, equipment cost, inbound freight and overhead (including depletion of salt reserves), are captured as inventory costs. Maintenance materials are expensed as consumed or capitalized into property, plant and equipment if it meets the criteria of a capital expenditure. Additionally, maintenance materials that are not expected to be used in the next twelve months from the balance sheet date are recorded as other inventories in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Management monitors inventory levels and adjusts valuation for slow-moving inventory, shrinkage, obsolescence, and markdowns. The Company accounts for slow-moving or obsolete inventory that is established based on management’s estimates of the net realizable value of the related products at the end of each reporting period. Property, plant and equipment, net Property and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and depletion. Expenditures for renewals and improvements that significantly add to the productive capacity or extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense. When depreciable properties are retired or sold, the cost and related accumulated depreciation is eliminated from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method, based on the useful lives of assets which range from three to twenty years. Property, plant and equipment also includes salt reserves, which consist of brine fields and underground salt bed owned by the Company. Salt reserves are depleted on a units-of-production basis based on the estimated annual consumption as extraction of reserves takes place. The following table summarizes the estimated useful lives of the Company’s different classes of property, plant and equipment: 9 Years Buildings and improvements 10 - 20 Machinery and equipment 3 - 14 Construction in Process ("CIP") represents the accumulated costs of construction and development for assets that are not yet completed and ready for their intended use. CIP is recorded as property, plant and equipment in the condensed consolidated financial statements and is not depreciated until the asset is placed into service. Borrowing costs are recognized, as an expense, in the period in which they are incurred, except to the extent that they are capitalized. Borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset are capitalized as part of the cost of that asset when it is probable that they will result in future economic benefits to the entity and that the costs can be measured reliably. The Company capitalized insignificant amounts of interest cost and $0.1 million for three months ended June 30, 2026 (Successor) and June 30, 2025 (Predecessor), respectively. The Company capitalized insignificant amounts of interest cost for the period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 (Successor) and the period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (Predecessor), and capitalized interest costs of $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor). Borrowing costs that are not directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset are recognized in profit or loss. Leases The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at its inception. In certain of the Company’s lease arrangements, judgment is required in determining if a contract contains a lease. For these arrangements, there is judgment in evaluating if the arrangement involves an identified asset that is physically distinct or whether the Company has the right to substantially all of the capacity of an identified asset that is not physically distinct. In arrangements that involve an identified asset, there is also judgment in evaluating if the Company has the right to direct the use of that asset. The Company determines whether an arrangement is or contains a lease, its classification, and its term at the lease commencement date. The Company leases office space, warehouses, and equipment under non‑cancelable operating and finance leases. A lease is classified as a finance lease if it transfers ownership, includes a purchase option reasonably certain to be exercised, covers a major portion of the asset’s economic life, has payments that approximate substantially all of the asset’s fair value, or involves an asset of specialized nature. Leases with a term greater than one year will be recognized on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as right-of-use ("ROU") assets, current lease liabilities, and if applicable, long-term lease liabilities. The Company includes renewal options to extend the lease term where it is reasonably certain that it will exercise these options. Lease liabilities and the corresponding ROU assets are recorded based on the present values of lease payments over the lease term. The interest rate implicit in the Company’s leases are not readily determinable. As such, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate as the discount rate, which approximates the interest rate at which the Company could borrow on a collateralized basis with similar terms and payments and in similar economic environments. The Company’s leases have remaining terms ranging from 1 to 5 years, with some of those leases including options that grant the Company the ability to renew or extend the lease term. When determining the lease term, the Company does not include periods covered by the renewal options unless they are reasonably certain to exercise such renewal options. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company recognizes lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company accounts for lease and non-lease components, principally common area maintenance for its facilities leases, as a single lease component for its facilities leases. Variable lease costs represent additional expenses incurred by the Company that are not included in the lease payment. Variable lease costs include maintenance charges, taxes, insurance, and other similar costs, and are recorded within cost of sales and general and administrative expense on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 (Successor), the period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (Predecessor), and the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor). Debt issuance costs Debt issuance costs are amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the related borrowing agreement and the amortization is included in interest expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The unamortized portion of deferred financing fees associated with long-term borrowings are shown netted against the Company's outstanding long-term debt. Environmental cost Environmental costs, other than those of a capital nature, are accrued at the time when exposure becomes known, and costs can be reasonably estimated. Costs are accrued based upon management’s estimates of all direct costs. Amounts 10 accrued for environmental matters were not material as of June 30, 2026 (Successor) and December 31, 2025 (Predecessor). Asset retirement obligations Legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets are reflected at their estimated fair value, with a corresponding charge to cost of goods sold, at the time they are incurred. Asset retirement obligations ("ARO") primarily consist of spending estimates related to capping brine wells and support facilities in accordance with federal and state reclamation laws as defined by each mining permit. The Company estimates and records the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred and a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The liability is accreted to its present value each period and the capitalized cost is amortized using the units-of-production method over estimated recoverable reserves upon commencement of salt extraction. The amortized cost is included in the cost of sales in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Finite-lived intangible assets and long-lived assets Finite-lived intangible assets acquired by the Company are initially recorded at fair value and amortized using the straight-line method to distribute the initial value of the assets over the estimated useful lives, which management has determined to be between ten and fifteen years. The Company reviews long-lived assets including right-of-use assets and finite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset might not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the use and eventual disposition of the asset. If such assets are considered impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value. There were no impairment indicators of long-lived assets or finite-lived intangibles for the period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 (Successor), the period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (Predecessor), and the six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor). Goodwill Goodwill consists of the excess cost of an acquired business over the fair market value of the underlying net assets. We review goodwill annually for impairment, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. We do not amortize such assets. The Company performs an annual impairment test as of October 1 of each year or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired. As the Company's business is highly integrated and its components have similar economic characteristics, management has concluded the Company operates as one reporting unit at the entity level. The Company evaluates goodwill for potential impairment on an annual basis or when indicators of impairment exist during the year. When the Company evaluates goodwill for potential impairment, generally, the Company first performs a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. A qualitative assessment may include, but is not limited to, reviewing factors such as macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, financial performance and other entity or reporting unit specific events. If the Company determines qualitatively that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, or if the Company decides to bypass the qualitative assessment, the Company performs a quantitative analysis. The quantitative analysis is used to identify both the existence of impairment and the amount of impairment loss by comparing the estimated fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value. The estimated fair value is based on forward-looking estimates of performance and cash flows of the reporting unit, which are based on historical operating results, adjusted for current and expected future market conditions, as well as various internal projections and external sources. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, an impairment loss would be recognized in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations in an amount equal to the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Foreign currency transactions Transactions in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency (USD) using exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Gains and losses on foreign currency transactions are recognized in Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Segment 11 The Company operates in one segment based upon the financial information used by its Chief Operating Decision Maker ("CODM") in evaluating the financial performance of its business and allocating resources. The single segment represents the Company’s core business of selling salt products to its customers. See Note 20, Segment Information, for further information on the Company’s reportable segment. Income taxes The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, the Company determines deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities on the basis of the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities by using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company recognizes deferred tax assets to the extent that it believes that these assets are more likely than not to be realized. In making such a determination, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, carryback potential if permitted under the tax law, and results of recent operations. If the Company determines that it would be able to realize the deferred tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, the Company would make an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, which would reduce the provision for income taxes. The Company records uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC 740 on the basis of a two-step process in which (1) the Company determines whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained on the basis of the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the Company recognizes the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority. It is the Company’s policy to include penalties and interest expense related to income taxes as a component of interest and other expense, net as necessary. Noncontrolling Interest Noncontrolling interest includes the share of Holdings' issued Class A Convertible Preferred Units ("Preferred Units"). These Preferred Units have a preference right upon a liquidation or distribution event to have their capital contribution returned first. Only after all Class A Capital Contribution (total cash or property contributed to Holdings from the Class A Members) has been returned can Class B or Class P Members earn any returns. The Company thus allocates its net income or loss using a balance sheet approach referred to as the hypothetical liquidation at book value ("HLBV") method. Under the HLBV method, the amounts reported as noncontrolling interest represent the amounts Holdings' members would hypothetically receive at each balance sheet date under the liquidation provisions of the Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement (the "Second A&R LLC Agreement"), assuming the net assets of the funding structures were liquidated at their recorded amounts determined in accordance with GAAP. The members' interests in Holdings' results of operations are determined as the difference in noncontrolling interest at the start and end of each reporting period, after taking into account any capital transactions between Holdings and its members. Comprehensive Income The Company had no other comprehensive income or loss for the periods presented. Accordingly, net income equals comprehensive income. Unit-based compensation (Predecessor only) US Salt accounted for unit-based compensation by recording expenses using the fair value of Class B unit ("USPH Class B unit") awards at the time of grant. In estimating the fair value of the USPH Class B units granted, US Salt utilized the option pricing model ("OPM"), in the form of a single stochastic valuation process applying the Black-Scholes Pricing Model ("BSPM"), along with the Monte-Carlo simulation model ("MCSM"). The BSPM and MCSM provided the ability to analyze financial instruments within a complex capital structure and whose values derived from variable significant inputs and assumptions along with future financial outcomes upon future events such as change of control or capital raise (such as an IPO). The application of the valuation method involved inputs and assumptions that were judgmental and highly sensitive. US Salt recognized expenses associated with such USPH Class B unit awards over the service period when the grant was service based. The unit-based compensation expense for performance-based USPH Class B units was recognized when management determined that it was probable that the performance criteria is met and if and only if participant had been 12 continuously employed by or continuously providing services to US Salt from the vesting start date through the date of which the performance criteria is met. US Salt's accounting policy was to recognize forfeitures as they occurred. US Salt may have made cash payments to repurchase vested USPH Class B units and forfeited the unvested USPH Class B units due to termination or departure of an employee or member of the Board of Directors. Upon the repurchase, US Salt recorded the repurchase price (which under the terms of the grant agreements will be at fair value) as a reduction of equity, and the previously recognized compensation expenses for unvested USPH Class B units were reversed. Subscription note receivable (Predecessor only) US Salt was able to issue Class A units ("USPH Class A units") to employees and receive subscription notes receivable. The subscription notes receivable was repaid through cash upon receipt of annual bonus. The notes were able to be voluntarily prepaid at any time without penalty. In addition, the notes required mandatory prepayment, without premium or penalty, upon the purchaser’s receipt of any cash proceeds related to the securities, including cash distributions (other than tax distributions) or transfers of such securities, in an amount equal to the proceeds received. Subscription notes receivable were classified as a deduction from Members' equity within the Condensed Statement of Changes in Members’ Equity. Noncontrolling parent interest (Predecessor only) Emerald Lake Capital LP together with Emerald Fund, Blocker Seller, and Emerald Lake Pearl Holding LLC owned approximately 99.5% of the Class A units of US Salt through EL US Salt Aggregator, LP ("Aggregator"), which held the 1% noncontrolling parent interest in US Salt Intermediate Holdings, LLC. Net income or loss attributable to the noncontrolling parent interest on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations represented the portion of earnings or losses attributable to the interest in US Salt's subsidiaries held by Aggregator. Net income per unit (Predecessor only) As of December 31, 2025 (Predecessor), US Salt had outstanding subscription notes receivable from members when certain USPH Class A units were issued. US Salt concluded that it 1) could cancel the USPH Class A units if the member defaulted on the subscription notes receivable and (2) intended to exercise this cancellation right. For net income per unit calculation purposes, US Salt treated the unpaid USPH Class A units that were issued and legally outstanding in the same manner as an option. The unpaid USPH Class A units were issued and legally outstanding and had the same distribution and participation rights as the paid USPH Class A units. Net income per unit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor) was calculated using the two-class method. The two-class method required an allocation of earnings to all securities (USPH Class A units and USPH Class B units) that participated in net income to the extent that each such security was able to share in US Salt's earnings. Basic net income per unit was calculated by dividing net income attributable to Parent Holdings Class A members by the weighted average number of USPH Class A units. Diluted net income per unit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor) was calculated by applying the two-class method for participating securities and then incorporating the dilutive effects of other potential USPH Class A units, determined using the treasury stock method, to arrive at the most dilutive net income per unit. The two-class method used net income available to Class A members and assumed conversion of all potential units other than the participating securities. There were no dilutive securities outstanding as of December 31, 2025 (Predecessor). Besides the above, there have been no changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies described in its 2025 Form 10-K that have had a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements. Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements In July 2025, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2025-05, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets, which amends the guidance in ASC 326 to simplify the estimation of credit losses on current accounts receivable and current contract assets arising from transactions accounted for under ASC 606. The amendments allow all entities to elect a practical expedient to assume that the current conditions as of the balance sheet date will remain unchanged for the remaining life of the asset when developing a reasonable and supportable forecast as part of estimating expected credit losses on these assets. Entities are required to disclose their practical expedient and accounting policy elections. The Company has applied this amendment prospectively starting in 2026. There was no significant impact upon adopting this standard. Accounting Pronouncements The Company has reviewed recent accounting pronouncements and concluded as follows: 13 In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, which requires disclosure of specified information about certain costs and expenses including the amounts of purchase of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, intangible asset amortization, and depreciation, depletion, and amortization recognized as part of oil- and gas-producing activities, and the total amount of selling expenses and an entity's definition of selling expenses. The amendments in this ASU are effective to all public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact this guidance may have on the consolidated financial statements. In January 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-01, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Clarifying the Effective Date, which clarified the effective date of ASU No. 2024-03 to be annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim periods within the annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The amendments in this ASU are effective to all public business entities. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact this guidance may have on the footnotes to the condensed consolidated financial statements together with ASU No. 2024-03. In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvements, which was intended to provide clarity without changing, expanding, or reducing current interim reporting or disclosure requirements. The amendments in this ASU are effective to all entities that provide interim financial statements and notes in accordance with GAAP for interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027 for public business entities and for interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2028 for entities other than public entities. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact this amended guidance may have on the footnotes to the condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company has considered all other recently issued accounting pronouncements and concluded they are either not applicable to the business or no material impact is expected on the condensed consolidated financial statements or notes as a result of future adoption. NOTE 3. Business Combinations The Company, together with Holdings, completed the US Salt Acquisition on February 26, 2026, resulting in the acquisition of 100% of the issued and outstanding equity units of US Salt (the "Business Combination"). US Salt is a leading provider in the evaporated salt market, specializing in the extraction, refinement, and packaging of specialty salts. Its products serve diverse sectors, including retail grocery, pharmaceuticals, industrial applications, and food service. As a result of the US Salt Acquisition, the Company’s financial statement presentation distinguishes US Salt as the "Predecessor" through February 26, 2026 (the "Closing Date"). The Company, which consolidated US Salt subsequent to the Business Combination, is the "Successor" for periods after the Closing Date. As a result of the application of the acquisition method of accounting in the Successor period, the financial statements for the Successor period present US Salt on a full step-up basis as a result of the Business Combination, and are therefore not comparable to the financial statements of the Predecessor period that are not presented on the same full step-up basis. During the period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 (Successor) and the period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (Predecessor), the Company incurred $21.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of transaction costs related to the acquisition of US Salt. These expenses are included in transaction expenses on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for each respective period. The fair value of the total consideration transferred was determined as follows: Fair Value Consideration Transferred (in millions) Payments made to the Seller Parties Cash consideration $ 386.8 Repayment of US Salt debt 209.7 Total cash consideration 596.5 Rollover equity 325.2 Total equity consideration 325.2 Total consideration $ 921.7 14 The equity consideration was calculated based on the number of shares issued at $8.00 per share and determined as follows: Fair Value Equity Consideration ($ in millions, shares in thousands) ContextLogic common shares issued to consummate the US Salt Acquisition 15,480.4 Holdings preferred units issued to consummate the US Salt Acquisition 25,175.6 Total shares issued 40,656.0 Price per share issued $ 8.00 Fair value of the equity consideration $ 325.2 The Company has applied the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, and recognized assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their fair values as of the Closing Date, with the excess consideration transferred recorded to goodwill. The Company is continuing to obtain information to complete its valuation of certain assets and liabilities. Preliminary estimates have been recorded and additional adjustments may be recorded to the fair value of intangible assets, property, plant and equipment, goodwill and deferred income taxes among other items during the measurement period, a period not to exceed 12 months from the Closing Date. The following table summarizes the preliminary acquisition date fair value of tangible and intangible assets acquired, net of liabilities assumed as part of the US Salt Acquisition: Fair Value (in millions) Cash and cash equivalents $ 11.3 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 0.9 Accounts receivable 13.4 Inventory 12.7 Property, plant and equipment 396.7 Intangible assets 388.0 Right-of-use asset 1.5 Other noncurrent assets 5.2 Total assets 829.7 Accrued liabilities 4.2 Accounts payable 6.8 Current portion of lease liability 0.7 Current maturities of long-term debt 0.3 Deferred tax liability 43.2 Lease liabilities, non-current 0.8 Net assets acquired 773.7 Goodwill 148.0 Total net assets acquired $ 921.7 The details on the methodology and significant inputs used for fair value of valuation are outlined below. Goodwill Preliminary allocation of consideration transferred resulted in $148.0 million in goodwill. The goodwill is amortizable for tax purposes. The factors contributing to the recognition of the amount of goodwill are based on several strategic and synergistic benefits that are expected to be realized from the acquisition. Inventory The fair value of inventory was determined by the market selling price of the inventory, less the remaining manufacturing and selling costs and a normal profit margin on those manufacturing and selling efforts. The fair value of inventory has been stepped up by $1.1 million. This amount has been fully amortized to cost of sales to align with US Salt’s historical inventory turnover. 15 Property, Plant and Equipment The fair value of property, plant and equipment of $396.7 million, of which of $310.0 million was salt reserves, was determined using cost and market approaches. The cost approach reflects the amount that would be required to replace the asset to service capacity. This approach was used where there was historical data available. Where there was no historical data available the market approach was used which reflects recent sales of identical or comparable assets. Intangible Assets The fair value of acquired intangible assets was $388.0 million. The fair value of customer relationships was determined using the multi-period excess earnings method. Key assumptions under this method are the revenue growth rate, adjusted EBITDA margin, customer attrition rate, discount rate, tax rate and contributory asset charges. The fair value of trade names were determined using the relief from royalty method. Key assumptions under this method are future cash flow estimates, royalty rate and discount rate. The fair value of permits were determined using the income approach method. Key assumptions under this method are future economic benefits and discount rate. Estimated Useful Life Estimated Asset Fair Value (in years) (in millions) Trade names and trademark 15 $ 28.0 Permits 10 100.0 Customer relationships 15 260.0 Identifiable intangible assets, net $ 388.0 Debt ContextLogic paid off the outstanding debt and related fees and balances of US Salt on the Closing Date amounting to $209.7 million. Pro Forma Financial Information The following unaudited pro forma information presents the net sales and earnings as if the US Salt Acquisition occurred on January 1, 2025. As a result, the unaudited pro forma financial information does not require predecessor and successor periods because the transaction, the related combination of the Company and US Salt, and the new basis applied in accordance with acquisition accounting is reflected for the entirety of the two periods presented. Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 2026 2025 2026 (in millions) (in millions) (in millions) (in millions) Pro forma net sales $ 33.8 $ 33.6 $ 66.1 $ 66.0 Pro forma net (income) loss 7.2 8.9 (5.9 ) 16.8 Pro forma net (income) attributable to controlling interest 7.2 8.9 (5.9 ) 16.8 Pro forma net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest — — — — The unaudited pro forma financial information for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2026 include adjustments to reflect the increased tangible asset depreciation, intangible asset amortization, and interest expense related to the new debt assumed. There were no recurring direct transaction costs incurred in connection with the US Salt Acquisition. The unaudited pro forma financial information does not assume any impacts from net sales, cost or other operating synergies that could be generated as a result of the US Salt Acquisition. The unaudited pro forma financial information is for informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved had the US Salt Acquisition been consummated on January 1, 2025. The unaudited pro forma results may not necessarily reflect the actual results of operations that would have been achieved nor are they necessarily indicative of future results of operations. 16 NOTE 4. REVENUE Revenue recognition Nature of Revenue Source - The Company manufactures and sells a range of branded and private label evaporated salt products to nationwide retailers, pharmaceutical companies, foodservice operators, and independent distributors. When the Company enters into a sale arrangement with a customer, it believes it is probable that it will collect substantially all the consideration to which it will be entitled in exchange for the goods that will be transferred to the customer. The Company’s customer contracts identify the product, quantity, price, payment terms, and final delivery terms. Payment terms sometimes include early-pay discounts. Although some payment terms may be extended, no terms beyond one year are granted at contract inception. The Company determines revenue recognition through the following steps: •Identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer •Identification of the performance obligations in the contract •Determination of the transaction price •Allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract •Recognition of revenue when, or as, the Company satisfies a performance obligation Performance Obligations - A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer and is the unit of account in FASB ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The contract's transaction price is allocated to the performance obligations and recognized as revenue when the performance obligations are satisfied. Substantially all our contracts are of a short-term nature and contain a single performance obligation. Because the Company’s agreements have an expected duration of one year or less, the Company has elected the practical expedient in ASC 606-10-50-14(a) to not disclose information about its remaining performance obligations. Shipping and handling costs associated with outbound freight, including shipping and handling costs after control over a product is transferred to a customer are accounted for as a fulfillment cost as incurred and are not considered to be a separate performance obligation. Shipping and handling costs recorded as a component of cost of sales were approximately $2.6 million and $2.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 (Successor) and June 30, 2025 (Predecessor), respectively. Shipping and handling costs recorded as a component of cost of sales were approximately $3.5 million, $1.3 million, and $4.8 million for the period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 (Successor), the period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (Predecessor), and the six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor), respectively. Contract Estimates - Most contracts include some form of variable consideration. The most common forms of variable consideration include discounts, rebates, and sales returns and allowances. Variable consideration is treated as a reduction in revenue when product revenue is recognized. The Company uses the most likely amount method to determine the variable consideration. The Company believes there will not be significant changes to estimates of variable consideration when any related uncertainties are resolved with customers. The Company reviews and updates its estimates and related accruals of variable consideration each reporting period based on the terms of the agreements, historical experience, and any recent changes in the market. Any uncertainties in the ultimate resolution of variable consideration due to factors outside of the Company’s influence are typically resolved within a short timeframe therefore not requiring any additional constraint on the variable consideration. Approximately 99.8% of the Company’s net sales are generated from North America, and 92.5% and 92.4% of which is from domestic sales for the three months ended June 30, 2026 (Successor) and June 30, 2025 (Predecessor), respectively. Approximately 99.7%, 99.8%, and 99.7% of the Company’s net sales are generated from North America, and 92.6%, 94.1%, and 92.3% of which is from domestic sales for the period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 (Successor), the period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (Predecessor), and the six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor), respectively. The Company offers customers limited right of return for its non-conforming products in the event of defects. Customer remedies may include either a cash refund or product exchange. Accordingly, the estimated right of return and related refund liability is recorded as a reduction in net sales. Return estimates are reviewed and updated in each reporting period based on historical sales and return experiences. Contract asset and liability balances as of June 30, 2026 (Successor) and December 31, 2025 (Predecessor) are immaterial. 17 Revenue disaggregation The Company has vertically integrated operations under which the Company solution mines, manufactures, processes, packages, markets, distributes and sells salt either as packaged products prepared on-site at the Watkins Glen, New York facility or as non-packaged products which are shipped in bulk or packaged at a third party facility. The following table disaggregates revenue between these two product categories: Successor Predecessor Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 Period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 Period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 Three Months Ended June 30, 2025 Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 (in millions) (in millions) (in millions) (in millions) (in millions) Packaged $ 29.8 $ 40.1 $ 17.5 $ 29.9 $ 58.0 Non-packaged 3.8 5.6 2.8 3.9 8.1 Total net sales $ 33.6 $ 45.7 $ 20.3 $ 33.8 $ 66.1 18 NOTE 5. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT GAAP establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy to classify and disclose all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as well as assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, in periods subsequent to their initial measurement. The hierarchy requires the Company to use observable inputs when available and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. The three tiers are defined as follows: Level 1 - Observable inputs based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 - Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and Level 3 - Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, and which require us to develop our own estimates and assumptions reflecting those that a market participant would use. The asset or liability’s fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques maximize the use of relevant observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. There were no instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs during the period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 (Successor), the period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (Predecessor), and the six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor). Related to the US Salt Acquisition, the Company applied fair value measurements on a nonrecurring basis to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Refer to Note 3, Business Combinations, for further details. The valuation techniques that may be used to measure fair value are as follows: •Market approach - Uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities; •Income approach - Uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based on current market expectations about those future amounts; and •Cost approach - Based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (i.e., replacement cost). The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities. Cash equivalents’ carrying value approximates fair value at the balance sheet dates, due to the short period of time to maturity. Accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities carrying values approximate fair value due to the short time to the expected receipt or payment date. As of June 30, 2026 (Successor), the Company’s "cash and cash equivalents" line item was comprised of cash deposited with banks and money market funds. The Company classifies cash equivalents within Level I of the fair value hierarchy because they were valued using quoted prices in active markets. A breakdown of cash and cash equivalents is as follows: Successor Predecessor June 30, 2026 December 31, 2025 Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value (in millions) (in millions) Cash $ 2.5 $ 2.5 $ 0.2 $ 0.2 Money market funds 8.5 8.5 10.6 10.6 Total cash and cash equivalents $ 11.0 $ 11.0 $ 10.8 $ 10.8 Disclosure of Fair Values The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair value as of June 30, 2026 (Successor) and December 31, 2025 (Predecessor) due to the relatively short duration of these instruments. Additionally, the carrying value of debt associated with the term loan facility approximates fair value because the interest rates are variable and reset on relatively short durations to then-market rates. NOTE 6: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 19 Accounts receivable, net of allowance for expected credit losses, is as follows: Successor Predecessor June 30, 2026 December 31, 2025 (in millions) (in millions) Accounts receivable $ 13.7 $ 12.2 Less: allowance for expected credit losses (0.1 ) (0.1 ) Total $ 13.6 $ 12.1 A roll forward of the allowance for expected credit losses is presented below: Predecessor Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 (in millions) Balance as of December 31, 2024 (Predecessor) $ 0.4 Add: bad debt expenses — Less: write-offs — Balance as of June 30, 2025 (Predecessor) $ 0.4 Predecessor Period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (in millions) Balance as of December 31, 2025 (Predecessor) $ 0.1 Add: bad debt expenses — Less: write-offs — Balance as of February 26, 2026 (Predecessor) $ 0.1 Successor Period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 Balance as of February 27, 2026 (Successor) $ 0.1 Add: bad debt expenses — Less: write-offs — Balance as of June 30, 2026 (Successor) $ 0.1 NOTE 7: INVENTORIES Inventories are as follows: Successor Predecessor June 30, 2026 December 31, 2025 (in millions) (in millions) Finished Goods $ 3.5 $ 2.4 Packaging and supplies 6.3 5.5 Maintenance materials 3.6 3.0 Total $ 13.4 $ 10.9 Maintenance materials exclude certain materials of $5.4 million and $5.2 million as of June 30, 2026 (Successor) and December 31, 2025 (Predecessor), respectively, that are not expected to be consumed within the next twelve months. These amounts are classified under other inventories in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Finished goods are shown at net realizable amount which includes write downs for obsolescence of $0.1 million and $0.3 million as of June 30, 2026 (Successor) and December 31, 2025 (Predecessor), respectively. 20 NOTE 8: PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET Property, plant and equipment, net are as follows: Successor Predecessor June 30, 2026 December 31, 2025 (in millions) (in millions) Land $ 6.7 $ 2.0 Buildings and improvements 17.7 20.1 Machinery and equipment 62.5 69.8 Salt reserves 310.0 275.3 Construction in process 2.3 2.2 399.2 369.4 Accumulated depreciation and depletion (3.6 ) (48.0 ) Total $ 395.6 $ 321.4 Depreciation and depletion expense are included in the following financial statement line items in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations: Successor Predecessor Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 Period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 Period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 Three Months Ended June 30, 2025 Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 (in millions) (in millions) (in millions) (in millions) (in millions) Cost of sales $ 2.7 $ 3.6 $ 2.4 $ 3.2 $ 6.4 Selling expense — — — — — General and administrative expense — — — 0.1 0.1 Total $ 2.7 $ 3.6 $ 2.4 $ 3.3 $ 6.5 The Company recognized a $0.1 million loss from disposal on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2026 (Successor) and no such loss for the three months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor). The Company recognized a $0.1 million loss from disposal on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 (Successor), no such loss for the period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (Predecessor), and an insignificant loss from disposal for the six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor). NOTE 9: GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS Goodwill The carrying amount of goodwill was $148.0 million and $28.1 million as of June 30, 2026 (Successor) and December 31, 2025 (Predecessor), respectively. There was no impairment of goodwill for the three months ended June 30, 2026 (Successor) and June 30, 2025 (Predecessor). There was no impairment of goodwill for the period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 (Successor), the period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (Predecessor), and the six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor). Intangible Assets Intangible assets and related accumulated amortization which are included in intangible assets, net in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows: 21 Successor June 30, 2026 Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Amount (in millions) Tradename $ 28.0 $ (0.6 ) $ 27.4 Customer relationships 260.0 (5.8 ) 254.2 Permits 100.0 (3.3 ) 96.7 Total $ 388.0 $ (9.7 ) $ 378.3 Predecessor December 31, 2025 Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Amount (in millions) Tradename $ 21.8 $ (6.7 ) $ 15.1 Customer relationships 2.4 (0.7 ) 1.7 Total $ 24.2 $ (7.4 ) $ 16.8 Amortization expense of the finite-lived intangible assets for the three months ended June 30, 2026 (Successor) and June 30, 2025 (Predecessor) was $7.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Amortization expense of the finite-lived intangible assets for the period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 (Successor), the period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (Predecessor) and the six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor) was $9.7 million, $0.3 million, and $0.8 million, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The estimated net amortization expense for the finite-lived intangible assets is $14.6 million for the remainder of 2026, $29.2 million per year for each of the four years ending December 31, 2027 through 2030, and $246.9 million thereafter. The remaining useful lives for the intangible assets is 10 years for permits and 15 years for trademarks and customer relationships. 22 NOTE 10. BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following: Successor Predecessor June 30, 2026 December 31, 2025 (in millions) (in millions) Prepaid insurance $ 0.7 $ 0.7 Other prepaid expenses 0.8 0.3 Other current assets 0.2 — Total $ 1.7 $ 1.0 Accrued liabilities consist of the following: Successor Predecessor June 30, 2026 December 31, 2025 (in millions) (in millions) Accrued payroll, bonus, and employee benefits $ 3.1 $ 3.9 Contingent loss accrual(1) 3.5 — Accrued services(2) 1.3 0.9 Rail car repair accrual(3) 0.8 0.7 Well capping accrual 0.3 0.3 Accrued insurance services — 0.5 Other accruals 0.5 0.1 Total $ 9.5 $ 6.4 (1)Estimated contingent loss related to a legal case settlement. Refer to Note 14, Commitments and Contingencies, for further information. (2)Accrued services primarily consist of professional services related to investigating potential acquisitions and other routine services. (3)Rail car accrual represents the expected cost of disposing of or repairing leased railcars. NOTE 11: LEASES The Company enters into leases for warehouses, rail cars, forklifts, office equipment, office space and certain other types of property and equipment. The leases consist of operating and financing leases expiring in various years through 2030. The elements of the lease costs were as follows: Successor Successor Predecessor Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 Period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 Period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 Three Months Ended June 30, 2025 Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 (in millions) (in millions) (in millions) (in millions) (in millions) Operating lease expense: Operating lease expense $ 0.2 $ 0.3 $ 0.2 $ 0.2 $ 0.4 Short term lease expense $ 0.1 $ 0.1 $ — $ 0.1 $ 0.3 Variable lease expense 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.4 Total lease expense $ 0.6 $ 0.8 $ 0.4 $ 0.5 $ 1.1 Total finance lease expense for the three months ended June 30, 2026 (Successor) and June 30, 2025 (Predecessor) was insignificant. Total finance lease expense for the period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 (Successor), the period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (Predecessor), and for the three months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor) was $0.1 million, insignificant, and $0.1 million, respectively. Lease term and discount rate information related to leases were as follows: 23 Successor Predecessor June 30, 2026 December 31, 2025 Weighted-average remaining lease term (in years) Operating leases 1.88 2.05 Finance leases 3.41 3.84 Weighted-average discount rate Operating leases 7.51 % 9.81 % Finance leases 7.36 % 10.53 % Supplemental cash flow information related to leases was as follows: Successor Predecessor Period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 Period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 (in millions) (in millions) (in millions) Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities Operating cash flows from finance lease (interest payments) $ — $ — $ — Operating cash flows from operating leases 0.3 0.2 0.4 Financing cash flows from finance lease — — — Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities Operating leases $ — $ — $ 0.3 Finance leases — — 0.1 Future maturities of lease liabilities are as follows: Successor June 30, 2026 Operating Leases Finance Leases Year ending December 31, (in millions) 2026 $ 0.4 $ 0.1 2027 0.4 0.2 2028 0.1 0.1 2029 0.1 0.1 2030 — — Thereafter — — Total future undiscounted lease payments 1.0 0.5 Imputed interest (0.2 ) (0.1 ) Present value of lease payments 0.8 0.4 Current portion (0.6 ) (0.1 ) Long-term portion of lease payments $ 0.2 $ 0.3 NOTE 12: LONG TERM DEBT Long-term debt consists of the following: 24 Successor Predecessor June 30, 2026 December 31, 2025 (in millions) (in millions) Term loan $ 215.0 $ 206.7 Unamortized debt discount and issuance (3.5 ) (1.3 ) Current portion (2.1 ) (2.3 ) Long-term portion $ 209.4 $ 203.1 Ares Capital Credit Agreement (Predecessor) In July 2021, US Salt entered into a credit agreement with Ares Capital Corporation, as the administrative agent, and other parties thereto. The credit agreement consists of a $232.0 million term loan, and up to $25.0 million of revolving line of credit. Interest rate for the term loan and revolving line of credit as of December 31, 2025 (Predecessor) was 9.4%, which was SOFR plus 5.40%. Interest rate for the revolving line of credit is the greater of 4.50% plus prime rate, NYFRB (New York Federal Reserve Bank) rate plus 5.00% or SOFR (subject to .75% floor) plus 5.50%-5.65%. The term loan requires quarterly principal payments of $0.6 million commencing on March 31, 2022 through maturity date of July 19, 2028, at which time the remaining principal balance is due. The term loan is subject to mandatory excess cash flow payments commencing for the year ended December 31, 2022 as defined in the credit agreement, not to exceed $5 million for any fiscal year. As of December 31, 2025 (Predecessor), the Company was not required to make additional term loan repayments due to Excess Cash Flow for the year ended December 31, 2025 (Predecessor). The revolving line of credit expires on July 19, 2026 and is subject to commitment fee of 0.50% per annum. The Company had no borrowings outstanding on the revolving line of credit as of December 31, 2025 (Predecessor). The unused amount of credit available under this facility is $25.0 million as of December 31, 2025 (Predecessor). The term loan and the revolving line of credit are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and subject to certain financial covenants. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants as of December 31, 2025 (Predecessor). In relation to the credit agreement, the Company paid debt issuance cost of $5.1 million, which is amortized over the life of the credit agreement using effective interest rate of 6.83%. Amortization of debt issuance cost for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor) was $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, and is included in interest expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. In February 2026, the Company paid off the $209.7 million remainder of this credit agreement and related accrued interest upon the consummation of the US Salt Acquisition. Wilmington Trust Credit Agreement (Successor) In February 2026, Holdings entered into the Credit Agreement with Wilmington Trust, National Association, as administrative agent, and the Lenders thereto (the "Wilmington Trust Credit Facility"), which consists of a $215.0 million term loan facility and an up to $25.0 million revolving credit facility. Interest rate for the Initial Term Loans and Revolving Loans as of June 30, 2026 was 7.98%, which was SOFR plus 4.25%. Interest rate for the revolving line of credit is at a base rate or a term SOFR rate plus an applicable margin between 4.00% and 4.50%, depending on the Borrower's Consolidated First Lien Net Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement). The term loan requires quarterly principal payments of $0.5 million with the first payment due on September 30, 2026 through the maturity date of February 26, 2033, at which time the remaining principal balance is due. The term loan is subject to mandatory Excess Cash Flow ("ECF") payments commencing for the year ended December 31, 2027. The ECF payments are calculated by multiplying the Applicable ECF Percentage (as defined in the Credit Agreement) against the fiscal year's ECF (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to the extent that ECF exceeds the greater of $9.5 million and 15.0% of TTM EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement). The Applicable ECF Percentage is determined based on the Consolidated First Lien Net Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) as of the last day of the fiscal year as follows: 0% if less than or equal to 2.50x; 25% if greater than 2.50x but less than or equal to 3.00x; and 50% if greater than 3.00x. These ECF payments are due within ten business days after delivery of both the annual audited financial statements and the related Compliance Certificate (as defined in the Credit Agreement). 25 The revolving line of credit expires on February 26, 2033 and is subject to a commitment fee on the unused available commitment between 0.375% and 0.50% per annum, determined by the Borrower’s Consolidated First Lien Net Leverage Ratio. The Company had no borrowings outstanding on the revolving line of credit at June 30, 2026 (Successor). The unused amount of credit available under this facility is $25.0 million as of June 30, 2026 (Successor). The term loan and revolving line of credit are secured by substantially all of the assets of US Salt and subject to certain financial covenants which are not due until 60 days after quarter-end for 2026 and 45 days after quarter-end beginning in 2027. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants as of June 30, 2026 (Successor). In relation to the Wilmington Trust Credit Agreement, aggregate debt discount and debt issuance costs totaled $3.6 million, which is amortized over the life of the credit agreement using an effective interest rate of 8.27%. Amortization of debt discount and issuance cost for the three months ended June 30, 2026 (Successor) and for the period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 (Successor) was $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, and was reported as interest expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, conditions to borrowing and events of default. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants as of June 30, 2026 (Successor). The following table summarizes the annual maturities of the principal amount of total debt due: Successor June 30, 2026 Year ending December 31, (in millions) Remaining 2026 $ 1.1 2027 2.2 2028 2.2 2029 2.2 2030 2.2 Thereafter 205.1 Total maturities $ 215.0 NOTE 13: ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS The following summarizes the changes in the asset retirement obligation during the period: Balance as of December 31, 2024 (Predecessor) $ 0.8 Liabilities incurred — Changes in estimated obligations — Accretion of expense — Balance as of June 30, 2025 (Predecessor) $ 0.8 Balance as of December 31, 2025 (Predecessor) $ 0.8 Liabilities incurred — Changes in estimated obligations — Accretion of expense — Balance as of February 26, 2026 (Predecessor) $ 0.8 Balance as of February 27, 2026 (Successor) $ 0.8 Liabilities incurred — Changes in estimated obligations — Accretion of expense — Balance as of June 30, 2026 (Successor) $ 0.8 In connection with certain contracts, the Company is required to hold surety bonds. These bonds are supported by a general agreement of indemnity in favor of the sureties. As of June 30, 2026 (Successor) and December 31, 2025 (Predecessor), 26 the Company had surety bonds outstanding with an aggregate stated amount of $1.1 million. The bonds relate primarily to the salt well plugging projects and generally expire and are renewed annually. The Company’s estimated abandonment costs related to plugging and abandonment of injection wells under these surety bonds are reported as part of asset retirement obligation in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of June 30, 2026 (Successor) and December 31, 2025 (Predecessor), management has not identified any defaults, and no accrual related to these bonds has been recorded. Bond premiums paid are recorded as prepaid expenses and amortized over the period of benefit. 27 NOTE 14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES IPO Securities Class Action Settlement As previously disclosed, the Company, its directors, certain of its officers and the underwriters named in its initial public offering (“IPO”) registration statement were named as defendants in a consolidated class action complaint pursuant to Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act first filed in May 2021. In May 2026, the Company entered into an agreement to settle these matters for $3.5 million in cash, without admission of liability or wrongdoing. The Company recorded an accrual of $3.5 million during the period ending February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 (Successor), which is included in accrued liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Under the agreement, an initial $1.8M of the settlement was placed in an interest-bearing escrow account after June 30, 2026 but before the date of filing. The Company expects to use these escrowed funds and existing cash on hand to fund the settlement payment when it becomes due. Upon acceptance by the Court and payout of the settlement amount, this matter will be fully resolved. Legal Contingencies and Proceedings In August 2021, a shareholder derivative action purportedly brought on behalf of the Company, Patel v. Szulczewski, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California alleging that the Company’s directors and officers made or caused the Company to make false and/or misleading statements about the Company’s business operations and financial prospects in various public filings. Plaintiff asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duties, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets, violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act, and for contribution under Sections 10(b) and 21D of the Exchange Act and is seeking monetary damages. This matter is currently stayed. The Company believes this lawsuit is without merit and it intends to vigorously defend it. Based on the preliminary nature of the proceedings in these cases, the Company cannot estimate a range of potential losses at this point in time. As of June 30, 2026 (Successor), in the opinion of management, there were no other legal contingency matters that arose in the ordinary course of business, either individually or in aggregate, that would have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company. Given the unpredictable nature of legal proceedings, the Company bases its estimate on the information available at the time of the assessment. As additional information becomes available, the Company will reassess the potential liability and may revise the estimate. NOTE 15. EQUITY AND NONCONTROLLING INTEREST Members' Equity (Predecessor) Members' units US Salt was authorized to issue USPH Class A units and USPH Class B units. There was no set number for authorized units and no par value was assigned to USPH Class A and USPH Class B units. US Salt was able to issue additional units, including USPH Class B units as management incentive units as approved by its Board of Directors. USPH Class A units represented capital interests and were entitled to priority distributions and liquidation proceeds until invested capital had been returned. USPH Class B units were generally issued as management incentive (profit) interests and participated in US Salt's residual economics only after applicable participation thresholds and vesting conditions were satisfied. Voting rights The authority to manage the business, make decisions, and act on behalf of US Salt resided exclusively with its Board of Directors, except for certain limited matters specifically designated as board of governance exceptions. Holders of USPH Class A units or USPH Class B units did not possess voting, consent, or approval rights with respect to the management or governance of US Salt, other than with respect to these limited exceptions. The composition of US Salt's Board of Directors included both Emerald Lake‑designated Managers ("ELCM Managers") and Additional Managers. For any meeting of its Board of Directors or its committees, at least one ELCM Manager had to be present to constitute a quorum. Actions of its Board of Directors was able to be approved by a majority of votes cast at a meeting where a quorum is present. The ELCM Managers collectively held a number of votes equal to the greater of (i) the number of ELCM Managers present at the meeting or (ii) one plus the number of non‑ELCM Managers present. Each ELCM Manager was entitled to cast a proportionate share of these collective ELCM votes. Each Additional Manager held one vote. If no ELCM Manager remained present during a meeting, the quorum was lost and no further business was able to be conducted until a quorum was re‑established. The authorized number of Managers on US Salt's Board of Directors was six members or such other number as determined from time to time by the Board. 28 Distribution and participation rights Distributions were made at the discretion of the Board of Directors, subject to the applicable law and US Salt's operating agreement. Distributions, other than tax distributions, were subject to contractual priority waterfall. Amounts were distributed first to holders of USPH Class A units until the unreturned capital associated with USPH Class A units had been reduced to zero. Thereafter, remaining distributions were made to holders of USPH Class A units and participating USPH Class B units on a pro rata basis based on the number of such units outstanding. Certain USPH Class B units were subject to participation thresholds (as discussed below) and vesting conditions and were not entitled to participate in distributions until such thresholds had been satisfied and vesting has occurred. As of December 31, 2025 (Predecessor), the total unreturned capital of Class A unitholders before distributions was $193.6 million. There were no tax distributions to USPH Class A unitholders for the period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (Predecessor) and $2.1 million and $3.5 million of tax distributions to USPH Class A unitholders for both the three months and six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor). Liquidation rights Upon liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of US Salt, its assets remaining after the settlement of liabilities were distributed in accordance with the same priority framework applicable to non‑liquidating distributions. Liquidation proceeds were distributed first to USPH Class A units until the return of unreturned capital, and thereafter to USPH Class A units and participating USPH Class B units on a pro rata basis. USPH Class B units that had not satisfied applicable participation thresholds or vesting requirements did not participate in liquidation proceeds. Neither class had liquidation preference beyond the contractual priority described above. Repurchase rights US Salt held the right, at its discretion, to repurchase outstanding units held by unitholders in accordance with the operating or related grant agreements. US Salt was able to settle the repurchase or redemption price either in cash or through the transfer of equity interests issued by one of its subsidiaries. If the subsidiary repurchased or redeemed those securities subsequently, the repurchase redemption price would have been equal to the amount of cash or notes, if applicable, equal to the aggregate repurchase or redemption price of the Units that were redeemed or repurchased. USPH Class B units Based on the terms of Class B unit grant agreements, USPH Class B units were issued to certain employees and members of the Board of Directors of US Salt. In each of the grant agreements, 40% of the total USPH Class B units granted had service conditions, which was service-based vesting ("time-vesting incentive units"), and 60% of the total USPH Class B units granted had both service and performance conditions ("performance-based incentive units"). Time-vesting incentive units Time-vesting incentive units vested over the requisite service period of five years, subject to the recipient remaining an employee or member of the Board of Directors of US Salt through each vesting date. For the period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (Predecessor), $0.1 million expense was recognized for the time-vesting incentive units over the requisite service period. Performance-based incentive units The performance-based incentive units were able to vest upon the consummation of a sale of US Salt, provided the participants had remained continuously employed or provided services from the vesting start date through the sale date. Vesting occurred in three tranches as follows: (i) one-third of the performance-based incentive units vested upon the consummation of a sale of the US Salt if the Investor Return was equal to or greater than 2.0; (ii) an additional one-third of the performance-based incentive units vested upon the consummation of a sale of US Salt if the Investor Return was equal to or greater than 2.5; and (iii) an additional one-third of the performance-based incentive units vested upon the consummation of a sale of US Salt if the Investor Return was equal to or greater than 3.0. Vested USPH Class B units were subject to a "Participation Threshold" before distribution of profit or distribution of sales proceeds from the sale of US Salt. Unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors of US Salt, on the date of each grant of USPH Class B units, pursuant to a grant made under a Class B unit grant agreement or similar agreement, the Board of Directors of US Salt would establish an initial "Participation Threshold" amount in respect of each Class B unit granted on such date. The initial Participation Threshold in respect of an USPH Class B unit would be equal to or greater than (i) the amount that would be distributed with respect to a USPH Class A unit ratably among Class A unitholders until the aggregate unreturned capital of Class A incentive units had been reduced to zero in a hypothetical transaction in which US Salt sold all of its assets for Fair Market Value and distributed the proceeds therefrom in liquidation of US Salt (as 29 determined immediately prior to the issuance of such USPH Class B unit, but taking into account all Capital Contributions, if any, with respect to any Unit issued as part of the issuance of such USPH Class B unit) minus (ii) the total Capital Contributions (if any) made by the holder receiving such USPH Class B unit with respect to all USPH Class B unit received by such holder as part of the same issuance. US Salt was able to periodically update the initial Participation Threshold from time to time as necessary to reflect any adjustments to the Participation Thresholds of outstanding USPH Class B unit required. Acceleration of vesting of incentive units Upon the occurrence of the sale of US Salt, all then outstanding time-vesting incentive units and performance-vesting incentive units which had not yet become vested became vested as of the consummation of such sale and were included in the shares acquired as part of the US Salt Acquisition. The Company elected an accounting policy to treat compensation costs due to acceleration as a result of the change in control provision included in the original terms of the awards as acquisition-related consideration transferred. Accordingly, the fair value of the accelerated portion of the awards represented by the cash or Holdings units transferred in exchange for the units subject to accelerated vesting was included in the total consideration transferred for the acquisition and no share‑based compensation expense related to such acceleration was recognized in either the Predecessor or Successor periods. Refer to Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, for further information. Noncontrolling parent interests US Salt owns 99% of US Salt Intermediate Holdings, LLC ("Intermediate Holdings"). The remaining 1% interest was held by Aggregator, which was controlled by Emerald Lake. Intermediate Holdings owned 100% of US Salt Holdings, LLC ("US Salt Holdings") and its operating subsidiaries. US Salt controlled Intermediate Holdings and US Salt Holdings and, accordingly, consolidated Intermediate Holdings and its subsidiaries in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The noncontrolling parent interest represented Aggregator’s 1% ownership interest in Intermediate Holdings, which was held by an entity other than US Salt. This interest was presented as noncontrolling parent interest in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and within equity in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The condensed consolidated financial statements recognized the subsidiary’s assets and liabilities offset by the noncontrolling interest in total equity. Stockholders' equity (Successor) ContextLogic Equity On February 25, 2026, the Company completed the Rights Offering and issued 429 thousand common shares of ContextLogic common stock to subscribers for gross proceeds of $3.4 million or $8.00 per share. In addition, in connection with the backstop agreements entered into with Abrams Capital Partners I, L.P. ("ACP I") and Abrams Capital Partners II ("ACP II", together with ACP I, "Abrams Capital"), the Company issued 190 thousand and 2,599 thousand common shares to ACP I and ACP II, respectively for gross proceeds of $22.3 million or $8.00 per share. On February 26, 2026, the Company issued 15,480 thousand common shares as a portion of the equity consideration for the US Salt Acquisition recorded at a fair value of $123.9 million. Noncontrolling Interest - ContextLogic Holdings LLC Units On February 26, 2026, the Second A&R LLC Agreement became effective for ContextLogic Holdings LLC, establishing and governing the rights, preferences and obligations of each class of units of Holdings. Holdings' membership interests are represented by three classes of units: Preferred Units, Class B Common Units (comprising Class B-1 and Class B-2 series), and Class P Units. The Preferred Units are held by the Company's investors and rank senior to all other units with respect to distributions and liquidation proceeds. The Class B Common Units ("Common Units") are held by the Company and represent the primary common equity interest in Holdings. The Class P Units are profits interests and are subordinate to both the Preferred Units and Common Units. Each class of units was issued in exchange for cash or other property contributions made to Holdings by its members (the "Capital Contributions"). Class A Convertible Preferred Units The Preferred Units were issued at $8.00 per unit (the "Class A Contribution Amount"), representing each unit's stated invested capital. Each Preferred Unit is convertible at the holder's option at any time into one Class B-2 Common Unit (subject to adjustment for stock splits, combinations, recapitalizations or similar transactions), provided that any conversion notice must cover at least the greater of (i) one-third of the converting member's then-outstanding Preferred Units or (ii) 30 5,000 Preferred Units. With respect to distributions and upon liquidation or dissolution, the Preferred Units rank senior to the Common Units and Class P Units and are entitled to receive distributions pro rata based on each Class A member's relative ownership of outstanding Preferred Units until each Class A member has received a full return of its Capital Contributions in respect of its Preferred Units. Prior to any such distribution, Holdings must provide Class A members at least five (5) business days' prior written notice (a "Class A Distribution Notice") detailing the distribution amount and the comparative amount that would be distributed upon conversion into Class B-2 Common Units, giving holders the opportunity to convert prior to the distribution. Class A members that are accredited investors also hold preemptive rights to purchase their pro rata share of any new units or other equity interests issued by Holdings to Abrams Capital, BCP Special Opportunities Fund III Originations LP ("BCP") or their respective affiliates. Class B Common Units The Class B Common Units consist of two series: Class B-1 Common Units, which carry voting rights, and Class B-2 Common Units, which are non-voting and are issuable solely upon conversion of Class A Convertible Preferred Units. Class B-1 Common Units are held by ContextLogic directly and through its wholly-owned subsidiary Emerald Lake Pearl Acquisition Blocker, LLC. ContextLogic effectively holds all outstanding Class B-1 Common Units and, as the sole holder of voting units in Holdings, holds all voting power of Holdings. No Class B-2 Common Units are currently outstanding. Class B members receive distributions pro rata based on each Class B member's relative ownership of outstanding Common Units, after Class A members have received a full return of their Capital Contributions, and until each Class B member has received a full return of its Capital Contributions in respect of Common Units. Thereafter, all remaining distributions are made pro rata to all members based on aggregate Common Units and, subject to any Retained Distributions (as defined below), Class P Units outstanding. Class P Units The Class P Units are intended to qualify as "profits interests" for U.S. federal income tax purposes. They are subordinate to both Preferred Units and Common Units in the distribution waterfall. Distributions on unvested Class P Units are retained by Holdings ("Retained Distributions") and released to Class P Unit holders only upon vesting. Any Retained Distributions attributable to forfeited units are redistributed to remaining members in accordance with the standard distribution waterfall. Refer to Note 16, Equity Award Activity, Unit-Based Compensation (Predecessor), and Stock-Based Compensation (Successor), for more information about Class P Units granted. Noncontrolling Interest Activity On February 26, 2026, immediately prior to the US Salt Acquisition, BCP acquired additional Preferred Units for gross proceeds of $75.0 million, which together with BCP’s previously held Preferred Units and Class A accumulated distributions (previously reflected as redeemable noncontrolling interest), converted into 19,123 thousand Preferred Units with an aggregate value of $153.0 million in conjunction with the US Salt Acquisition. Upon completion of the acquisition and implementation of the Second A&R LLC Agreement, the Preferred Units held by BCP no longer have redemption features and are therefore reflected as noncontrolling interests as a component of the Company’s equity. On February 26, 2026, pursuant to the BCP Backstop Agreement, BCP acquired an additional 11,156 thousand Preferred Units for aggregate proceeds of $89.3 million. On February 26, 2026, Holdings issued 25,176 thousand Preferred Units, recorded at a fair value of $201.4 million, as a portion of the equity consideration for the US Salt Acquisition. Because the noncontrolling interest activity described above occurred in conjunction with the US Salt Acquisition, all activity is reflected as Successor equity activity in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity. Net Income or Loss Allocation under HLBV Given the preferred distribution structure described above, the Company allocates its net income or loss using the HLBV method. Under the HLBV method, the amounts reported as noncontrolling interest represent the amounts Holdings' members would hypothetically receive at each balance sheet date under the liquidation provisions of the Second A&R LLC Agreement, assuming the net assets of the funding structures were liquidated at their recorded amounts determined in accordance with GAAP. The members' interests in Holdings' results of operations are determined as the difference in noncontrolling interest at the start and end of each reporting period, after taking into account any capital transactions between Holdings and its members. 31 At a high level, if Holdings is in a net loss position, all net losses would be 100% attributed to the Class B Members until all Class B Capital Contribution was eroded. Then, net losses would be 100% attributed to the Class A Members. If Holdings is in a net income position, it would be allocated first to any Business Needs (as defined in the Second A&R LLC Agreement, to the extent not already reflected in LLC’s net assets); second to restore Class A's Capital Contributions to full; third to restore Class B's Capital Contributions to full; fourth to Class P to the extent described in the Second A&R LLC Agreement; and fifth to Class B (B-1 and any converted B-2) and Class P Members on a pro-rata basis. 32 NOTE 16. EQUITY Award activity, UNIT-BASED COMPENSATION (PREDECESSOR), AND STOCK-based compensation (SUCCESSOR) Unit-Based Compensation (Predecessor) US Salt recognized compensation expense in its condensed consolidated financial statements because its employees and members of the Board of Directors provided services to US Salt and benefited from the USPH Class B units issued to them. The USPH Class B units are issued for no consideration. Refer to Note 15, Equity and Noncontrolling Interest, for more information about the USPH Class B units. There were no USPH Class B units granted during the period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (Predecessor) or the six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor). The following table summarizes USPH Class B units activity for the period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (Predecessor) and the six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor): Predecessor Period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 Number of Units Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Term (in thousands) (In Years) Balance as of December 31, 2025 17.0 $ 1,000.0 1.75 Granted — — Repurchased — — Forfeited — — Balance as of February 26, 2026 17.0 $ 1,000.0 1.59 Predecessor Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 Number of Units Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Term (in thousands) (In Years) Balance as of December 31, 2024 18.0 $ 1,000.0 2.68 Granted — — Repurchased (0.2 ) 1,000.0 Forfeited (0.8 ) 1,000.0 Balance as of June 30, 2025 17.0 $ 1,000.0 2.25 Under the valuation methodology theory underlying the option pricing model, the fair value of the USPH Class B units was comprised of intrinsic and extrinsic values. Considering the specific features and attributes of the USPH Class B units, the entire fair value of the units was comprised of the underlying extrinsic value (i.e., the present value of the potential future benefits as of the respective measurement dates) while no value was assigned to the intrinsic value for the period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (Predecessor) and the six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor). Upon consummation of the sale of US Salt, there is no remaining unrecognized compensation expense for the time-vesting and performance-vesting USPH Class B units other than what was included as part of the consideration transferred. Refer to Note 3, Business Combinations, for further information. 33 Equity Award Activity (Successor) A summary of activity under the equity plans and related information was as follows: Successor Period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 Options Outstanding RSUs Outstanding Number of Options Weighted- Average Exercise Price Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (In Years) Number of RSUs (in thousands) (in thousands) Balance as of February 27, 2026 (Successor) 363.3 $ 16.95 0.1 127.5 Granted — 50.0 Vested — (69.9 ) Forfeited or cancelled (363.3 ) $ 16.95 — Balance as of June 30, 2026 (Successor) — $ — 0.0 107.6 As of June 30, 2026, 5,550 thousand shares remained available for grant under the Company’s equity incentive plans. Equity-Based Compensation Expense Total equity-based compensation expense included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations was as follows: Successor Successor Predecessor Predecessor Predecessor Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 Period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026(1) Period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026(2) Three Months Ended June 30, 2025(2) Six Months Ended June 30, 2025(2) (in millions) (in millions) (in millions) (in millions) (in millions) Cost of sales $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — Selling expense — — — — — General and administrative 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 Transaction expenses — 0.4 — — — Total equity-based compensation $ 0.1 $ 0.6 $ 0.1 $ 0.1 $ 0.2 (1)Successor information is stock-based compensation. (2)Predecessor information is member-unit based compensation. The Company will recognize the remaining $0.7 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to outstanding RSUs over a weighted-average period of approximately 3.4 years. US Salt Long-Term Incentive Plan (Successor) On April 8, 2026, US Salt adopted the LTIP, which is a performance-based incentive plan designed to attract, retain, and incentivize key employees of US Salt and its subsidiaries by providing participants with the opportunity to share in long-term EBITDA growth above a specified baseline. Awards granted under the LTIP may be settled, at the discretion of the plan administrator, in cash, shares of the Company’s common stock, Preferred Units, or any combination thereof. The performance period under the LTIP began on January 1, 2026 and ends on December 31, 2030, and payment of LTIP awards, if earned, is expected to occur within 60 days following December 31, 2030. LTIP awards outstanding as of June 30, 2026 were granted on April 8, 2026 and are subject to continued service through the performance period, subject to certain forfeiture provisions, and achievement of performance conditions based on EBITDA growth above a baseline EBITDA amount. The aggregate participation rate allocated to participants as of June 30, 2026 was less than 100%, allowing room for future allocation at the plan administrator’s discretion. 34 The awards are subject to additional provisions, including forfeiture upon certain terminations of employment or breaches of restrictive covenants and a clawback provision requiring repayment to US Salt upon certain post-payment breaches of restrictive covenants. Determining the fair value of the LTIP liability requires judgment, including management’s estimate of the most likely EBITDA performance scenario and assessment of whether achievement of the performance condition is probable. As of June 30, 2026, management determined that achievement of the applicable performance condition was probable. For the three months ended June 30, 2026, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense related to the LTIP of $0.8 million. For the period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense related to the LTIP of $0.8 million. No awards were settled, forfeited, or modified during the three months ended June 30, 2026 and the period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026. As of June 30, 2026, the Company recorded an accrued liability related to the LTIP of $0.8 million, which is included in other noncurrent liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets because settlement is not expected within twelve months of June 30, 2026. As of June 30, 2026, unrecognized compensation cost related to LTIP awards was $15.7 million for the aggregate participation rate allocated to employees. This was based on the liability measurement as of June 30, 2026 and the Company expects to recognize it ratably over the remaining requisite service period of approximately 4.5 years, subject to continued service, future changes in fair value, forfeitures, and continued assessment of whether achievement of the applicable performance condition is probable. Class P Unit Grants (Successor) On March 6, 2025, the Board approved, and the Company entered into, an employment agreement for Mr. Rishi Bajaj to serve as the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), including a revised compensation package (the "Employment Agreement"), effective March 6, 2025 (the "Effective Date"). On the Effective Date, Mr. Bajaj was awarded 1,423 thousand Class P Units, consisting of an award targeted at 1,423 thousand performance-based Class P Units which will be earned and will vest based on the achievement of specified Company stock price targets, up to a maximum of 1,898 thousand Class P Units (the "Initial Grant"). In December 2025, the Company and Mr. Bajaj entered into a Separation Agreement and Release (the "Separation Agreement"), under which the Company granted 600 thousand Class P Units in Holdings (the "Transaction Grant") to RB Strategic Holdings LP – Easter Series, an entity controlled by Mr. Bajaj. The Transaction Grant was issued to Mr. Bajaj as consideration for services rendered during his tenure as CEO and as recognition of his contributions in initiating and advancing the US Salt Acquisition. The Transaction Grant is equity-classified under ASC 718 and was measured at fair value as of the grant date, which the Company determined to be December 7, 2025 as it was the date on which all key terms were approved and mutually understood ("Transaction Grant Date"). The Transaction Grant contains both a performance condition and a market condition, but no substantive service condition: •Performance Condition – The US Salt Acquisition must close for the award to become eligible to vest. The award is forfeited in its entirety if the transaction does not close. •Market Condition – Vesting requires the Company's common stock to reach $30 per share (based on a 20‑day average closing price) at any point through December 31, 2030. This condition is incorporated into the fair value measurement under the Monte Carlo simulation model. •Service Condition – The Company determined that the Separation Agreement’s cooperation and restrictive covenants do not constitute a substantive service requirement. Therefore, no service‑based vesting condition exists. A Monte Carlo simulation model under the option pricing method was used to estimate the fair value of the Transaction Grant as of the grant date. The fair value incorporated a discount for lack of marketability because the Class P Units represent non‑marketable, minority interests in Holdings that lack control rights, have no active trading market, and are subject to transfer restrictions. In addition, the priority distribution rights afforded to the Class A and Class B Units subordinate the Class P Units economically, resulting in greater volatility in their expected returns relative to the controlling equity interests. The total fair value granted for the Transaction Grant was $0.3 million. The valuation assumptions utilized for the Transaction Grant as of the December 7, 2025 grant date were as follows: 35 Expected time to a liquidity event (1) 5.23 years Expected volatility (2) 30 % Risk-free interest rate (3) 3.71 % Equity value (4) $ 738 Discount for lack of marketability 20 % (1)Represents the expected time to a liquidity event as of the measurement date. (2)Given the fundamental change in the Company’s business expected to result from the closing of the US Salt deal, the Company’s historical stock price volatility is not a reasonable proxy for expected volatility. Accordingly, the Company estimated expected volatility using a selected group of guideline public companies, considering industry alignment, size, and stage of development, with adjustments to reflect differences in financial leverage. (3)The risk-free rate equals the continuously compounded yield from the US Treasury’s published Daily Treasury Par Yield Curve Rates as of the Transaction Grant Date for a period equal to the time from the Transaction Grant Date until the expected liquidity event, assuming linear interpolation between terms. (4)Holdings’ underlying equity value on the Transaction Grant Date was estimated to be equal to the capital contributions for the Class A Units and Class B Units on a pro forma basis assuming closing of the US Salt Acquisition. Because the Transaction Grant contains no substantive service condition, compensation cost is recognized in full when achievement of the performance condition (closing of the US Salt Acquisition) is probable. On February 27, 2026, upon the consummation of the US Salt Acquisition, the performance condition was achieved and thus the Company recognized an expense of $0.3 million related to the vesting of the Transaction Grant. However, because the market condition has not been met, it remains outstanding and will continue to vest. Similarly, because the Company's Board terminated Mr. Bajaj without Cause, the Initial Grant remains outstanding and will continue to vest in accordance with the terms of the Employment Agreement. However, all stock-based compensation expense related to the Initial Grant was accelerated and expensed on Mr. Bajaj's termination date in December 2025. Changes in the Initial Grant and the Transaction Grant for the period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 (Successor), were as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts): Initial Grant Transaction Grant Number of Units Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Number of Units Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Nonvested at February 27, 2026 (Successor) 1,898 $ 2.39 600 $ 0.56 Vested — — — — Forfeited — — — — Nonvested at June 30, 2026 (Successor) 1,898 $ 2.39 600 $ 0.56 36 NOTE 17. INCOME TAXES The Company holds an economic interest in Holdings and consolidates its financial position and results. The remaining ownership of Holdings not held by the Company is considered a noncontrolling interest. Holdings is treated as a partnership for income tax reporting and its members, including the Company, are liable for federal, and state income taxes based on their share of Holdings' taxable income. Prior to the acquisition, US Salt was treated as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes, in which the partnership’s taxable income or loss was passed through to its unitholders. The Company’s tax provision for the interim periods is determined using an estimate of the annual effective tax rate, adjusted for discrete items, if any, that arise during the period. Each quarter, the Company assesses its estimate of the annual effective tax rate, and if the estimated annual effective tax rate changes, the Company makes a cumulative adjustment in the period of change. The Company’s quarterly tax provision and the estimate of the annual effective tax rate is subject to fluctuation due to several factors, including variability in pre-tax earnings, the geographic distribution of the pre-tax earnings, tax law changes, non-deductible expenses, such as stock-based compensation, and changes in the estimate of the valuation allowance. The benefit for income taxes was insignificant (0.0%) for the three months ended June 30, 2026 (Successor). The benefit for income taxes was $41.9 million (127.0%) for the period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 (Successor). There was no provision for or benefit from income taxes for the period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (Predecessor) or for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor). The Company’s effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2026 (Successor) differed from the U.S. statutory rate of 21% primarily due to additional valuation allowance on tax attributes generated in the period. The Company’s effective tax rate for the period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 (Successor) differed from the U.S. statutory rate of 21% primarily due to the release of valuation allowance associated with the acquisition of US Salt and additional valuation allowance on tax attributes generated during the period. The Company’s effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor) differed from the U.S. statutory rate of 21% as US Salt was a partnership and not subject to federal or state corporate income taxes. The Company continues to maintain a valuation allowance on its domestic net deferred tax assets which is excluded from the annual effective tax rate estimate. The Company had no unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2026 (Successor) and December 31, 2025 (Predecessor). There were no interest and penalties associated with the unrecognized tax benefits for the three months ended June 30, 2026 (Successor), the period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 (Successor), the period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (Predecessor), and the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor). The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. The Company is not currently under examination by income tax authorities in federal, state or other jurisdictions. All tax returns will remain open for examination by the federal and state authorities for three and four years, respectively, from the date of utilization of any net operating loss or credits. Certain tax years are subject to foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities until the statute of limitations expire. 37 NOTE 18. Net INCOME per share (Successor) and per unit (predecessor) The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share: Successor Predecessor Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 Period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 Period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 Three Months Ended June 30, 2025 Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 ($ in millions, shares in thousands, except per share data) ($ in millions, shares in thousands, except per share data) Numerator: Net income attributable to Parent Holdings Class A unitholders (Predecessor) $ 1.7 $ 4.7 $ 7.6 Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders (Successor) $ (6.3 ) $ 9.0 Denominator: Basic and diluted weighted average USPH Class A units outstanding (Predecessor) 190.9 190.9 190.9 Weighted-average shares used in computing net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic (Successor) 45,737 45,682 Weighted-average shares used in computing net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, diluted (Successor) 45,737 45,690 Net income per unit attributable to USPH Class A unit, basic and diluted (Predecessor) $ 8.91 $ 24.62 $ 39.81 Net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders, basic (Successor) $ (0.14 ) $ 0.20 Net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders, diluted (Successor) $ (0.14 ) $ 0.20 The following outstanding shares of potentially dilutive securities were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share for the three months ended June 30, 2026 because including them would have had an anti-dilutive effect: Successor As of June 30, 2026 (in thousands) Restricted stock units outstanding 0.8 Total 0.8 Calculation of Net Income per Share (Successor) Awards under the LTIP may be settled, at the discretion of the plan administrator, in cash, shares of the Company’s common stock, Preferred Units, or any combination thereof. The Company considers the potential dilutive effect of awards that may be settled in shares of the Company’s common stock in calculating diluted net income per share. No potential shares related to the LTIP were included in diluted net income per share for the three months ended June 30, 2026 (Successor) and the period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 (Successor) because no shares were contingently issuable under ASC 260 as of June 30, 2026. Calculation of Net Income per Unit (Predecessor) 38 US Salt used the two-class method in its computation of net income per unit. US Salt's paid and unpaid USPH Class A units issued through subscription notes receivable were entitled to receive distributions at the same rate. Under the two-class method, US Salt's net income available to Class A unitholders was allocated between the paid and unpaid USPH Class A units on a fully-distributed basis and reflected residual net income after amounts attributed to noncontrolling interests. In the event of a net loss, US Salt determined that both paid and unpaid USPH Class A units share in the Company’s losses, and they shared in the losses using the same mechanism as the distributions. US Salt also had USPH Class B units whereby vested USPH Class B units were subject to the hurdle of unreturned capital of Class A and a "Participation Threshold" before Class B unitholders received distribution of profit or distribution of sales proceeds from the sale of US Salt. For the period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (Predecessor), the three months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor), and the six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor), USPH Class B units were participating securities for net income per unit calculation purposes because they were able to participate in undistributed earnings with USPH Class A units. However, because the Class B unit participation was contingent on overcoming the hurdle as described above that was not objectively determinable and/or subject to management discretion, US Salt did not allocate undistributed earnings to Class B unless and until the contingency occurs. USPH Class B units were non-dilutive securities as the hurdle of unreturned capital of USPH Class A unitholders was not met as of June 30, 2025 (Predecessor). Basic and dilutive net income or loss per unit was calculated by dividing undistributed earnings allocated to paid and unpaid USPH Class A unitholders by the weighted average member units outstanding for the respective period. NOTE 19. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION (pREDECESSOR) Management Fees On July 19, 2021, US Salt Holdings entered into a Professional Services Agreement with Emerald Lake, who would provide financial and management consulting services. Emerald Lake agreed to consult with the US Salt’s Board of Directors and the oversight of management on business and financial matters including company strategy, budgeting of future investments, acquisition and divestiture strategies, and debt and equity financings. In consideration of Emerald Lake’s services, US Salt Holdings paid Emerald Lake an annual management fee (the "Management Fee") the greater of $1.9 million or 1% of Emerald Lake Investment. The Management Fee was payable in cash in quarterly installments equal to the greater of $0.5 million and 0.25% of Emerald Lake Investment. The Management Fees were $0.3 million, $0.5 million, and $1.0 million for the period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (Predecessor), the three months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor), and the six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor), respectively, and were reported in the general and administrative expenses in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 2025 (Predecessor), there were no unpaid management fees in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Upon the consummation of the US Salt Acquisition, the Professional Services Agreement was terminated and no further Management Fees will be incurred. USPH Class A and Unit Subscription Receivable The activities of USPH Class A units and subscription notes receivable from employees and Board of Directors of US Salt are summarized as follows: Predecessor Period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 USPH Class A Units Amount Subscription Receivable (in thousands) (in millions) (in millions) Outstanding, December 31, 2025 (Predecessor) 0.9 $ 1.0 $ 0.1 Repayment — — (0.1 ) Balance as of February 26, 2026 (Predecessor) 0.9 $ 1.0 $ — 39 Predecessor Three Months Ended June 30, 2025 USPH Class A Units Amount Subscription Receivable (in thousands) (in millions) (in millions) Balance as of March 31,2025 (Predecessor) 0.9 $ 1.0 $ 0.1 Repayment — — — Balance as of June 30,2025 (Predecessor) 0.9 $ 1.0 $ 0.1 Predecessor Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 USPH Class A Units Amount Subscription Receivable (in thousands) (in millions) (in millions) Outstanding, December 31, 2024 (Predecessor) 0.9 $ 1.0 $ 0.2 Repayment — — (0.1 ) Balance as of June 30,2025 (Predecessor) 0.9 $ 1.0 $ 0.1 40 NOTE 20. SEGMENT INFORMATION The Company operates as a single segment, which is the consolidated entity. Our Chief Operating Decision Maker ("CODM") is our President. The CODM evaluates the Company's performance and allocates resources based on consolidated net income as presented in the statement of operations supplemented by significant expense categories that impact net income as outlined below. The CODM uses these varying results to prioritize reinvestment of profits in the Company. One customer accounted for $4.7 million and $4.3 million of the Company’s total net sales during the three months ended June 30, 2026 (Successor) and June 30, 2025 (Predecessor), respectively. One customer accounted for $6.5 million, $2.5 million, and $8.6 million of the Company’s total net sales during the period from February 27, 2026 to June 30, 2026 (Successor), the period from January 1, 2026 to February 26, 2026 (Predecessor), and the six months ended June 30, 2025 (Predecessor), respectively. The following tables provide the operating financial results of the Company: Successor Predecessor Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 Period from February 27 - June 30, 2026 Period from January 1 - February 26, 2026 Three Months Ended June 30, 2025 Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 (in millions) (in millions) (in millions) (in millions) (in millions) Net sales $ 33.6 $ 45.7 $ 20.3 $ 33.8 $ 66.1 Cost of sales 18.4 25.8 10.9 17.0 34.1 Depreciation, amortization and depletion 10.0 13.3 2.7 3.6 7.3 Selling expense 1.0 1.4 0.6 1.0 2.0 Administrative expense 4.1 9.1 1.0 1.3 2.8 Transaction expense 1.8 22.5 0.1 0.2 0.2 Interest expense 4.4 6.2 3.0 5.4 10.8 Other segment items 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.3 Benefit from income taxes — (41.9 ) — — — Net income $ (6.3 ) $ 9.0 $ 1.7 $ 4.7 $ 7.6 Capital expenditures - purchases of property, plant and equipment $ (1.6 ) $ (2.3 ) $ (1.3 ) $ (1.6 ) $ (4.2 ) Other segment items include foreign currency gain/(loss), loss due to disposal of fixed assets, stock-based/unit-based compensation expenses, and management fees paid to Emerald Lake (Predecessor). The measure of segment assets is reported on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. NOTE 21. Subsequent Events Gaylord Chemical Acquisition On August 4, 2026, Holdings entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") with EagleTree-Gaylord Management Investment, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, EagleTree-Gaylord Holdings Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Gaylord Chemical”) to acquire Gaylord Chemical, following satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, for $850 million in cash (the "Transaction"), subject to customary adjustments. The Purchase Agreement may be terminated prior to the consummation of the Transaction by the mutual written consent of Holdings and Gaylord Chemical and in certain other circumstances. In connection with its entry into the Purchase Agreement, Holdings obtained equity financing commitments from certain investors for an aggregate of $870 million and obtained a debt financing commitment comprising a $250 million term loan and a $25 million revolving credit facility. These financing commitments will be used to finance the consideration due under the Purchase Agreement and related fees and expenses. A portion of the equity financing is expected to be provided by, and the equity financing commitments may be offset by, a proposed rights offering by the 41 Company (the “Rights Offering”). The record date, subscription ratio, expiration date and other terms of the Rights Offering will be described in a registration statement, including a prospectus, to be filed with the SEC. Any offer of the subscription rights or the securities issuable upon exercise of the subscription rights will be made only by means of the prospectus forming part of the registration statement, once such registration statement is declared effective. 42

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties set forth below, together with all of the other information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes, and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, before making a decision to invest in our common stock. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently believe are not material, may also become important factors that affect our business. These risk factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and the market price of our common stock could decline. These risk factors do not identify all risks that we face – our financial condition and/or operations could also be affected by factors that are not presently known to us or that we currently consider to be immaterial to our financial conditions and/or operations. Other than as described below, there have been no additional material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed under the heading "Risk Factors" in Part I, Item 1A of our 2025 Form 10-K and the risk factors previously disclosed under the heading "Risk Factors." in Part II, Item 1A of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, filed with the SEC on May 15, 2026. Risks Related to the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition, Backstop Agreements, and Financings On August 4, 2026, Holdings entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with EagleTree-Gaylord Management Investment, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Seller”), EagleTree-Gaylord Holdings Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Target Company”), and GCH Buyer, Inc., a Delaware corporation and indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings (“Buyer”). The Purchase agreement provides that, following satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, Buyer will purchase from Seller all of the outstanding shares of the Target Company (the “Gaylord Chemical Acquisition”) for $850 million in cash, subject to customary adjustments. See Note 21 of Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information. If we consummate the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition, we and Gaylord Chemical may incur significant cost, time, effort and attention on integration and the development of necessary support. These may hinder our ability to realize the expected benefits of the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition. Gaylord Chemical maintains its own sales, marketing, product development, manufacturing and other administrative teams, legal, purchasing, information technology (“IT”), tax and certain other financial and operating services such as human resources (“HR”), insurance and treasury. Gaylord Chemical will continue to operate independently from ContextLogic until closing of the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition. While we intend to operate Gaylord Chemical predominantly as a stand-alone business with substantially the same organizational structure, operations, management team, employees and locations as are presently used in Gaylord Chemical, the success of the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition will substantially depend on our ability to incorporate Gaylord Chemical into the Company and support its business needs, as well as to effectively manage this business. Such challenges include (i) the integration of Gaylord Chemical into our accounting reporting system and functions, (ii) the development, adaptation and maintenance of the operating and administrative support systems historically provided by Gaylord Chemical on which Gaylord Chemical has relied, including legal, purchasing, IT, tax, HR, insurance and treasury, and (iii) the ability of Gaylord Chemical and management to adapt to our policies, procedures and support systems. If the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition is consummated, incorporation of, and development of the necessary support for, Gaylord Chemical could be a lengthy process, requiring substantial expenditures by the Company, as well as significant time, effort and attention from the management teams and key employees of both the Company and Gaylord Chemical. Such demands could divert needed resources from both businesses. Further, these challenges could result in the loss of key employees, disruption of the ongoing businesses and relationships with customers, suppliers and other third parties, diversion of management and corporate attention to integration issues, tax costs and inefficiencies, and inconsistencies in standards, controls, IT systems, accounting systems, procedures, policies, Sarbanes-Oxley controls and other administrative systems. If any of these factors limit our ability to integrate Gaylord Chemical successfully or on a timely basis, we may not achieve the strategic, operational, financial and other benefits anticipated to result from the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition to the fullest extent, on a timely basis or at all. Beyond the purchase price, potential termination penalties, and the cost of our diligence and preparation associated with the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition, we will incur significant transaction and integration costs in connection with the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition and significant fees in connection with any delays in closing. In addition to the purchase price, we will incur significant transaction costs in connection with the Gaylord Chemical and the Financings. Among these costs are fees or reimbursement of expenses under each of the Financings, including, notably, commitment, funding, duration, agency, and administration fees to the parties providing the Financings. Significant costs 61 have been incurred and are expected to be incurred prior to the closing of the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition, including related to legal, accounting, diligence and other transaction fees and expenses. There can be no assurance that the conditions to closing set forth in the Purchase Agreement or each of the Financings will be met or waived on the applicable timelines, or at all. As a result, we or our affiliates may incur significant costs or interest associated with any delays. Further, any delay in the closing of the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition will increase the related transaction costs. The substantial majority of these costs will be nonrecurring expenses related to the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition. While we satisfy the closing conditions and pursue the Financings for the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition, we and Gaylord Chemical will be subject to business uncertainties that could adversely affect our and their businesses. Delays in closing the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition could exacerbate these uncertainties and adverse effects. Uncertainty about the effect of the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition on the employees and customers of both the Company and Gaylord Chemical may have an adverse effect on us and Gaylord Chemical and, consequently, on the combined company. Although we and Gaylord Chemical intend to take actions to reduce any adverse effects during the time period before closing, these uncertainties may impair our and their ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel until the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition is completed and for a period of time thereafter. These uncertainties could cause customers, suppliers and others that deal with Gaylord Chemical, and to a lesser degree, our business, to seek to change existing business relationships with the two companies. Alternately, it could cause third parties who are considering doing business with us or Gaylord Chemical to delay taking action until the outcome of the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition or the Financings is known. Employee retention could be reduced during the pendency of the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition, as employees of the Company or Gaylord Chemical may experience uncertainty about their future roles with the combined company. If, despite retention and business partner management efforts, we or Gaylord Chemical lose key employees or customer/supplier relationships because of concerns relating to the uncertainty and difficulty of the integration process or a desire not to remain with the combined company, the business, operations, prospects and financial results of the combined company could be harmed. If the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition is completed, as owner, we will operate a large entity in an industry and locations in which we do not currently operate, subject to additional regulations, risks and uncertainties that we have not previously faced. These could exceed our expectations and have a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations. If the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition is consummated, the size of the Company and our operating segments following the transaction will change compared with our current operations. As a result, any risk or uncertainty that is significant to Gaylord Chemical will also be significant to us and have a negative effect on our financial condition and results of operations. If Gaylord Chemical is unable to maintain compliance with U.S. federal, state and non-U.S. regulatory requirements, we could incur substantial costs, including fines, civil penalties and criminal sanctions, or costs associated with upgrades to improve facilities or changes in manufacturing processes in order to achieve and maintain regulatory compliance. While we intend to operate Gaylord Chemical largely as a stand-alone business, our results of operations, financial condition and stock price will depend on how Gaylord Chemical can handle its business risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties may exceed our expectations, and it may take time for us to mitigate them. The market price of our Common Stock after the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition may be affected by factors different from those affecting our shares currently. Our current business differs from Gaylord Chemical in several ways, including industry, geographic area, and applicable regulations. As a result, if the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition is consummated, the results of operations of the combined company and the market price of shares of our Common Stock may be affected by factors different from those currently affecting our results of operations. The Gaylord Chemical Acquisition may not be accretive to earnings and if not accretive, may cause dilution to our earnings per share. We currently anticipate that the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition will be accretive to our adjusted earnings per share in the first complete fiscal year following its consummation. This expectation is based on our preliminary estimates, which may change materially. We may encounter additional or unforeseen transaction and integration-related costs, or we may fail to realize all of the anticipated benefits of the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition. Any of these factors could cause a decrease in our adjusted earnings per share or decrease or delay the expected accretive effect of the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition and contribute to a decrease in the price of our Common Stock. Our acquisition of Gaylord Chemical may expose us to unknown or contingent liabilities for which we will not be adequately indemnified. The entities that we will acquire in the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition may have unknown or contingent liabilities, including liabilities for failure to comply with environmental and other laws and regulations, and for litigation or other claims. The Purchase Agreement does not include indemnification provisions and, generally, Gaylord Chemical will not be obligated to indemnify us. Based on these provisions we may incur material liabilities for the past activities of Gaylord Chemical. Such 62 liabilities and related legal or other costs and/or resulting reputational damage could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. The proposed Financings in connection with the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition and future debt financing arrangements that we or our subsidiaries may enter into otherwise, may contain various covenants that limit our ability to take certain actions and also require us to meet financial maintenance tests. Failure to comply with these limits could have a material adverse effect on our operations, business and financial results. Gaylord Chemical will have additional borrowing capacity under the Financings to finance a portion of the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition. Interest costs related to this indebtedness will be substantial. The facilities pursuant to the Financings and the instruments governing our other future indebtedness contain, or will contain, certain customary restrictions, covenants, provisions for mandatory repayment upon the occurrence of certain events, and provisions for events of default that will require us or Gaylord Chemical to satisfy certain financial tests and maintain certain financial ratios, restrict our or Gaylord Chemical’s ability to engage in specified types of transactions, and otherwise limit the distributions of funds from Gaylord Chemical to us. This overall leverage and the terms of our financing arrangements could: •limit the ability to pay dividends; •make it more difficult to satisfy obligations under the terms of this indebtedness; •limit the ability to refinance this indebtedness on terms acceptable to Gaylord Chemical or us, or at all; •limit the flexibility to plan for and adjust to changing business and market conditions in the industries in which we or Gaylord Chemical operate and increase the vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; •require the dedication of a substantial portion of cash flow to make interest and principal payments on such debt, thereby limiting the availability of cash flow to distribute to us or to fund future acquisitions, working capital, business activities, and other general corporate requirements; •restrict sales of key assets; •limit the ability to substantially change our business or enter into new lines of business; •limit the ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, to fund growth or acquisitions or for general corporate purposes, even when necessary to maintain adequate liquidity, particularly if any ratings assigned to our debt securities by rating organizations were revised downward; or •subject us to higher levels of indebtedness than our competitors, which may cause a competitive disadvantage and may reduce our flexibility in responding to increased competition. In addition, the restrictive covenants pertaining to the Facilities and certain other indebtedness would or could require us to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy other financial conditions and tests. Our ability to meet those financial ratios, conditions and tests will depend on our ongoing financial and operating performance, which, in turn, will be subject to economic conditions and to financial, market, and competitive factors, many of which are beyond our control. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under the instruments governing our indebtedness. With respect to the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition, if consummated, challenges with integration, the industry, operations and other business, market and acquisition-related risks, as well as various uncertainties and events beyond our control, could affect our ability to comply with such restrictions and covenants. Failure to comply with any of the restrictions and covenants in our existing or future financing arrangements could result in a default under those arrangements and under other arrangements containing cross-default provisions. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under any such financing arrangement, the relevant lenders could assess increased interest rates, accelerate the maturity of the debt or foreclose upon any collateral securing the debt. In this event, we may lack sufficient funds or other resources to satisfy all of our obligations. In addition, any limitations imposed by financing agreements on our ability to incur additional debt or to take other actions could significantly impair our ability to obtain other financing. We do not currently control Gaylord Chemical and will not control Gaylord Chemical until the completion of the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition. We will not control Gaylord Chemical unless and until the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition is completed. The Purchase Agreement imposes certain customary limitations on how Gaylord Chemical may be managed while the Gaylord Chemical Acquisition is pending, but there can be no assurance that Gaylord Chemical will be operated in the same way as it would be under our control. Impairment of Gaylord Chemical’s intangible assets could result in significant charges that could adversely impact our future operating results. Gaylord Chemical is expected to have significant intangible assets, including goodwill, which are susceptible to impairment charges as a result of changes in various factors or conditions. As has been our past practice with our other operating subsidiaries, we will assess the potential impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on an annual basis, as well as whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may exceed fair value. We will assess finite-lived intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may 63 exceed fair value. Adverse changes in the operations of our businesses or other unforeseeable factors could result in an impairment charge in future periods that could adversely impact our results of operations and financial position in that period. 64