Tusimple Holdings Inc.
TuSimple builds self-driving technology for long-haul semi trucks, using cameras and computer vision so big rigs can pilot themselves on highways and freight routes. Founded in 2015 by Xiaodi Hou and Mo Chen, it was headquartered in San Diego with deep roots in China, and in 2021 it completed the world's first fully autonomous truck run on open public roads with no one in the cab, traveling from Tucson to Phoenix, Arizona. The name is a playful double meaning: it draws on the Chinese character for "image" while also joking that the challenge was "too simple."
10-Q · Quarter ended Sep 30, 2023 · SEC filing ↗
The original filing sections are available below.
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and…
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. In addition to historical consolidated financial information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates, and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. You should review the section titled “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” for a discussion of forward-looking statements and the section titled "Risk Factors" of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 for a discussion of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any period in the future. Overview When used in this report, the terms “TuSimple”, “Company”, “we”, “us”, and “our” mean TuSimple Holdings Inc. and all subsidiaries. TuSimple is a global autonomous driving technology company headquartered in San Diego, California, with operations in the United States (“U.S.") and the Asia-Pacific region (“APAC”). Founded in 2015, we are working to revolutionize the estimated $4 trillion global truck freight market by developing proprietary technologies that enable the scaled development and deployment of autonomous freight transportation. We believe that our full-stack L4 autonomous driving technology and our Autonomous Freight Network (“AFN”) will make global trucking safer as well as more reliable, efficient, and environmentally friendly. Reportable Segments TuSimple’s two reportable geographic segments are the U.S. and APAC. These segments align with our bifurcated development strategy of our L4 autonomous driving technology and independent operations and commercial business models in each region. Each segment has stand-alone engineering teams, software code base, infrastructure, technological capabilities, and onboard software development to fit regional demands and differences in end-market use cases. AFN We are in the early stages of developing our AFN. Our AFN will provide autonomous freight capacity as a service through two service models based on users’ needs: •TuSimple Capacity. Our fleet of owned or leased retrofitted (near-term) and purpose-built L4 autonomous semi-trucks (longer-term) will serve customers that desire access to safe, reliable, low cost, and more environmentally friendly freight transportation without owning semi-truck assets. •Carrier-Owned Capacity. Customers that prefer to own their fleet will be able to purchase our purpose-built L4 autonomous semi-truck from an OEM with on-board autonomous driving software solutions. We believe the TuSimple Capacity model with retrofitted trucks will enable an accelerated path to commercialization. We have developed proprietary technologies and systems necessary for the development and deployment of our autonomous trucking operations within the AFN. Once fully scaled, the AFN aims to serve as a comprehensive autonomous freight solution that provides users with access to L4 autonomous semi-trucks operating on HD digital mapped routes connecting a network of terminals. Full-Stack L4 Autonomous Driving Technology, Hardware, and Offboard Capabilities TuSimple is developing L4 autonomous driving solutions with Automated Driving System (“ADS”) L4 capable onboard software, offboard capabilities, and hardware. The capabilities for the U.S. and APAC segments, including their software base code, have been independently developed by the technology teams in each region. 18 Our autonomous driving technology is specifically designed for semi-trucks in the geographies where we operate. Our current development priorities and testing activities are focused on further refining our L4 autonomous driving technology to prepare them for scaled deployment and commercialization. Our proprietary L4 autonomous driving solutions include our L4-capable ADS, such as 1,000 meter perception range, multi-modal perception, and offboard capabilities, such as high definition (“HD”) maps, machine-learning, autonomy visualization and simulation capabilities, and an integrated L4 autonomous semi-truck design consisting of a redundant sensor suite, on-board computing solutions, and other components. Long-range perception, advanced planning and decision-making, and highly accurate mapping are important capabilities for the autonomous freight operation of semi-trucks, which are heavy, articulated vehicles that need to be able to operate at highway speeds. Our Operations Today We currently operate approximately 70 L4 autonomous semi-trucks, 35 in the U.S. and 35 in APAC in Driver-In mode with a safety driver and safety engineer in the cabin. Operating with a safety driver and safety engineer allows us to continually improve our L4 technology. We have also conducted select testing operations in other locations in the U.S., China, Japan and Sweden as we make Operational Design Domain ("ODD") expansions and demonstrate our capabilities to customers and partners. Currently, we do not have operations in Sweden and we are focused on expanding our ODD in the APAC region. During prior years, we generated revenue from freight capacity services to customers via the TuSimple Capacity service model in the U.S. Gross loss margins for our revenue operations exceeded 100% of revenue given their developmental nature, including having a driver and test engineers in the trucks. Deploying our autonomous trucks in Driver-In mode in a real world commercial setting allowed us to develop our technology while generating revenue, as well as establish fleet management operations and related processes ahead of initiating commercialization. Currently, we believe the incremental benefits and learnings associated with these revenue operations do not outweigh their operating losses. Effective the fourth quarter of 2022, we de-emphasized revenue-generating freight services for our U.S. operations. As such, we do not plan to generate significant revenue in the U.S. for the foreseeable future. Components of Results of Operations Revenue To date, all of our revenue recognized has been from freight capacity services provided through the TuSimple Capacity service model in the U.S. Revenue is recognized over time as the goods are transported from one location to another based on the number of miles traveled. Shipments are completed within a short period of time, typically spanning one to two days. Cost of Revenue Our cost of revenue consists primarily of fuel costs, depreciation of property and equipment (including semi-trucks acquired under finance leases), labor costs, and other costs directly attributable to the provision of freight capacity services. Currently, we operate a large portion of our semi-trucks with two occupants, a safety engineer and a safety driver. Research and Development ("R&D") R&D costs consist primarily of personnel-related expenses, including stock-based compensation costs, associated with software developers and engineering personnel responsible for the design, development, and testing of our L4 autonomous driving technology, and allocated overhead costs. Selling, General and Administrative ("SG&A") SG&A costs consist primarily of personnel-related expenses, including stock-based compensation costs, associated with our sales, marketing, management, and administration activities, professional service fees, and other general corporate expenses. 19 Interest Income Interest income consists primarily of interest earned on our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. Provision for Income Taxes Provision for income taxes consists primarily of U.S. federal and state income taxes and income taxes in certain foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct business. Since inception, we have incurred operating losses. We have a full valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets, including federal and state net operating loss carryforwards and research and development credit carryforwards. We expect to maintain this valuation allowance until it becomes more likely than not that the benefit of our federal and state deferred tax assets will be realized by way of expected future taxable income. Results of Operations The following table sets forth our unaudited condensed consolidated results of operations data for the periods presented (in thousands): Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022 2023 2022 2023 Revenue $ 2,653 $ — $ 7,511 $ 307 Cost of revenue 5,436 — 15,292 754 Gross loss (2,783) — (7,781) (447) Operating expenses: Research and development(1) 84,931 44,322 248,608 164,430 Selling, general and administrative(1) 31,119 26,335 85,351 83,757 Total operating expenses 116,050 70,657 333,959 248,187 Loss from operations (118,833) (70,657) (341,740) (248,634) Interest income 5,545 9,298 7,912 28,922 Other income (expense), net 127 (77) 169 (975) Loss before provision for income taxes (113,161) (61,436) (333,659) (220,687) Provision for income taxes — — — — Net loss $ (113,161) $ (61,436) $ (333,659) $ (220,687) (1) Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows (in thousands) Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022 2023 2022 2023 Research and development $ 16,915 $ 6,564 $ 56,771 $ 24,962 Selling, general and administrative 6,117 4,187 18,939 13,553 Total stock-based compensation expense $ 23,032 $ 10,751 $ 75,710 $ 38,515 20 Comparison of the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022 and 2023 Revenue Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, (In thousands, except percentages) 2022 2023 % Change 2022 2023 % Change Revenue $ 2,653 $ — (100) % $ 7,511 $ 307 (96) % Three Months Ended September 30, 2023 Compared with the Same Period in 2022 We had no revenue in the three months ended September 30, 2023, in-line with our previously disclosed revised strategy to pause freight revenue operations in our U.S. segment. Nine Months Ended September 30, 2023 Compared with the Same Period in 2022 Revenue decreased by $7.2 million, or 96%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2023 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to reduced volume of orders and loads, in-line with our previously disclosed revised strategy to pause freight revenue operations in our U.S. segment. Cost of Revenue Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, (In thousands, except percentages) 2022 2023 % Change 2022 2023 % Change Cost of revenue $ 5,436 $ — (100) % $ 15,292 $ 754 (95) % Three Months Ended September 30, 2023 Compared with the Same Period in 2022 Cost of revenue was zero in the three months ended September 30, 2023, in-line with our previously disclosed revised strategy to pause freight revenue operations in our U.S. segment. Nine Months Ended September 30, 2023 Compared with the Same Period in 2022 Cost of revenue decreased by $14.5 million, or 95%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2023 compared to the same period in the prior year, in-line with our previously disclosed revised strategy to pause freight revenue operations in our U.S. segment. Restructuring During the fourth quarter of 2022 and first half of 2023, our board of directors authorized multiple restructuring plans to rebalance our cost structure in alignment with our strategic priorities, including a 25% and a 30% reduction of our total workforce in December 2022 and May 2023, respectively, and impairment or write-off of several capital assets. 21 Research and Development Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, (In thousands, except percentages) 2022 2023 % Change 2022 2023 % Change U.S. $ 60,632 $ 20,228 (67) % $ 186,006 $ 100,951 (46) % APAC 24,299 24,094 (1) % 62,602 63,479 1 % Total R&D $ 84,931 $ 44,322 (48) % $ 248,608 $ 164,430 (34) % Three Months Ended September 30, 2023 Compared with the Same Period in 2022 U.S. R&D expenses decreased by $40.4 million, or 67%, in the three months ended September 30, 2023 compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease was primarily attributable to our restructuring efforts during the fourth quarter of 2022 and first half of 2023 that significantly reduced headcount and resulted in decreased personnel-related costs, including stock-based compensation expense. APAC R&D expenses decreased by $0.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2023 compared to the same period in the prior year. There was a decrease in joint development costs due to the timing of our joint development activities related to our TuSimple Domain Controller ("TDC"), which was offset by increased R&D expenses to expand operations in China and Japan as we further develop L4 capabilities in the region. Nine Months Ended September 30, 2023 Compared with the Same Period in 2022 U.S. R&D expenses decreased by $85.1 million, or 46%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2023 compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease was primarily attributable to our restructuring efforts during the fourth quarter of 2022 and first half of 2023 that significantly reduced headcount and resulted in decreased personnel-related costs, including stock-based compensation expense, and decreased depreciation and allocated facility costs. APAC R&D expenses increased by $0.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2023 compared to the same period in the prior year. There was an increase in personnel-related costs and R&D expenses to expand operations in China and Japan as we further develop L4 capabilities in the region, which was offset by reduced joint development costs due to the timing of the joint development activities related to our TDC. Selling, General and Administrative Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, (In thousands, except percentages) 2022 2023 % Change 2022 2023 % Change U.S. $ 25,828 $ 17,970 (30) % $ 67,527 $ 62,822 (7) % APAC 5,291 8,365 58 % 17,824 20,935 17 % Total SG&A $ 31,119 $ 26,335 (15) % $ 85,351 $ 83,757 (2) % Three Months Ended September 30, 2023 Compared with the Same Period in 2022 U.S. SG&A expenses decreased by $7.9 million, or 30%, in the three months ended September 30, 2023 compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease was primarily attributable to our restructuring efforts during the fourth quarter of 2022 and first half of 2023 that significantly reduced headcount and resulted in decreased personnel-related costs, including stock-based compensation expense, decreased office and facility-related costs due to the associated change in our business strategy, and decreased professional services costs due to decreases in consulting services. These decreases were partially offset by increased allocated corporate legal costs in connection with ongoing litigation and investigations. 22 APAC SG&A expenses increased by $3.1 million, or 58%, in the three months ended September 30, 2023 compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase was primarily attributable to increased allocated corporate legal and professional services costs in connection with ongoing litigation matters. Nine Months Ended September 30, 2023 Compared with the Same Period in 2022 U.S. SG&A expenses decreased by $4.7 million, or 7%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2023 compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease was primarily attributable to our restructuring efforts during the fourth quarter of 2022 and first half of 2023 that significantly reduced headcount and resulted in decreased personnel-related costs, including stock-based compensation, decreases in office and facility-related costs and business development and marketing costs due to the associated change in our business strategy, decreased professional service fees due to reduced consulting services, and allocated corporate costs consisting of a non-recurring expense recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2022 related to the modification of Cheng Lu's equity awards in connection with his separation as CEO in March 2022. These decreases were partially offset by increased allocated corporate legal and professional services costs in connection with ongoing litigation and investigations and restructuring expenses related to our restructuring plans during the first half of 2023. APAC SG&A expenses increased by $3.1 million, or 17%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2023 compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase was primarily attributable to increased allocated corporate legal and professional services costs in connection with ongoing litigation and investigations, partially offset by a decrease in personnel-related costs due to the decrease in stock-based compensation due to the decrease in our stock price, and allocated corporate costs consisting of a non-recurring expense recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2022 related to the modification of Cheng Lu's equity awards in connection with his separation as CEO in March 2022. Interest Income Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, (In thousands, except percentages) 2022 2023 % Change 2022 2023 % Change Interest income $ 5,545 $ 9,298 68 % $ 7,912 $ 28,922 266 % Three Months Ended September 30, 2023 Compared with the Same Period in 2022 Interest income increased by $3.8 million, or 68%, in the three months ended September 30, 2023 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to an increase in our interest-bearing short-term investments. We started to invest in marketable securities in August 2022. Nine Months Ended September 30, 2023 Compared with the Same Period in 2022 Interest income increased by $21.0 million, or 266%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2023 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to an increase in our interest-bearing short-term investments. We started to invest in marketable securities in August 2022. Segment Adjusted EBITDA We have two reportable segments: U.S. and APAC. Our Chief Operating Decision Maker ("CODM") utilizes the segment Adjusted EBITDA metric to evaluate operating performance and allocate resources. 23 The following table provides information about our segment Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands): Three Months Ended September 30, % Change Nine Months Ended September 30, % Change 2022 2023 2022 2023 U.S. $ (68,249) $ (29,231) (57) % $ (192,132) $ (119,853) (38) % APAC (24,531) (28,175) 15 % (63,559) (71,937) 13 % Total Adjusted EBITDA $ (92,780) $ (57,406) (38) % $ (255,691) $ (191,790) (25) % The changes in our segment Adjusted EBITDA for both U.S. and APAC segments are primarily attributable to the changes in operating expenses. Refer to the comparisons above for discussion on the changes in respective research and development expense and selling, general and administrative expense for the two segments. Key Metric and Non-GAAP Financial Measure Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, (In thousands, except percentages) 2022 2023 % Change 2022 2023 % Change Loss from operations $ (118,833) $ (70,657) (41) % $ (341,740) $ (248,634) (27) % Adjusted EBITDA(1) $ (92,780) $ (57,406) (38) % $ (255,691) $ (191,790) (25) % (1) Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. For more information regarding our use of this financial measure and a reconciliation of this financial measure to the most comparable GAAP measure, see “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measure.” Adjusted EBITDA Adjusted EBITDA is a performance measure that our management uses to assess our operating performance in our business. Since Adjusted EBITDA facilitates internal comparisons of our historical operating performance on a more consistent basis, we use this measure for business planning purposes. Accordingly, we believe that Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results in the same manner as our management team and board of directors. We calculate Adjusted EBITDA as loss from operations, adjusted to exclude: •depreciation and amortization; •stock-based compensation expense; •restructuring expenses; and •finance lease interest expense included within cost of revenue. For more information regarding the limitations of Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of loss from operations to Adjusted EBITDA, see the section titled "Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measure." Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measure We use Adjusted EBITDA in conjunction with GAAP measures as part of our overall assessment of our performance, including the preparation of our operating budget and quarterly forecasts, to evaluate the effectiveness of our business strategies, and to communicate with our board of directors concerning our financial performance. Because non-GAAP financial measures are not standardized, it may not be possible to compare this measure with other companies’ non-GAAP measures having the same or similar names. In addition, other companies may not publish similar metrics. Furthermore, this measure has certain limitations in that it does not include the impact of certain expenses that are reflected in our consolidated statements of operations that are necessary to run our business. Our Adjusted EBITDA should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, or in isolation from, measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. 24 The following table provides a reconciliation of reported net loss from operations determined in accordance with GAAP to non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA (in thousands): Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022 2023 2022 2023 Loss from Operations $ (118,833) $ (70,657) $ (341,740) $ (248,634) Stock-based compensation expense(1) 23,032 10,751 75,710 41,071 Depreciation and amortization(1) 2,874 1,707 8,335 4,500 Restructuring expenses — 793 1,568 11,220 Finance lease interest expense included within cost of revenue 147 — 436 53 Adjusted EBITDA $ (92,780) $ (57,406) $ (255,691) $ (191,790) (1) Excludes amounts related to restructuring events. Liquidity and Capital Resources We have financed our operations primarily through the sale of capital stock, which has historically been sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure requirements. As of September 30, 2023, our principal sources of liquidity were $249.2 million of cash and cash equivalents, exclusive of restricted cash of $1.7 million, and $526.0 million of short-term investments. Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of cash on deposit with banks, certificates of deposit, and money market funds. Short-term investments consist primarily of available-for-sale debt securities including: commercial paper, U.S. treasury securities, U.S. government agency securities, and corporate debt securities. We consider our short-term investments as available for use in current operations. Based on our current operating plan, we believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for at least the next 12 months. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to, the rate of our growth, our ability to attract and retain users and their willingness to pay for our services, and the timing and extent of spending to support our efforts to develop our L4 autonomous driving technology and AFN. Further, we may enter into future arrangements to acquire or invest in businesses, products, services, strategic partnerships, and technologies. As such, we may be required to seek additional equity and/or debt financing. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership interest of our stockholders will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect the rights of common stockholders. The incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased fixed obligations and could result in operating covenants that would restrict our operations. If we are unable to maintain sufficient financial resources, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected. Cash Flows The following table summarizes our cash flows for the periods presented (in thousands): Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022 2023 Net cash (used in) provided by: Operating activities $ (255,991) $ (217,931) Investing activities $ (210,140) $ (147,698) Financing activities $ 1,941 $ (1,526) Operating Activities Net cash used in operating activities was $256.0 million and $217.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and 2023, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in net losses as a result of our restructuring activities during the fourth quarter of 2022 and first half of 2023 to rebalance our cost structure in alignment with our strategic priorities. 25 Investing Activities Net cash used in investing activities was $210.1 million and $147.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and 2023, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to movements in the balance of our investments in marketable securities caused by purchases of investments and proceeds from the maturity of investments during the nine months ended September 30, 2023. Financing Activities Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and related to proceeds received from the issuance of shares related to the exercise of stock options by employees and purchases under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, that were partially offset by the principal payments on our finance leases and truck purchase loans. Net cash used in financing activities was $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023 and primarily related to the principal payments on our finance leases and truck purchase loans. Material Cash Requirements At September 30, 2023, there were future minimum lease payments of $52.7 million for operating leases. Critical Accounting Estimates We prepare our condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We base our estimates on historical experience and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Our actual results could differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions. There have been no material changes to our critical accounting estimates as compared to the critical accounting estimates discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, except as described in Note 1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our condensed consolidated financial statements. Recent Accounting Pronouncements For information on recently issued accounting pronouncements, refer to Note 1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Other than the items noted below, there have been no material changes to the Company's market risk during the first six months of 2023. For a discussion of the Company's exposure to market risk, refer to the Company's market risk disclosures set forth in Part II, Item 7A, "Quant…
Other than the items noted below, there have been no material changes to the Company's market risk during the first six months of 2023. For a discussion of the Company's exposure to market risk, refer to the Company's market risk disclosures set forth in Part II, Item 7A, "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" of the 2022 Form 10-K. Investment and Interest Rate Risk We are exposed to interest rate risk primarily due to our investment portfolio. Changes in interest rates affect the interest earned on our total cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities and the fair value of those securities. We had cash and cash equivalents of $249.2 million and short-term investments of $526.0 million as of September 30, 2023, which primarily consisted of cash deposits, money market funds, commercial paper, U.S. government and agency securities, and investment-grade corporate debt securities. The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve capital and meet liquidity requirements without significantly increasing risk. We invest primarily in highly-liquid, investment grade debt securities, and we limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. We do not enter into investments for trading or speculative purposes and have not used any derivative financial instruments to manage our interest rate risk exposure. Because our cash equivalents and marketable securities generally have short maturities, the fair value of our portfolio is relatively insensitive to interest rate fluctuations. Due to the short-term nature of our investments, we have not been exposed to, nor do we anticipate being exposed to, material risks due to changes in interest rates. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates would not have a material impact on the fair value of our investment portfolio as of September 30, 2023. 26
Read original filing text →From time to time, we are involved in various legal proceedings arising from the normal course of business activities. Defending such proceedings may be costly and can impose a significant burden on management and employees. We may receive unfavorable preliminary or interim ruli…
From time to time, we are involved in various legal proceedings arising from the normal course of business activities. Defending such proceedings may be costly and can impose a significant burden on management and employees. We may receive unfavorable preliminary or interim rulings in the course of litigation, and there can be no assurances that favorable final outcomes will be obtained. Other than below, we are not presently a party to any litigation the outcome of which, we believe, if determined adversely against us, would individually or taken together have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows or financial condition. Shareholder Securities Litigation On August 31, 2022, a securities class action (the “August 2022 Action”) complaint was filed, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, against the Company and certain of its current and former directors and officers (Xiaodi Hou, Mo Chen, Cheng Lu, Patrick Dillon, and James Mullen), and the underwriters who underwrote its IPO, on behalf of a putative class of stockholders who acquired its securities from April 15, 2021 through August 1, 2022. The August 2022 Action is captioned: Dicker v. TuSimple Holdings, Inc. et al., 3:22-cv-01300-JES-MSB (S. D. Cal.). The complaint filed in the August 2022 Action alleges, among other things, that the Company and certain of its current and former directors and officers violated Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act by making materially false or misleading statements, or failing to disclose information it was required to disclose, regarding the Company's autonomous driving technology. The complaint seeks unspecified monetary damages on behalf of the putative class and an award of costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. On November 10, 2022, a second securities class action (the “November 2022 Action”) complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company and certain of its current and former directors and officers (Xiaodi Hou, Mo Chen, Cheng Lu, Eric Tapia, Patrick Dillon, and James Mullen), and the underwriters who underwrote its IPO, on behalf of a putative class of stockholders who acquired its securities from April 15, 2021 through October 31, 2022. The November 2022 Action was originally captioned: Woldanski v. TuSimple Holdings, Inc., et al., 1:22-cv-09625-AKH (S.D.N.Y.). The complaint in the November 2022 Action alleges, among other things, that the Company and certain of its current and former directors and officers violated Sections 11, 12(a), and 15 of the Securities Act and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act, by making false or misleading statements, or failing to disclose information it was required to disclose, regarding the Company's related party transaction with Hydron, Inc. (“Hydron”) and the Company’s sharing of confidential information and proprietary technology with Hydron without approval from the Company’s board of directors. The complaint seeks unspecified monetary damages on behalf of the putative class and an award of costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. The November 2022 Action has since been transferred to the Southern District of California and is now captioned: Woldanski v. TuSimple Holdings, Inc., et al., 3:23-cv-00282-JES-MSB (S. D. Cal.). On May 3, 2023, the Company made a motion to consolidate the August 2022 Action and November 2022 Action. The Court granted this motion and consolidated the August 2022 Action and November 2022 Action on July 20, 2023. On October 2, 2023, the plaintiffs filed a consolidated and amended complaint (the "Consolidated and Amended Complaint"). The Consolidated and Amended Complaint was filed against the Company and certain of its current and former directors and officers (Guowei "Charles" Chao, Xiaodi Hou, Mo Chen, Bonnie Yi Zhang, Cheng Lu, Patrick Dillon, Brad Buss, and Karen C. Francis) and the underwriters who underwrote its IPO, containing similar claims as asserted in the complaints filed in Dicker v. TuSimple Holdings, Inc. et al., 3:22-cv-01300-JES-MSB (S. D. Cal.) and Woldanski v. TuSimple Holdings, Inc., et al., 3:23-cv-00282-JES-MSB (S. D. Cal.). The Consolidated and Amended Complaint alleges, among other things, that the Company and certain of its current and former directors and officers violated Sections 11, 12, and 15 of the Securities Act, Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5, by making false or misleading statements, or failing to disclose information it was required to disclose, regarding the Company's related party transaction with Hydron, the Company’s sharing of confidential information and proprietary technology with Hydron without approval from the Company’s board of directors, the Company's safety profile, and certain of the Company's risk factors. The Company is unable to estimate the potential loss or range of loss, if any, associated with this, or any similar, lawsuit, which could be material. 29 Shareholder Derivative Actions On November 28, 2022, a shareholder derivative action was filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery by a stockholder purportedly on behalf of the Company against certain of its current and former directors and officers (Xiaodi Hou, Mo Chen, Brad Buss, Karen Francis, Michelle Sterling, and Reed Warner) alleging, among other things, that certain of the Company’s current and former directors and officers breached their fiduciary duties to the Company in connection with a related party transaction with Hydron: Nusbaum v. Hou et al., 2022-1095-NAC (Del. Ch.). The shareholder derivative action also alleges breaches of fiduciary duties against certain of the Company’s current and former directors and officers in connection with the restructuring of the Company’s board of directors. On December 15, 2022, a second shareholder derivative action was filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery by a stockholder purportedly on behalf of the Company against certain of its current and former directors and officers (Xiaodi Hou, Mo Chen, Cheng Lu, Patrick Dillon, Eric Tapia, James Mullen, Brad Buss, Charles Chao, Karen Francis, Michelle Sterling, Reed Werner, and Bonnie Zhang) alleging similar claims to the action filed on November 28, 2022: Young v. Hou et al., 2022-1157-NAC (Del. Ch.). The second shareholder derivative action additionally asserts, among other things, claims regarding the safety of the Company’s technology and alleged inadequacy of the Company’s internal controls. On March 6, 2023, a third shareholder derivative action was filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery by a stockholder purportedly on behalf of the Company against certain of its current and former directors and officers (Xiaodi Hou, Brad Buss, Mo Chen, Charles Chao, Karen Francis, Wendy Hayes, Cheng Lu, James Lu, Michael Mosier, Michelle Sterling, Reed Werner, and Bonnie Zhang), alleging similar claims to the actions filed on November 28, 2022 and December 15, 2022: Wolfson v. Hou et al., 2023-0279-NAC (Del. Ch.). The stockholder has since purported to voluntarily dismiss her action. On March 29, 2023, the Company made a motion to consolidate all of the above shareholder derivative actions. The Court granted the motion and consolidated the shareholder derivative actions on May 5, 2023. A consolidated complaint was filed on July 24, 2023 against Xiaodi Hou, Mo Chen, Brad Buss, Karen C. Francis, Reed Werner, Hydron Inc., and TuSimple as nominal defendant, containing substantially the same claims as asserted in the complaint filed in Nusbaum v. Hou et al., 2022-1095-NAC (Del. Ch.). On August 17, 2023, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered an order staying the consolidated action through February 9, 2024, pending an investigation by a special litigation committee ("SLC") formed by the Company’s Board of Directors to assess and determine whether the pursuit of derivative claims asserted in the consolidated action would be in the Company’s best interests. The Board previously delegated to the SLC its authority to take all actions advisable, appropriate, and in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders with respect to the pending shareholder derivative litigation. The Company is unable to estimate the potential loss or range of loss, if any, associated with this, or any similar, lawsuit, which could be material. Regulatory Investigations Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States (“CFIUS”) The Company is cooperating with an inquiry by CFIUS concerning its compliance with the National Security Agreement (“NSA”) entered into with the U.S. government as it relates to information shared by TuSimple U.S. with TuSimple's China-based businesses (“TuSimple China”), Hydron, and Hydron’s partners. If CFIUS concludes that information shared with TuSimple China, Hydron, and Hydron’s partners was shared in violation of the terms of the NSA, it may impose a civil penalty on the Company. At this time, the Company is unable to estimate the likelihood of a negative outcome or the potential loss or range of loss associated with this matter. The Audit Committee and the Government Security Committee of the Board of Directors, the Board, and the Company are committed to cooperating fully as discussions with CFIUS continue. The Company is unable to estimate the potential loss or range of loss, if any, associated with this, or any similar, investigation, which could be material. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") As disclosed on November 7, 2022, in connection with the filing of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K regarding the initial findings of the Audit Committee’s internal investigation into the related party transaction with Hydron, the Company proactively reached out to the SEC and received an initial request for information from the SEC. Since the initial outreach, the Company and certain current and former directors and officers received subpoenas from the SEC requesting the production of Company documents and, with respect to certain individuals, subpoenas for testimony. The Company is unable to estimate the likelihood of a negative outcome or the potential loss or range of loss associated with this matter. The Company has cooperated, and intends to continue to fully cooperate, with the SEC’s investigation. The Company is unable to estimate the potential loss or range of loss, if any, associated with this, or any similar, investigation, which could be material. 30
Other than below, there were no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 7, 2023. Risks Related…
Other than below, there were no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 7, 2023. Risks Related to Our Technology, Business Model, and Industry Our autonomous driving technology and related hardware and software could have undetected defects, errors, or bugs in hardware or software which could create safety issues, delay technology development and testing, reduce market adoption, damage our reputation with current or prospective users, or expose us to product liability and other claims that could materially and adversely affect our business. Our autonomous driving technology is highly technical and very complex, and has in the past and may in the future experience defects, errors, or bugs at various stages of development. We may be unable to timely correct problems to our partners’ and users’ satisfaction. Additionally, there may be undetected errors or defects especially as we introduce new systems or as new versions are released. These risks are particularly prevalent in the highly competitive freight transport market, as any such errors or defects could delay or prevent the adoption of autonomous driving technology in trucks. These risks are also heightened as a result of our restructuring plans and significant employee attrition, which have increased our safety risks and the ability to detect potential concerns in the development and testing of our technology. When such concerns arise, we have in the past and may in the future, pause the testing of our technology as we work to address them. Safety concerns and any related pause in the testing of our technology could have a material adverse impact on our business, prospects, operating results, and financial condition. Errors or defects in our products may only be discovered after they have been tested, commercialized, and deployed. If that is the case, we may incur significant additional development costs and product recall, repair or replacement costs, or more importantly, liability for personal injury or property damage caused by such errors or defects, as these problems would also likely result in claims against us. Our reputation or brand may be damaged as a result of these problems and users may be reluctant to use our services, which could adversely affect our ability to retain existing users and attract new users, and could materially and adversely affect our financial results. In addition, we could face material legal claims for breach of contract, product liability, tort or breach of warranty as a result of these problems. Any such lawsuit may cause irreparable damage to our brand and reputation. Further, defending a lawsuit, regardless of its merit, could be costly and may divert management’s attention and adversely affect the market’s perception of us and our services. Also, our business liability insurance coverage could prove inadequate with respect to a claim and future coverage may be unavailable on acceptable terms or at all. These product-related issues could result in claims against us and our business could be materially and adversely affected. Risks Related to Our Business Operations Our workforce was recently reduced, which, along with our exploration of strategic alternatives and other additional factors, could impact the speed of our business development, our ability to retain and attract talent and our ability to continue developing and testing our technology. As previously disclosed, on December 15, 2022 and May 16, 2023, the Board authorized restructuring plans, which included reductions in workforce. There can be no assurance regarding future restructuring plans or reductions in workforce, which could individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, and financial condition, and our ability to hire and retain employees with appropriate qualifications. We have experienced, and we expect to continue to experience, difficulty in hiring and retaining employees with appropriate qualifications. The restructuring plans mentioned above, the announcement of our exploration of strategic alternatives, and other factors mentioned throughout our Annual Report on Form 10-K have contributed to significant employee attrition. This level of attrition has increased our safety risks and the ability to detect potential concerns in the development and testing of our technology. When such concerns arise, we have in the past and may in the future, pause the testing of our technology as we work to address them. Safety concerns and any related pause in the testing of our technology could have a material adverse impact on our business, prospects, operating results, and financial condition. 31 To execute our strategy, our business requires that we attract and retain highly qualified personnel. Competition for these personnel is intense in the technology industry, especially for engineers with high levels of experience in artificial intelligence and designing and developing autonomous driving related algorithms. The recruitment and retention of personnel with relevant experience is critical to our business, as these personnel, including engineers, play a significant role in our technology development and testing process, including the safety of our technology. If we are unable to recruit or retain personnel with relevant experience in artificial intelligence and designing and developing autonomous driving related algorithms, we have in the past and may in the future, pause the testing of our technology. Safety concerns due to personnel attrition or otherwise, and any related pause in the testing of our technology could have a material adverse impact on our business, prospects, operating results, and financial condition. We may also need to recruit highly qualified technical engineers internationally and therefore subject us to the compliance of relevant immigration laws and regulations. Many of the companies with which we compete for experienced personnel have greater resources than we have and can offer more attractive compensation packages for new employees. Additionally, if we hire employees from competitors or other companies, their former employers may attempt to assert that these employees or our company have breached their legal obligations, resulting in a diversion of our time and resources and potentially in litigation. Further, job candidates and existing employees often consider the value of the equity awards they receive in connection with their employment. If the perceived value of our equity awards declines, it may adversely affect our ability to recruit and retain highly skilled employees. If we fail to attract new personnel on a timely basis or fail to retain and motivate our current personnel, we may not be able to commercialize and then expand our products and services in a timely manner and our business and future growth prospects could be adversely affected. Risks Relating to our Exploration of Strategic Alternatives We may be subject to risks associated with potential transactions related to our exploration of strategic alternatives (a “Potential Transaction”), which may not be completed on the terms or timeline contemplated, or at all, for a variety of reasons. The failure to complete a Potential Transaction could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and the market price of our Common Stock. We may decide to divest of certain assets or businesses as part of a Potential Transaction. For example, on June 28, 2023, we announced that we are evaluating and reviewing strategic alternatives for our U.S. business with a goal of maximizing shareholder value. Any Potential Transaction would require significant attention from our management and could result in a diversion of resources from our existing business, which in turn could have an adverse effect on our operations, and, consequently our results of operations and financial condition. We may not be successful in identifying or managing the risks involved in any divestiture or similar transaction, including our ability to obtain a reasonable purchase price, potential liabilities that may continue to apply to us following the divestiture or similar transaction, potential tax implications, employee issues or other matters. Further, strategic opportunities are impacted by our reputation, including unfavorable publicity, and the allegations made therein, and the confidence of our business partners in our business. Our inability to address these risks or if the exploration of strategic alternatives is not successful, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, and if we are not successful in initiating a Potential Transaction, we may consider a wind-down of U.S. operations. Even if a Potential Transaction is initiated, there can be no assurance that all required approvals will be obtained or that all closing conditions will otherwise be satisfied (or waived, if applicable), and, if all required approvals are obtained and all closing conditions are satisfied (or waived, if applicable), we can provide no assurance as to the terms, conditions and timing of such approvals. Furthermore, if we initiate a Potential Transaction, we may be subject to a number of material risks, including: •the trading price of our Common Stock may significantly decline to the extent that the market price of the Common Stock reflects positive market assumptions that a Potential Transaction will be initiated and completed, and the related benefits will be realized; •the obligation to pay significant transaction costs, such as legal, accounting, and financial advisory costs that are not contingent on closing; •disruptions to our business and our relationships with third parties and employees; •the diversion of management and resources towards a Potential Transaction for which we will have received little or no benefit if completion of a Potential Transaction does not occur; and •reputational harm including relationships with customers and business partners due to the adverse perception of any failure to successfully complete a Potential Transaction. 32