CRDO Filings — Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd - FilingSpy
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
A maker of high-speed cables, chips, and connectors that link servers inside giant AI data centers, Credo designs products like its ZeroFlap cables and optical transceivers so the machines powering cloud computing can talk to one another quickly and reliably. Founded in 2008 by engineers specializing in SerDes connectivity, the company designs its chips but has them built by outside foundries. Its name comes from the Latin "credo," meaning "I believe," and its ZeroFlap brand is a nod to eliminating network "flaps"—the frustrating connection drops that can stall big AI training runs.
10-K · Fiscal year ended May 2, 2026 · SEC filing ↗
Credo's revenue more than tripled to $1.34B as two hyperscale customers drove a 206% increase in AEC product shipments.
Two hyperscale customers now drive nearly all of Credo's . Revenue rose 206% to $1.34 billion and widened 3.3 points to 68.0%, as AEC cable shipments to those two customers accounted for over 99% of the increase. The company is profitable and holds $1.2 billion in cash, but its entire growth story rests on demand from two buyers.
Key takeaways
rose 206% to $1.34 billion, with over 99% of the $898.3 million increase coming from higher AEC cable unit shipments to hyperscale data center customers.
widened 3.3 points to 68.0%, which management attributed to improved economies of scale as product grew faster than costs.
was pronounced: R&D rose 90% to $279.4 million and SG&A rose 86% to $184.0 million, yet combined they fell to 34.7% of from 56.3% a year ago, and reached 33.3%.
Section summaries
Business
Credo designs high-speed copper/optical connectivity solutions (ICs, AECs, chiplets) for AI-driven hyperscale data centers, generating $1.3B in FY2026 revenue.
⌄
The company operates a fabless model, relying on TSMC for wafer fabrication and partners like Amkor, ASE, and BizLink for packaging, testing, and AEC manufacturing.
Its product portfolio spans ZeroFlap AECs, optical DSPs (including the new 3nm Bluebird 200G/lane DSP), ZeroFlap optical transceivers, OmniConnect memory solutions, SerDes chiplets, and PCIe retimers.
swung to $472.3 million from $52.2 million, and reached $2.51, as the ramp far outpaced expense growth.
Customer concentration intensified: two end customers each accounted for over 30% of , and the top 10 customers represented approximately 90% of the total.
The company raised $736.3 million through an , ending the year with $1.2 billion in cash and equivalents, while reached $464.3 million.
What changed
The single-customer concentration flagged in FY2025 deepened into a two-customer concentration: the two hyperscale customers that began ramping in Q1 FY2026 each accounted for over 30% of FY2026 , and no other customer reached 10%.
The concern from FY2025 persisted: consumed $184.7 million of over the first nine months, driven by a $127.9 million build and an $81.1 million increase in receivables, though full-year operating cash flow still reached $464.3 million.
continued to expand, reaching 68.0% for the full year, up from 64.8% in FY2025, as the economies of scale that began in FY2025 accelerated with the volume ramp.
The product engineering services and IP license streams that had been declining in FY2025 became immaterial, with product sales now representing nearly all revenue.
The $736.3 million ATM equity offering, executed across Q2 and Q3 FY2026, transformed the balance sheet, pushing cash and equivalents to $1.2 billion and to $2.1 billion.
What to watch
Whether either of the two hyperscale customers reduces its order volumes, and whether any third customer reaches 10% of , indicating diversification beyond the current two-buyer concentration.
Whether of 68.0% can be sustained or extended as AEC volumes scale further, or whether pricing pressure or the $250.8 million balance signals growing cost risk.
How the $1.2 billion cash balance is deployed — whether for acquisitions, given the mention of acquisition-related costs in operating expenses, or held as a liquidity buffer.
Whether U.S. tariffs on semiconductors materialize and affect Credo's costs or customer demand, given that the risk factor disclosure notes evolving trade policy as a material threat.
Credo targets hyperscalers, NeoClouds, OEMs, ODMs, and optical module manufacturers, with its top 10 customers accounting for approximately 90% of total in fiscal 2026.
Key competitive strengths include foundational SerDes IP, a comprehensive connectivity portfolio, and a strategy of delivering leading-edge performance using cost-effective mature process nodes.
The company is expanding into adjacent markets with new products like the OmniConnect Weaver memory fanout gearbox and microLED-based Active LED Cables (ALCs) for longer-reach interconnects.
Research and development is a major focus, with $279.4 million spent in fiscal 2026 and a global engineering team of 616 employees.
Customer concentration, macroeconomic and trade policy risks, and intense competition pose material threats to the company's financial performance.
⌄
is highly concentrated, with the top 10 customers accounting for approximately 90% of total revenue in fiscal 2026, and sales are made on a purchase order basis without long-term commitments.
Evolving U.S. tariffs and trade tensions, particularly with China, could increase costs, disrupt the supply chain, and adversely affect the business.
The company relies on a limited number of third parties, notably TSMC for all IC manufacturing, and has no long-term supply contracts, creating significant supply chain vulnerability.
Intense competition from larger, well-resourced companies like Broadcom, Marvell, and Astera Labs could lead to price pressure, reduced profitability, and loss of market share.
The lengthy, competitive '' process requires substantial upfront investment with no guarantee of future , and failure to secure wins can lock the company out of customer projects for a generation.
The company faces risks from being a Cayman Islands holding company, including potential PFIC classification for U.S. investors and difficulties in enforcing U.S. legal judgments.
The following table presents the approximate square footage of our significant leased facilities as of May 2, 2026: (Square Feet) Locations Primary Use Leased Facilities (1) United States Research and design, sales and marketing, administration and operations 143,945 Mainland Ch…
⌄
The following table presents the approximate square footage of our significant leased facilities as of May 2, 2026:
(Square Feet)
Locations Primary Use Leased Facilities (1)
United States Research and design, sales and marketing, administration and operations 143,945
Mainland China Research and design, administration and operations 99,088
Taiwan Research and design, administration and operations 56,259
Canada Research and design, administration and operations 8,200
Hong Kong Research and design, administration and operations 7,083
Singapore Administration and operations 2,874
Total 317,449
(1) Lease terms expire in various years from 2026 through 2033, and generally include renewals at our option.
58
We also lease smaller facilities in various domestic and international locations, which are occupied by administrative and sales personnel. We believe that our existing facilities are sufficient for our current needs. We intend to add new facilities and expand our existing facilities as we continue to add employees and grow our business. We believe that new spaces will be available at reasonable terms in the future in order to meet our needs.
From time to time, we are involved in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. We are not presently a party to any litigation the outcome of which, we believe, if determined adversely to us, would individually or taken together have a material ad…
⌄
From time to time, we are involved in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. We are not presently a party to any litigation the outcome of which, we believe, if determined adversely to us, would individually or taken together have a material adverse effect on us. The results of any current or future litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.
The information set forth under “Note 9 - Commitments and Contingencies” in our notes to the consolidated financial statements set forth in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference. For a discussion of certain risks associated with legal proceedings, please see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” above.
Revenue surged 206% to $1.34B driven by hyperscaler AEC ramp, lifting gross margin to 68.0% and net income to $472.3M.
⌄
Total grew $898.3M to $1.34B, with over 99% of the increase from higher AEC unit shipments to hyperscale data center customers.
expanded 3.2pp to 68.0%, primarily due to improved as scaled.
Operating expenses rose but leveraged sharply: R&D increased 90% to $279.4M and SG&A rose 86% to $184.0M, yet combined they fell to 34.7% of from 56.3%.
was a major cost driver, rising $60.9M in R&D and $44.4M in SG&A from new equity awards.
reached $464.3M; the company raised $736.3M via an ATM equity offering, ending the year with $1.2B in cash and equivalents.
Customer concentration remained high with two end customers (B and D) each accounting for over 30% of .
Auditor EY issued unqualified opinions on the financial statements and internal controls, highlighting inventory valuation as a critical audit matter.
⌄
Ernst & Young LLP audited the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended May 2, 2026, and issued an that they present fairly, in all material respects, the company's financial position and results of operations.
The auditor also issued an on the effectiveness of the company's as of May 2, 2026.
The identified relates to the valuation of inventories, which totaled $250.8 million, due to the subjective judgment required in estimating for excess and obsolete .
The auditor's procedures to address the valuation matter included testing internal controls, evaluating product demand assumptions, and performing sensitivity analyses on those assumptions.